Clintons Self-Destruct In Glorious Corruption Scandal

After decades of putting up with these people, who were the poster children of the 1968 revolution as they gained power in the early 1990s, America may finally be free of the Clintons as the Uranium One scandal, ignored by the media, finally detonates in their faces.

The Clintons represented 1968 as it wanted to see itself: not a wild bacchanal of people attempting to avoid the sterile 1950s world by creating an even more selfish and manipulative one, but as an expression of “freedom” and “rights” — because what else is acceptable to express in a democracy? — guided by people who turned out to look relatively normal, suburban and middle class.

We were all creeped out by Bill. It was not that he had an affair in office, as surely he was not the first president to do so, but that he picked a Generation X kid who was obviously overweight and thus underconfident. When you are president, you cheat on your wife with supermodels. You do not use the vulnerable, essentially victimizing them. Yet the Left was silent on that issue.

We also felt some reservations about The Clinton Foundation, which seemed like the classic scam where the politician says he cannot help you, but if you make a donation to his brother, he will reconsider your case. It is just third-world corruption made genteel in appearance, but what else would we expect from the 1968ers, who made selfishness and lust into political values?

Then there were clear abuses of power like Benghazi, where either through incompetence or malignant neglect, Hillary Clinton left Americans in the field to die. That echoed the approach Bill Clinton had taken in Somalia, where he stranded American servicemen by refusing to give them the support they needed. For the Clintons, the rest of us are a means-to-the-end of the Clintons’ wealth, power and influence.

Clearly there were signs of Clinton fatigue in this last election cycle. Younger voters preferred Bernie Sanders because he simply admitted that the Democratic platform was socialism and was honest about it, where Hillary Clinton chose a feminist-based approach which attempted to incorporate other minorities as a series of footnotes. But she bullied her way in there, probably by threatening to release her files on the other Democratic operatives, who all appear to be corrupt as well.

We should face the fact that any ideology which promises Utopian absolutes is a license to steal. No one honest will claim to be able to “solve” poverty, for example, or end racial tension, since humans disliking other groups has been a cornerstone of human behavior since the dawn of time. Nor does anyone sane talk about equality as anything but equality of birth, which is what the founding fathers referred to, as a means of correcting the then already-prevalent idea that government should create equality. The founders argued instead that nature/God/gods created equality and rights, and that government should be restricted from attempting to alter that condition. No one sane talks about spreading democracy to a world that clearly does not want it. But insanity sells because it is easier than sanity and makes us have warm feelings, and for most people, when the group has warm feelings, they feel personally safe. Time after time, they elect charlatans who then steal everything they can.

And the Clintons, it seems, were more successful than most, ending up many times multimillionaires through the power they found in office.

But now, it seems, a life of crime has caught up with them:

On Tuesday, two House investigative committees announced they would start looking into the questionable Uranium One deal that Clinton approved while serving as the nation’s top diplomat — a deal that delivered effective control of 20% of the U.S.’ uranium mining assets to Russia’s state-owned Rosatom, and led to millions of dollars in “donations” to the family Clinton Foundation.

…Under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, the State Department has processed some 32,000 pages of Hillary Clinton’s emails but, The Daily Caller reports, has “released a small fraction of those.” There are still some 40,000 other pages to be “processed,” which could take years.

…The FBI ultimately arrested and deported a 10-person Russian spy ring, including a “Cynthia Murphy” who, in 2010, had edged perilously close to Hillary’s State Department circles through a job she held with a leading Democratic financier.

Unlike the Trump dossier which the DNC purchased to use as a weapon in the 2016 presidential campaign, this shows us actual evidence with connections on both sides. If Russia intervened in the American election, and benefited Donald J. Trump, that is not evidence of corruption unless we can show the quid-pro-quo that is the hallmark of this kind of crime, essentially a trading of favors for money. But with the Clintons, we now have several instances of this.

