African Governments Commemorate the Role of Jews in Subverting White Rule

Mistake number one: They weren’t English.

THE TEXT BELOW is reproduced verbatim from a website advertising postage stamps, released in collaboration by the governments of  Liberia, Gambia, and Sierra Leone, that commemorate the role of Jews in subverting White rule in South Africa. Each stamp bears a Jewish star on the lower right.

The claim “that Jews were over represented by 2,500 percent in their proportion to the governing population” is on the original site, which you can view here.

I have removed only the “read more” links, since it appears to me that what is stated on the front page more than makes the point.

Legendary Heroes of Africa

In the anti Apartheid South African Liberation struggle, it was estimated that Jews were over represented by 2,500 percent in their proportion to the governing population. This stamp issue acknowledges the extraordinary sacrifices made by Jews to the liberation of their African brethren, and these stamps recognize some of the most significant contributors to global humanity in the 20th Century.


((((((Helen Suzman))))))

((((((Helen Suzman)))))) (née Gavronsky) was born in the South African mining town of Germiston on 7 November 1917 to Samuel and Frieda Gavronsky, both immigrants from Lithuania who had come to South Africa to escape the restrictions imposed on Jews.

Eli ((((((Weinberg))))))

Eli ((((((Weinberg)))))) was born in 1908 in the port of Libau, in Latvia on the Baltic Sea. He experienced the First World War and the October Revolution of 1917 as a child, and this led to his socialist political development. During World War I, he was separated from his family.

Esther Barsel

Esther Barsel (born October 17, 1924, in Raguva, Lithuania; died October 6, 2008, in Johannesburg) was a South African politician and long-standing member of the South African Communist Party (SACP). She was a member of both her local African National Congress branch and the SACP’s Johannesburg Central Branch.

Hymie Barsel

Hymie Barsel was born on September 11, 1920 in Fordsburg, Johannesburg, South Africa to Faiga and Moishe Barsel, both of Litvak heritage. He was raised in a Zionist oriented home. He suffered from epilepsy which was ill understood at that time, eventually receiving treatment from Dr. Max ((((((Joffe)))))), also a Zionist.

Sierra Leone

Yetta Barenblatt

Yetta Barenblatt was born on 24 September 1913, in Dublin, Ireland, to Basna and ((((((Solomon)))))) Malamed of Lithuanian origin. In 1925, a friend encouraged her to come to South Africa with the promise of employment. However, due to her circumstances, further education was not possible and Barenblatt was forced to seek employment at a retail store.

Ray Alexander Simons

Ray Alexander Simons née Alexandrowich was born on 12 January 1913 in Latvia. While at school, she displayed little fear in challenging authorities. Her independent thinking suggested she pursue a career in medicine but she soon took up politics. When she was about 13, she became active in the underground Latvian Communist Party.

Baruch Hirson

Baruch Hirson, named after his late grandfather, was born on 10 December 1921 at Doomfontein near Johannesburg in the Transvaal. His father was an electrician. His parents, Joseph and Lily Hirson, were Jews who had immigrated to South Africa to evade the pogroms, persecution and discrimination Jews were subjected to in the old Romanov Empire.

Norma Kitson

Norma Kitson was one of a generation of Jewish activists, who committed themselves to the struggle against racial tyranny in South Africa. The drive of these South African Jews was to give witness against racism and social injustice, even at great personal cost. Norma Kitson’s autobiography, Where Sixpence Lives (1986), uniquely fuses the personal and the political.


((((((Ruth First))))))

((((((Ruth First)))))) was born on May 4, 1925 to Jewish immigrants Julius and Matilda First. Julius, a furniture manufacturer, was born in Latvia and came to South Africa in 1906. He and his wife were founder members of the Communist Party of South Africa (CPSA) or South African Communist Party (SACP) in 1921. Ruth and her brother, Ronald, grew up in a household in which intense political debate between people of all races and classes was always present.

Hilda ((((((Bernstein))))))

Hilda ((((((Bernstein)))))) was born in London in 1915. Her father was Simeon ((((((Schwartz)))))) from Odessa, Ukraine. He relocated to England in 1901 where he became a Bolshevik and represented the new USSR in UK for a short while in 1920’s. He returned to the USSR when recalled in 1925, and died in the 1930’s without ever having returned to the UK.

Lionel Rusty ((((((Bernstein))))))

Lionel “Rusty” ((((((Bernstein)))))) was born in Durban, in 1920; the youngest of four children of European émigrés. Orphaned at eight years old, he was raised by relatives. These early disruptions to his family life were compounded when he was sent to finish his education at a boys’ boarding school. Hilton College, a private school, that was the South African equivalent of Eton or Harrow.

