At this point, we can conclude with reasonable certainty that Mexico is not in fact a real country, but rather, a giant theme park which exists only to provide shocking, grotesque entertainment to curious onlookers from the civilized world.
In this case, that’s you.
Mexico: Westworld, now without uppity yet superpoweful niggerbitch whores.
From January to March 2018, Mexico saw 852 train robberies, according to Mexico’s Train System (SFM). That figure is almost seven times higher than the 125 recorded during the same time period in 2017. In three months, Mexico recorded more train robberies than 720 robberies reported for 2017.
“Train robberies have become a national security problem,” said Mexican Congressman and former Chairman of the Bicameral Commission for National Security Waldo Fernandez during an exclusive interview with Breitbart Texas. “It is concerning the lack of attention that this is getting from the federation and the fact that none of the [presidential] candidates have spoken out about it. An attack on a train is a direct affront to the Mexican state.”
The uptick in train robberies and derailments come at a time when cartels diversified their operations from drug trafficking into human smuggling, human trafficking, kidnapping, and extortion. Business leaders in Mexico are concerned that unless the government addresses the issue in a timely manner, the practice will continue to spread.
One of the most recent intentional derailments took place last month in the municipality of Orizaba, Veracruz, where a team of gunmen cut the train’s brake lines in an apparent attempt to steal part of a shipment of 2,000 tons of corn and sorghum. The train was made up of four engine cars and 39 container cars that traveled at least 6 miles without brakes until colliding with another train. The wreck caused the derailment of 17 train cars, killed one of the drivers, and injured four crew. The wreck also caused considerable damage to the surrounding community.
Classic, cartel people. Classic.
In recent weeks, Mexican authorities dealt with six separate train wrecks between Puebla and Veracruz. The crashes were caused by criminals removing rails or placing rocks on the tracks to steal the cargo.
Intelligence information obtained by Breitbart Texas points to a cartel faction calling itself“Sangre Nueva Zeta” as being the one responsible for train robberies in Veracruz, Tlaxcala, and Puebla. Authorities are currently searching for Roberto “El Bukanas” De Los Santos de Jesus, a former municipal police officer turned regional leader for SNZ.
“Robert of the Saints of Jesus.” What a fitting name for a dirty atzec “cop” who figured that everything was so destroyed in Mexico, he could just take a promotion to boss when the last boss died, and he’d make more money.
This should show you how close the police are with the cartels in Mexico.
Really, though, this guy’s name. Get a load of this guy, ¿eh?
The Christian piety of these pitiless aztec bandits (or at least the “women” that name them) will never cease to amaze me. You did a great job with the missionary work, Spain.
You couldn’t just exterminate the natives, now could you, Spain?
THAT WOULDN’T HAVE BEEN VERY CATHOLIC OF YOU, NOW WOULD IT, SPAIN?
Now, and always.
In the states of Guanajuato and Queretaro, the attacks on trains are carried out by Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG).The gunmen hold up the trains at gunpoint or through derailments to steal containers of fuel from refineries to other parts of Mexico.
I DON’T UNDERSTAND HOW THIS IS POSSIBLE.
MEXICO HAS DEMOCRACY, THE CHURCH, AND CAPITALISM.
WHAT DO YOU MEAN, “AZTECS CAN’T LIVE LIKE EUROPEANS”?
Over the weekend, Mexican federal authorities arrested Jorge “El Izquierdo” Ibarra Lozano in Guadalajara, Jalisco–a top regional commander. Law enforcement information leaked to Breitbart Texas reveals the arrest was carried out as part of a tactical operation by Mexican federal authorities. However, the success was short-lived. Less than 72 hours later, a federal judge ordered Ibarra Lozano’s release after ruling the arrest was illegal.
The release of the top tier lieutenant for the Beltran Leyva Cartel comes days after another judge released a top regional boss for Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generacion–also one of the founding leaders of the self-defense movement in Michoacan.
As Breitbart Texas reported in late May, authorities in Michoacan arrested Juan Jose “El Abuelo” Farias, a regional commander for CJNG who hid his activities by passing himself off as one of the founding leaders of the “Auto-Defensa Movement.” That arrest was also short-lived since a judge claimed the Mexican Navy lied in reports and there was not enough evidence to charge Farias.