It is only fitting that the hippies who brought us the horrors of 1968 go out in a blaze of corruption, perversion, incompetence and degradation as the Clintons are. There is a lesson here: whoever promises a world without consequences, and tells us that the obvious rules of reality do not exist, is not a saviour but a Satan, come to deceive us and take everything we have.

Overpopulation & Hyperimmigration

by Peter Goodchild

Overpopulation

Mass immigration is a story that has two aspects: (1) ecological and (2) political. The “ecological” and the “political” are closely related elements of systemic collapse, “the decline of the West.”

By “ecological aspect” I mean that human overpopulation is always destructive to the planet Earth, and that migration across borders merely shifts the problem of overpopulation from one country to another. By “political aspect” I mean that, in spite of all the fraudulent appeals to humanitarianism and other pseudo-values, the unfortunate reality is that hordes of impoverished and uneducated barbarians will eventually be profitable for the capitalists who are creating a new Utopia. That is why every politician of every party runs after “the ethnic vote” like a dog after a car. It is quite obvious, though, that many “refugees” are actually robbers and rapists, and that the coming Utopia could bear a close resemblance to the world of the Middle Ages, with an extremely wealthy elite class dominating a lower class that is kept permanently at an almost subhuman level of development. The final Utopia will be quite a Dystopia.

The following remarks focus largely on the “ecological” aspect, but that aspect overlaps seamlessly with the “political.” Canada is a perfect example of such an overlap. The fact that most of Canada is uninhabitable rock leads to the “ecological” fact that the enormous growth of Canada’s population will have disastrous effects on the habitability of the land. In reality, the habitable part of Canada, roughly speaking, is a strip of land, 150 km wide, running along the southern border, with a population density roughly equal to that of most other industrialized countries. Canada is not “vacant land” looking for buyers. At the same time, we must consider the “political” fact that mass immigration pushes out some of those troublesome white people who refuse to be converted to the new “ism” — “multiculturalism.”

The world’s population has risen from about 1.7 billion in 1900 to 2.5 in 1950, and is now well over 7 billion. Most of this increase, of course, has been in “developing” countries, suggesting that the term “developing” is rather misleading: a combination of environmental degradation and rapid population growth often makes “development” impossible (Catton, 1982; Kaplan, 2001). It has been said that as fossil-fuel production declines the global population must drop to far below its present size. In terms of agriculture alone we would not be able to accommodate even the present number of people as fossil fuels become scarce, with manual labour therefore replacing automation, and without the hydrocarbon-based fertilizers and pesticides that make modern yields triple those of earlier times (Pimentel & Hall, 1984). Even then we have not factored in war, epidemics, and other aspects of social breakdown.

Overpopulation is the fundamental cause of systemic collapse (Catton, 1982). All of the flash-in-the-pan ideas that are presented as solutions to modern dilemmas — solar power, biofuels, hybrid cars, desalination, permaculture, enormous dams — have value only as desperate attempts to solve an underlying problem that has never been addressed in a more direct manner.

American foreign aid has always included only trivial amounts for family planning (Spiedel, Sinding, Gillespie, Maguire, & Neuse, 2009, January). It would seem that the most powerful country in the world has done very little to solve the biggest problem in the world. However, there is the frightful possibility that one reason why the US government now gives so little aid to some countries is that the problem of overpopulation is regarded as hopeless, and that any assistance would be just money down the drain (Kaplan, 2001).

The problem of overpopulation is worsened by the fact that there are so many people busy either transmitting or receiving disinformation about the subject (Kolankiewicz & Beck, 2001, April). For left-wingers, discussion of high population is seen as persecution of the world’s poor. For rightwingers, high population is seen as providing more buyers, more workers, and more investors. For politicians, more people means more votes. For many religious groups, high population reflects God’s command to go forth and multiply. Corporate funding of several major environmentalist groups has also done quite a job of disconnecting them from discussion of population: they may be “green” but they are no longer “clean.”

