The number of terror-related arrests in Britain has reached a record high, the Home Office has announced, in a bulletin which highlighted a “steady rise” in “the proportion of prisoners holding far-right ideologies” over recent years.
Following the Islamist attacks in London and Manchester, UK terror arrests numbered 441 in the year to April 2018, surging 17 percent from the previous 12 month period, in which 378 individuals were held.
Assistant Commissioner Neil Basu, head of Counter Terrorism Policing in Britain, said officers have seen a “genuine step-change in momentum” since Britain saw nearly 40 people murdered in a series of terror attacks last year.
Counter-terror activity has increased to an “unprecedented level”, with officers having foiled an average of one terror attack a month, according to the commissioner, who said in a statement: “Police, together with the security services, are determined to make the UK as hostile an environment for terrorists as possible.”
Did Neil Basu say that while laughing or something?
The British police are single-pointedly dedicated to stretching the collective anus of British people as wide as possible to accommodate the maximum number of Islamic cocks. These people are steeped so high in treason, in fact, that it wouldn’t surprise me if that was their official job description.
100% gommitted to brotecting against derrorism :DDD
Since March 2017, authorities have prevented 12 terrorist plots and an additional four “extreme right-wing attacks”, the Home Office said, stressing that “there have been steady increases in recent years in the number of terrorist prisoners across all the types of ideologies covered.
“The proportion of prisoners holding far-right ideologies has increased steadily over the past three years,” added the bulletin. Of the 228 people currently imprisoned for terrorism-related crimes, 82 percent are Islamist, 13 percent “far right”, and six percent committed offences driven by commitment to “other” ideologies including the Republican movement in Northern Ireland.
I suspect these numbers have passed through the Ministry of Truth a few times.
Actual right wing (i.e., white nationalist) terrorism basically doesn’t exist in the UK. The closest we’ve seen to it in recent years is when BASED Welshman, Darren “Paki Plower” Osborne, rammed into a bunch of hajis in London in June 2017. But even that was a “get the fuck out of my country you filthy invaders” act of self-defense rather than a calculated attempt to instill fear in the populace.
This is the face of a man who hates what his country has become.
Moreover, other acts of conquest that any sane society would regard as terrorism, such as the organized Paki rapes of tens of thousands of white schoolgirls, are not included in the statistics, while minor expressions of British nationalism, such as throwing bacon at an imam, presumably are included. (How else did they bloat that right wing percentage to 13%?)
Clearly, these are dishonest statistics tailored to deliver the following impression:
Scotland Yard highlighted the so-called diversity of suspects, emphasising that the new figures showed “a broad spectrum of people being arrested in connection with terrorism investigations in terms of age, gender and ethnicity.”
While British passport-holders made up 68 percent of suspects, Algerian, Pakistani, Iraqi, Afghan, Iranian, Somali, Turkish, Indian, and Irish were the most prominent nationalities amongst aliens arrested.
Yes goyim, anyone can be a terrorist.
There’s no consistent racial or religious trend here; the universe simply likes to possess random people – some of whom just happen to be colorful – and make them bomb things for teh lolz.
It’s a sad state of affairs, really, when even a 90-year-old Scottish pensioner could decide to drive a truck into a group of civilians while shouting, “Allahu Akbar, yer feckin’ cunts!”
The traditional Islamic burqa and niqab veils have been banned in Denmark after a majority vote in the country’s parliament.
In a 75-30 vote with 74 absentees on Thursday, Danish lawmakers approved the law. The Danish government says it is not aimed at any religions and does not ban headscarves, turbans or the traditional Jewish skull cap, AP reports.
During the weeks-long parliamentary procedure of the bill, the government removed a provision allowing prison sentences as potential punishment for breaking the new law. Financial penalties will instead be enforced against those who infringe on the new legislation.
Those found violating it will receive a 1,000 Krone (£119/$166) fine which could increase to as much as £900/$1,257 for repeat offenders. Anyone forcing a person to wear garments covering the face by using force or threats can be fined or face up to two years in prison.
Unlike the Austrian burqa ban, which prohibits all facial coverings including Halloween costumes, the Danish ban will have a limited number of exceptions including those using scarves to protect their faces from cold and people dressed up in costume.
So, Denmark has joined the small but growing list of European countries – Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Germany – that banned the burka and, in consequence, transformed into multicultural utopias free from bombings, machete attacks and nationwide rape gangs.
Oh wait, no, those countries have gotten even worse since their burka bans. :DD
Probably because they’re still infested with Moslems. :DDDD
Could there be a greater act of political masturbation than a burka ban?