One month before that arrest, in February, the Mexican Navy carried out an operation targeting the leader of the Gulf Cartel faction controlling the border city of Matamoros, Tamaulipas. Three days later, a federal judge ruled the arrest was illegal, Breitbart Texas reported
The man known as “El Izquierdo” is a close ally of Hector “La Burra or HH.”Both cartel bosses are waging a fierce territorial war with another Beltran Leyva boss and former ally Rodolfo “El Gato” Villarreal Hernandez for control of the ritzy municipality of San Pedro, intelligence information provided to Breitbart Texas revealed.
In 2009, authorities arrested El Izquierdo and La Burra on federal weapons charges after finding them in a business establishment filled with weapons and armored vehicles.After the arrest of his allies, El Gato took over San Pedro, its lucrative drug distribution areas, and its bustling business sector. For unknown reasons, a Mexican judge ordered the release of El Izquierdo and La Burra earlier this year. After their release, the duo turned from allies to enemies.
I’ve been avoiding writing about Mexico because it’s like writing about Syria.
Look, Mexico is really entertaining. Feuding cartel bosses, cartel warehouses full of american guns that americans aren’t allowed to own and armored vehicles, corrupt cops, corrupt judges, violence, death, whores who are at least not niggerbitches, I mean… it’s got a lot going on for itself.
As an amusement park.
His face when people would rather just watch real mexican crime because niggers
But, I mean, come on guys.
Do we really have to waste all this land on a giant theme park, just for our own sick entertainment?
Like, I know. It was funny. You laughed. I laughed, too. We all laughed.
But isn’t this a lot of land?
I mean, look at these people. Just, look at them.
Mexico is lost.
After so many years trying, I think it would be better to just burn it all down and then start over from zero.
Room of useful idiots sits politely as a racist #AntiWhite black woman explains to them that they are
1. not human
The whites shown in these now-commonplace videos are far from making the sanity cut at this point. Yes, there is also a brood of insane black enemies and traitorous whites, but what to do with the “Insane White Question”? These Traitors will be the enemy for several generations to come. For some, there may be longer-term hope in re-education, but the prognosis is grim, and they may need to be put down for their own good.
Many people think that racial populations are “equal” with respect to their genetic potential for cognitive traits. On this website, we look at a lot of data having to do with racial differences in various traits to assess the validity, or lack thereof, of this assumption. Sometimes, though, it is important to step back and recognize just how impossible the notion of equality truly is. If the races really are genetically equal with respect to most psychological traits, it is nothing short of an evolutionary miracle, and in this article, I will explain why.
We all accept that the races differ in various ways for genetic reasons. For instance, East Asians are shorter than Africans and Europeans. Certain body types were more likely to evolve in different climates. In response to environmental variables such as UV radiation, we evolved differences in skin color, hair color, hair texture, etc. Some historic populations had cows available to milk while others did not and, so, some populations are lactose tolerant while others are not. Some populations had to face malaria, while others did not, and this led to differences in our blood. The list could go on. This is all utterly uncontroversial.
The races also differ in brain size. This has been shown repeatedly, all over the world, dating back more than a century (Last, 2016). More recently, it has been shown that you can predict someone’s race by looking at the shape of their brain (Fann et al. 2015). Yet, it is supposed that, unlike the racial differences in virtually every other part of the body, these ones are due entirely to the environment. This is obviously a political move. Evolution doesn’t care that genetic differences in personality are politically controversial, it sees the brain as just another organ. If we evolved differences in all the others, we probably evolved differences in the brain too.
In fact, the brain is a more likely site for genetic differences between races than most other parts of the body are. Why? Because researchers have shown that genes involved in the brain are the ones that differ most between the races (Wu and Zhang, 2011) .
“Other genes that showed higher levels of population differentiation include those involved in pigmentation, spermatid, nervous system and organ development, and some metabolic pathways, but few involved with the immune system.” – Wu and Zhang (2011) (emphasis added)
Given this, if anything we should expect racial differences in the brain to be larger than other racial differences. The assumption that they are infinitely smaller, such that they do not exist, is not genetically plausible.