Overpopulation can always be passed off as somebody else’s problem. It is the fundamental case of what Garrett Hardin calls “the tragedy of the commons” (1968, 1995): although an oversize family may have a vague suspicion that the world will suffer slightly from that fecundity, no family wants to lose out by being the first to back down. Without a central governing body that is both strong and honest, however, the evasion is perpetual, and it is that very lack of strength and honesty that makes traditional democracy an anachronism to some extent.

The Chinese have made quite an effort at dealing with excess population growth, but even they have not been very successful. Since 1953, the year of the first proper Chinese census and approximately the start of concerns with excessive fertility, the population has gone from 583 million to over 1.4 billion. For that matter, since the official starting of the one-child campaign in 1979, the population has grown by over 300 million (Riley, 2004, June); in other words, China’s increase is equal to the entire population of the US.

Overpopulation, however, is a problem that occurs not only in poor countries. The evidence is also clear in the US:

Mounting traffic congestion; endless disruptive road construction; spreading smog; worsening water pollution and tightening water supplies; disappearing wildlife habitats, farmland, and open spaces; overcrowded schools; overused parks and outdoor recreation facilities; the end of small-town life in communities that until recently had been beyond the city; the impending merging together of separate, unwieldy metropolitan areas into vast megalopolitan miasmas; and the overall deterioration in quality of life and the increasing social tensions of urban dwellers reflected in such phenomena as gated communities and road rage (Kolankiewicz & Beck, 2001, April).

It is only in the hinterlands, away from the cities, that the opposite occurs: depopulation and “rural flight.” The causes of depopulation are many, but they begin with the industrialization of agriculture and the growth of enormous corporate farms, “agri-business.” As the farming population is impoverished and reduced, the peripheral economy also shrinks, and crime and other social problems are the result. Nevertheless, the urban population of a country increasingly outweighs the rural. Worldwide, slightly more than half the human population now lives in urban areas, but these places will be death traps as resources disappear.

Actually, “overpopulation” tends to be a euphemism for “over-immigration,” and again we return to the “political.” Every country in the world is already well populated, in most cases quite overpopulated. The conception of some sort of land that is lying empty, waiting for the blessing of new arrivals, is a fiction invented by dishonest politicians. Family planning organizations sometimes inadvertently help to propagate this myth by euphemism, excessive caution in phraseology, and an unwillingness to risk antagonism. Although “family planning” is an admirable goal, what such organizations rarely state is that it is not where a child is born that really matters, demographically and economically, but where that person is eventually living — not the moment of birth, but the decades between birth and death, during which time that person will be consuming the world’s resources, along with more than 7 billion other people doing the same. Emigration and immigration, transferring the problem of overcrowding from one country to another, do no good at all; if anything, they simply perpetuate the illusion that birth control is unnecessary.

Discussion of overpopulation, however, is a great taboo. Politicians will rarely touch the issue. The many documents on population published by the United Nations merely sidestep the issue by discussing how to cater to large populations, in spite of the fact that such catering is part of the problem, not part of the solution.

To speak against overpopulation is an exercise in futility. How likely is it that the required massive change in human thinking will ever take place? Even in “developed” countries, to broach the topic of overpopulation is often to invite charges of racism and elitism. And there seems something both naïve and presumptuous in the common belief that people in poor countries are just waiting to be enlightened to “modern” ideals. On the contrary, the inhabitants of poor countries are often quite determined to hang on to their present systems of politics and religion, no matter how archaic and oppressive those systems may seem to outsiders, and would prefer that any proselytizing go in the opposite direction.

References

The Feminist, Liberals And Hollywood Are All Collapsing Now

Best comments:

I feel a great disturbance in the force. It’s as though a billion Feminists realized they lost control of their man-slaves and shrieked at once, and then shrieked some more, and then shrieked some more, and then shrieked some more and I mean it’s honestly kind of impressive that they haven’t lost their voices yet, like, what the fuck, how are they still going? Do they even need to breathe? Aren’t they supposed to be ‘suddenly silenced’ or something?