Ronald Segal

At an early age, Ronald Segal proclaimed himself a Socialist, saying he did not want to be a millionaire. But he had no choice. His father was a co-owner of Ackerman’s, a giant cheap clothing chain in South Africa. At their home on the slopes of Cape Town’s Lion’s Head, his Zionist parents entertained visiting dignitaries. At age eight, Ronald read Gone With the Wind and a biography of ((((((Disraeli)))))).

100,000 Russians March to Honor Royal Family Murdered by Jewish Communists

EARLY IN THE MORNING of July 17, Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia led a 22-kilometer procession in honor of the Romanov royal family on the 100th anniversary of their murder. Law enforcement agencies reported that over 100,000 pilgrims participated. Tsar Nicholas II, his wife, Alexandra Fyodorovna, their five children Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Anastasia and Alexei, along with physician Yevgeny Botkin and three servants, were executed by Bolshevik revolutionaries on July 17, 1918.

Some of the participants wore Czarist-era clothing.

Appendix 1

The Brutal Murder of the Romanovs by Bolshevik Jews

The Russian Royal Family was executed and buried in July 1918.

AT ABOUT 1 a.m. on July 17, 1918, in a fortified mansion in the town of Ekaterinburg, in the Ural Mountains, the Romanovs — ex-tsar Nicholas II, ex-tsarina Alexandra, their five children, and their four remaining servants, including the loyal family doctor, Eugene Botkin — were awoken by their Bolshevik captors and told they must dress and gather their belongings for a swift nocturnal departure. The White armies, which supported the tsar, were approaching; the prisoners could already hear the boom of the big guns. They gathered in the cellar of the mansion, standing together almost as if they were posing for a family portrait. Alexandra, who was sick, asked for a chair, and Nicholas asked for another one for his only son, 13-year-old Alexei. Two were brought down. They waited there until, suddenly, 11 or 12 heavily armed men filed ominously into the room.

What happened next — the slaughter of the family and servants — was one of the seminal events of the 20th century, a wanton massacre that shocked the world and still inspires a terrible fascination today. A 300-year-old imperial dynasty, one marked by periods of glorious achievement as well as staggering hubris and ineptitude, was swiftly brought to an end. But while the Romanovs’ political reign was over, the story of the line’s last ruler and his family was most certainly not. …

Tsar Nicholas II of Russia with Tsarina Alexandra and their children grand duchesses Olga, Tatiana, Maria, and Anastasia, and Tsarevich Alexei.

At first, during the spring of 1917, the ex-imperial family was allowed to live in relative comfort at a favorite residence, the Alexander Palace at Tsarskoe Selo, not far from Petrograd. Nicholas’s cousin, King George V of England, offered him sanctuary, but then changed his mind and withdrew the offer. It was not the finest moment for the House of Windsor, but it is unlikely that it made any difference. The window of opportunity was short; demands for the ex-tsar to stand trial were growing.

Alexander Kerensky, first justice minister and then prime minister of the provisional government, moved the royals to the governor’s mansion in Tobolsk, in distant Siberia, to keep them safe. Their stay there was bearable but depressing. Boredom turned to danger when Kerensky was overthrown by Lenin and the Bolsheviks in October 1917. Lenin famously said that “revolutions are meaningless without firing squads,” and he was soon considering, along with lieutenant ((((((Yakov Sverdlov)))))), whether to place Nicholas on public trial — to be followed by his execution — or just kill the entire family.

The Bolsheviks faced a desperate civil war against the Whites, counterrevolutionary armies backed by Western powers. Lenin responded with unbridled terror. He decided to move the family from Tobolsk closer to Moscow, to which he had relocated the Russian capital. A trusted Bolshevik factotum was dispatched to bring the Romanovs westward, and in April 1918 they endured a terrifying trip by train and carriage.

The teenage Alexei suffered an attack of bleeding and had to be left behind; he came to Ekaterinburg three weeks later with three of his sisters. The girls, meanwhile, were sexually molested on the train. But eventually the family was reunited in the gloomy, walled mansion of a merchant named Ipatiev in the center of the city, whose leaders were the most fanatical of Bolsheviks.

The mansion was ominously renamed the House of Special Purpose and converted into a prison fortress with painted-over windows, fortified walls and machine gun nests. The Romanovs received limited rations and were watched by hostile young guards. Yet the family adapted. Nicholas read books aloud in the evening and tried to exercise. The eldest daughter, Olga, became depressed, but the playful and spirited younger girls, especially the beautiful Maria and the mischievous Anastasia, began to interact with the guards. Maria began an illicit romance with one of them, and the guards discussed helping the girls escape. When this was uncovered by Bolshevik boss Filipp Goloshchekin, the guards were changed, regulations were tightened. All of this made Lenin even more anxious.

By the beginning of July 1918 it was clear that Ekaterinburg was going to fall to the Whites. Goloshchekin rushed to Moscow to get Lenin’s approval, and it is certain that he got it, though Lenin was clever enough not to put the order on paper: The killing was planned under the new commandant of the House of Special Purpose, Yakov Yurovsky, who decided to recruit a squad to murder the royals all together in one session and then burn the bodies and bury them in the woods nearby. Just about every detail of the plan was ill conceived and would be grotesquely bungled in practice.

