Tea Party movement dead in the water

Tea Party Movement dead in the water


The Rise Of Ethnopolitics

Tea Party movement dead in the water

The Tea Party movement has become nothing but a wholly owned subsidiary of the Republican party. Their favorite person, Sarah Palin, just got paid $100,000 to give a speech at the Tea Party Convention. It was nothing but a boring “Go GOP!” sermon. It meant so little to Palin that even though she’d had months to prepare for it, she had to write notes on her hand reminding herself to talk about energy and taxes. Not only can she not remember to talk about lower taxes to an anti-big government convention without a crib note, she’s completely unaware of what’s actually going on.

In her speech, she talked about newly elected Senator Scott Brown being part of the Tea Party “revolution”; never mind that Brown has already turned his back on the Tea Party movement, saying that it had little to do with his victory, and he wants to be the kind of Senator John McCain is. He doesn’t even want anything to do with Palin herself. Palin called him to congratulate him the night of his election victory, but a few days before her big speech Brown denied he’s ever spoken to her.

She’s brilliant, I tell ya. The other day she denounced Rahm Emanuel for calling some Democrats “retarded”, saying Obama should demand his resignation because the word “retarded” is extremely offensive. (She has a kid with Down Syndrome.) But a few days later, when Rush Limbaugh mocked people like Palin herself by saying that because of politically correct types we can “no longer call a retard a retard”, Palin said that was fine, because Limbaugh was using “satire.” In other words, she has no principles at all, and will praise a Republican for doing the exact same thing she denounces Democrats for. She quit her job as governor of Alaska in order to get rich, and she has no intention of letting facts or principles stand in her way.

And it appears the average Tea Party supporter is no smarter than Palin. If there’s any single person who’s responsible for the rise of the Tea Party movement, it’s Congressman Ron Paul. This is an election year, and Rep. Paul normally doesn’t have any challengers in the GOP primary. But this year he’s got three. And all three of them are self proclaimed Tea Party types. They’re angry with Paul because he not only wants lower taxes, he actually thinks if you want low taxes you have to restrain spending, and he refuses to bring home the bacon for his district. He also doesn’t think fighting two unwinnable wars for Israel in countries that are no threat to us at all, and that are costing us trillions of dollars, qualifies as small government or fiscal restraint. In other words, Tea Party supporters don’t really want smaller government; they like big government fine but just don’t want to pay for it. Ron Paul says that the GOP and neocons have hijacked the Tea Party movement away from its founding principles to benefit themselves, and he’s right.

And if you’re still optimistic, and holding out hope that the Tea Party movement can really bring about change in this country, then keep reading. This should disabuse you of that notion:

The South Carolina Republican Party announced Monday that it’s uniting with tea party groups in the state to share resources, coordinate messaging and push the GOP in a more conservative direction.

The points of contact between the state party establishment and the grass-roots will be the Greenville County Republican Party — one of the most conservative wings of the state party — and the Upstate Coalition of Conservative Organizations, an umbrella structure of state tea party groups.

The agreement, as announced by South Carolina Republicans, is designed to serve four goals: increase precinct involvement, improve communication between the state party and grass-roots groups, create liaisons between the state party and the various tea party organizations and to work “closely to make the Republican Party more conservative.”

State Republican Party Chairwoman Karen Floyd told POLITICO that the arrangement came at the suggestion of a local activist who works with both the state party and local tea party groups.

That Balloon That Never Goes Up

That Balloon That Never Goes Up

[This is some Classic HAC found in the archives. Figured I’d play Russian roulette once more, although the Organs might have a hard time explaining to their superiors why they never noticed this article at the time it was first published – HAC]

C-GRAM: September 21st, 2005

Okay, time once again to do what HAC does best: question a Movement sacred cow.

One of the hoariest and most time-honored of such sacramental beasts is the concept of When The Balloon Goes Up.

It runs something like this: the White man is completely lazy, apathetic, cowardly, dazed and confused, and useless. (I have to admit, it’s hard to argue with that one.) He will continue to be so, as long as he has his job, his paycheck, his beer in the refrigerator, his television, and the Quickie Mart down the street run by Apu where he can stock up on salty snacks for his long weekends watching niggers bounce a ball. He will never, ever get up off his ass until such time as the supply of all these things is suddenly cut off by some big huge catastrophe, an economic collapse with a massive depression, race riots in the streets, fuel shortages, beer shortages, aliens descending from outer space, or whatever your favorite scenario might be.

This huge catastrophe will create a Mad Max Road Warrior type scenario, and all of a sudden we’ll be riding around on motorcycles with green Mohawk haircuts and driving out the muds with crossbows, yadda yadda yadda. (I’ve never quite understood how a race of people who have spent their entire lives on the couch watching bakketbawl and swilling the worst excuse for beer in the world will suddenly transform into Road Warriors, but we’ll let that pass.) Rite-wingers generally refer to this as When The Balloon Goes Up.