They’re coming at this sex robot issue all wrong. But then again what do you expect from a bunch of cucks? It’s not like they will ever lay the blame at women’s feet. They will never ask “why would a man choose a lifeless doll over a flesh and blood woman and not the strawman “misogyny” argument”. Because then they’d have to realize how women royally fucked themselves out of the market.

Necessity is the mother of all invention. So who created the environment that made sex dolls necessary? You know the answer, cucks. Don’t worry, Muhammed will take good care of your wife. She’ll remember that “diversity is our strength” when she’s being stoned to death for being a whore.

How many women do more than just lay there during sex? Men are already used to that. It’s not like we have to become accustomed to it. Most women are heartless, unfeeling, uncaring bitches. Men are already used to that. It’s not like we have to become accustomed to it. How many women get their panties all in a knot wedged up their open trench pussies over having to contribute to the house hold chores and flatly refuse to lift a finger? Men are already used to that. It’s not like we have to become accustomed to it. How many women are useless parasites in the relationship and don’t contribute anything to either the relationship or the house hold? Men are already used to that. It’s not like we have to become accustomed to it. Sex dolls don’t whine, bitch, moan, throw temper tantrums and divorce rape you. I fail to see the draw back to a sex doll.

Never forget feminist apologist females need the implied threat of an entire army to get ONE man to submit to her worldview. Any ideology that requires him to fund a gun that’s pointed toward him is to be rejected by default.

My Thoughts on the Happenings

America is white supremacy, cause America is a white nation, always was, and will be again soon.

Diversity creates Adversity. The liberal establishment is in collapse: hate-obsessing on something that contradicts their own self-reverential worldview, condemning them to perpetual distraction. The result is the inevitable crashing and burning. liberals have been driving drunk while texting for generations. Swerving into the wrong lane over and over, until reality finally catches up to them and they crashed into oncoming traffic head on, those in the drivers seat are killed instantly as the vehicle is crushed, and those in the back are dazed and confused, wondering what happened. The few survivors crawl out of the clown car screaming at the innocent people they’ve harmed. After all, it’s never their fault, you see, it’s everyone else’s for daring to get in their way.

Lots of drama and moral preening, then collapse when details and commitment matter, when the wall of reality and the natural order finally sets in and the party is over. The ultimate example of distracted Democrats’ fixation on completely the wrong thing leading to the disaster that is the left today is the debacle of the Hillary Clinton race for the presidency.

Perhaps they were relying on the stupidity of the American voter, their words not mine, but that was the wrong equation. In the various autopsies of that miserable campaign, Clinton s failure comes down to fixation on herself and entitlement. The presumption was the election was hers, which is typical in self-entitled feminist in America and most women in general.

Overconfident and sure of her strategy, she took her base for granted and waltzing to the inauguration, falling down a few times in her drunkenness, never noticing the ten flights of stairs just in front of her. For the entire campaign season, she was told there was only one name on the card in the winner’s envelope, and it was hers. Until it wasn’t. Just like all other leftist, they think they know everything, until they don’t.

Its us or them, everyone see’s what is coming.

The left have no idea what is coming for them. Ken Roth, the director of Human Rights Watch, made the point a bit more bluntly in a foreword to the rights group’s own annual World Report, titled “Demagogues Threaten Human Rights.”

“Certain politicians are flourishing and even gaining power by portraying rights as protecting only the terrorist suspect or the asylum seeker at the expense of the safety, economic welfare, and cultural preferences of the presumed majority,” wrote Roth. “They scapegoat refugees, immigrant communities, and minorities. Truth is a frequent casualty. Nativism, xenophobia, racism, and Islamophobia are on the rise.”

“The rising tide of populism in the name of a perceived majority has paralleled a new infatuation with strongman rule that was apparent particularly prominently during the US presidential election campaign,” wrote Roth. “If all that matters are the declared interests of the majority, the thinking seems to go, why not embrace the autocrat who shows no qualms about asserting his ‘majoritarian’ vision—self-serving as it may be—and subjugating those who disagree.”

