Why The Revived West Will Have A Culture Of Ritual Suicide

by Brett Stevens on March 18, 2018

Most suicide is tedious. Some lost teenager, adrift without parental guidance or a civilization that can nurture intelligent and realistic thinking, self-destructs, usually at the encouragement of some glibly giggling budding sociopath who thinks how much more powerful it will make them to have destroyed another.

Ritual suicide comes from another vein entirely. This occurs when someone feels they have failed their responsibility to upholding the principles of the tribe. It is more than merely failing the tribe; it requires having failed to live up to an ideal.

America finds itself stunned by the collapse of a walking bridge at Florida International University, killing five people. This fear originates less in the event itself than in the perceived takeover of America by incompetence.

Over the past six decades, American politicians and the voters who approve of them have steadily removed the rule of duty from American work. When work becomes a career, and people want security in that career, they create endless entities to insulate themselves from the consequences of failure.

Unions, affirmative action, regulations, and endless recommendations by professional organizations join the march to obscure incompetence. People love rules because when their bridge collapses, they can say, “But I followed the rules!” while handily equating the letter of the law with the intent of the law.

We know at some level that we are less capable than we were in the 1900s, 1950s, and 1980s. This makes us nervous because it is a sign of civilization collapse, which is not a sudden Hollywood-style process but a gradual descent into Brazil or Mexico, where buildings fall down all the time and people cry out “¡Ay, Caramba!” and then resume normal life. In a collapsed nation, incompetence and corruption are the norm.

Americans like to think that we are above that, forgetting that unless we maintain the conditions that created our competence, we will through the processes of entropy and degeneration become incompetent. Yet we had to fiddle with the formula by creating insulation against consequences and importing labor from failed countries.

Now we see a symbol of that failure when an ordinary and not really challenging engineering project fails in a very public way. Our hidden fears come to light. What we have suspected for some time seems to be upon us. It is, even if this event is not directly related to that.

In the old days, when we were a WASP nation, the West had a sense of ritual suicide even if it was not literal suicide. Our principles were like the intent of our laws: not just to avoid being on the wrong side of the law, but to avoid screwing up in such a way that we dishonor ourselves.

A WASP who screwed up this badly would be honor-bound to quit his job and retreat in shame to some place where no one knew him and he could take on a menial job and never screw up again. It was cruel, perhaps less cruel than Japanese ritual suicide, but it was effective.

In fear at that, our new ethnic and racial diversity demanded that we paper ourselves with rules and protections so that incompetents would not be forced to self-destruct in exchange for betraying our principles and possibly killing others. Now we see where reversing that culture of duty gets us.

Perhaps when an event like this happens we should find out who originated the failure, bring them onto a public stage, and either have them gut themselves or worse, explain themselves to others. Their failure will provide an example of what we do not tolerate, and motivate others to check those equations again before hitting “go.”

Zimbabwe 2.0: South Africa Votes to Confiscate White Minority’s Land Without Compensation

The move has come just twenty-four years after apartheid officially ended

The South African parliament voted on Tuesday to move forward in amending their Constitution to allow for the confiscation of land from their white minority without compensation.

The move has come just twenty-four years after apartheid officially ended. Whites ended the apartheid system only with the explicit constitutional guarantee that their land would never be stolen, but now that they’ve become a small minority with rapidly dwindling political power that’s all gone out the window.

From News.com.au:

SOUTH Africa’s parliament has voted in favour of a motion that will begin the process of amending the country’s Constitution to allow for the confiscation of white-owned land without compensation.

The motion was brought by Julius Malema, leader of the radical Marxist opposition party the Economic Freedom Fighters, and passed overwhelmingly by 241 votes to 83 against. The only parties who did not support the motion were the Democratic Alliance, Freedom Front Plus, Cope and the African Christian Democratic Party.

The Democratic Alliance is the party most white South Africans vote for. Whites make up less than half of the party and the entire party got only 22 percent of the vote in South Africa’s 2014 general election.