Early on that July morning, the bleary-eyed Romanovs and their loyal retainers stood in the cellar as the heavily armed murder squad filed into the room. Yurovsky suddenly read out a death sentence. Then the men used their weapons. Each was meant to fire at a different family member, but many of them secretly wished to avoid shooting the girls, so they all aimed at the loathed Nicholas and Alexandra, killing them almost instantly.

The firing was wild; the killers managed to wound one another as the room filled with swirling dust and smoke and screams. When the first volley was done, most of the family was still alive, wounded, crying and terrified, their suffering made worse by the fact that they were in effect wearing bulletproof vests.

The Romanovs were famed for their collection of jewelry, and they had left Petrograd with a large cache of diamonds hidden their baggage. During the last months they had sewn the diamonds into specially made underwear in case they needed to fund an escape. On the night of the execution the children had pulled on this secretly bejeweled underwear, which was reinforced with the hardest material in existence. Tragically, ironically, the bullets bounced off these garments. Finally the murderers waded into the gruesome scene of wounded, bleeding children (one of the killers compared it to a slippery ice rink awash with blood and brains) and stabbed them manically with bayonets or shot them in the head.

The mayhem lasted 20 agonizing minutes. When the bodies were being carried out, two of the girls turned out to still be alive, spluttering and coughing before being stabbed into silence. This was surely the origin of the legend that Anastasia, the youngest daughter, had survived, a story that inspired so many impostors to impersonate the murdered grand duchess.

The Romanovs’ remains were initially moved from their unmarked graves to a room in the bureau for forensic examination in Ekaterinburg.

Now that the deed was done, drunken assassins and Bolshevik thugs argued about who was to move the bodies and where. They mocked the deceased royals, pillaged their treasures, and then failed to conceal or bury them. Eventually the bodies were piled into a truck, which soon broke down. Out in the woods, where the Romanovs were stripped naked and their clothing burned, it turned out that the mineshafts that had been selected to receive the bodies were too shallow. In a panic Yurovsky improvised a new plan, leaving the bodies and rushing into Ekaterinburg for supplies.

He spent three days and three nights, sleeplessly driving back and forth to the woods, collecting sulfuric acid and gasoline to destroy the bodies, which he finally decided to bury in separate places to confuse anyone who might find them. He was determined to obey his orders that “no one must ever know what had happened” to the Romanov family. He pummeled the bodies with rifle butts, doused them with sulfuric acid, and burned them with gasoline. Finally, he buried what was left in two graves.

Yurovsky and his killers later wrote detailed, boastful, and confused accounts for the Cheka, a precursor to the KGB. The reports were sequestered in the archives and never publicized, but during the 1970s renewed interest in the murder site led Yuri Andropov, the chairman of the KGB (and future leader of the USSR), to recommend that the House of Special Purpose be bulldozed.

Appendix 2

The Mark Weber Report:
Communism’s Death Toll and the Jewish Role in Bolshevism

We’re relentlessly told that we must “never forget” the “Six Million” victims of Hitler and the “Nazis.” But we hear far less about the vastly greater number of [real] victims of Lenin and Stalin, and the grim legacy of Soviet Communism. Some 20 million people perished as victims of the Soviet regime, historians acknowledge. Jews played a decisive role in founding and promoting the egalitarian-universalist ideology of ((((((Marxism)))))), in developing the Marxist political movement, and in brutally establishing Bolshevik rule in Russia. With the notable exception of Lenin, who was one-quarter Jewish, most of the leading Marxists who took control of Russia in 1917-20 were Jews, including ((((((Trotsky)))))), Sverdlov, Zinoviev, Kamenev and Radek. The Bolshevik killing of Russia’s imperial family is symbolic of the tragic fate of Russia and, indeed, of the entire West.

What They Call “The Jewish Question” Is Actually The Diversity Question

Here on the Right, we are blighted by circular logic. We live in a Leftist time, so eventually our thoughts lead us to some un-Leftist conclusions, at which point we tend to reject our new knowledge because we know that it is socially unacceptable and for that reason pursuing it will win us nothing but ostracism.

In order to avoid that ostracism, many people choose conclusions which are somewhat taboo but still do not attack the main aspects of The Narrative™ of our time, which is the equality will lead us to Utopia through progress.

One of those conclusions happens to be The Jewish Question, which shows up like a drunk uncle at your birthday party and is often just as welcome. Many of us fear the “JQ” because it acts like a black hole, sucking in minds until their answer for every misfortune is to link it to the Eternal Jew instead of analyzing which of our actions brought this about.

Things that get a free pass through the Jewish Question: democracy, individualism, equality, class warfare, even diversity itself. In fact, the JQ seems to subsume any other issue in a need to attribute a worldwide conspiracy to Jews.