What these leftist fail to understand, is that a nation is its people and the sacred bond to the soil, the land in which that nation sits, the resources, cities and infrastructure which allow a people to grow and prosper. And when outside groups invades that sacred territory, steal the birthright of its inhabitants, destroy its cities and demand to be placated, feed, housed, all at the expense of the traditional majority, you cannot expect any other result, other than ethnic nationalism. The idea that whites would not awaken to the threat from non-whites, trace back the cause of this threat, the policies and laws enacted by the enemy within, and then become angry and take back what is rightfully theirs by birth alone, which is not only natural but in alignment with human history, too think otherwise, is insanity, delusional, totally out of step with observable reality.

Traitors only deserve death.

It will not be a peacefully transition, and the more the leftist, and their pets resist, the more hell there will be to pay.

The fraying of the liberal order will have real geopolitical effects. “The next five years will see rising tensions within and between countries,” predicts the National Intelligence Council, a unit of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence — that is, an American government agency. Of course, parasites do not like the host resisting its parasitism, that is to be expected. We on the right, embrace this struggle, this will be the final war for humanity, and we shall lay claim to all that is, and lay waste to those who sought our extermination.

The study paints a dark picture of future wars:

“Warring will be less and less confined to the battlefield, and more aimed at disrupting societies. … Noncombatants will be increasingly targeted, sometimes to pit ethnic, religious, and political groups against one another to disrupt societal cooperation and coexistence within states. Such strategies suggest a trend toward increasingly costly, but less decisive conflicts.”

I believe it will be far worse than anything the leftist mind can imagine.

The left believed that they could create vast zone of peace and prosperity and it would spread, and any lingering political disagreements would be easily addressed within the framework of a liberal order. They ignored the peoples need for identity, culture and heritage.

We are all witnessing the fall of the west, the disintegration of its societies and social fabric, the rise in ethnic warfare, and when some groups in these liberal societies were in fact harmed by these developments, a degree of backlash is not only inevitable, but should have been expected. It didn’t help that elites in many liberal countries made some critical blunders, including the creation of the euro, the invasion of Iraq, the misguided attempt to nation-build in Afghanistan, and the 2008 financial crisis. Combined with the generations long anti-white policies, flooding white nations and only white nations with non-whites, then forcing integration while at the same time attacking white populations through the media and education system, it was only a matter of time, somethings got to give. These and other mistakes helped undermine the legitimacy of the post-Cold War order, opening the door to illiberal forces, and left white segments of societies around the world, open to our message, to the truth of the cultural Marxist ideology, and those that work towards white genocide.

Real America is awake, and it wants its nation back.

As events in Iraq, Afghanistan, and several other places demonstrate, writing a constitution, forming political parties, and holding “free and fair” elections won’t produce a genuinely liberal nation unless individuals and groups in society also embrace the key liberal i.e. WHITE norms as well. This sort of cultural and normative commitment cannot be developed overnight or injected from outside, and certainly not with drones, special forces, and other instruments of violence. Liberalism, ONLY works in an all white nation, a homogeneous nation, with a common heritage, in which the traditional stock traversed the age of enlightenment by their own doing, and not be force.

It is also abundantly clear that post-Cold War liberals underestimated the role of nationalism and other forms of local identity, including sectarianism, ethnicity, tribal bonds. In their effort to strip whites of their national identity, and deny us a right to exist, they left the only choice open to whites in a world that hates them, ethnic nationalism, white identity, racial rights.

Deep down, I think this explains why so many people in the United States and in Europe are desperate to keep Uncle Sam fully engaged in Europe. It’s not so much the fear of a declining but assertive Russia; it’s their fear of Europe itself. Liberals and Marxist want Europe to remain peaceful, tolerant, democratic and embedded within the EU framework, deep down, they don’t trust the Europeans to manage this situation, and they fear it will all go south if the “American pacifier” is removed. For all of liberalism’s supposed virtues, at the end of the day its defenders cannot shake the suspicion that its European version is so delicate that it requires indefinite American support, and in this the left is deadly right, all that stands in the way of a new white nationalistic fever to sweep across our ancient homeland, is the removal of America from the worlds stage, and a return to the natural order is all but guaranteed.