It was amended but supported by the ruling African National Congress and new president Cyril Ramaphosa, who made land expropriation a key pillar of his policy platform after taking over from ousted PM Jacob Zuma earlier this month.

“The time for reconciliation is over. Now is the time for justice,” Mr Malema was quoted by News24 as telling parliament. “We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land.”

According to ((((((Bloomberg)))))), a 2017 government audit found white people owned 72 per cent of farmland in South Africa.

Whites own the land because they colonized it and built it from nothing starting in the 1600’s. They literally “drained the swamps” covering many parts of South Africa and built giant farms in their place.

The continent of Africa is absolutely massive and has no shortage of natural resources. According to the former president of Nigeria, “Africa has around 600 million hectares of uncultivated arable land, roughly 60 percent of the global total.”

Despite being “colonial oppressors,” millions of Africans from all over the continent eventually moved to the whites’ prosperous colonies in South Africa to share in the bounty they created.

We’ve already seen what happened in Zimbabwe after Mugabe and his goons moved to steal white people’s land:

Mugabe was ousted in late 2017 and the nation finally changed course. As I reported in December 2017, white farmers were greeted with tears of joy by Africans as they returned to their land which was seized by Mugabe.

The mob is now voting to do the exact same thing in South Africa.

Here’s some tweets shared by EFF leader Julius Malema reacting to the news:

Meanwhile, while they’re busy kicking out white people for colonizing their land, they’re actively being colonized by the Chinese who don’t give a damn about “racism” and mock egalitarian white liberals as “Baizuo,” which is basically their word for cucks.

This should be triggering an international incident. Instead, because it’s whites being victimized it’s being cheered.

ABSOLUTE LEGEND: New Video Emerges of Russian Pilot’s Last Moments

Roy Batty

Daily Stormer
February 6, 2018

There are good wars and there are bad wars. The war against terrorism in Syria is a good war. It is a just war. 

I’ve got nothing but good vibes and best wishes to send the way of Assad and the bro-tier nations that have come out to make a stand against ZOG.

The last moments of the Russian pilot shot down over Syria have come out.

He took down two Jihadis before he detonated a grenade rather than be taken alive.

His last words are perhaps better translated as, “this one’s for the lads.”

Fam. A moment of silence please.

Now, I don’t want to fanboy too hard, but this is the second time this has happened.

The Russian pilots are 2/2.

There is…something about the Russkies that is hard to put into words. They have this world-weariness that manifests itself in the strangest ways.

The sheer amount of deaths in Russia of young men attest to this. Most of it is pointless and misdirected, doing stupid stunts and going out of the way to prove that you don’t care about death.

It’s sad.

But if marshaled and channeled – these men turn into serious hardcore Berserkers.

There is a lot of good still left in Russia and in the Russian man.

This was the pilot who called in an airstrike on his downed position. He wasn’t a muscleman. He wasn’t a hulking McBain.

It was just some regular, kind of skinny almost-kid who just got married and who had a kid on the way. He proved that not all superheroes wear capes.

And there was another guy worth mentioning from the Chechen wars.

He was taken into captivity by the Jihadists in Chechnya. They forced their prisoners to convert to Islam. But Rodionov refused and they brutally killed him for it. The Orthodox church canonized him as a Martyr.

If you want to watch a movie about the Chechen war, I highly recommend “War” – a Russian film that pulls no PC punches. The brutality of the subhuman savages is portrayed accurately and the quiet heroism of the Russian soldier is as well. But be warned, its pretty intense and rage-inducing. It’s sitting at the top as my fav film of all time atm.

This link doesn’t have subs, unfortunately

Right behind is another film about a Russian that comes to America and shoots up Jews, degenerates and niggers.

This is all to say that there is a lot of heroism still left in the White man. However, in the modern Jewified society that we live in, there are few outlets for our warrior instincts.

Many American kids sign up for ZOG wars. They think this will give them the outlet for their feelings of heroism and patriotism and martial instinct. Most end up deeply disillusioned and some even kill themselves when they come back. And worse, they come back to their quiet ethnic replacement.