There may even be some truth in it. However, as we will see, partial truth is the enemy of whole truth. ((((((Ron Unz)))))) writes a provocative piece about the JQ and The Culture of Critique:

Jewish lives have infinite value, and non-Jewish ones none at all, which has obvious policy implications. For example, in a published article a prominent Israeli rabbi explained that if a Jew needed a liver, it would be perfectly fine, and indeed obligatory, to kill an innocent Gentile and take his. Perhaps we should not be too surprised that today Israel is widely regarded as one of the world centers of organ-trafficking.

…But Shahak notes that the numerous American rabbis who so eagerly worked with Martin Luther King, Jr. and other black Civil Rights leaders during the 1950s and 1960s strictly concealed their religious beliefs while denouncing American society for its cruel racism, presumably seeking to achieve a political quid pro quo beneficial to Jewish interests from America’s substantial black population.

…I think I’ve read here and there that some scholars believe that Hitler may have modeled certain aspects of his racially-focused National Socialist doctrine upon the Jewish example, which really makes perfect sense. After all, he saw that despite their small numbers Jews had gained enormous power in the Soviet Union, Weimar Germany, and numerous other countries throughout Europe, partly due to their extremely strong ethnic cohesion, and he probably reasoned that his own Germanic people, being far greater in numbers and historical achievements could do even better if they adopted similar practices.

…Furthermore, Jewish hostility toward non-Jews may have often served the interests of others, and helped determine the economic role they played, especially in European countries, with this factor having been obscured by widespread ignorance of the underlying religious tenets. As most of us know from our history books, political rulers with little sympathy for their subjects sometimes restrict military power to a relatively small group of well-rewarded mercenaries, often of foreign origins so that they will have little sympathy for the population they harshly repress. I strongly suspect that some of the most common traditional economic niches of European Jews, such as tax-farming and the arrenda estate-management system of Eastern Europe, should be best understood in a similar light, with Jews being more likely to extract every last penny of value from the peasants they controlled for the benefit of their local king or lords, and their notorious antipathy for all non-Jews ensuring that such behavior was minimally tempered by any human sympathy. Thus, we should not be surprised that Jews first entered England in the train of William the Conqueror, in order to help him and his victorious Norman lords effectively exploit the subjugated Anglo-Saxon population they now ruled.

…When a ruling elite has limited connection to the population it controls, benevolent behavior is far less likely to occur, and those problems are magnified when that elite has a long tradition of ruthlessly extractive behavior. Enormous numbers of Russians suffered and died in the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution, and given the overwhelmingly Jewish composition of the top leadership during much of that period, it is hardly surprising that “anti-Semitism” was deemed a capital offense. Kevin MacDonald may have been the one who coined the term “hostile elite,” and discussed the unfortunate consequences when a country comes under such control.

The original article contains much more information and I encourage you to read it. However, as Nietzsche says, “There are no truths, only interpretations.” I would like to offer an alternative interpretation that will dismay both JQ loyalists and defenders of the status quo alike.

  1. Every group acts in self-interest only. If we take one principle from Machiavellian thinking, this would be it. No matter how many treaties, trade agreements, and even military collaborations exist, each group is scheming for itself to be on top and everyone else to be beneath.
  2. Any minority group opposes the majority. Ever wonder why despite fifty years of conservative pandering, minorities do not vote Republican in any significant number? Any party associated with the founding of a multicultural nation is a rebuke to minorities and threatens their power. They will vote for whoever looks like them.
  3. Minority groups are used as mercenaries and captive voter blocs. As Plato notes, tyrants import foreigners because foreigners in a foreign land always vote against the majority interest, thus cementing the power of the tyrant. The same tyrants use those foreign groups as adversaries against the majority, creating instability that causes people to cling to strong power.
  4. Minority groups do the dirty work. When a tyrant wants to act against majority interests, he uses the intermediaries because they share his interests in suppressing the majority. This enables the tyrant to act invisibly, and take advantage of natural friction as a method of converting the population to the subservient.
  5. Minority groups face high selection pressure. For a foreign population among a different majority, two choices exist: assimilate and work against the majority, or resist and remain in poverty. The brightest naturally rise and dedicate their talents to subverting the majority.
  6. Minority groups will become internally conflicted. For a minority group, the only real future exists in ethnic self-determination, which requires they have their own lands. Those who diverge from this goal will find themselves forced into paradox, and will adopt increasingly neurotic beliefs.
  7. Minority groups rely on the State. In a country where one is foreign, government employment or indirect employment in a role that no one else does, constitutes the only source of income. This makes minority groups vessels of unpopular roles and enforcers of the will of the State against the population.

When diverse groups are placed into the same society, friction results from the competition for who defines the values and behaviors of the group. Only one group can come out on top, and this causes each group to attempt to damage the others while promoting itself.