The United States does not have infinite resources, wealth or manpower and we no longer have a limitless willingness to subsidize other wealthy states’ defenses, we are in a state of decline, thanks to diversity and multiculturalism, thanks to the jews and the ethnic tension which is growing daily, America will take a step back, put America first, defend its founding stock, and replenish the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants, Marxist, parasites, and patriots.

 

The Fall of YouTube

Project Veritas’ latest installment in the American Pravda series takes aim at The New York Times, the supposed “paper of record.” In the first part of this series, Nicholas Dudich, Audience Strategy Editor for the Times’ extensive video library speaks candidly about how his left political bias influences his editorial judgement and reveals an unusual connection to former FBI Director James Comey, and a strange association with domestic terror group Antifa.

Image result for fall of youtube

 

Intolerable, Flagrant Injustice for Whites in America

Jose Ismael Torres and Kayla Rae Norton react to their decades-long prison sentences for being White in modern America

by David Sims

THIS YEAR (2017) the Marxist left made a substantial grab for heightened reach and power. Charlottesville was part of it. Another part of it was this year’s conviction of Kayla Rae Norton and Jose Ismael Torres in Georgia. These two Whites are guilty of nothing more than creating a public disturbance (if that), yet they got sentenced to prison terms more appropriate to aggravated manslaughter or second-degree murder.

The original aggression at a Black kid’s birthday party was committed by some of the Blacks who attended it, when they threw rocks at the traveling group of Confederate Pride demonstrators.

Reverse the situation, put the Whites where the Blacks were, and put the Blacks where the Whites were, and once again the Whites will be assigned all of the blame and put into prison for decade-plus terms.

Here are some comments I’ve seen on the convictions of Norton and Torres:

Funny how Latahusha Nedd, the African-American female who held a gun up to a camera and threatened to shoot White people and police in the exact same area, is already out of prison and posting on Facebook, however if you’re White and wave a Confederate flag, you’d better be prepared to do 35 to life. That’s what they call justice in America in 2017.

Looks like the media left out the part where the Blacks threw rocks at one of the trucks as it passed, causing him to hit a curb, starting the whole confrontation.

I doubt that the Latahusha Nedd precedent and the actual causes of the Black-White birthday party confrontation were unknown to the court. Rather, it’s more like considerations of fairness in the application of the laws are now considered “counter-productive” by the left and by those who seek to ingratiate themselves with the left (like certain judges).

Anti-Whites are using videos of the sentencing hearing to mock Norton and Torres most spitefully. Apparently, Norton and Torres broke down in tears when they heard how much time in prison they had received. A White mother and father will not be able to raise their three children, who must now grow up without them. And the White family’s trouble began when Black people threw rocks at their vehicles, and they stopped to complain about it.

Here’s a quote from some early press coverage of the incident:

Bush said his group was leaving a nearby event when they drove by Alford’s home and the partygoers started yelling at the trucks in front of him. They then threw rocks at his vehicle, he said. Bush said he fishtailed while trying to drive away, then ran over a median and got a flat tire. When he pulled into a nearby driveway, the partygoers swarmed and made threats, and his friends backed him up, he said. “Basically about eight of us had to hold 15 to 20 of them back,” Bush said, admitting that a specific racial slur was likely used by members of his group. Someone called 911 and police eventually arrived to separate the factions. Authorities said neither side claimed anything physical took place, and no injuries were reported. They are now reviewing videos to see if any criminal activity occurred.

There was a video on YouTube showing the incident, but apparently a leftist reported it and had it censored.

The anti-White “Young Turks” television channel said of the incident (followed by my response): “So what they did is they drove through a Black neighborhood as a Black child was having a birthday party. And they started making threats toward the party-goers.”