Others just lash out, like St. Dylann or Luca the Fascist Avenger.

All of it is another Jewish subversion of our warrior instincts.

I am sure that all of us would be warriors and statesmen in our societies if we lived in healthier times. There would be stories about our heroism and self-sacrifice  and society would recognize our valor.

But we do not live in such times. The wars in Chechnia and in Syria are perhaps the only war in the last 100 years that have been fought for morally righteous reasons. And this resonates with red-pilled people.

These pilots may not have realized it at the time, but they are being cheered for and lionized by millions of young White men the world over who know that their cause is just and that they were absolute legends for doing what they did.

I don’t know about you guys, but I was fucking inspired by these Russian pilots. I’d give my left nut to fight for a cause that motivated me to such heights of self-sacrifice.

It’s not the same thing by a long shot, but it’s the reason I joined the Alt-Right. Our cause is the most just cause that our people has ever had to fight for since the time of the Crusades.

And I know that when the time comes, we too will show the world our valor.

Time to Drop the Jew Taboo: It’s Making Discussion of Russian History Impossible

Source: russia-insider.com

Charles Bausman, Russia Insider, 15 January 2018

Most people know about, but few are willing to condemn, the strict taboo in the media, of criticizing Jews as a group, using that term. One cannot even criticize a small subsection of Jews, a miniscule percentage of the Jewish population, even when they richly deserve it.

Obviously, this is a ridiculous way to run a publication whose object is to get to the truth, so I am writing this to explain why, from now on, the pages of Russia Insider will be open to articles which fairly and honestly address the influence of Jewish elites, including pointing out when it is malevolent, which it often is, and try to understand it and explain it, with malice towards none.

I have become convinced that unless we break this taboo, nothing will improve in the human catastrophe unfolding in geopolitics. Millions have died over the past 30 years, and if we want it to stop, and to avoid a cataclysm which seems to approach inexorably, we have to have the freedom to criticize those responsible. It is very clear to me, as it is to many others, that much of the guilt for this comes from Jewish pressure groups, particularly in the media.

I can see as an editor, that much of what is written about geopolitics in the ‘public square’, admirable though it may be in other respects, makes itself irrelevant by tiptoeing around this crucial issue.

I am a newcomer to the media world, unexpectedly thrust three years ago into the role of owner, publisher and editor of this fairly widely read publication. We get about 10 million visits per month across all of our platforms from a sophisticated audience, and we are widely followed by so-called ‘influencers’. We’ve made a big mark in a short time, and we did it by saying what others were not willing to say. Many subjects which we were the first to speak about on a major platform have now entered the mainstream.

Russia Insider is a grassroots phenomenon, and sometimes resembles a political movement as much as it does a publication. We exist solely because of small donations from readers. We get no funding from major donors, not to mention governments, foundations, or other organized groups. It is all private individuals. Our single largest donation over the past year was $5000, and the median gift is $30. We raised about $80,000 last year. This gives us the freedom to pretty much say what we want, something that can be said of very few publications, even in the alternative media space, most of whom are beholden to large donors.

I see everyday how one can influence the public agenda by addressing or ignoring certain topics. One really can make a difference, and I have tried to make a positive impact, as I understand it. It has been a remarkable education in the power of the media, including our relatively small publication, Russia Insider.

This taboo is the great exception. It really is quite extraordinary to realize that you can publish just about anything, except that. Almost everyone knows about the taboo, just as I did in my previous career in business, but it is another thing altogether to enforce it. I felt, until recently, compelled to do so. I felt that I was having my nose rubbed in it as I tried to make sense of world events.

Read the rest at Russia Insider.


Race Is Just Your Extended Family

Submitted by Henry Armitage.

I want to share what I think is the number one, knock-down argument that we should be using when we present our ideas. And by “our ideas,” of course, I mean the essential one of the necessity of the White ethnostate.

First, let me list the arguments that guys on our side often do use. I think these are all great arguments. The problem with them is that they all shift focus from the primary issue and onto secondary ones, thereby giving our opponents wiggle-room in the form of NAXALT-type arguments which often succeed in their objective of twisting the debate into something convoluted enough for the anti-alt-righter to declare a draw in bad faith.