Ultimately, this is just common sense. Populations around the world had different food sources. They hunted different kinds of animals and picked different kinds of plants. They lived in different climates. They fought different diseases. These differences impact behavior. For instance, some animals require more group work to kill than others. Harsh winters require more pre-planning and delayed gratification (saving food) than more temperate climates. The more easily acquirable food is around, the less important working with the group is. The more predators and other humans are around, the more physical strength and aggression will be needed. The more pathogens are present, the more important cleanliness will be. This list could go on infinitely.
And maybe you think one of these explanations is wrong and an environmental difference will have the opposite effect of what I have said. That is certainly possible, but the idea that any one of these environmental differences, let alone all of them together, will have no effect whatsoever on the selective pressures for any mental traits is completely implausible.
And this is all before culture comes into the picture. Once that happens, these differences are magnified times a hundred. In some cultures, being smart is the best way to have lots of kids. In others, physical strength, or determination, or social intelligence, etc., will be the most effective way. The notion that in every culture every psychological variable has the exact same association with fertility, which is the logical implication of egalitarianism, is obviously insane.
That culture has sped up evolution is evident in our own DNA. By looking at our genome, researchers can estimate how the speed of evolution has changed over time. In 2007, a landmark paper was released showing that evolution sped up by a factor of 100 within the last 5000 years, suggesting that the development of civilization, which happened at different times and in different ways around the globe, had an extremely dramatic impact on evolution (Hawks et al., 2007).
Even more recently, we are starting to get some idea of how culture influenced evolution. For instance, a 2014 paper found that England’s “war on murder”, a time in which criminals were essentially sent to die for fairly petty crimes, had a significant eugenic effect on the population in terms of criminality (Frost and Harpending, 2015). And, after all, how couldn’t it? If you kill a ton of criminals every generation, genes that predispose people towards criminality are obviously going to become less common.
My pointing in bringing this up is not to suggest that England is especially non-criminal. Other countries no doubt had similar periods and England has had its share of crime problems in its history. Nonetheless, the “war on murder” is a vivid example of the fact that culture can, and in fact must, impact evolution. Anything that differentially impacts people’s probability of reproducing will. Given this, and given the enormous amount of culture diversity which has existed on earth for millennia, it is, once again, lunacy to suggest that this all led to every population on earth possessing the exact same genetic predisposition for every mental trait there is.
On top of all this, there’s the Neanderthals (and others). After humans left Africa they met, and bred with, other species or subspecies of human. These other humans had been evolving separately from us for a really long time and they are universally accepted to have been different from us physically, and mentally, due to evolution. Some populations bred with these groups more than others, and Africans didn’t breed with them at all. This has led to the races differing in their degree of Neanderthal admixture.
Moreover, Neanderthal DNA is associated with various traits, including mental ones. For instance, one researcher described their findings from early last year thusly: “We discovered associations between Neanderthal DNA and a wide range of traits, including immunological, dermatological, neurological, psychiatric and reproductive diseases.” Specifically, they found that Neanderthal DNA was related to traits like nicotine addiction, depression, and other mental traits.
How is it even possible, you might ask, for the races to differ in their level of Neanderthal admixture and still be “equal” if Neanderthals weren’t “equal”? It’s not. For this, and all the other reason’s laid out here, equality is, practically speaking, a biological impossibility.
Exit poll data shows the dramatic effect this has had on American democracy: if White Americans were the only people that voted in presidential elections, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Barak Obama would have never been president.
On this view, the question then gets moved one step back and becomes “Why do non-Whites have liberal political views”. Even this first step is a mistake. The blog The Audacious Epigone has recently demonstrated, via an analysis of data from the General Social Survey, that even self-described conservative non-Whites voted for Obama in 2012.