The JQ behaviors described by the quoted article fit exactly into this pattern. Jews, as a high intelligence group, will be more successful in these behaviors than low-IQ third world groups, but the pattern will remain the same. Asian, African, mixed, or otherwise, every group will behave this way.

Over time, the corruption caused by diversity will extend to the group itself:

Furthermore, since the Talmud represents a massive accretion of published commentary built up over more than a millennium, even the most explicit mandates have sometimes been transformed into their opposites. As an example, Maimonides, one of the highest rabbinical authorities, absolutely prohibited rabbis from being paid for their religious teaching, declaring that any rabbi who received a salary was an evil robber condemned to everlasting torment; yet later rabbis eventually “reinterpreted” this statement to mean something entirely different, and today almost all rabbis collect salaries.

Without an enclosing nation to protect it, culture itself becomes a weapon of war in the diverse dystopia, and so slowly becomes corrupted. Over time, all meanings are converted from the inconvenient but future-directed to the convenient and past-directed. This guts the culture.

The JQ is actually the “diversity question,” which says that no matter which groups are involved, diversity destroys all groups. Perhaps we should blame the Jews for some things, but that obscures what we should really blame, which is diversity itself, an outpouring of egalitarianism to include different ethnic groups.

As the effects of the twentieth century manifest themselves fully, more people are seeing that “nice” ideas like diversity, equality, and democracy (D.E.D.) are in fact wholly destructive and will result in the death of their civilization. In our hearts and minds, diversity has died, taking the JQ with it.

Civility and Survival – Its Us or Them, No Mercy, Expect None Given, None Asked For.

By John Nobull

John Murray Cuddihy’s study of the ‘Ordeal of Civility‘ endured by Jews in a Gentile society highlights, by implication, a considerable weakness in ourselves. The fact is that our tendency to be civil has been systematically exploited to the point where it opens up a gap in our armour.

There is now an overwhelming body of evidence that hordes of aliens, many of them actively hostile, are rapidly replacing us in our own countries. Not even the blind can be ignorant of this, unless they have also lost their senses of hearing and smell. Since this is the most important problem of the century, or indeed of any century, it dictates one of three main attitudes: first, some degree of welcome for the immigrants, leading inevitably to support for miscegenation; second, a determination to resist the intrusion and reverse the tide; and third, an attempt to ignore the problem as far as possible. There is a rightist variant of this last attitude which runs: “Why struggle to maintain a rotten multiracial system? Why not just cultivate our gardens with a few friends?” Up to now, the resistance alternative has been the least effective, although even liberals and Jews are finding it increasingly difficult to ignore the problems associated with the presence of hostile aliens. It is very shocking for Jews to read about Jews being knifed or pushed under subway trains by New York blacks. Such treatment tends to modify their previous assumptions about race. There is no better definition of a conservative than “a liberal who has just been mugged.”

However, my words are addressed to the resisters, not to the conscious temporisers. We know that the alien influx can spell the end of us as a people. We should therefore regard the aliens as an occupying army, to be resisted and expelled. That is what we believe in theory, but what do we do in practice? I will tell you. We behave with more civility towards the aliens than either the liberals or the temporisers. Until recently, if I were asked a question by some coloured immigrant lost in a London street, I would give him exact directions and send him on his way. Only if he showed signs of active hostility would I fail to assist him. It is the same with most of my rightist friends. I notice that, since they are among the very few whites who do not look utterly demoralised, aliens make a beeline for them whenever they need help of any kind, even a handout, and they are seldom disappointed. They know that they can nearly always count on a sense of noblesse oblige which makes discourtesy a crime. So it is that companions of mine who, only a minute or so before, were drawing attention to the degenerate appearance of some biped in the street, would blossom into courtesy the moment they were asked for information by that same biped. I am sorry, but this won’t do. The only proper description of such behaviour is collaboration with the enemy.

Working-class resisters are more likely to be logical. They are not so much burdened with feelings of politeness. For example, parts of the American South have remained white to this day, simply and solely because there is no cooperation with racial outsiders or known liberals. I can also cite the example of a part of the United Kingdom (I would not reveal its whereabouts for the world) where working-class hostility has so far prevented the settlement of a single coloured. Alas, the main advantage of this goes to middle class people who continue to prattle about tolerance while benefiting every day of their lives — in terms of safety, aesthetics and sense of belonging — from the intolerance (or rather, determination to survive) of their working-class neighbours. I am no impassioned admirer of the British working class as a whole, but it still has some merits lacking in the middle classes:

How beastly the bourgeois is, Especially the male of the species.

Never mind the law. It doesn’t matter how many Race Relations Acts they impose on us, provided we can rebuild our sense of community to the point where we automatically reject the resident alien. It is quite impossible to impose such a law in a community where everyone covers for everyone else, in which traitors are ostracised, and the judiciary and the police are themselves under pressure from their fellow citizens. English law is a reflection of contemporary values. Well and good. We can change those values.