The corollary to this is that since nothing can possibly be done while ZOG remains all-seeing, all-knowing, and all-powerful (which it isn’t), there is no point whatsoever in our actually doing anything until such time as The Balloon Goes Up. Or even trying. The people and the times, tsk tsk tsk, just aren’t ready for us. If only the people and the times were ready, oh my, such deeds of manly heroism we would do then! But The Balloon hasn’t Gone Up, and therefore we can do nothing except “educate” and “wake people up.”

Educate, My Ass

If an inquiring mind is ever able to cut through mountains of waffle and get any kind of answer on this subject, “education” usually boils down to nothing more than hiding behind an e-mail address while playing with the computer in one’s basement rec room, with a bowl of nachos and a cold brewski beside the mouse. “Education” in practice means circulating the same old material, mostly dating from the 1950s and 1960s or even from before the war, that we’ve been circulating for the past fifty years about Jews running the Federal Reserve, the Benjamin Franklin quotation, and an endless supply of atrocity stories about black crime.

And of course, there is that lovely, risk-free internet. This is why the Movement of yesteryear consisted largely of a bunch of sad old men who sat around mailing one another news clippings telling one another how bad things are. (Some of them are still around.) Today, it consists mostly of a bunch of sad old men who sit around tapping on keyboards and forwarding news articles all over the internet by e-mail, telling one another how bad things are. But what can we do? The White man is useless until The Balloon Goes Up. Right?

Now let me dare to ask the blasphemous question. Is The Balloon ever going to Go Up? I mean, really?

We’ve been waiting for almost forty years now for this big disaster to occur that will finally shake the federal monkey off our backs long enough so we can take all those guns out of the closet and clean this mess up. Has anything of the kind ever even come close to occurring?

No. The riots of the 1960s and the 1990s were purely localized events and consisted almost entirely of monkoids trashing their own neighborhoods. There was never any serious danger to the system, and all of these events were brought under control by the authorities in a matter of days. The fuel shortages of the 1970s were annoying, and nothing more. Jug-Ears’ incompetence in foreign policy produced gas prices as high as $3.00 per gallon only last summer. White Americans grumbled…nd paid. And re-elected the misbegotten moron in November.

That Balloon Ain’t Going Up. Well, Probably Not.

Will there ever in fact be some kind of nationwide catastrophe which will crack the iron bands that crush us and remove the federal government’s heavy hand from us all at once, so all of a sudden we find that can do the necessary? (This of course, presumes that we have the necessary physical courage and will to do the necessary under any circumstances at all, which is dubious, but I won’t get into that. Since by common consent we don’t discuss the character issue within the Movement, there would be no point.) Will there in fact ever be a depression so severe, a riot so widespread, an event so cataclysmic, that it will affect the supply of basic goods and services in most areas of the United States, to any serious or lasting extent? Will the electric power ever really go off and stay off, silencing the air conditioners and televisions?

Well—it can happen. It certainly happened to the people of Iraq. But will it happen here? Ever?

Or will our future just be one long, endless decline, a gradual deterioration of the quality of life, year after year, as more and more of North America turns into Brazil? I’ll be honest. I don’t know.

One thing I have learned in the Movement is that making predictions is a dangerous business. But I do believe that if in fact the Balloon were anywhere near Going Up, there would be certain definite indicators, and they would be visible and discussed outside the babblings of rite-wing conspiracy theorists on the internet.

I will say this: there doesn’t appear to be any sign that anything of the kind is happening. This is a huge country and it still possesses virtually unlimited wealth. As god-awful as things are, America’s ability to absorb economic, political, social, and biological punishment and abuse is still a long, long way from reaching the breaking point.

And you know something? I think all of us know in our heart that the Balloon ain’t Going Up any time soon. And hoo boy, are we glad!

That Balloon Lets Us Off The Hook

You remember Leaderless Resistance, the brilliant strategy laid out by Louis Beam? And you remember how and why it failed, because in actual practice it turned out to be all leaderless and no resistance?

Beam’s plan was predicated on the idea that these leaderless resistance cells would actually do something. It never happened. The internet came along and everybody retreated into the cool dark of their basement rec rooms and the warm glow of their computer screens.

Do you remember Lone Wolf, the strategy William Pierce tried to inspire with Hunter? What we ended up with instead of Hunters were violent kooks like Ben Smith and Buford Furrow, who were of course cheered on hysterically by people like Tom Metzger and Alex Curtis in order to sell their Skinhead music tapes and videos. As if the White race could be saved by lunatics who hear voices in their head.

Now, am I alone in suspecting that a lot of this talk about When The Balloon Goes Up is just basically an excuse for the White man to continue to do nothing?

Maybe I’m off base, but as Northwest Migration begins to slowly (way too slowly) catch on, I’m starting to hear a lot of this “but we must wait for The Balloon to Go Up.” And it’s sounding increasingly worried. Here we now have a perfectly legal, perfectly logical, and personally beneficial act that anyone can carry out, and which will advance the cause of the 14 Words and give White people a wonderful place to live. Bluffs are being called, and the Movement is getting jumpy. There is one thing that Movement Man most definitely does not like, and that is having his bluff called.