To get a closer look at this phenomena, I examined how people voted, by race, according to how they answered questions about the size of government and wealth redistribution (economic views) and gay marriage and abortion (social views). In 2012, non-Whites who were pro-life and pro choice, for and against gay marriage, for smaller and larger government, and for or against wealth redistribution, all voted for Obama with the exception that Hispanics, who were against wealth redistribution broke for Romney by 6 points.
Even this Hispanic exception is not reliable. See, for instance, this data on the 2008 election:
(And yes, the Black patterns stays the same when you look at pre-Obama elections.)
Thinking that the government should be smaller had the largest impact on the Black vote. Because of this, I decided to look at Blacks who self-identify as conservatives and who think the government should be smaller. They still self identified as democrats. (I switched to party ID because the sample size of Black conservatives who think the government should be smaller is not very large and party ID was asked for decades. By contrast, questions on elections are only asked for 3 waves of the GSS.)
Demographic variables follow a similar pattern. Pew data shows that Non-Whites at every level of education and income, and of both sexes, are more likely to identify as democrats than republicans.
Political ideology and demographic data strongly predict how White people vote. To many White people, I suspect that it is almost incomprehensible that these things would not be the major factors determining who someone favors for president. And yet, for non-Whites something entirely different is clearly going on.
Some might suppose that this other factor is racial tribalism and, indeed, measures of racial tribalism do predict how strongly Blacks favor the democrat party. But even Blacks who do not think, for example, that government assistance to Blacks should be increased, or Blacks who think that the republican party is better than the democrat party for Black people, prefer the democrat party.
Similarly, Blacks who do, and who do not, feel that they have been discriminated against because of their race prefer the Democrat party.
In fact, Blacks who both want smaller government and think that government assistance to Blacks should be lower prefer the Democrat party.
Measuring ethnic tribalism among Hispanics is a little less straightforward, but immigration views seem like a reasonable proxy. On a 6 point scale of party affiliation, with 0 meaning strong republican and 6 meaning strong democrat, Hispanics who want immigration increased by a lot had an average score of 3.6 while Hispanics who want immigration decreased by a lot had an average score of 3.3. Both groups of Hispanics preferred democrats, and to roughly equivalent degrees.
All this is not to say that demographics, political ideologue, and ethnocentrism/perception of racism have no impact on non-White voting patterns. The data above shows that they do. However, there is some other factor which biases non-Whites strongly in favor of the democrat party so much so that even with these other factors removed non-Whites would still vote democrat.
I’m not sure what that factor is.To my knowledge, neither is anyone else. This makes the prospects of getting non-Whites to vote republican especially abysmal. First, we would have to figure out what this mystery factor (or factors) is (or are). Then we would have to deal with this factor, racial tribalism, and the fact that non-Whites are mostly liberal. In short, courting non-Whites to the republican party is a pipe dream.
Previously I wrote an article that just looked at the net budgetary impact of whites and non-whites. Here I decided to break down the black and hispanic numbers as well.
The most recent year with good data on everything is 2014. So that is the year all of these numbers are from.
Before getting into the methods, I’ll first show the final impact of this so you can see what a big deal this is:
Budgetary Impact of Whites, Blacks and Hispanics in 2014
White Per Capita
Black Per Capita
Hispanic Per Capita
This takes into account taxes paid and government services consumed at both the State and Federal level. The “Equal Military” column treats military spending as a service consumed equally on a per-capita basis between blacks, whites and hispanics. The “Static military” assigns all military spending to whites.
On net, whites generate a $249.52 billion surplus, or $1,260 per person if you assign 100% of military spending to whites. If you just give whites a proportional share of military spending, their surplus goes up to $553.52 billion total and $2,795 per capita.
Blacks, by contrast, run a budget deficit of $389.71 billion, or $10,016 per capita. If 100% of military spending is assigned to whites, blacks STILL run a $306.53 billion deficit, or $7,700 per capita.
Hispanics run a budget deficit of $411.95 billion of $7,289 per capita if military spending is proportional. If 100% of military spending is assigned to whites hispanics run a deficit of $291.3 billion, or $5,160 per capita.
Race and Tax Revenue
So regarding the methodology, I first looked in several places to figure out how much each race paid in taxes, as the government doesn’t keep such statistics. However, there are statistics collected by the tax foundation showing how much each income bracket pays in taxes.