Leftist Young Turk, you left out an important detail. As the flag-waving trucks entered the neighborhood, the Blacks saw the Confederate flags, decided that they didn’t approve of the display of Confederate pride, and began throwing rocks at the trucks. One of the trucks swerved to avoid a rock and ran into a median, where something concealed in the grass caused the truck to have a flat tire. The convoy stopped in order to let the driver of the truck with the flat tire change the tire. As this was going on, Blacks from the party swarmed the truck and caused a confrontation. That’s when the hard words were spoken, undoubtedly on both sides.

The mainstream media did with this event what it usually does — what it did with George Zimmerman, what it did with its hoaxing regarding Charlottesville: it lied, it abused emphasis, it omitted important details, it made deceptive use of camera angles, lines-of-sight, timing, and selective “eyewitness” interviews to give the public a false impression.

And you, Young Turks, are part of this deception. Kayla Rae Norton and Jose Ismael Torres are political prisoners convicted of trumped-up charges and given a show-trial with a conclusion pre-determined by Political Correctness. They are guilty of nothing more than creating a public disturbance, if that, and their sentences are more suited to persons convicted of aggravated manslaughter or second-degree murder.

If this happens again, except with Whites where the Blacks were, and Blacks where the Whites were, then once again the Whites will be assigned all of the blame and will be given decade-plus prison sentences. And the reason will once again be Political Correctness. [That is, this sort of thing will happen until we build a new society for ourselves alone, which is exactly what we must do. — Ed.]

* * *

Domestic Terrorists Vandalize Christopher Columbus Statues Across America

Lee Rogers
Daily Stormer
October 10, 2017

Domestic terrorists celebrated Columbus Day by vandalizing statues of Christopher Columbus.

Several anti-fascist terrorist groups were openly stating that they had plans to vandalize statues of Christopher Columbus on Columbus Day.  Based on the fact that Columbus statues were vandalized across America, the people associated with these domestic terrorist groups need to be rounded up and arrested.

Here’s just some of the vandalism that occurred.

RT:

Statues of Christopher Columbus, thanks to whom Europeans discovered and colonized the Americas, were vandalized in Illinois, Rhode Island and in three cities in Connecticut on the national holiday dedicated to his memory.

The Columbus statue in Chicago’s Arrigo Park was splattered with red paint, and words “mass murderer” and “decolonise” were spray-painted on the sidewalk next to the monument.

This is a continuation of the Jewish Communist war against White Europeans. In certain parts of the country, municipalities have already changed Columbus Day into Indigenous Peoples Day.

NY Post:

Is it time to say arrivederci to Christopher Columbus?

A movement to abolish Columbus Day and replace it with Indigenous Peoples Day has gained momentum in some parts of the US, with Los Angeles in August becoming the biggest city yet to decide to stop honoring the Italian explorer and instead recognize victims of colonialism.

Austin, Texas, followed suit Thursday. It joined cities including San Francisco, Seattle and Denver, which had previously booted Columbus in favor of Indigenous Peoples Day.

But the gesture to recognize indigenous people rather than the man who opened the Americas to European domination also has prompted howls of outrage from some Italian-Americans, who say eliminating their festival of ethnic pride is culturally insensitive, too.

Indigenous Peoples Day is a joke. The accomplishments of Columbus far outweigh the collective value of red savages who continually slaughtered each other with tomahawks.

The Communists have put out this narrative that everything about the colonial era was terrible. They claim that it was just White people running around the world slaughtering natives. The history is far more complex than that. Colonialism actually brought a higher standard of living to many native populations. It is also necessary to recognize that these native populations weren’t so innocent. Many were violent and this resulted in battles and wars.

It was good to see that the President fully recognized Columbus Day and paid no attention to this Indigenous Peoples Day garbage.

The bottom line is that these terrorists are not going to rest until every reference to European history is erased. Defacing statues of Columbus is just another part of this insane war they are waging. They would prefer to celebrate idiotic monkeys and savages instead of White men who achieved great things. These people are insane and they’re just going to get crazier. We are going to have to deal with them sooner rather than later.