The Revolutionary Tripod

Where is this leading? Oh, it’s leading somewhere. It’s leading to an even more subversive idea, one that will have Movement Man befouling his Fruit of the Looms.

Okay, let’s recap once again. We need to take another look at that Revolutionary Tripod, the three conditions which are essential for actual political and social change to take place in any society. I know, I know, I have gone over this about five hundred times before, but guys, this is really important. This is really something that we all need to internalize. For there to be revolutionary change the following three situations must obtain:

1. The Withdrawal of the Consent of the Governed. A majority, or at least a significant and effective minority, of the people of a nation or colony must consciously desire an end to the existing political and social order, and its replacement by a new one. It certainly helps if they want your revolutionary movement specifically to replace the existing order, although as Lenin and the Bolsheviks proved, it’s not absolutely necessary.

2. A Fighting Revolutionary Party. A political, propaganda, and military vehicle must exist which will express the withdrawal of consent in concrete terms, and which is prepared to replace the existing order, and which is ready and willing to take direct action to do so.

3. The Loss of the Credible Monopoly of Armed Force. All political power is based on the use of deadly force by the ruler or the state, the infliction or threat of bodily harm or death on others, without punishment of those who exercise force in the state’s name. This is what makes the policeman’s club or gun different from the club or gun in the hand of the criminal. The policeman may do harm without being punished for it, except within certain narrow parameters when he harms an influential, a wealthy man or some other societally protected person such as our minorities, through error or stupidity , and sometimes even then he is never punished at all.

For example, FBI agents inflict terrible tortures on helpless prisoners in Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere which would earn you or I life sentences if we were to inflict them on anyone without permission from the ruling elite, and yet they are not punished, but on the contrary they are commended and promoted. This is called a credible monopoly of armed force.

In order for any revolutionary movement to succeed, it must first break that credible monopoly of armed force, by demonstrating to the public an ability to do harm to its enemies and not be punished. The people must be made to understand that change is in fact possible, because the state is no longer certainly able to punish those who oppose it. Eventually the revolutionary movement transfers the monopoly of armed force to itself, thereby becoming the established state. This is how revolutions occur.

Now let’s back up a bit, to the withdrawal of the consent of the governed and the creation of a viable revolutionary party. How, exactly, is this to be achieved?

Well, first, there has to be one or more legitimate grievances. Those we have in plenty, although they vary from age to age. Our ancestors in 1775 revolted over a paltry tax on tea. Our closer forefathers in 1861 revolted over a massive insult to the South and the Southern way of life on the part of the rest of the United States, as expressed in the election of the demagogue Abraham Lincoln to the presidency. Today we let our own children be routinely murdered, sodomized, deracinated, corrupted in their minds and bodies, and frog-marched into drug addiction, and we sit there staring at the television.
But let’s assume that somehow we can in fact overcome the character problem and a significant minority of us do have sense enough to migrate to the Northwest and eventually form a Party of the kind Brad Davis refers to, the kind which we are clearly unable to form now—but let’s just suppose. Right. We have our Party. What to we do now? How would we go about bringing on a revolution if, as it appears, that pesky Balloon isn’t Going Up?

The Propaganda of the Deed

I know this is going to scare many of you shitless.

We need to start cultivating the habit of in-depth thinking, insofar as we’re still capable of it, and thought must be free. Thought must have all the data in order to draw conclusions. Thought cannot be Orwellian and deliberately train itself to avoid certain topics, or else the mind ceases to hit on all cylinders. Maybe if you can be brought to understand the possibilities which would become available to us, if and when we ever deal with the character issue, then we might be able to persuade ourselves to deal with it.

The Reds and anarchists for the past two hundred years, ever since the days of one Gracchus Baboeuf, (don’t ask), have theorized about and sometimes practiced something called the Propaganda Of The Deed. In its crudest form it consists of high-profile acts of violence or destruction meant to state a position, a claim, or a cause in such a manner that it cannot be ignored.

Let me repeat those crucial, key words: cannot be ignored.

Democracy is top-notch at ignoring messages that it does not wish to hear, and quietly, genteelly suppressing people and points of view that it finds inconvenient.

It does this with varying degrees of cruelty, up to and including death and torture, but mostly democracy utilizes its control of the public media of information, communication and expression to ignore any serious dissent or alternative to its policies or behavior. Democracy establishes a maze for the rats to run through which they call a political process, and claims that the rats therefore have nothing to complain about. But democracy is a maze that leads nowhere, designed only to perpetuate the existing order of a wealthy ruling élite and to prevent change of any kind. Democracy crushes the rats when they try to escape from the maze.

But what if the rat were to bite?

True, Propaganda of the Deed is very dangerous, and it requires men and women who are willing to give up their own lives in the service of others. We are so far from this condition that I honestly am not worried about being accused of “inciting” anyone to anything with this article. In all the nearly one hundred years of our existence, our Movement has produced exactly one Bob Mathews, one Gordon Kahl, and one Tim McVeigh…maybe. (We still don’t know what McVeigh’s true agenda was.)