The pattern is always the same:
Politicians let Moslems live in European countries because it’s sad that they’re brown
Moslems start hajiing up the place because they’re aware that they’re members of an invading tribe
Politicians attempt to “integrate” the Moslems by banning something that native Europeans find weird and alienating
Progression of the caliphate continues unabated because the root problem persists
Obviously, I don’t want Moslems in Europe. I believe that these inbred, camel-faced monsters should be forced to leave the continent with nothing but the towels on their heads, and the ones that refuse to leave should be executed on the spot by terrifying-looking supersoldiers that resemble the Ultramarines from Warhammer 40k.
Since that’s not a viable option right now, though, I want kebabesses in Europe to keep wearing their ninja suits precisely because they discourage “integration” (which is, and always has been, a codeword for miscegenation).
Let us pause for a moment and reflect upon how much we hate Albania.
So fuck these burka bans and other McLaws that only civic nationalists would be dumb enough to celebrate. If you’re not going to exterminate or at least expel the hajis from your nation, then don’t bother doing anything at all.
If you are trying to gaslight or brainwash the citizens of a country into accepting, at least outwardly, a lie about the nature of their reality, a great way to do it is to lie about the nature of the country in which they reside.
Think about it.
When the Soviet Union captured Eastern Germany from the Naional Socialists, and continued to occupy it and turned it into a vassal state, they didn’t call it the German Socialist Republic, they labelled it the German Democratic Republic. Similarly, Soviet occupied Poland became the People’s Republic of Poland. (At least the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics had at least some honesty attached to its name.) Sometimes, Communist regimes liked to combine the two euphemisms into “People’s Republics,” to hide the fact that they were or still are Communist totalitarian dictatorships, in much the same way that our weak political leadership has combined two adjectives to create the euphemism “violent extremism,” in order to hide the Islamic and terrorist nature of Islamic terrorism.
Europe appears demographically finished, and we will most likely see the political systems of individual countries, and possibly the entire EU, become Islamic in nature, within the next couple of decades. As such, Europe will become a Caliphate, or some European countries will become Islamic Republics. But they won’t be called that. Belgium won’t be called the Islamic Republic of Belgium, it will be called Belgium. Germany won’t be called the Islamic Caliphate of Germany, it will be called Germany. The European Union won’t become Eurabia, they will simply call it Europe.
The left currently dominates the discourse on the Middle East Migrant Crisis. They have been able to label the Middle East Migrant Crisis the European Migrant Crisis. They have been able to attach the label of “refugee” to people who refuse refuge in multiple safe countries but want to go to Germany. They are very quickly applying the label of ‘white supremacist’ to anyone who dares to identify themselves as European, or of a European nationality, based on their ethnicity, rather than their location. They are experts at changing the meaning of something in order to achieve their political ends.
And those at the forefront of the Islamic political movement are nothing if not masters of this leftist tactic of controlling the discourse. They encourage more “dialogue” whenever an Islamic terrorist attack occurs, speak of “extremisms” in explaining why Islamic terrorist attacks occur, and promote “tolerance” in resolving the issue.
Likewise, when an Islamic political party comes to power in Europe, and indeed it will, it may not even explicitly identify as Islamic in nature. It will not make radical changes overnight, but assure everybody that nothing has changed. Incremental tightening of the screws will be accompanied by occassional violent outbursts, whether they are of the Krystalnacht or Night of the Long Knives variety, followed by long lectures on the importance of tolerance and diversity.
The European will become the new Jew.
My advice to Europeans? You have two options: fight tooth and nail for your cultural and political rights, or get out while you still can.
Germany will become Islamic State, says Merkel
Chancellor Angela Merkel said that Germans have failed to grasp how Muslim immigration has transformed their country and will have to come to terms with more mosques than churches throughout the countryside, according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily.
“Our country is going to carry on changing, and integration is also a task for the society taking up the task of dealing with immigrants,” Ms. Merkel told the daily newspaper. “For years we’ve been deceiving ourselves about this. Mosques, for example, are going to be a more prominent part of our cities than they were before.”
Germany, with a population of 4-5 million Muslims, has been divided in recent weeks by a debate over remarks by the Bundesbank’s Thilo Sarrazin, who argued Turkish and Arab immigrants were failing to integrate and were swamping Germany with a higher birth rate.
The Chancellor’s remarks represent the first official acknowledgement that Germany, like other European countries, is destined to become a stronghold of Islam. She has admitted that the country will soon become a stronghold.
In France, 30% of children age 20 years and below are Muslims. The ratio in Paris and Marseille has soared to 45%. In southern France, there are more mosques than churches.
In Belgium, 50% of the newborns are Muslims and reportedly its Islamic population hovers around 25%. A similar statistic holds true for The Netherlands. It’s the same story in Russia where one in five inhabitants is a Muslim.
Muammar Gaddafi once stated: “There are signs that Allah will grant victory to Islam in Europe without sword, without gun, without conquest. We don’t need terrorists; we don’t need homicide bombers. The 50 plus million Muslims (in Europe) will turn it into the Muslim Continent within a few decades.” The numbers support him.
A refugee from the Muslim world sees it taking shape.For more than 30 years, Bat Ye’or, a refugee from Egypt, has been writing about dhimmis — Christians and Jews living under oppression in Muslim lands. Now, she has a new book, Europe, Globalization, and the Coming Universal Caliphate, that looks at Muslims living in lands that once were Christian but today call themselves multicultural. She predicts Europe will not remain multicultural for long. She is convinced that Europe, sooner rather than later, will be dominated by Islamic extremists and transformed into “Eurabia” — a term first used in the mid-1970s by a French publication pressing for common European-Arab policies.
Immigrants can enrich a nation. But there is a difference between immigrants and colonists. The former are eager to learn the ways of their adopted home, to integrate and perhaps assimilate — which does not require relinquishing their heritage or forgetting their roots. Colonists, by contrast, bring their culture with them and live under their own laws. Their loyalties lie elsewhere.
Ye’or contends that a concerted effort is being made not only to ensure that Muslim immigrants in Europe remain squarely in the second category, but also that they become the means to transform Europe politically, culturally, and religiously. Leading this effort is the Organization of the Islamic Conference, established in 1969, which, a few months ago, no doubt on the advice of a highly compensated public-relations professional, renamed itself the Organization of Islamic Cooperation.
The OIC represents 56 countries plus the Palestinian Authority. It claims also to represent Muslim immigrants — the “Diaspora” — in Europe, the Americas, Africa, and Asia. It is pan-Islamic: It seeks to unify and lead the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims. In a manual first published in 2001, “Strategy of Islamic Cultural Action in the West,” the IOC asserts that “Muslim immigrant communities in Europe are part of the Islamic nation.” It goes on to recommend, Ye’or notes, “a series of steps to prevent the integration and assimilation of Muslims into European culture.”
The IOC, she argues, is nothing less than a “would-be, universal caliphate.” It might look different from the caliphates of the Ottomans, Fatimids, and Abbasids. It might resemble, instead, a thoroughly modern trans-national bureaucracy. But, already, the OIC exercises significant power through the United Nations, and through the European Union, which has been eager to accommodate the OIC while simultaneously endowing the U.N. with increasing authority for global governance. Among the other organizations that Ye’or says are doing the OIC’s bidding are the U.N. Alliance of Civilizations, the U.N. Commission on Human Rights, and the European Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation (PAEAC).
In the eyes of OIC officials, no problem in the contemporary world is more urgent than “Islamophobia,” which it calls “a crime against humanity” that the U.N. and the EU must officially outlaw. Even discussing why so much terrorism is carried out in the name of Islam is to be forbidden. The OIC insists, too, that international bodies ban “defamation of religion,” by which it means criticism of anything Islamic. Defamation of Judaism, Christianity, Bahai, Hinduism, and even heterodox Muslim sects such as the Ahmadiyya is common within the borders of many OIC countries, a fact the OIC refuses to acknowledge.
Though funding for terrorist groups flows generously from individuals in oil-rich OIC countries, the organization itself is not a supporter of terrorism. Neither, however, is it an opponent. Violence directed against those it views as enemies of Islam is defined as “resistance” — even when civilians, including women and children, are the intended victims.
While the OIC expresses concern for the rights of Muslim immigrants in the West, the egregious mistreatment of foreign workers in the Gulf countries (and other Muslim countries as well) is not something OIC officials deign to discuss. Nor has the OIC ever condemned the genocide of the black Muslims of Darfur or the genocidal intentions toward Israelis openly expressed by Hamas, Hezbollah, and the rulers of Iran.
European diplomats might at least insist that the OIC accept the principle of reciprocity. If there is to be a “dialogue of civilizations,” shouldn’t both sides get to air their grievances? Shouldn’t Europeans work to end the persecution of religious and ethnic minorities in OIC countries and to grant foreign workers in Muslim countries basic rights and a path to citizenship? If the Saudis want to fund and control tens of thousands of mosques around the world, is it too much to ask that they permit people of other faiths to at least worship on their soil? Evidently it is, and Ye’or offers this explanation: Committed to a multicultural, multiethnic, multireligious, and multilateral ideology that rejects patriotism and even national identity and cultural pride, afflicted by guilt over their imperial and colonial past — and ignorant about more than a thousand years of Islamic imperialism and colonialism — Europeans have become dhimmis in their own lands; inferiors who accept their status and submit. TheOIC, by contrast, rejects multiculturalism, openly professing the superiority of the Islamic faith, civilization, and laws.
The caliphate,” Bat Ye’or concludes, is “alive and growing within Europe. . . . It has advanced through the denial of dangers and the obfuscating of history. It has moved forward on gilded carpets in the corridors of dialogue, the network of the Alliances and partnerships, in the corruption of its leaders, intellectuals and NGOs, particularly at the United Nations.”
If you think that’s alarmist, if you think the OIC sincerely seeks cooperation with the West or that Europeans know where lines must be drawn and have the courage to draw them, read her book. Or just wait a few years.
— Clifford D. May is president of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a policy institute focusing on national security and foreign policy.
Last June the New York Times reported that Michael D’Andrea was appointed to the CIA’s Iranian operations department. This was a sign that the Trump administration and its Jews (like Ezra ((((((Cohen))))))-Watnick and ((((((Jared Kushner))))))) were going to escalate their aggression against Iran.
D’Andrea is quite an eccentric fellow. He is a white convert to Islam (most likely Sunni) who is obsessed with overthrowing the Iranian government. During the last 15 years, he has used his post in the CIA to collude with Israel to assassinate various figures associated Hezbollah, Iran and other leaders in the Shiite world.
The Iranian government is openly naming him as the figure who orchestrated the phony Iran protests. This isn’t a conspiracy theory, all the chess pieces from the US, Gulf terror states, and Zionist entity are being put into place in preparation for a war against Iran’s allies.
The game plan here appears to be to spark an armed conflict in Iran in order to give Israel and Saudi Arabia more elbow room for what is starting to look like the inevitable invasion of Lebanon or Syria.
Thankfully, the people of Iran have rejected this fake revolution. It seems to have evaporated faster than ((((((Stefan Molyneux))))))’s vaporub tears!
Crying is not an argument. Israeli first boomer neo-con sheds crocodile tears as he calls for young American blood in the middle east in support for Israeli calls for war. pic.twitter.com/gGKqRjjq0e
Members of Iran’s ruling establishment took turns Thursday assigning blame for what they regard as an embarrassing outbreak of protests this week in more than 80 cities across the country.
Iran’s chief prosecutor elaborated on the government’s claims that the United States and other foreign enemies were responsible for stirring up the violent protests. The United States, Israel and Saudi Arabia planned the “riots,” the prosecutor, Mohammad Jafar Montazeri, said on state television, in an effort to “subvert the Iranian government.”
“The U.S., the Zionist regime and the Al Sauds were the three sides of this subversive plan, and Saudi Arabia committed to provide money for it,” Montazeri said.
Montazeri asserted that Michael D’Andrea, a CIA officer who runs Iran operations, was a “main designer” of the protests and that the CIA hoped to turn the protest into an “armed” revolt by mid-February, the anniversary of the country’s 1979 Islamic Revolution. The Trump administration has denied having any involvement in the protests, and the CIA declined to comment.
Iran’s government routinely filters websites and apps it deems inappropriate or dangerous, and Twitter and Facebook have been blocked since the 2009 anti-government protests. The prosecutor said that about a million pages on social media had been banned by the authorities, but complained that the pages “mushroom under new names and colors despite more than 15,000 of them being blocked every week.”
Laugh out loud moment: the US government and United Nations “condemning” Iran for censoring certain pages on social media. The Jews who govern us in Europe and America have been censoring nationalist and alt-right ideas for years now – with an extreme uptick in purges and political arrests in countries like Germany – and nobody says shit!
When Iran shuts down Mossad and Saudi bots calling for violent insurrection, it’s violating (((human rights))).
A story published by Wired reveals that an EU-funded group of arms experts went to Iraq and Syria to explore Islamic State’s well-oiled manufacturing machine, only to find that the US routinely violated arms control clauses.
This week the Conflict Armament Research (CAR), a London-based organization partly funded by the European Union, published a 200-page report that summarizes three years of work done by its field teams in Iraq. CAR experts were documenting the weapons Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) used on battlefields and how exactly it acquired them. In a story published by Wired, writer Brian Castner, a former Explosive Ordnance Disposal officer and veteran of the Iraq War, recounts his experience of following CAR field expert Damien Spleeters as he gathered evidence in the Iraqi city of Tal Afar.