And the census has data on income for each race and the proportion of brackets they are. And so using this, we can deduce how much each racial group pays in taxes:
Race and Tax Payment in 2014
% of taxes bracket pays
% of bracket is white
% of bracket is hispanic
% of bracket is black
% of taxes paid by whites-in-bracket
% of taxes paid by blacks-in-bracket
% of taxes paid by hispanics-in-bracket
This comes out to $4529.52 billion paid by whites, $528.30 billion paid by hispanics, and $485.67 billion paid by blacks.
Race and Government Use
So how does that compare with services consumed? Well for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Welfare I was able to find racial breakdowns. But what about state spending? Roads, schools, trash pick-up, police? For all of that I lumped into “equal government” and assigned the cost of it on a population basis.
Race and Government Use 2014
White Use %
White Use $
Black Use %
Black Use $
Hisp. Use %
Hisp. Use $
So as it happened, and this is something I thought going in, the race differences in government consumption are not a very big deal, and the real cause of the budgetary impacts of races is the difference in tax payment. I also found some data showing that whites made up 75% of millionaires, and I thought “ya know, based on this, whites overall probably pay around 75% of the taxes” – and I was correct.
Wage Impact of Racial Diversity
One thing people will say in response is that white wages are jacked up by having non-whites around. This doesn’t appear to be true when you look at regions in the US:
Median Income and Proportion of Popoulation of Whites by Region
Median Income of White Males
Median Income of White Females
So a big impact doesn’t just pop out at you. And if there is a correlation between median white income in a state, or county, and the proportion of blacks and/or hispanics in that state or county, well then the next step would be to show causality.
Another interesting thing to point out is that a Dutch meta-analysis of 384 studies on the impact of immigration on native wages in the United States and EU countries found that a 1% increase in immigrants as part of the labor force was associated with a 0.119% reduction in native wages.
But one thing to consider is correlation and causation. Just because a 1% increase in immigration is only associated with a 0.119% decrease in native wages doesn’t mean that the actual impact is that small.
So we’re looking at a small negative impact on wages, not the big positive impacts you would need for the libertarian story to hold water. I mean it’s not stupid to believe in the absence of data; lower-skill people come in, earn wages, white people are freed for higher-earning labor. But it doesn’t appear to be actually happening.
If you want to argue that the presence of blacks and hispanics around white people drives up white wages, that’s not something that is immediately obvious from the data, it’s only intuitive if you to hold very pro-market priors. You need more than just “ideas that make sense” and connect-the-dots / painting-by-numbers economic narratives that libertarians like to spin, and then act as if they’ve actually discovered something.
The negative fiscal impact of blacks and hispanics is significant. All of this discussion of a “national debt” and “deficit” is primarily of function of blacks and hispanics. Without them, we would be running budget surpluses today, even when keeping the military the same size.
The most basic fundamental of life is struggle. All lifeforms, by their very nature, are engaged in a constant campaign to thwart the omnipresent threat of nonexistence. Even the most primitive amoeba struggles for each and every moment of its seemingly—to us—meaningless existence to resist re-absorption into the void of nonexistence from which it sprang at the moment of its inception. Life is struggle, every moment of it. Whether or not you are aware of it, a countless number of tiny cells within your own body are—right now, as you read—currently engaged in a heroic and nonstop battle to preserve your body and its vitals against the destructive and disintegrating forces of the entropy-laden Universe. Societies and cultures—although not alive in the same sense that plants and animals are—also struggle to persist and maintain themselves amidst the chaos of our realm. And we humans, like the cells within our own bodies, are the ones who maintain such cultural entities via our collective actions. When the members of any given society play constructive, positive roles within that society, the society in question thrives, grows, and prospers. However, when the members of a society acquire goals or interests that are unrelated to—or worse, run counter to—the success of their society, that society will disintegrate just as surely as the body whose cells have turned cancerous will die.
There is and has always been ONLY one solution to the threat we face, you may not like it, you may hate me for saying it, you may even cry yourself to sleep and call me crazy for even suggesting it.