So what is all this babble in aid of? The Reds believe that the Propaganda of the Deed, under certain conditions and with a little bit of luck, is of itself capable of jump-starting a revolutionary process. The ultimate example of this would be the 1916 Easter Rebellion in Dublin.

Taking it further, a revolutionary movement, intelligently led and possessing not only propaganda skills but the ability to deploy Propaganda of the Deed, can sometimes create the necessary conditions for revolution itself. In other words, The Balloon does not have to Go Up before the revolutionary struggle can begin.

Historical results? Well, to be sure, they’ve been mixed.

It works quite often in Third World coups, (the assassination of Omar Trujillo in the Dominican Republic comes to mind) but we won’t count those as genuine revolutions. In 1881 the assassination of Czar Alexander the Second definitely didn’t succeed in bringing about revolution in Russia; Lenin had to wait until 1917. The assassination of the King of Iraq worked, eventually. The storming of the Bastille is a maybe. The murder of the Duchesse de Praslin in 1848 brought down the last King of France. The Kirov murder in 1934 enabled Stalin to launch his major purges, although there’s a good chance Stalin himself had Kirov whacked. The Pazzi conspiracy of 1478 in Florence failed miserably. (Now you get some idea of what I do with my time, not having the financial wherewithal to go gambling on riverboat casinos.)

People, we’ve got to discuss the character issue. Not now. I know we’re not ready. But it’s going to have to be soon. Our race is running out of time, and hard decisions must soon be made.

posted by The Old Man at

One half of all immigrant families on welfare!

One half of all immigrant families on welfare!


Across America, every state, county, and city is going bankrupt. The state in the worst shape in California which is now 58% non-white.

Welfare, free health care, and other public services to immigrants is pushing America to the brink. Instead of closing the border, Obama recently issued a back door amnesty for illegal aliens from Haiti. Even releasing Haitian illegal aliens from detention centers who have already been convicted of crimes in the United States!

From NumbersUSA

Approximately 1/2 of immigrant households (both legal and illegal) with kids access welfare services, primarily food and Medicaid. Many argue that immigration is a social issue, but it’s a fiscal issue as well. Sign our petition urging Pres. Obama, Speaker of the House Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Reid to stop expanding our welfare system through high immigration numbers.

The immigrant population has grown by an average of 1.3 million per year since 2000, plus an additional 1 million new births in those households. That’s 23 million new people every decade, and HALF of all immigrant families are using welfare, especially food and Medicaid welfare! This includes illegal AND legal immigrants. See Roy’s blog to read the whole ugly story.

Pres. Obama has pledged to reduce our deficits, so isn’t this a good time to send hundreds of thousands of petitions to him, Reid and Pelosi suggesting a suspension of most immigration that is driving those deficits up?

Sign our petition NOW and then send it to your friends and family. If your on Facebook or Twitter, please share the link to help get the message to Washington!


Public schools throwing away millions on professional race hustlers.

Photo Right: Glen Singleton.

We are bombarded with the constant cry that public schools need more money. Yet we see what they waste the money they have on. Professional  race hustler Glen Singleton charges over $100k to come to public schools and call everyone a “racist.”

Singleton arrives at schools, and tells them that all the white teachers are “racists.” The non-white teachers have even unconsciously picked up “racism” from the white teachers. Non-whites, he says, do poorly because the teachers are all “racists.” The solution is for schools to pander to non-whites and look for ways to artificially lift them up. (Which as we already know, means dumbing down the entire school!)

Whites, according to Singleton, are supposed to mortify themselves and repent for imaginary wrongs committed against non-whites.

Then Singleton laughs all the way to the bank, and probably can’t believe how gullible and foolish these condescending white liberal school administrators are.

From RockyMOuntainNews…

If any school district in Colorado can turn around second-rate achievement among many black and Hispanic students, it should be Cherry Creek. It has the resources, tradition of excellence, quality staff, first-rate facilities, and community confidence required to pull off the feat. And it has a smart pro at the helm in Superintendent Monte Moses. The stars are aligned.

Yet in its quest to eliminate the achievement gap, Cherry Creek has embraced, oddly, a program that is at best offensive, and potentially an obstacle to long-term progress. It’s the brainchild of Glenn E. Singleton of the Pacific Educational Group in California, a man with a one-word explanation for low-scoring blacks and Hispanics: racism.

“It is our belief that the most devastating factor contributing to the lowered achievement of students of color is institutionalized racism,” Singleton writes (with co-author Curtis Linton) in his recent book Courageous Conversations About Race. White teachers (and minority teachers co-opted into the white power structure) stymie black and Hispanic students because they fail to understand their cultures and how daily racial oppression affects their outlook. They also push a curriculum tooled for whites, and are ignorant of the special ways that blacks and Hispanics communicate.

“We will shine the light on racial dominance to uncover how Whiteness challenges the performance of students of color while shaping and reinforcing the racial perspective of White children,” Singleton and Linton promise.