The case I am making is that we should do the opposite of what I am doing here, and put first things first, and second things second.

The Secondary Arguments

  1. Crime
    We all know that blacks and non-Whites commit multiple times more than their fair share of crime. Get rid of the non-Whites, get rid of the crime, right? The normie rebuttal is, you guessed it, NAXALT. Lots of non-Whites are law-abiding, lots of Whites aren’t, so why does it have to be about race? etc.
  2. IQ
    Basically, the same as for crime. Plus, this one is just too technical, too complicated to be a debate-stopper. And who could forget, “But Asians and Jews are smarter than we are, so…?”
  3. Culture
    Anders Breivik said, when asked why he shot a bunch of Marxists, that he did it for “everything in Norway, ranging from door handles, patterns, beer brands…” This made him seem like a crazy man. Who would commit a mass murder to secure the existence of home décor and a future for Hansa-Borg Pilsner?
  4. Collectivism vs. Individualism
    It’s obviously true that groups working together do better than individuals thwarting one another. Of course, you have people who will try to problematize White identity and White nationalism, as distinct from more particular national identities, but they’re just selectively playing dumb.
  5. General Differences
    It’s about time preference and impulsivity, parental investment levels, and so on. It’s about whether civility and rationality constitute microaggressions. It’s about customer service standards, whether spitting in the street, or worse, is socially acceptable. All great points, but still deflecting from causes to effects.

So how do you do it? How do you reach the normie or the erring ideologue and get them to say that we need to secure a future for White children?

Here is the argument I always use. It will only work on someone who has the following psychological attributes:

  1. They care about commitment and consistency more than about the other principles in marketing psychologist Robert Cialdini’s list. They want their beliefs and values to make sense and not contradict one another.
  2. They have normal attitudes towards family, children and the blood ties that make human societies possible. (“Normal” here does not mean ideal; just not wildly degenerate).

That’s it.

The Primary Argument

It’s really an elaboration upon the “your race is your extended family” talking point, which is commonly brought up, but not often spelled out in its implications. Here’s one of its two premises in graphic form:

In dialogue form, it goes like this:

You: So, do you have any kids?

Normie: Not yet. But the wife’s 35 now and she’s starting to realise, you know, it’s now or never…

You: But you could adopt at any age, within reason.

Normie: Adopt?

You: Yeah. Look, we were just talking about race and all that, and you said it doesn’t matter to you. You don’t care about blood, about DNA, or the fact that this biological family called the White race exists, that you’re a part of it, and that it might go extinct.

Normie: Well I don’t!I care about the people who are in my life, who I know; I don’t care about strangers anymore or less just because they might be more genetically similar to me. What if they’re bad people?

You: Ok, back up a second. What I want to know is, if that’s true, why do you feel the need to be actually related to your own children. It never occurred to you to adopt, just like it never occurs to most people unless they have fertility issues. And even then, they’re more likely to adopt a kid who’s of the same race as them, if they can get access to one.

Normie: (splutters incoherently)

You: So it looks to me like you do care about that stuff after all.

Normie: Well, a family isn’t a race exactly. What you said before was just, like, a metaphor, right?

You: No, no. I meant it literally. An extended family is just exactly what a race is. You can have families that are separated, where people grow up apart and never know one another, but they are still, objectively, families. And what was that you were telling me about your cousin Steve?

Normie: That he was conceived with donor sperm?

You: Yeah, and didn’t you say that when he found out he tracked down his biological father? How did that go, again?

Normie: It was very emotional for both of them. He said they had a lot in common…

You: And what was that other thing you told me? Oh yeah, “I could never be a White nationalist because I’m 2% Pacific Islander. My 23&Me said so!”

Normie: Oh, that? I just did it for fun!It doesn’t mean anything!