What the middle classes can do is learn from the Jews, who have perfected methods of racial survival and domination in multiracial societies. To begin with, they regard the interests of Jews as paramount over those of the host community. They deal with Gentiles, certainly, but they are opaque, letting in the light of information or any other benefit which comes from outside, while at the same time denying us any real glimpse into their attitudes and intentions. They calculate their behaviour towards Gentiles with a view to obtaining a maximum effect. As Shylock puts it: “I will buy with you, sell with you, talk with you, walk with you, and so following, but I will not eat with you, drink with you, nor pray with you. What news on the Rialto?” There is one fundamental difference between us and the Jews, however. They need us, whereas we don’t need them.

My own criterion of behaviour depends entirely upon the status of the individual concerned. For instance, I like to practise my Hindustani occasionally, so when a Hindi or Urdu speaker accosts me, I take the opportunity of practising his language, free, just as they do with us in English. Early in the conversation, I establish whether my interlocutor is a bona fide visitor or an immigrant. If the latter, I always drop him and leave him to draw the obvious inference. I have even gone so far as to point out to Indians that we never colonised India in the sense of settling there in any numbers, whereas they are colonising our overcrowded island in no uncertain manner. Yet several parts of India (Kashmir, Darjeeling, the Nilgiri Hills) would have been quite suitable for British settlement. Similarly, I am far more inclined to tolerate an obvious visitor from West Africa in his colourful native blanket than I am to tolerate some bloody-minded “Black Englishman.” And I would far rather meet an Orthodox Jew, ritually oiled and curled, than a nasty, pushy assimilated Jew. The Orthodox Jew may not be a lovely sight, but at least he is proclaiming his difference from us. He does not threaten our community from within.

(Based on an article in Instauration)

Read more at Jamie Kelso’s online Instauration archive

How Israel Armed the Drug Cartels

By Asa Winstanley

[] The approach of Israel’s intelligence agencies – as with many countries’ spy agencies – seems to be that the ends justify the means. The goals of the Israeli state are so self-evidently righteous, the thinking seemed to be, that funding them with off-the-books drugs money was par for the course.

Israel’s involvement in the South American drug trade is far better documented, however, if still not very widely known. Andrew and Leslie Cockburn’s book Dangerous Liaison contains a large amount of key reporting on the issue.

In the 1980s and early 1990s, the so-called “King of Cocaine” was Pablo Escobar, the leader of Colombia’s notorious Medellin Cartel. At the height of his career, Escobar’s cartel was responsible for some 80 per cent of the cocaine smuggled into the United States. One estimate put his net worth at $30 billion.

Books, films and TV shows have been made about Escobar, including the popular Netflix series Narcos. What is perhaps less well known is that the cartel’s military forces were trained and armed by Israel, whose Colonel Yair ((((((Klein)))))) trained and armed the militias founded and controlled by the Medellin Cartel’s military leader.

The Medellin Cartel’s military leader was Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha, who set up “self-defence” squadrons to protect his “ranchers” from left-wing guerrillas like the FARC, which had been taxing their cocaine exports. Rodriguez Gacha and his affiliated far-right death squads were responsible for some of the country’s worst campaigns of political terror, targeting judges, politicians and civilians alike for assassination.

According to the Columbian secret police, the Cockburns wrote in their book Dangerous Liaisons, Colonel ((((((Klein)))))) “had not only taught Rodriguez Gacha’s men how to make bombs (including one that exploded on board [a] commuter flight), he had also trained the killers of Luis Carlos Galan, a presidential candidate in 1989 who was often compared to John F. Kennedy and who almost certainly would have moved into the Presidential Palace. General Maza [of the secret police] also accused ((((((Klein)))))) of importing quantities of Israeli arms for the Medellin Cartel.”

These weapons were Israeli army surplus, including mortars, mines and explosives, infrared equipment, machine guns and medical supplies. The shipments also included five hundred assault rifles and 200,000 rounds of ammunition.

In 1989, after US and Columbian authorities had finally turned decisively against Escobar and his associates (under the rubric of the “War on Drugs”) they eventually cracked down on the the cartel. Rodriguez Gacha, along with his son and bodyguards, died in a last-stand shootout. When they lined up the bodies, the authorities found a cache of 178 Israeli “Galil” assault rifles.

Later on, when details of Colonel ((((((Klein)))))) and his training firm Spearhead came to light in the world’s press, Israeli politicians attempted to distance themselves, painting the group as something of a rogue operator. But that was far from the truth.

As the Cockburns document, the Israeli government would have had to have known about the arms shipment that ((((((Klein)))))) and his firm facilitated to the right-wing death squads and drugs cartels. One high ranking Colombian official declared “unequivocally” that “officials of the Israeli government knew and consented to the sale of the arms shipment to Colombia, up to the point of expediting a vessel to complete the first step of the route.”