Cherry Creek not only paid Singleton’s outfit a six-figure fee for advice, Moses wrote an endorsement blurb for the back of his book. And the program of “equity teams” and “courageous conversations” is being implemented in district schools.

In a recent interview, the superintendent was at pains to emphasize that Singleton’s program was only one of several initiatives in Cherry Creek intended to improve achievement – and that these include everything from lengthening time spent in class to re-examining curriculum.

But Moses also stood fast as a booster of Singleton’s theories. Of the gap in reading between district blacks and Hispanics on the one hand and whites and Asians on the other, Moses noted, only half can be attributed to the “risk factors” of special education, poor mastery of English, poverty, and residence in the district less than one year. Those same factors, he said, account for even less of the achievement gap in math, according to the same district analysis.


Pentagon “immortal organism” plans read like low budget horror film.

From Wired.com…

The Pentagon’s mad science arm may have come up with its most radical project yet. Darpais looking to re-write the laws of evolution to the military’s advantage, creating “synthetic organisms” that can live forever — or can be killed with the flick of a molecular switch.

As part of its budget for the next year, Darpa is investing $6 million into a project called BioDesign, with the goal of eliminating “the randomness of natural evolutionary advancement.” The plan would assemble the latest bio-tech knowledge to come up with living, breathing creatures that are genetically engineered to “produce the intended biological effect.” Darpawants the organisms to be fortified with molecules that bolster cell resistance to death, so that the lab-monsters can “ultimately be programmed to live indefinitely.”

Of course, Darpa’s got to prevent the super-species from being swayed to do enemy work — so they’ll encode loyalty right into DNA, by developing genetically programmed locks to create “tamper proof” cells. Plus, the synthetic organism will be traceable, using some kind of DNA manipulation, “similar to a serial number on a handgun.” And if that doesn’t work, don’t worry. In case Darpa’s plan somehow goes horribly awry, they’re also tossing in a last-resort, genetically-coded kill switch:

Develop strategies to create a synthetic organism “self-destruct” option to be implemented upon nefarious removal of organism.

The project comes as Darpa also plans to throw $20 million into a new synthetic biology program, and $7.5 million into “increasing by several decades the speed with which we sequence, analyze and functionally edit cellular genomes.”

Of course, Darpa’s up against some vexing, fundamental laws of nature — not to mention bioethics — as they embark on the lab beast program. First, they might want to rethink the idea of evolution as a random series of events, says NYU biology professor David Fitch. “Evolution by selection is not a random process at all, and is actually a hugely efficient design algorithm used extensively in computation and engineering,” he e-mails Danger Room.

Even if Darpa manages to overcome the inherent intelligence of evolutionary processes, overcoming inevitable death can be tricky. Just ask all the other research teams who’ve made stabs at it, trying everything from cell starvation to hormone treatments. Gene therapy, where artificial genes are inserted into an organism to boost cell life, are the latest and greatest in life-extension science, but they’ve only been proven to extend lifespan by 20 percent in rats.

But suppose gene therapy makes major strides, and Darpa does manage to get the evolutionary science right. They’ll also have a major ethical hurdle to jump. Synthetic biology researchers are already facing the same questions, as a 2009 summary from the Synthetic Biology Project reports:

The concern that humans might be overreaching when we create organisms that never before existed can be a safety concern, but it also returns us to disagreements about what is our proper role in the natural world (a debate largely about non-physical harms or harms to well-being).

Even expert molecular geneticists don’t know what to make of the project. Either that, or they’re scared Darpa might sic a bio-bot on them. “I would love to comment, but unfortunately Darpa has installed a kill switch in me,” one unnamed expert tells Danger Room.


Black 15 year old girl brutally beaten for “acting white.” Black security guards watch attack and refuse to help.

A 15 year old black girl was brutally beaten by a mob of black thugs who accused her of “acting white.” Before the attack, the girl begged three black security guards to protect her. Instead they stood by and watched the beating. Four of the thugs have been arrested.

From USAToday…

A 15-year-old girl who was badly beaten and robbed in a Seattle bus tunnel as three unarmed security guards looked on told investigators that she thought the men would protect her.

The statements were revealed in court papers filed Wednesday against the teen girl accused of attacking her and the three young men accused of stealing her purse, phone and iPod. The four were all charged with first-degree robbery.

The victim told a King County sheriff’s detective that the group followed her from a nearby department store into the bus tunnel at Westlake Station on Jan. 28, and she deliberately stood next to the three guards.

The guards didn’t intervene, though. They have standing orders to “observe and report,” so they called police but did nothing else as another 15-year-old girl punched and repeatedly kicked the victim in the head.

Government officials as well as executives at Olympic Security Services Inc., which employs the guards, are reviewing that protocol after the guards’ response was caught on surveillance video.

“I went to the security and told them that these kids were trying to jump me,” the girl said. “I know that I am about to get jumped and I am hanging around the guards to try and get protection. … I thought the security guards would defend me.”

The girl, who is black, also told the detective that the altercation began at a nearby department store, where some in the group made threatening comments that she had “nice things” and that she acts “white.”