CAR field research is about finding weapons and weapon components, documenting markings and tracing the weapons back to their country of origin and origin through tell-tale signs like particular shades of paint. Serial numbers allowed the group to confirm numerous cases in which weapons produced by EU members like Romania and Bulgaria, and purchased by the US and Saudi Arabia, ended up in the hands of IS.
Spleeters was the one who discovered a batch of dismantled Romanian PG-9 73mm rocket-propelled grenades in Tal Afar. The batch had been sold to the US in 2014 and later apparently sent to Syria to arm a group called Jaysh Suriyah al-Jadid in violation of clauses forbidding re-export of the weapons. The Romanian government has provided CAR with documents confirming both the delivery and the fact that the US signed an end-use certificate. This case is not an isolated incident; several others are detailed in the CAR report.
The CAR investigation has also uncovered the scale and ingenuity of IS arms manufacturers, who managed to organize production of “a nation-state’s worth of weapons” according to Castner. The terrorist group did not simply grab whatever weapons they could, but spurred a complex production network, which repurposed components of weapons made in other countries and complemented them with domestically-produced components to create a range of arms tailored for IS’ own needs.
“Iraq’s oil fields provided the industrial base – tool-and-die sets, high-end saws, injectionmolding machines – and skilled workers who knew how to quickly fashion intricate parts to spec. Raw materials came from cannibalizing steel pipe and melting down scrap. ISIS engineers forged new fuzes, new rockets and launchers, and new bomblets to be dropped by drones, all assembled using instruction plans drawn up by ISIS officials,” Castner writes.
The military defeat of IS does not mean the loss of all the know-how – weapon designs, solved engineering problems, industrial processes, blueprints and schematics – which the self-proclaimed caliphate gathered over three years. The effort needed to mass-produce arms will only become smaller as technologies like metal 3D-printing are becoming more accessible, he warned.
CAR’s field expert Spleeters became fascinated with tracing supply chains in modern conflicts, starting in 2011 in his native Belgium. Working as a reporter, he wanted to understand and report to the public how Belgian-made weapons came into the possession of Libyan rebels fighting to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi. He discovered that the only way to get to the bottom of the story was to travel to Libya, which he did in his spare time. Spleeters became a freelance journalist after returning, reporting on arms trafficking for newspapers and think-tanks specializing in tracing arms, and joined CAR as a fulltime investigator in 2014.
The expert says field trips are the only way to properly collect evidence necessary to establish the truth. The data collected this way cannot be replicated by analyzing online videos, a method favored by some investigative groups like Bellingcat.
“With all the social media things, when you see ordnance or small arms from afar, you might think, ‘Oh, that’s an M-16.’ But if you see it close up, you figure out it’s a CQ-556 rifle from China, a copy of the M-16. But you need to be close by to see it,” Castner cites him as saying. Spleeters believes that the camera conceals more than it reveals.
He said the situation in Iraq, just like Syria, was a mess. “Nobody knows what’s going on, and there’s all these conspiracy theories. We live in a post-truth era, where facts don’t matter anymore. And with this work, it’s like you can finally grab onto something that’s true.”
There are reports of an explosion occurring in the bus terminal of a New York City subway station. It looks like this may have been an attempted pipe bombing or suicide bombing gone wrong. The bomber seems to have blown himself up by mistake.
Police have a man in custody but have yet to identify him.
THERE are fears New York suffered another terror attack today following an explosion at Port Authority Bus Terminal near Times Square.
Police have yet to reveal the nature of the device but local reports suggest a suicide belt or pipe bomb detonated prematurely underground at the packed bus and train interchange.
Witnesses reported a stampede as panicked commuters rushed to escape the scene, but police said the suspect was the only person injured.
An officer reportedly told CBS News that cops are looking at a possible suicide bomber, although the situation is said to be “fluid”.
One man has been taken into police custody with non life-threatening injuries.
The New York Post citing police sources said “wires” were seen protruding from the suspect’s body in the aftermath of the blast. Police have yet to comment on this.
Here’s a few news clips on the situation.
The NYPD is responding to reports of an explosion of unknown origin at 42nd Street and 8th Ave, #Manhattan. The A, C and E line are being evacuated at this time. Info is preliminary, more when available. pic.twitter.com/7vpNT97iLC
The New York City Police Department has so far only issued this statement to describe what’s going on.
Other than that, we don’t know a whole lot else. Even though we can’t say for certain, the chances of the bomber being a Moslem is high. Nearly every type of incident we have seen like this has involved a Moslem or a group of Moslems being responsible.
We’ll have more information as it becomes available.