You: Why would you and plenty of other people pay, like, $200 for something that means nothing? It’s almost like we’re not just individuals after all; like however hard we try to repress it, we still see ourselves as part of a genetic continuum…

The guy who makes this argument in its most sophisticated form is probably Frank Salter in his book Ethnic Genetic Interests. It should be the keynote in any debate we have with non-racialists, though, because, first, it gets to the heart of the issue: Some things are valuable because they get us things we want for their own sake. Money is good because we can use it to buy stuff. White nationalism is good because, if successful, it gives us a high IQ, high trust society where people mostly get along. But, more than that, it’s good because we love our race, our people, and want to preserve it for its own sake.

Notice that I don’t say “their sake.” You don’t have to love every single White person in order to love your race. This confusion is at the heart of the argument that nations are “imagined communities” –as if the only way of being a part of a collective, and devoted to its interests, is to be on first-name terms with every member of it! These fools might as well say that you can’t look out for your health without getting to know every cell that makes up your body. It’s also a great rebuttal to the (((argument))) about how Whiteness isn’t a real identity: You can be English, Norwegian, Italian, etc…. Just take another look at that graphic above. Are they saying that the existence of a branch refutes the existence of a trunk?

Hopefully, I’ve convinced you to add this argument to your arsenal, or if it’s already in there, to use it for an opening volley when next you engage with the enemy, or in friendly fire with the Eternal Normie.

FROM: https://altright.com/2018/01/24/race-is-just-your-extended-family/

Greece Fights Back: Antifa Buildings Torched Amid Europe’s Largest Ever Nationalist Rally

Source: squawker.org

Jack Kenrick, Squawker, 22 January 2018

Over four hundred thousand flag waving patriots joined together yesterday. In a display of purely Nationalistic based pride that seemed almost out of place in today’s modern diversity first Europe. Taking to the streets in protest of neighboring country Macedonia, a nation they feel has stolen an important part of their heritage and culture. Here below is some drone footage of the rally, which provides a proper sense of just how large this crowd truly was.

Not everyone was thrilled by the huge turnout. Including Greece’s Progressive government, who made their disapproval of the entire event quite clear before it even began. With multiple senior lawmakers today calling the event an irresponsible act, that only fanned the flames of the over 25-year-long feud with neighboring Macedonia.

The political disapproval for the rally is likely why despite a purported 68% of Greeks backing the protests overall goals, the crowd yesterday was met with an incredibly large militarized police presence. A presence that sadly and almost inevitably led to numerous reports of violence and the crowd clashing with authorities.

The Greek government even attempted to use its control of the media to limit the influence and reach of the protest. With the state controlled national broadcaster ERT, purposely not mentioning the largest demonstration in Greek history on their nightly news broadcast.

Beyond even these blatant examples of Government censorship, the real story however might just be the fact that the Greek people appear to have seemingly run out of patience for the Alt-Left extremists living among them. With witnesses claiming to have seen a handful of protesters break away from the crowd and throw a Molotov cocktail into a building widely known to be used by a local Antifa chapter operating in the city. While no damage was done to neighboring houses, nor anyone injured in the attack as the house was empty at the time. The Antifa occupied house was in fact completely destroyed in the ensuing blaze.

Government opposition leader Kyriakos Mitsotakis called the rally a demonstration of “the indignation of Greek citizens towards a government that acts secretly and, with its acts and omissions, shows that it is incapable of serving national interests.” This declaration in support of the rally was met with an official government spokesperson quickly calling Mitsotakis “unreliable, irresponsible and populist.” Proving once again that anyone who has his own people’s interests at heart, is considered unacceptable by the Leftist ruling political class.

Despite the blow back from their own Government, the people of Greece don’t appear to be backing down. With the rally this weekend revealing just how many were still willing to take to the streets and openly display their love of country and national heritage. Some even, whether right or wrong, even dared to back up those words with actions against those who might otherwise want to quiet them. It’s uncertain for now if this violence was merely a one off or signs of continued conflict to come, but we do know for sure that the peaceful protests at least will be continuing. With another demonstration set for February 4th, this time located in the capital city of Athens itself.