An Israeli defence ministry spokesperson said later that the transaction via a front company to ship the weapons to Escobar’s death squads was carried out “under all the usual procedures at the Defence Department” even though state owned Israel Military Industries shipped the guns in a sealed container marked “machine parts” in a clear attempt to cover their tracks.

After ((((((Klein))))))’s exposure, when Israeli politicians began to denounce him in public, he was adamant that everything that he had done, he had done with the permission of the Israeli government. An Israeli investigation of ((((((Klein)))))) and his company revealed a 1986 document signed by the Defence Minister (and later Nobel Peace Prize winner) ((((((Yitzhak Rabin)))))), giving Spearhead permission for “the export of military know-how and defence equipment.”

The same ((((((Rabin)))))), after ((((((Klein))))))’s exposure, attempted to distance Israel from Spearhead, claiming that its personnel were “mercenaries”, as if they had been completely independent, which was not the case. They were instead part of an expendable front organisation, both for the Israeli government and for its patrons in Washington DC.

Speaking to the Cockburns, ((((((Klein)))))) made it clear that Zvi Reuter, then the head of “Sibat”, the Israeli defence ministry’s arms industry liaison department, “was duly informed of every move they made.”

((((((Klein)))))), somewhat understandably, became rather disillusioned with this realpolitik approach of his handlers. He summed it up frankly: “It’s so hypocritical. Spearhead was the only organisation that served American interests, because it was fighting the Communist guerrillas, which were such a threat to the interests of the Americans. Now they turn around and say that cocaine is the biggest threat, so they turned against Spearhead. It just shows that we no longer serve American interests and as a result, we were thrown to the side and persecuted.” (Emphasis added.)

Israeli journalist Nahum Barnea defended ((((((Klein)))))) in Yedioth Ahronoth, on the basis that when he fought in Lebanon, Israel had done similar things there, since its right-wing Phalangist allies were active participants in the Lebanese drug trade. “The truth is that Yair ((((((Klein)))))) and myself have already gone to war in the service of the drug cartel once,” he wrote. “It happened seven years ago in the Lebanon war… what is the moral difference?”

Decades later, ((((((Klein)))))) was arrested in Russia after a Colombian court had convicted him in absentia of training the death squads. An Interpol warrant had been put out for his arrest. Russia had at first agreed to deport him to Colombia, but ended up making a deal with Israel to exchange him for a Russian prisoner. As far as is known, Yair ((((((Klein)))))) (now promoted to Lieutenant-Colonel) still walks free in Israel.

This article originally appeared on Middle East Monitor.

White Nations are a Jewish Moral Emergency

According to the jews, White homelands and only White homelands need to be forcibly diversified with an endless influx of the worst, most primitive and hostile sewage-colored semi-humans. Despite the fact that Whites today make up less than 9% of the world population, conniving kosher criminals tell us that our native lands must be overrun with violent invasive species who have senselessly ruined their own lands and now opportunistically are destroying ours. As common as the mud they resemble, these incompatible genetic aliens are being used as biological weapons by the jews to ruin what were once prosperous White countries. The jews cannot hide their malicious glee as they cynically tell us to celebrate the fact that we are quickly becoming minorities in our own homelands. Rat-faced creatures, shrill and sanctimonious, screech that any common-sense actions that would give White nations even a slight chance at a future are a “moral emergency.”

The jews project their heinous crimes upon their victims. No matter how nonsensical the guilty jewish accusations are, there is no shortage of twisted and insane rabbinical logic offered as a justification, or when that fails as a distraction. For example, the jews accuse Whites of being some kind of privileged ruling class despite the glaringly obvious fact that Whites should be the ruling class in their own nations. This is not so-called privilege, but a basic criteria if a White nation is to exist in any meaningful way; a White nation simply cannot persist if ruled by non-Whites. The jews also claim themselves to be victims, but they can never proffer the crime which allegedly reduced them to that status. They may whine about supposed persecution, but they haven’t even faced expulsion from a White nation in nearly 70 years. The kosher con-men are quick to browbeat us with the holohoax, but are equally quick to use their insidious control over of our governments to criminalize any honest debate about whether the holohoax even happened (it didn’t). But what of jewish privilege? Despite being less than 3% of the US population, the jews occupy 33% of the US Supreme Court seats, 10% of the US Senate, and over 7% of the House of Representatives; not to mention the obscene over-representation of jews in controlling positions of our mass media, technology, and educational institutions. Pay no attention to the facts, goyim. Go back to working your dead-end job that increasingly can’t even pay for the most basic necessities of life. Keep believing that the jews are simply the most powerful, wealthy, outspoken, and unaccountable supposed “victims” in all of history. Definitely don’t notice that the nation-wrecking jews have seemingly endless time and money with which to organize and support the ongoing invasion of our homelands.