Left-wing Marvel Comics head defends anti-TEA Party issue of Captain America.

Left-wing Marvel Comics head defends anti-TEA Party issue of Captain America.

We reported before that the new issue of Captain America vilifies the TEA Party movement as extremists and racists.

Marvel Editor-In-Chief Joe Quested said he analogizes for depicting a TEA party activist with a sexually explicit sign, but says he stands by the rest of the comic.

It’s Official: The US Is a Police State

It’s Official

[People, try, try, try to wrap your minds around this: the Muslim threat is, at the very least, HIGHLY exaggerated and has been used as an excuse to bring in all these tyrannical and unconstitutional “security” laws. There has not been one successful “terror attack” on U.S. soil since 9/11 (and 9/11 itself is in serious doubt) except for a couple of individuals like that Army doctor in Texas who seem to have flipped out from years of having to take bullshit from Amurrican yay-hoos waving Masonic dishrags. Please try to GET IT: whatever the American law and police can do to dark-skinned foreign Muslims, they can and eventually will to to stroppy White Baptist good ole boys who drive pick-up trucks with rifle racks. The Muslims have been used to get the laws in place and set the precedent.There is no hope of any kind from within the existing System. The only hope for racial survival is for total revolution and the establishment of a White nation.)

It Is Now Official: The US Is a Police State

by Paul Craig Roberts

Americans have been losing the protection of law for years. In the 21st century the loss of legal protections accelerated with the Bush administration’s “war on terror,” which continues under the Obama administration and is essentially a war on the Constitution and U.S. civil liberties.

The Bush regime was determined to vitiate habeas corpus in order to hold people indefinitely without bringing charges. The regime had acquired hundreds of prisoners by paying a bounty for terrorists. Afghan warlords and thugs responded to the financial incentive by grabbing unprotected people and selling them to the Americans.

The Bush regime needed to hold the prisoners without charges because it had no evidence against the people and did not want to admit that the U.S. government had stupidly paid warlords and thugs to kidnap innocent people. In addition, the Bush regime needed “terrorists” prisoners in order to prove that there was a terrorist threat.

As there was no evidence against the “detainees” (most have been released without charges after years of detention and abuse), the U.S. government needed a way around U.S. and international laws against torture in order that the government could produce evidence via self-incrimination. The Bush regime found inhumane and totalitarian-minded lawyers and put them to work at the U.S. Department of Justice (sic) to invent arguments that the Bush regime did not need to obey the law.

The Bush regime created a new classification for its detainees that it used to justify denying legal protection and due process to the detainees. As the detainees were not U.S. citizens and were demonized by the regime as “the 760 most dangerous men on earth,” there was little public outcry over the regime’s unconstitutional and inhumane actions.

As our Founding Fathers and a long list of scholars warned, once civil liberties are breached, they are breached for all. Soon U.S. citizens were being held indefinitely in violation of their habeas corpus rights. Dr. Aafia Siddiqui, an American citizen of Pakistani origin, might have been the first.

Dr. Siddiqui, a scientist educated at MIT and Brandeis University, was seized in Pakistan for no known reason, sent to Afghanistan, and was held secretly for five years in the U.S. military’s notorious Bagram prison in Afghanistan. Her three young children, one an 8-month-old baby, were with her at the time she was abducted. She has no idea what has become of her two youngest children. Her oldest child, 7 years old, was also incarcerated in Bagram and subjected to similar abuse and horrors.

Siddiqui has never been charged with any terrorism-related offense. A British journalist, hearing her piercing screams as she was being tortured, disclosed her presence. An embarrassed U.S. government responded to the disclosure by sending Siddiqui to the U.S. for trial on the trumped-up charge that while a captive, she grabbed a U.S. soldier’s rifle and fired two shots attempting to shoot him. The charge apparently originated as a U.S. soldier’s excuse for shooting Dr. Siddiqui twice in the stomach, resulting in her near death.

On Feb. 4, Dr. Siddiqui was convicted by a New York jury for attempted murder. The only evidence presented against her was the charge itself and an unsubstantiated claim that she had once taken a pistol-firing course at an American firing range. No evidence was presented of her fingerprints on the rifle that this frail and broken 100-pound woman had allegedly seized from an American soldier. No evidence was presented that a weapon was fired, no bullets, no shell casings, no bullet holes. Just an accusation.

Wikipedia has this to say about the trial: “The trial took an unusual turn when an FBI official asserted that the fingerprints taken from the rifle, which was purportedly used by Aafia to shoot at the U.S. interrogators, did not match hers.”

An ignorant and bigoted American jury convicted her for being a Muslim. This is the kind of “justice” that always results when the state hypes fear and demonizes a group.

The people who should have been on trial are the people who abducted her, disappeared her young children, shipped her across international borders, violated her civil liberties, tortured her apparently for the fun of it, raped her, and attempted to murder her with two gunshots to her stomach. Instead, the victim was put on trial and convicted.

This is the unmistakable hallmark of a police state. And this victim is an American citizen.

Anyone can be next. Indeed, on Feb. 3 Dennis Blair, director of national intelligence told the House Intelligence Committee that it was now “defined policy” that the U.S. government can murder its own citizens on the sole basis of someone in the government’s judgment that an American is a threat. No arrest, no trial, no conviction, just execution on suspicion of being a threat.

This shows how far the police state has advanced. A presidential appointee in the Obama administration tells an important committee of Congress that the executive branch has decided that it can murder American citizens abroad if it thinks they are a threat.

I can hear readers saying the government might as well kill Americans abroad as it kills them at home – Waco, Ruby Ridge, the Black Panthers.

Yes, the U.S. government has murdered its citizens, but Dennis Blair’s “defined policy” is a bold new development. The government, of course, denies that it intended to kill the Branch Davidians, Randy Weaver’s wife and child, or the Black Panthers. The government says that Waco was a terrible tragedy, an unintended result brought on by the Branch Davidians themselves. The government says that Ruby Ridge was Randy Weaver’s fault for not appearing in court on a day that had been deliberately miscommunicated to him. The Black Panthers, the government says, were dangerous criminals who insisted on a shootout.

In no previous death of a U.S. citizen by the hands of the U.S. government has the government claimed the right to kill Americans without arrest, trial, and conviction of a capital crime.

In contrast, Dennis Blair has told the U.S. Congress that the executive branch has assumed the right to murder Americans who it deems a “threat.”

What defines “threat”? Who will make the decision? What it means is that the government will murder whomever it chooses.

There is no more complete or compelling evidence of a police state than the government announcing that it will murder its own citizens if it views them as a “threat.”

Ironic, isn’t it, that “the war on terror” to make us safe ends in a police state with the government declaring the right to murder American citizens whom it regards as a threat.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Jew Bankers Want To Tax Us By The Mile

Goldman Sachs Wants You to Pay-by-the-Mile to Drive on U.S. Roadways
by Mark Anderson

According to an independent British newspaper editor, in the not-so-distant future, English drivers will be charged based upon the number of miles they drive, as is being done step-by-step in America.

On January 12, AFP interviewed Mike Robinson, the editor of the UK Column, a liberty-minded newspaper not unlike American Free Press. “Road charging,” as it is called in England, is widespread, he told AFP, as fiber optic cable has been laid along most English roads to help track vehicle travel by the mile so drivers can be charged.

“It has been on the European Union agenda for quite a long time,” he added.

His comments came amid recent news of a radical plan to raise $200 billion by privatizing “the motorway network,” as Brits call it. The plan was presented to the three main political parties by NM Rothschild, the influential investment bank, British news sources say.

The Rothschild bank, called “an architect of several privatizations,” reportedly made its pitch in the weeks running up to the summer recess back on July 21, 2009. Bankers told leading politicians that the sale of the roads overseen by the [public] Highways Agency—all motorways and most “big trunk roads”—could help revive battered public finances. This is the same story Americans have been told.

True to form, toll-road companies and “infrastructure funds” would compete to operate and maintain stretches of the British toll network.

In one version of this scheme, the British government would pay for upkeep through a system of “shadow” tolls. A more radical and less politically acceptable option would be for private companies to charge motorists directly through privately owned toll booths or electronic card readers.

And how did U.S. politicians get the idea that privatizing roads was an acceptable future? Two words: Goldman Sachs, according to noted Texas columnist Ed Wallace.

“Yes, large Wall Street investment banks, led by Goldman, started advising states across the nation on how to raise fast money by diverting the most necessary publicly owned assets—roads—into private ownership,” wrote Wallace. “You have to admit, it’s brilliant, because it’s a forced and guaranteed market: Americans can’t get out of driving.”

And as Daniel Schulman and James Ridgeway wrote in a scathing article, The Highwaymen, in January 2007, “Many similar deals are now on the horizon, and MIG and Cintra are often part of them. So is Goldman Sachs, the huge Wall Street firm that has played a remarkable role advising states on how to structure privatization deals—even while positioning itself to invest in the toll road market.”

SEIU VP to Obama: Mass Amnesty will save the “Progressive Movement.”

SEIU VP to Obama: Mass Amnesty will save the “Progressive Movement.”

Amnesty will provide “progressive candidate’s (like Obama)” 8 million new votes. The man speaking below was chairman of the Obama National Latino Advisory Council during his presidential campaign. He also listed as an “honorary chairman” of the Democratic Socialists of America. After Obama’s election he was awarded the position of vice president of the SEIU. Below he speaks at the 2009 “America’s Future Now!” conference, a gathering of radical Marxists in Washington DC.

“Progressive” is code for Marxist/Socialist.

The Third Horseman of the Apocalypse Appears

Black Criminal Arrested 74 Times with 153 Charges

by Jeff Davis

A news article on Cincinnati.com reports: “Douglas Robinson has been arrested so many times in the last two years – 74 times, to be exact – that social service agencies in the area put him on a list of people they wanted to help the next time he was arrested. That happened Monday, resulting in a maximum 90-day jail sentence on charges of solicitation and possession of illegal drugs. But when one of the agency people called the jail to make sure Robinson was held, he found that Robinson was already free — released due to overcrowding, much like the other times he was arrested. Hamilton County’s director of pretrial services, Wendy Niehaus, said it’s frustrating, but that she and her staff understand the difficult position Hamilton County Sheriff Simon Leis is in as jailer. ‘The sheriff has to prioritize,’ Niehaus said. ‘Is it Douglas that he keeps? Or is the person charged with aggravated robbery? That’s the bottom line.’ But when Robinson is released, it doesn’t improve the situation for anyone, she said. ‘He’s part of a marginalized population that sucks up resources, just not the right kind,’ Niehaus said.”

Sounds like the entire black population. Of course, the armed robbers are probably robbing in order to buy drugs from this guy. And what’s the point of having laws if you can’t punish violators? Clearly this guy isn’t deterred.

The article notes “Robinson’s case is another example of how lack of jail space due to budget cuts affects the county’s criminal justice system on all levels. Every one of Robinson’s arrests has meant work time for the Cincinnati Police Department, which has its own budget problems. And since he never comes back to court as promised, judges and their staff spend time issuing warrants. Still more officers have to go out and track down Robinson again. Robinson’s criminal history dates to spring 2008, when he was kicked out of a homeless shelter after being accused of theft. Records show the 50-year-old Robinson became a chronic problem downtown. He has been arrested 73 times since, on 153 charges, records show. Mostly he’s arrested for panhandling and trespassing, sometimes also with resisting arrest. Robinson was arrested Tuesday on a charge of possession of drugs and tampering with evidence after Cincinnati police officers say they saw him on Pleasant Street with crack cocaine and a pipe to smoke it. Hamilton County Municipal Judge Ted Berry was so shocked when he saw Robinson’s record Wednesday that he asked if it was a typographical error. It wasn’t a mistake, courtroom staff assured him.”

And we wonder why our cities are in such horrendous shape? The bulk of the crime in this country is committed by minority criminals who are repeat offenders let loose either by the revolving door justice system itself or because the jails are so overcrowded wih black and brown criminals that there’s literally no room until they build more prisons.

There was a drop in the American crime rate for a few years in the 1990s and early 2000s due to “three strikes you’re out” laws and harsher penalties for serious offenders. These new laws kept many violent criminals physically in prison, thus making it impossible for them to reoffend. But now the system is breaking down thanks to the ongoing Depression. Politicians don’t want to spend money building more and more prisons or even maintaining the existing prison populations. California just released 5,000 prisoners and plans to release a total of about 40,000. One of these released “non-violent” prisoners in California has already beem re-arrested after attempting to commit a rape less than 12 hours out of prison.

As the Obama Depression continues and state and county budgets collapse, there will be more and more criminals released from prison as a cost-cutting measure. America is about to become a much more dangerous place.

The Third Horseman of the Apocalypse Appears

by Jeff Davis

“And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand. And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny…” – Revelation 6: 5-6

The Third Horseman of the Apocalypse, Famine, is now here, following War with Pestilence and Death waiting in the wings. A Presstv article reports: “A new survey indicates that nearly one in five US households could not afford to buy enough food at least once during the past year. An anti-hunger group said the poll found 18.2 percent of households reported food hardship — lacking money to buy enough food — in 2009. The figure reflects a higher percentage than the government’s ‘food insecurity’ rating of 14.6 percent of households, or 49 million people, in 2008. ‘There are no hunger-free areas of America,’ Jim Weill of the Food Research and Action Center was quoted as saying by Reuters.”

Think about that. Think about the way things were in the 1950s and 1960s. Think about what Barack Hussein Obama and the liberals have brought us to with their madness. For decades the number of people on food stamps had been under 30 million. Today the number is over 36 million. The old-style food stamps are being phased out as too impractical for the huge increases in people, who need them. Today people have a debit-style card to buy their food. Not sure if the card has a “666″ anywhere on it.

Take a look around your home town and notice all the food donation boxes popping up. Drive by your local food bank on Monday morning or whenever the issue day is, and take a look at who is standing patiently in line waiting for donated food. You’ll see some blacks and Mexicans, true, but what is shocking is that most of the people in that line today will be White. Blacks and illegal aliens have other ways to feed themselves, governmental or otherwise. Most of the people standing in that line will be White men and women who two years ago were working and feeding themselves. Some of them now have no homes to go to, but instead will take their plastic bags of donated canned goods and cardboard-packaged starch and trudge back to tent cities called Obamavilles.

Remember, the state-controlled media simply isn’t allowing us to see how bad things are getting out there. They’re still trying to fool us into thinking we’re in a “recovery”. You don’t see the Obamavilles on CNN or in your local paper; you see them driving by on the highway. There’s one in your area. Go find it, and take a look at what we did to ourselves on November 4th, 2008. Or rather what liberals appeasing their White Guilt, ACORN. George Soros and the left-wing media did to us.