After students at a San Fransico school were threatened and racially taunted (“F—- them white boys, f—- them white boys”) for simply wearing an American flag, the school reacted not by punishing the students giving the threats, but by ordering the victims of the taunts to “either to change their Old Glory shirts, turn them inside out or go home”. Students wearing Mexican flags were given no such orders however.
The parents of the American flag wearing students took the school to court over this blatantly discriminatory behavior, but in a mind boggling decision the judge ruled for the school, arguing the ban was for the students’ safety and there was no need to ban the Mexican flag, since threats of violence were only against those wearing American flags. Thus in the backwards justice of this judge, victims of threats and taunts must have their rights curbed, while the perpetrators of such threats are free to do as they please.
The same federal judge who said it was perfectly fine for a homosexual judge in a long-term relationship with another man to rule on a dispute over homosexual marriage – a ruling from which he might benefit – now has concluded that it’s all right for a school to censor clothing displaying the American flag because there were students who threatened violence against those wearing the clothing.
The judge, James Ware, of the federal court in the Northern District of California’s San Francisco Division, has dismissed a complaint brought against the Morgan Hill Unified School District where the Old Glory theme on student T-shirts had been censored.
He found that it was reasonable because there were students who apparently hated the emblem enough to threaten with violence other students who were wearing it, and the censorship was “equal” even though the Mexican flag was not also censored because no one threatened violence against the students wearing that emblem.
Demographics means something, heritage, culture, race, all mean something in the greater history of humanity. Any nation that ignores these universal principles, walks the path of self destruction. The decade to follow we will see the end of the Amerikan empire, the fall of the Western world into the progressive socialist chaos, the end of an age. Western liberal democracies will come to an end, and something new will be born in its place.
Race war, class war, anti-government riots –you name it. All of it is headed our way. The sentiment across the nation, as Michael Bloomberg suggested in a recent interview, is that Americans know something is wrong in this country. For every individual and the groups with which they affiliate it’s different. For the black panthers it’s racism and poverty. For unions it’s benefit cuts, wage cuts and free market solutions. For Tea Party members it’s an intrusive and socialist government. The majority of America is not happy and they’ve lost hope, because regardless of what group you identify with, what color you are or what way you lean politically, you’re losing jobs, falling behind on essential bills, having difficulty putting food on the table and are constantly being accosted by government on all levels. When the riots start –and they will –the core motivators for individuals who hit the streets will be similar. Where the difference will arise is who each person or group will blame. Those elites in the upper echelons of our command and control apparatus thrive on hate, confusion and panic, and they will use our own ignorance against us. When we discuss the coming civil disobedience and unrest in America, we may find ourselves visualizing protests where the people join together to oust a tyrannical government. Be forewarned. This is not the most likely outcome –at least not at the outset. With so many different ideologies in this country, every one of us interprets the problems and directs blame a different way. These differences will be used against us; they’ll be used to turn us against each other. As you watch the following short speech from Black Panther National Chairman Malik Shabazz, consider that, while you may disagree with his solutions to the problems or where he places some of the blame, his core message is very similar to those of others that are fed up with what’s going on in this country.
New Black Panthers:
“Our message to the State Department, our message to the CIA, our message to Homeland Security, our message to the government today, is that your enemy is not our enemy. Your enemy in Afghanistan, your enemy in Iran, your enemy that you are bombing in Libya today –those are not our enemies. Our enemies are right here in the United States of America. Our battle is not against Ghaddafi. Our battle is against police brutality right here at home. Our battle is against budget cuts right here at home… … A message to the President, Barack Hussein Obama. We elected you. But we did not elect you to bomb your homeland. We did not elect you to bomb Africa. We are pleading with you Mr. Obama. You cannot make a compromise with the devil. The bible says resist the devil, and the devil shall flee from you. You can’t cut a deal with Satan, Mr. Obama. You got to stand up for God… … We have to fight. Gird up your loins college students. Gird up your loins young black man and young black woman, for the hour of war is at hand.”
Combine that statement with this one from the Chicano nationalist moments:
Chicano race organizations Calls for Race war?
Miguel Perez says he is the current president of Chicanos Unidos Arizona and an active member of La Raza. He says he also served as the vice president of MECHA in Fullerton California.
La Raza, or NCLA, is a militant Latino group that Obama is funding with American tax dollars. MECHA is a nationwide Latino student organization. MECHA explicitly calls for the creation of Atzlan, a new Chicano/Latino nation, in what is now the Southwest United States.
Perez is using Examiner.com to call for Latinos in the Southwest to arm themselves for race war. Perez tells his readers Latino groups believe they have enough people in states such as California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas to successfully wage a war on the United States.
Who’s side will you be on?
Perez is hyping a call to arms by a fellow Chicano militant…
Phoenix-based Nuestros Reconquistos claims that there will be a war very similar to the Civil War fought in the next five years. “La Raza and MEChA have already talked to Latinos and Phoenix and explained that Latinos need to arm themselves for war,” says Nuestros Reconquistos President Manuel Longoria.
Cecilia Maldonado of Chicanos Unidos Arizona isn’t hoping for any sort of war, but believes it may be unavoidable. “For generations, our people have prepared us to take back the lands of the Southwest that were stolen from our Mexican ancestors. Because of the bad economy and many racist laws, Latinos will be forced to fight sooner than later,” says Mrs. Maldonado.
Perez is listed as the “civil rights” writer for the Phoenix area on examiner.com. He recently praised Obama for issuing a unilateral amnesty for illegal aliens by ordering law enforcement to cease deportations.
Miguel Perez, current president of Chicanos Unidos Arizona and an active member of La Raza, also served as the vice president of the Latino civil rights organization MECHA in Fullerton California. He is the son of two Mexican immigrants. Perez plans to become a lawyer in order to protect the rights of Latinos. You can reach Perez at email@example.com.
Phoenix-based Nuestros Reconquistos claims that there will be a war very similar to the Civil War fought in the next five years. “La Raza and MEChA have already talked to Latinos and Phoenix and explained that Latinos need to arm themselves for war,” says Nuestros Reconquistos President Manuel Longoria.
Don’t kid yourselves, this guy and MANY MANY of his fellow travelers are quite serious… dead serious in fact. They already have the numbers in many communities and will be able to easily overrun most adjacent communities for the simple fact that most people think it can’t or won’t happen. Come on, think about it, the majority of Americans believe that they are just here to bus our tables and cut our grass… they’re just good hard working decent people who only want a better life for themselves and their families… and most importantly, they’re no threat. That is what ALL media outlets and political/community leaders have been telling the people for years now.
Maybe in some states something like this might only last a week, but in states such as CA, AZ, & N.M. it would be devastating and they could easily gain control of large portions of the state. Look at the devastation that a relatively small number of drug gang members have wrought on whole cities just south of the border…and they’re killing their own people there! These guys basically hate white people, do you think for even a moment that they would have a problem with killing entire neighborhoods just to get their point across?
Go ahead and laugh this guy off and treat what he is saying as a joke, but do so at your own peril, Arizonians and seriously fear what I believe is coming.
The black and brown people want to defend their own people from aggression they believe whites will inflict upon them for the destruction of the Amerikcan nation, they understand that they are the cause of most of our problems, they know that they deserve nothing less then genocide for their racial crimes against the white race, and they are correct. But to believe that they would be able to hold on to any territory they steal from white Americans is foolish. Let them have los Angels, atlanta, and other non white cities, a cluster of thermal nuclear bombs detonated in those cities, will make it clear we mean business. The challenge for we the vanguard will be to convince our racial comrades, that in a civil war we must use chemical, biological, nuclear, and concentration camps against our racial enemies.
They brought this upon themselves, they started this war by invading our communities, weakening our civilization, we will finish it. I support the nuclear option in the coming civil war, make it clear to all whites, they must as well.
During the opening night of the Wisconsin state fair, numerous white people were viciously attacked by black thugs as they left. Yet the police were quick to deny that racially motivated attacks took place.
Initially the police admitted to arresting a large number of black thugs for violent crimes that night. Yet they insisted that none of those arrested had been involved in attacking white people. They also stated that none would be charged with hate crimes. Now, as more evidence has come out, the police department seems to have done a complete 180. First claiming they arrested suspects for unrelated non-racial violent crimes, now admitting they in fact have suspects in racially motivated attacks.
The local media has been quick to downplay or censor the attacks as well, despite the existence of numerous frantic 911 calls.
The investigation into 11 of the violent incidents on the opening night of the Wisconsin State Fair has resulted in the arrest of a 16-year-old African-American who reportedly told investigators he targeted whites.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker was asked on WLS Radio’s Roe and Roeper Show Friday if he thought the crimes warranted hate crime status, “I think it is absolutely outrageous, it is a hate crime, and I would imagine the prosecutor will be very aggressive on this. There is no tolerance whether it’s white on black or black on white, there shouldn’t be any tolerance in general for that kind of problems.”
West Allis police said Thursday the teen was arrested late Wednesday. The Milwaukee teen was booked on suspicion of attempted robbery and robbery. Police recommend that he face additional penalties for hate crimes.
Police say the teen told investigators whites were cho
Several left-wing extremist sites aimed largely at a white Marxists have been glorifying the riots. Now the British media has outed a major hard-core Trotskyite for actively directing white Marxist thugs during the riots. 25 year old Jacob Bard-Rosenberg, is a self-described “student of critical theory.” He has been very visible in London’s extreme Marxist left. He sent numerous messages to his followers over twitter inciting them to riot.
sen because he considered them “easy targets.”
On opening night of the fair last week, 31 people were arrested and at least 11 people were hurt. The West Allis Police Department has said race was a factor in the 11 violent incidents it’s investigating.
“The police department issued a statement with details of arrests, saying ‘None of these incidents possessed elements that would compel the pursuance of a ‘hate crime’ prosecution.”
Witnesses reported attacks on the opening night of the fair that seemed to be racially motivated with young African Americans beating up white fair goers, but police say at this point there is not enough evidence to support such claims.”
Police arrested a 22 year old black man for the horrific murder of a 68 year old white man. The man confronted several black rioters in the street and was attacked. Dozens of white pedestrians and motorists have been victims of brutal racially motivated attacks.
The radical left has completely gutted the effectiveness of the police in European nations like Great Britain and Norway. First we saw the extremely slow response to the spree killer in Oslo. It took nearly 90 minutes for police to respond, because the only officers with access to firearms were far away. Apparently, the only law enforcement that carries a gun in Norway are arctic park rangers that occasionally have to shoot a polar bear.
In England, hundreds of columns are being written about the extreme lack of training, supplies, or the authority to do anything to stop the riots. It took four days of mass arson, racially motivated beatings, and mass looting just for the London police to receive permission to fire rubber bullets.
Now the left-wing police authority in London is diverting hundreds of officers to stop law abiding citizens from organizing neighborhood watches!
A mob of black teenagers turned violent at the Kansas City Plaza. One teenage black male opened fire wounding three other teens. The mayor of Kansas City was at the plaza. Two police officers forced him to the ground for his own protection.
Mayor Sly James was in the Plaza to get a first hand look at the out of control mobs.
A 14-year-old boy was shot and killed Saturday night after police released details about a 24-hour spate of shootings in the city that left six others dead and nine injured.
Detroit Police say the juvenile was shot around 6 p.m. Saturday in the 4600 block of Coplin while he and an 18-year-old boy were playing with a gun that went off. The bullet struck the 14-year-old, killing him.
Police said the suspect is in custody and the weapon has been recovered.
The shooting follows nine others that occurred between 6 a.m. Friday and 6 a.m. Saturday.
At one scene, five people were shot, police said. At another, three people were shot. The remainder of victims were shot at separate locations.
One other victim was in critical condition, one in stable and the remainder in serious condition at area hospitals.
The city was on pace for 350 murders this year, according to an analysis by The Detroit News. In a city that has lost 25 percent of its population since 2000, that could put the year on pace to reach the highest per-capita rates in a decade.