From Berkeley to San Francisco to San Diego, Bay Area Jews this past week joined hundreds of thousands of demonstrators at more than 700 rallies across the country to oppose the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” immigration policies, which includes holding thousands of children in detention centers. Protests were held in more than 30 cities and towns across the Bay Area.”

The most mild and ineffectual suggestion that an ostensibly White nation should perhaps allow in billions of dangerous, moronic, and civilizationally incompatible savages at a slightly slower rate is met with the predictable jewish wailing and garment-rending. Don’t forget the last time our disgusting ZOG tried to prey on our empathy with the Mestizo “children” who were going to get DACA (deferred action for childhood arrivals), “children” meant people who were up to 38 years old.  Nobody ever asks how these Bay Area jews, living in the most expensive place in the entire USSA, are able to enjoy the luxury of being able to jet-set around the country to aid and abet foreign invasion.

During her [Rabbi ((((((Sydney Mintz))))))’s] remarks, she sounded a shofar and told the crowd she was “declaring a state of moral emergency.”

If your country is so thoroughly infested with the enemy within that you can hear the sound of a shofar, followed by duplicitous semitic bleating, you’re facing a true state of moral emergency.

We stand to abolish ICE,” she said, referring to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency responsible for immigration raids taking place across the country. “We invite you not just to turn red states blue, but turn states that are insane, humane.”

The jewish plan for what remains of America, and all White nations, laid bare. There is no appeasing the jew, the enemy within that will stop at nothing until every last White life is violently killed by the teeming hordes of dangerously idiotic living fossils, or extinguished by miscegenation with the mud-world genetic cesspool. The mere suggestion of defending the borders of an ostensibly White country is enough to send the jews into a paroxysm of hypocritical invective. I’m sure Rabbi Mintz has plenty of verbal chicanery ready to explain why she’s adamantly in favor of the USSA meekly surrendering its borders to incompatible alien invaders, but she is conspicuously silent on Israel’s incredibly strict and well-funded border police.

Another Bay Area resident in San Diego was Sue Reinhold of Berkeley, who participated in civil disobedience organized by the Latino rights group Mijente and cosponsored by some Jewish groups including Bend the Arc (for which Reinhold and Mintz serve as board members) and the rabbinic social justice group T’ruah and social action group Bend the Arc [sic].”

The insidious jewish infestation of a once prosperous White country makes itself known as kosher activist groups spring up like so many poisonous mushrooms. The jewish control of our government and our money supply allow them to parasitically drain the wealth produced by our productive work, and use it to fund an army of lay-about jews whose sole assignment from the Sanhedrin is to foment discord and instability in White nations, and to corrupt the uniquely White characteristics of compassion and altruism into weapons used against us. If there was any doubt about how the jews have realized their nefarious talmudic schemes in the USSA, look no further than the innumerable jewish “social justice” and “social action” groups that have a seemingly unending supply of money and time to push their rabidly anti-White agenda. It was boasted of so clearly in The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion:

The second secret requisite for the success of our [jewish] government is comprised in the following: To multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will fail to understand one another. This measure will also serve us [the jews] in another way, namely, to sow discord in all parties, to dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative which might in any degree hinder our affair.” – Protocol No. 5

“ews are morally responsible to be the light unto the nations,” [Rachel Biale, board member of Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay] said. “That’s what it says in our texts. It really means leading the way by example as role models, and engaging people in conversations.”

In the deranged mind of the jew, they are the light of the world and “g*d’s chosen people.” In reality they are demons in human form, as is clear from the examples and role models they provide for all the world to see. How have the jews led by example, being the pretentious “light unto nations” they believe themselves to be? Circumcision, animal torture, animal torture again, usury and debt-slavery economies, brutality, pornography, sex trafficking and child rape, encouraging and funding the non-White invasion of White homelands, and ritual murder often of children.

The jews ingratiate themselves into White societies by pretending to be victims, even though such kosher claims are nothing more than wild self-serving fantasies. It is the jews who are the predators and Whites who are their victims; though in typical semitic fashion all their kosher crimes are projected onto us. The jews are our implacable racial enemies, and they infiltrate our nations in order to destroy them from within through economic ruination, hedonism, and perversion. Once these internal subversions have eroded the cultural, moral, and economic ties of a White country, the jews work remorselessly to deploy an endless supply of impulsive, easily-agitated, brown-skinned nightmare creatures who will violently prey upon the demoralized White population. Meanwhile, the jews relentlessly promote miscegenation in the hopes that, through a combination of brutal savagery and dysgenics, the White race will go extinct. There is no place for jews in a White society that wants to survive. We face a terrible, existential danger of living in countries that have not just been subverted, but are completely controlled by jews. We must expose the jews for what they are: a race of predators and a nation unto themselves who have a rabid, unquenchable hatred of Whites. We must stop the jewish-orchestrated White genocide.

Source article: