The New World Order Feudal Enslavement System

The New World Order Feudal Enslavement System

 

Totalitarian Collectivism

 

 

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, 1933

 

 

 

pyramidofpower.jpg

The New World Order Feudal Enslavement System

 

 

From times immemorial, the top down authority imposition has been the rule. This system of control is the reason why excrement discharge flows downhill. The feudal model works well for the lords who sit atop the pyramid. Essentially the New World Order is the supreme evolution of the subjugation of the serf class. In spite of this fact, what keeps this inequitable delineation between the dominant and the spineless? Pure power and malicious behavior achieves the perfection of perdition, in this hierarchal slave gulag. Because it can be done and no force can stop the captivity is the cause of the suffering. 

The manipulating influence behind the Anglo-American hegemony and hyper-power governance is the “Crown”.

The Crown as defined by NESARA INTERNATIONAL may seem bizarre to the casual spectator. However, the secrets of the international banksters, wholly exposed after the global financial meltdown, are undeniable. If this is not the ultimate extortion by the global gangsters, what could top this rush into thralldom? 

“The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and attorneys. The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawnbroker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery – the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane – a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorneys from the independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent “legal” – but totally unlawful – contracts on the American people. The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorneys carry out their Orders by controlling their victim’s judiciary”.

This technical description helps to focus on the undeniable; that the entire legal, political and economic template is driven by a sinister desire to regiment the population. Substitute or interchange the term “Crown” for the Illuminati or the New Work Order and you have the same playbook used on different teams. The Khazars inspired banking system is the means by which the top echelon of the obelisk pulls the strings of all the puppets. In the Youtube, Monopoly Men Rothschild Banksters Rule, the feudal enslavement system in revealed.

 

 

In the news is a CNBC report, not exactly a radical repository of resistance, UK Proposes All Paychecks Go to the State First. “The UK’s tax collection agency is putting forth a proposal that all employers send employee paychecks to the government, after which the government would deduct what it deems as the appropriate tax and pay the employees by bank transfer”.

 

 

From the usually dependable Webster G. Tarpley, a second example illustrates the problem. In French President Sarkozy Demands Financial Transaction Tax on Banks, Mr. Tarpley identifies an even more dire financial impoverishment plot.  

“What Sarkozy has thus proposed under the name of financial transaction tax is none other than the Tobin tax, the Wall Street sales tax, the securities transfer tax, or Robin Hood tax, which this website has long advocated. As Sarkozy specified, the financial transaction tax, like a sales tax, would take a small percentage of financial turnover and use the proceeds for purposes of world economic development. Naturally, the really critical questions are how big this percentage will be, who will collect it, and how it will be used”.

 

 

 

Banksters are exempt from the pain of paying taxes. TARP proved that reality with the “Too Big to Fail” precept. Their customers bear the burden of satisfying the impossibility of retiring the compound interest curse. Payment in any form of taxes, fuels the debt creation fiat money central bank monopoly. The push for a global currency is in full gear. This summary from NESARA INTERNATIONAL places the entire banking system under the mastery of the monolith cabal. 

“The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the Crown Temple from the independent and sovereign City of London. The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from Switzerland, the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and most importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected his Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland. The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland controls all the central banks of the G7 nations. He who controls the gold rules the world”.

The notion that a Robin Hood Tax punishes the banks is ridiculous. The idea that such a universal tax is in the public interest is utterly obscene. Only in the land of Prince John would the serfs rally to a crusade of an improvised world cause. Here is the “wordspeak” of this 1984 propaganda. “This tax on banks – not you or I – has the power to raise hundreds of billions every year. It could give a vital boost to the NHS, our schools, and the fight against child poverty in the UK – as well as tackling poverty and climate change around the world”.

 

 

 

The notion that a Robin Hood Tax punishes the banks is ridiculous. The idea that such a universal tax is in the public interest is utterly obscene. Only in the land of Prince John would the serfs rally to a crusade of an improvised world cause. Here is the “wordspeak” of this 1984 propaganda. “This tax on banks – not you or I – has the power to raise hundreds of billions every year. It could give a vital boost to the NHS, our schools, and the fight against child poverty in the UK – as well as tackling poverty and climate change around the world”.
No doubt, the funds would go to ransom King Richard from the lion den of his New World Order jailers. All for the wonderful “feel good dream” of eliminating poverty and saving the planet! Just how stupid are our Brit cousins? The RHT poll is over ten to one in favor of the tax. 

The minions of the banksters and their transnational corporatists create the problem and look to their crony knights to shape phony policy solutions; while there, Norman sheriffs enforce the collection of the tariff from the Saxon boors. Sound like the same plight of the indentured servant hoards that go begging for their food stamps in this country.

 

 

feudal.jpg

 

If falling astray of the dictates from feudal lords was the reason, why bands of thieves sought refuge in the forest; what option does the unemployed and beleaguered taxpayer do in his own collapsing castle? Just maybe the real problem is the destructive feudal scheme, is the true cause of the failed kingdom. 

Taking from the rich in order to give to the poor is a caustic fable for hiding the systemic injustice. Caught in the debt created currency repression is the discipline that keeps the peasants in bondage. Money or the lack of it, in sufficient quantities for the little people to feed and shelter their families dominates the economic depression. The mental strain leads to despair. No modern day Robin Hood will equalize the booty, when the NWO squeezes out the natural entrepreneurial instincts of wealth creators. The elitist faction continually wage wars to maintain their rule. The golden top cap of the Great Pyramid is long gone, residing in some bankster’s vault, where only a Freemason knows the location. That real golden crown is now just an ingot in the inventory of “The Crown” system of global governance.

From

Neo-Feudalist System, Keith Gardner states,  

“The reality is that our current system is a mixed system of false paradigms. If you take a long-view of history and recognize the false paradigms, you start to see a pattern of feudalism. The New World Order is a new form of neo-feudalism. The goal is of course a world communist government. However, a world communist government is a world fascist government. A world fascist government is a world feudalistic government. The differences are in the details.

The solution is knowing the solution. The solution is classical liberalism. The false left/right paradigm of Marx, Keynes, and Mises will never solve the problem. They all push towards the New World Order and push towards enslavement of the people. Mises is perhaps the most deceptive method of enslavement, which is why they would pursue it, unless you understand feudalism and classical liberalism and recognize Mises as feudalism”.

The Totalitarian Collectivism that we live under is a top down authoritarian order of compliance. In order to break this prototype,

Mr. Gardner offers this initial step.

“We should end the Federal Reserve, end fractional reserve lending, have the U.S. government print debt-free money to replace the fractional reserves with real reserves as private debt is paid. The U.S. government can use the debt-free money to pay off the national debt and issue significant tax refunds to every citizen. We can do this without causing inflation with a public debt-free paper if we end the Federal Reserve and fractional reserve lending”.

Would “The Crown” allow this repudiation of their banking monopoly? Ask most of the assassinated Presidents and the conquered nations that resisted the dictates of the New World Order despotic pyramid. The circlet of plutocrats grows in riches and power with every consolidation of their diabolical planetary empire. People will only be able to free themselves when the crown is ripped from the heads of this satanic Hydra. You have entered and are now living within the New World Order. Life worth living will soon become a faint memory. Your only hope is to slay the dragon.

“Purifying the World” — the latest collectivist hogwash about purging the world of evil and the perfectibility of man.

The Bolsheviks believed in the perfectibility of man. They called their ideal “The New Soviet Man.”

Man will make it his purpose to master his own feelings, to raise his instincts to the heights of consciousness, to make them transparent, to extend the wires of his will into hidden recesses, and thereby to raise himself to a new plane, to create a higher social biologic type, or, if you please, a superman. — Leon Trotsky, Literature and Revolution, on “the New Soviet Man.”

The Nazis believed in the “purification of the race.” Their model was the Aryan warrior. Their version of “The New Soviet Man” was the
herrenvolk — “the Master Race.”

Blood mixture and the result drop in the racial level is the sole cause of the dying out of old cultures; for men do not perish as a result of lost wars, but by the loss of that force of resistance which is continued only in pure blood. All who are not of good race in this world are chaff. — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

Both variants of collectivism stacked up millions upon millions of bodies trying to achieve their view of perfection, of “purification.”

The natural by-products of collectivist “perfectibility” and “purification.”

Courtesy of Pete at WRSA we have this link to an article in American Thinker which refers to this article on the “Purificationist” collectivism of today.

As Pete asks, “do you understand yet?” 

 

 

Inevitablism on a roll

Inevitablism on a roll

Irwin Stelzer can be justly proud of his career.  As his entry at Wikipedia makes clear:

Irwin M. Stelzer (born 1932) is an American economist[1] who is the U.S. economic and business columnist for the Sunday Times, the Courier-Mail, the Guardian and a contributing editor of the Weekly Standard. He is also an occasional contributor to the Daily Telegraph. He resides in London and the United States. Stelzer has served as a managing director of the investment banking firm of Rothschild Inc and was co-founder and president of National Economic Research Associates, Inc which became NERA Economic Consulting and which was subsequently sold to Marsh & McLennan, Inc. He is a signatory of the Henry Jackson Society, a senior director and fellow of the Hudson Institute and has edited and introduced a book on neoconservatism. He is a visiting fellow of Nuffield College, Oxford …

… he is someone whose writings are taken seriously by powerful men on both sides of the Atlantic, and who is no doubt on first-name terms with many of them.  Today, in the Daily Telegraph, he offered them his view on How to make immigration work in Britain’s interests.  I won’t bore you with the details.  He is, as a man of the Establishment, concerned that “hostility to migrants is sweeping Europe”.  He has a plan.  “Britain can do little to reduce the flow of immigrants” from the EU, he says.  “Immigrants possess skills that are in short supply here, and add billions of pounds to national output,” he says.  But the losers who see their job prospects taken away by immigration and their neighbourhoods transformed could be paid off.  “How so?, he says … “By requiring employers to bid for the limited number of entry permits, the proceeds to be remitted to the communities on which the immigrant imposes costs, or to HM Treasury.” He says.

No doubt, “powerful men” will read the column, welcome Stelzer’s little scheme (with reservations, of course), and file it away for some opportune moment when the minister is in melt-down and the briefing paper for tomorrow’s Cabinet is still to be written.  But what of those damned losers in the migration game?  The indigenous, as they seem to be calling themselves these days.  Are they grateful for Mr Stelzer’s ingenuity?  Are their fears and hostility calmed?  Are they looking forward to selling-out to race-replacement for a few thousand quid?

Well, I’ve never seen a thread like this one in any English national daily.  Never.

A brief selection for your amazed eyes:

stolenfrom

“Britain can do little to reduce the flow of immigrants from the other 26 EU member states”

Well there is – we can leave that disaster of an undemocratic entity, and be a free nation again. We could possibly have writers on the DT that don’t deliberately try to flood our small island with countless 3rd worlders…..Imagine that?

Anyway, how’s Israels immigration policy coming along Mr “I don;t care about Britain” Stelzer? You utter utter c£nt

james1

“We could possibly have writers on the DT that don’t deliberately try to flood our small island with countless 3rd worlders…..Imagine that?”

That’s why i despise them.

They choose to take their 20 pieces of silver and destroy any future for their own children. Disgusting traitors.

stolenfrom

We’ve got Brogan on another blog trying to tell us that we ‘must now learn to trust our MPs’

Bunch of cumts!

dougie

It’s not his country though is it? As far as he’s concerned we’re just goy.

james1

I didn’t even bother to read the article. He’s got a nerve writing about it though, then again, every johnny foreigner thinks they can stick their oar in about Britain nowadays don’t they.

Politicians, journalists, bankers. All one and the same.

james1

Ever felt like you been rumbled Mr Selzer?

The BS, it just don’t work no more, like it used to.

Can’t wait for the next instalment of ‘Telegraph View’ on immigration lol

Oh dear, what now eh.

james1

So when is Israel going to open the floodgates to the world Mr Selzer?

After seeing what a resounding success mass immigration is in Western Europe, surely you want some of your own enrichment no?

(Edited by a moderator)

proleishplumber

Irwin says “From France (deport Romas), to Germany (preserve national identity), to Sweden (xenophobes win seats), to the Netherlands (no more burqas), an anti-immigration tide is sweeping across Europe.”

How can anyone take this man seriously? ‘No more burqas’ is an anti-immigration stance, is it? But aren’t the ones with the burqas they want to ban already here? Swedish nationalists are ‘xenophobes’ are they? Wanting to stop immigration means you fear foreigners, does it? You cynically confuse and conflate issues and use far-left smear tactics even as roll out your oh-so-reasonable rhetoric.

Americans sell work permits for $10,000, says Seltzer. We should do the same, presumably. Of course once these ‘workers’ are here they are not just workers but fully-fledged Britons, and I am expected to regard them as every bit as British as me, to treat them as my own kin. So Irwin has put a price on my ethnic identity, and this price is whatever $10,000 is in Sterling at current exchange rates. No deal, Mr Seltzer.

dougie

It would be easier to take Irwin Stelzer more seriously if he started advocating non Jewish immigration to Israel. But no. It’s only white countries such people think need “diversifying”.

Steffiegirl

I wonder if the government reads or knows about the comments from the general public and how we all feel – it doesn’t seem so.

tommo2

They do. I’ve written to my MP many times on the immigration issue. He responds with the mantra that immigration is good for the country. What do we have to do to get the message across – blow-up parliament?

henrietta

The thing of it is, *they don’t care*. They don’t care what ordinary people think, and they don’t seem to care much about British culture or the quality of life of people who live in Britain. The only way forward is to make them care, but it isn’t clear how.

proleishplumber

When Irwin Seltzer talks of ‘our’ interests, who is he referring to? I am not Jewish, I am a white-Anglo Saxon Protestant.

Clearly, this is an outrageous thing to say, isn’t it? How awful of a white man to think he could have his own racial or ethnic interests that diverge from that of the Jews, or other groups! Jews, of course, along with all non-white European Christian groups, are permitted to have their own ethnic, religious and racial interests.

I am not interested in ‘sensible curbs’ which are nothing more than a bone being thrown by our masters during hard times, with the intention of gearing our race-replacement back up to current genocidal levels as soon as economic conditions allow.

What I want, Mr Seltzer, Mr Miliband, Mr Soros, Mr Saatchi, is for all non-white immigration to be ended completely, and for me and my people to be allowed to pursue our own racial and genetic interests regardless of what you may think.

watt

Brave comment. Interesting that throughout the world indigenous peoples – Maori, Aborigine, Red Indians etc – are revered but in Europe the indigenous are threatened with race laws if they assert themselves ; in England the flag removed from public places and equated with fascism. We let this happen.

thelennoxman

Good comment proleishplumber. Keep saying it as it is, we need more people like yourself on these blogs, to keep hammering the message home.
Seeing as a lot of them on here, still thinks Cameron is a Conservative and labour stands for the working man? You can see why the country is going to the dogs.

wnc

As an American, with all of our free speech rights, I could not post what you have posted for fear of forever being branded “racist.” A post like this could and would cost me my job. Believe it. That’s what it has come to here in the US. The blacks, Mexicans, Asians, Muslims can say and do as they please but us, nope.

Axl Rose of Guns and Roses hit the nail on the head with his lyric from One in A Million:

“Immigrants and faggots, they make no sense to me. They come to our country and think they’ll do as they please. Like start some mini Iran or spread some F-ing disease. They talk so many G-damn ways, it’s all Greek to me.

jose_maria

Who actually wants integration with muslims if that means we become like them?

What if it means we actually become them?

What if integration means that we become a coffee-coloured mass of muslims?

No ta.

karna1983

I admire the British, it’s a shame you are being forced to become intolerant.

jose_maria

Intolerance? No, we object to their presence not their existence.

jwhite3

There is but ONE reason why mass immigration is such a big problem in the West, and that is immigrants, like Irwin Stelzer, have been allowed to influence immigration policy.

tiggypetsworth

Name 10 benefits from immigration – 300 spoken languages and new and varied foods do not count.

europeansocialist

1) Learning from other cultures – increase in cultural diversity.
2) Higher net tax take overall paying for aging native population.
3) Demonstrates Britain’s appeal – today the UK confirmed as 4th
most admired nation.
4) No more grey boring and stale egg ‘n’ chips Britain thank God.
5) Physical embodiment of mixed couples and children, best of
both worlds.
6) A younger, more dynamic workforce. Brits do not want to pick
vegetables at 6am but immigrants do and will.
7) Skilled workers in vital sectors esp. NHS.
8) Sporting and musical contribution of immigrants and their
descendents.
9) Shapes country in new and improved image – see USA.
10) Flushes out bigots/little Englanders and exposes them for
what they are, i.e. fundamentally un-British.

jose_maria

1) Can be done via the internet.
2) After beenfits have been included, unlikely.
3) Thanks, they can come on holiday and then go home.
4) Cookery courses available at all tertiary colleges…
5) … is called genocide, and reflects your true agenda.
6) Not at poverty rates of pay they don’t. So let the market adjust…
7) What, like that ‘German’ doctor who administered a fatal od to his patient? http://www.cambstimes.co.uk/news/german_doctor_struck_off_in_uk_for_killing_fenland_man_with_morphine_overdose_1_464604 I wonder how the family is feeling…
8) You call that music? And nil-nil with Montenegro…
9) Yes, this is called cultural genocide and ethnic cleansing.
10) The real bigots are the social engineers like you.

dickgreendoxon

There has been very little coverage of this government’s (Theresa May) decision to grant amnesty to 135,000 failed asylum seekers, who have been granted permanent residence in the UK….solely to clear the backlog! Including dependants, this amounts to about a quarter of a million people.

Whilst some of them may now be able to work (assuming they can find a job…..May’s timing is astonishing), they will also be able to claim the full range of benefits.The potential lifetime cost to the taxpayer of a single unemployed asylum seeker, wife and two kids is about £1 million…….compared to the £5/day they currently receive in basic state support.

“Immigrants possess skills that are in short supply here, and add billions of pounds to national output.” No, Mr Stelzer…….some immigrants do, far too many do not. We have too few of the first category, and far too many of the second. And, frankly, I find it astonishing that an American lectures us on this…..the average American citizen is pissed off with mass immigration, with people flooding into an economy which is no longer creating jobs, but haemorrhaging them. Just like here.

brenda_lacluster

Hear hear dear, as someone with relatives in Indiana, Irwin would be lucky to escape with his life if he gave this little address outside a welfare center.

grahammilne

There are too many of them
They aren’t integrating and have no intention of doing so
They are a drain on our welfare system and take our jobs
They are outbreeding us to the extent that we will be a minority in our own country in a few decades
The survivial of our country is at stake
So without any racism on our part they must go
Any other nation would be justified in doing the same

ameliemaryann

For starters, we will be a minority in Leicester next year – 2011.

cyphre

It really comes down to who Britain belongs to.
Does it belong to the corrupt socialists who have sold it out for profit and pure self interest?
Does it belong to big business who just see a potential profit in cheap labour?

Or does it belong to us, the native people of Britain?
I suggest it belongs to us – the indigneous people of Britain and the only -people who should have a say in immigration is us – those who own this homeland!

The whole issue of immigration should be subject to a referendum where the people can vote on it.

I for one will vote against any and all immigration. I don’t have to justify or apologise for who I have in my home.

In Britain only the British are relevant.

archipoeta

Please don’t lump together immigrants from Eastern Europe who are literate and, if not actually Christian, don’t subscribe to a belief system that wants to impose its values on the host nation, and those from the Third world, who are in many cases sub/illiterate and wish to impose Islam on the rest of us.

uberwest

Why not? Do the Poles or Romanians care any more that they are taking jobs from British workers and / or forcing wages down for the jobs they do?

No they don’t.

But this is another negative aspect of an unfettered immigration policy, it’s creating hostility to people who otherwise we wouldn’t have any reason to be hostile to. But it’s important to remember who’s to blame – the politicians.

jabjabhook

Personally, I endorse every sentiment expressed.

Civil uprising is needed immediately.

We are going to have to start filling our prisons with the middle classes before our politicians will listen.

We can all break a window for England if it is the right window.

The local bank might be a good place to start.

Register your protest now.

understandingreality

Well said.

The Browning of the GOP

The Browning of the GOP: Top Conservatives Bring Color and Candor to Republican Party

Here’s a statistic that you might find shocking: one in four Black voters between the ages of 18 and 29 describes [himself or herself] as ‘conservative.’
Now, here’s why you shouldn¹t find it shocking: African-Americans, as a whole, are conservative, favoring positions that could only be described as mainstream Republican. According to a recent study, 75 percent of Blacks favor school prayer; 73 percent favor a $500-per-child federal tax credit; and 72 percent favor three-strikes-and-you¹re-out laws. These are all conservative positions.
While the most liberal faction of the Democratic Party has held it hostage with left-wing ideas that are far from the mainstream, the Republican Party has remained steadfast, supporting the issues that a new generation of Blacks routinely rate among their chief concerns. Be honest: Black America often cringes with the Republican Party at the liberal secular attitudes Democrats have toward such issues as nontraditional marriage, gays in the military and education policies that continue to fund a failed system.
But we never break rank, even though the reality is clear: no political group has done more to help minorities than Republicans. It¹s the party that freed the slaves, invited Booker T. Washington to the White House and sent federal troops to Little Rock, Ark., to enforce school integration.
Click here to continue reading.

 

The Legend of the White God

http://www.rnpaheadquarters.org/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/logo.jpg

The following is based upon a work by Pierre Honore an internationally known scholar and diplomat.  He was in Brazil as director of a research institute and advisor to the government, and was able to travel extensively throughout Latin America and was thus able to examine remains of a great civilization, a study to which he devoted more than 15 years.

“They could do practically anything, for nothing seemed too difficult for them, they cut the greenstone, they melted gold, and all this came from Quetzalcoatl….arts and knowledge.”
….Fray Bernandino Shagun
The Legend of the White God
We know from ancient Indian legends that at some point shrouded in the mists of time, White men landed on the shores of the New World, long before Columbus.  Every Indian society of which we have any knowledge records this arrival and refers to a White God who brought them their system of science, engineering, gave them their legal codes, and helped them achieve a high level of civilization.  But who was this High God??  And how did he and his relatives cross a vast unknown ocean to arrive in a New World?  From these ancient legends we learn that these White Gods arrived in huge foreign ships with swan wings, hulls gleaming so brightly that they looked like giant serpents gliding over the water.  When they reached the shore, strange men emerged from the ships, fair skinned and blue-eyed, wearing the gowns of a coarse black material with a circular opening at the neck and short wide sleeves.
The legend of a particular White God has also survived to our day from all the ancient civilizations of Central and South America.  The Toltecs and Aztec of Mexico called him Quetzalcoatl, the Incas called him Viracocha, to the Maya he was Kukulcan, who brought them their laws, their script and was worshipped like a god by the people.  To the Chibchas he was Bochia, the White Mantle of Light.  To those of Peru he was Hyustus, and to this day they will tell you that he was fair and had blue eyes.
According to two of the chroniclers White men with beards turned up on the shores of Lake Titicaca, built a great city, and taught the inhabitants a more civilized way of life.  The Indians said that the White Gods built this city 2000 years before the time of the Incas.
Locust: recent discoveries point to early Europeans arriving in the Americans 2-5,000 years prior to the mud’s. Our people in the Americas were then systematically exterminated by the mud’s. Just like what is occurring all over the world in white nations now.

Central to Racial Nationalist thought is the proposition that civilizations are organic and not linear in nature.
Because civilizations are organic in nature, they go through the same aging process that all organisms go through.
Just as individuals get senile when they age, so too do civilizations.  When this happens, they become pacifistic and ‘tolerant’.  They become weak and unable to resist predators.  A spiritual syphilis sets in.  Their immune system is weakened.  They tolerate the intolerable.
Racemixing, or miscegenation, is one symptom of this aging process.  Moral decay is another.  Degeneracy becomes a way of life.  It is always easier to go down hill, rather than to climb up one, so as we weaken, our standards are lowered.
Over time, the builders of civilization are overwhelmed by outsiders, like bacteria infecting a host.  They become a conquered people.  The victors take what they want.  Street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, boudoir by boudoir, until all that was once theirs, now belongs to another.
We are thus, like the White corpuscles in our own bodies, fighting off infections that threaten it.  What the Jew media ridicules as ‘racism’ is really a healthy reaction to an unhealthy situation.
Beyond the rhetoric, beyond the symptoms, there is a much greater battle being fought in this struggle.  We are fighting not just for the survival of our folk, but for its very soul.  It is always better to be strong than to be weak.  In truth, kindness is often mistaken by a civilization’s predators for weakness.  And whether the predator is a wolf, or a wolf in sheep’s clothing, it is still a predator.
It has always been the noble barbarian, with his sword and code of strength that has been the builder, shaper and defender of civilizations.  It is them that we in the RNPA strive to emulate, because they were men and women worthy of emulation.
We willingly choose them over the puss-filled leeches who now occupy positions of power, and who sell out their own for a few shekels and the siren’s praise of the Jews’ media.  We choose strength over weakness.  We choose the sound of thunder over that of a whimper.  We choose victory over surrender!

Debunking Jared Diamonds – Guns, Germs & Steel

This article will be debunking Jared Diamonds; Guns, Germs and Steel.

Not that it’s needed, the 10 000 year old explosion as well as Michael Harts; Understanding Human history does a fine job at it, and so would any other book I have on the subject in my collection, some of them being Jensens The G factor, The Global BellCurve, IQ and the Wealth of Nations, IQ & Global Inequality, Race differences in intelligence, Race evolution and behaviour, Race, genetics and society, The BellCurve and Intelligence Race and Genetics.

Jared Diamon put together his theory to answer a question that a Papua New Guinea man asked him and the question was as follows;

 

Why does the white man have so much more cargo and we New Guineans have so
little cargo?

It seems rather strange that a man who is trained as a biologist and physiologist would go out of his way to look at every possible explaination, except the area he himself is trained in – Biology, for the answer to that question. At first some of Diamons explainations seems plausible, yet upon further examination the very framing of most of his arguments seems outright intellectually dishonest. In his book the central thesis is that geography and luck was what gave some groups the ability to develop civilization and technology, while others stagnated. These eventually led to some groups conquering other groups, because of the byproducts of those geographical advantages, such development of superior weapons (Guns, Germs & Steel). He claims that Europeans just happened to be on a continent “Eusasia” that ran latitudinally rather than longitudinally and that continents that run latitudinally are easier to transverse and spread technology more so than continents that run longitudinally, like Africa & the Americas. The reason he gives is because there is very little change in geographical diversity, environment and climate when you go along lines of latitude. He also claims that Eurasians swaped technology more because of this. In a sense, swaping tech gave Eurasians a sort of greatest hits collection of advancements by swaping with each other. However, this is easilly refuted just by looking at the famous Silk road.

The silk road runs on line of latitude from Europe to China, it crosses regions of Europe, into regions of Kazakstan and into the Takla makan desert of China. Nedless to say, that is a vastly great variation of environments, climate and geography. Yet somehow the Eurasians managed to spread their technology.

 

His argument also seems to contradict himself, because when talking about meso american civilizations, they do not seem to have gathered anything from other groups or by swaping technology. You have a few groups like the Mayans, the Aztecs and Incas who did develop alot of things, yet the other tribes living just outside of their empires still live like primitives. So #1. Who did the Mayans/Aztecs/Incas swap tech with? And #2. Why didn’t those other tribes copy the Mayans/Aztecs/Incas? Unless of course the legends of the White Gods bestowing civilization upon them, is true! Then that would support Diamonds theory.

Another argument that he makes is that only certain animals were suitable for domestication and most of them lived in Eurasia. He claims that those animals were easier to domesticate because the animals in Africa like the Zebra were more “wild” in a sense and uncontrollable because they had more vicious predators keeping them that way. As if there were no predators in Eurasia and the Eurasian animals are all happy go lucky! See the African Zebras had Lions and Hyenas and all Europe had was European cave bears, wild boars and cave lions, nothing to worry about am I right? In the book he makes it seem like you could just walk up to a horse in the Ukraine and give it a big hug and a kiss and it wont do anything. It makes me wonder if he’s every seen wild horses, because all horses at one point or another were wild. The process of taming them is rough and takes time, not to mention to even capture them in the first place. He argues that the Zebra and most other larger African animals could not be domesticated because of that “wild” nature. Well the first problem with his argument is, when does an animal become “truly domesticated”? The point being an animal doesn’t have to be “trully domesticated” to be trained and useful. For example, the common household kitty cat, (I have one myself), isn’t “truly domesticated”, my little cat could just as easily live outside of the land as well as she can come home and take scraps from you (and she does). She’s an indoor and outdoor cat in this sense. Most of us have been to the Circus and seen those big African elephants being trained to do all kinds of incredible things, even other animals including PREDATORS, like bears, tigers and lions! Yet somehow the Africans couldn’t do it? At the same time, just because an animal is “domesticated” doesn’t mean it is just going to rollover for you. For example, anyone who has ever been to a Rodeo sees the bucking broncos and bulls and these are ‘domesticated’. However, you can’t just go up and give them a hug and a kiss, now can you? I am sure that is exactly how the horse would have been in the Ukraine before they were “domesticated”.

Diamond says that this is why the Zebra was not capable of being used by Africans.
But Jared, only decades of the White man colonializing the Africas and he had tamed them.

Obviously these animals could have been tamed and used, they didn’t have to be “domesticated”. The fact of the matter is that the Negroid never had the idea materialise in his head. And why would he, since you have to have a reason to tame the animal in the first place. Like to attatch a plow to it, however that would first require a plow to be invented. And you can’t pull a chariot with the Zebra if you haven’t even invented the wheel!

 

Furthermore there was the Quagga (Equus quagga quagga) which is an extinct subspecies (race/breed) of the plains Zebra, that is now extinct. It went extinct in 1883. The Zebra went extinct, along with some other subspecies and species, when the Africans hunted them to extinction because they were very docile and easy to catch. This took place after the Europeans left Africa. The Europeans who knew the animal before it went extinct said that the Quagga would have been a good candidate for domestication, however the Africans were more interested in eating them rather than using it for anything productive.
This makes sense now that we know that negroes buy more impulsive, doesn’t plan ahead as much as Whites and Asians, nor save and invest, but rather spend money quickly. We know that they, rather than saving a Snickers bar to when they might be hungry in the future, rather eat it right now, unlike Whites and EastAsians who rather saved it til when they might get hungry. So their impulsiveness THEN get’s reinforced NOW, when we’re able to actualy study population differences.

 

Diamond thinks that the African animals, like the Zebra were to “wild” to be domesticated, perhaps that would have to apply to all African animals including the human ones, and this is why the negroid cannot be domesticated as well. If Diamond doesn’t have a problem believing that the different environments made animals on one continent behaviorally different then animals on other continents, due to different environmental factors the animals evolved in, then the answer should be obvious to him. The blacks were indeed isolated and had a geographical disadvantage, they were isolated from those stressors and pressures from more cognitively demanding environments like that of ice age Europe that selected larger more intelligent brains.

 

On a side note. You can’t really say the same about our modern western Europe now can you? Which get’s more similar to the movie Idiocracy by the day. If you cant talk properly, grab your crotch alot, eat fastfood and buy neon looking clothes with graphitti themes while listening to primitive music done on a computer said to be futuristic, then you’re an alpha male.

 

Anyhow, this is the real reason why some groups developed superior cultures, technology and civilizations.

Are the Jews Getting Nervous?

Are the Jews Getting Nervous?

by Jeff Davis

World Jewry has always been keenly aware of the potential of White Americans rebelling against the sham two-party government, that the Jews have controlled for decades. An ADL press release claims “Rumors about gun confiscations. Angry protests about the government’s tax policies, replete with Nazi comparisons. A resurgent militia movement. Rage at the election of a president deemed to be illegitimate and threatening. Distrust and anger toward the government fueled by paranoia and conspiracy theories… In the year since we marked the historic election of the nation’s first African-American president we have seen a tremendous amount of anger and hostility…There is a toxic atmosphere of rage in America being witnessed at many levels, and it raises fundamental questions for our society.”

What the ADL sees as an alarming development is a positive development in the eyes of White patriots. The ADL wants the illegal alien invasion of America to continue without a peep of protest from angry White Americans. And why does the ADL want this? The result of a limitless brown invasion of America will be the extermination of the White race. Seems like the Jews are trying to commit genocide against us. A real genocide, not a phony one like that ridiculous Holocaust story of theirs.

The ADL gibbers on “One of the most disturbing trends in the rise of anti-government sentiment has been the resurrection and proliferation of conspiracy theories alleging dark, violent designs on the part of the federal government to declare martial law and end democratic government, to confiscate firearms from American citizens and to build hundreds of concentration camps to house dissidents. These theories have spread far and wide on social-networking sites.”

Of course, if the government is in fact planning to do this, it is a conspiracy, and NOT a theory. History is full of conspiracies. One of the biggest conspiracies in world history is The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. It talks about the Jews using their control of the media to control White nations. The ADL should know about this particular conspiracy; they’re an active part of it.

The ADL whines on “In the summer of 2009 a variety of anti-government protests and disruptions occurred at town hall meetings organized by senators and representatives across the country to discuss health-care reform… These events became a fertile ground for anti-Obama protests and stunts, with some individuals angrily launching verbal attacks against the president and other office holders…”

It’s called democracy, something the Jews complain about whenever it goes against their interests. And those people speaking out at town hall meetings are using their Freedom of Speech –something the Jews don’t think we should have.

Chinese archaeological find shatters “Out of Africa” myth.

Chinese archaeological find shatters “Out of Africa” myth.

The “Out of Africa” myth is a theory put forth not by actual scientists but by left-wing liberal arts professors. The theory is not based on any scientific evidence, but on social and political dogma. Often, the science departments at liberal Universities are bullied into accepting such hogwash by leftist University heads.

Already the human genome project as well as the Neanderthal genome project have shattered the political motivated “Out of Africa” myth. The projects have discovered incredible differences between the genetic makeup of modern man along racial lines. Modern homo sapien races did not evolve from a single ancestor. In the case of Caucasians, genes originating with the Neanderthals are present. Neanderthal genes are also found, but to a lesser extent in Asians, but are completely absent in the Negro race. This is quite significant as experts widely recognize the Neanderthal as the most advanced pre-homo sapiens.

An archaeological find in China shows strong evidence of parallel human evolution with multiple, different ancestors. An anatomically modern human jawbone was found deep in the earth and comes from a time period in which such humans were only supposed to have existed in Africa.

What The U.S. Must Learn From Japan’s Kowtow To China and Americas march towards war with China.

What The U.S. Must Learn From Japan’s Kowtow To China

By Patrick J. Buchanan

Hubris will do it every time.

The Chinese have just made a serious strategic blunder.

They dropped the mask and showed their scowling face to Asia, exposing how the Middle Kingdom intends to deal with smaller powers, now that she is the largest military and economic force in Asia and second largest on earth.

A fortnight ago, a Chinese trawler rammed a Japanese patrol boat in the Senkaku Islands, administered by Japan but also claimed by China. Tokyo released the ship and crew, but held the captain.

His immediate return was demanded by Beijing.

Japan refused. China instantly escalated the minor incident into a major confrontation, threatening a cut off of Japan’s supply of “rare-earth” materials, essential to the production of missiles, batteries and computers.

Through predatory trading, China had killed its U.S. competitor in rare-earth materials, establishing almost a global monopoly.

The world depends on China.

Japan capitulated and released the captain.

Now Beijing has decided to rub Japan’s nose in her humiliation by demanding a full apology and compensation.

Suddenly, the world sees, no longer as through a glass darkly, the China that has emerged from a quarter century of American indulgence, patronage and tutelage since Tiananmen Square.

The Chinese tiger is all grown up, and it’s not cuddly anymore.

And with Beijing’s threat to use its monopoly of rare-earth materials to bend nations to its will, how does the Milton Friedmanite free-trade ideology of the Republican Party, which fed Beijing $2 trillion in trade surpluses at America’s expense over two decades, look now?

How do all those lockstep Republican votes for Most Favored Nation status for Beijing, ushering her into the World Trade Organization and looking the other way as China dumped into our markets, thieved our technology and carted off our factories look today?

The self-sufficient Republic that could stand alone in the world is more dependent than Japan on China for rare-earth elements vital to our industries, for the necessities of our daily life, and for the loans to finance our massive trade and budget deficits.

How does the interdependence of nations in a global economy look now, compared to the independence American patriots from Alexander Hamilton to Calvin Coolidge guaranteed to us, that enabled us to win World War II in Europe and the Pacific in less than four years?

Yet China’s bullying of Japan is beneficial, for it may wake us up to the world as it is, as it has been, and ever shall be.

Consider.

China now claims all the Paracel and Spratly islands in the South China Sea, though Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Brunei border that sea. To reinforce her claim, a Chinese fighter jet crashed a U.S EP-3 surveillance plane 80 miles off Hainan Island in 2001. Not until Secretary of State Colin Powell apologized twice did China agree to release the American crew.

China’s claim to the Senkakus (the Diaoyu Islands to the Chinese) was emphasized last week. While these are largely volcanic rocks rather than habitable islands, ownership would give a nation a powerful claim to all the oil, gas and minerals in the East China Sea.

China has repeatedly warned the United States to keep its warships, especially carriers, out of the 100-mile-wide Taiwan Strait. On the mainland opposite, Beijing has planted 1,000 missiles to convince Taipei of the futility and cost of declaring independence.

When the U.S. Navy launched exercises with South Korea after the sinking of South Korea’s warship Cheonan by the North, China threatened the United States should it move the 97,000-ton carrier George Washington into the Yellow Sea between Korea and China. The carrier stayed out of the Yellow Sea and remained east of the Korean Peninsula.

In addition to her claims to sovereignty over all the seas off her southern and eastern coasts, China occupies a large tract of Indian land in the Aksai Chin area of India’s northwest. Thousands of square miles were seized by Beijing in the 1962 war with New Delhi—and annexed.

In 1969, China and the Soviet Union battled on the Amur and Ussuri rivers over lands Czar Alexander I seized at the end of that bloodiest war of the 19th century, the Chinese civil war known as the Taiping Rebellion. Leonid Brezhnev reportedly sounded out the Nixon White House on U.S. reaction to Soviet use of atomic weapons to effect the nuclear castration of Mao’s China.

China’s claims to her lost lands in Siberia and the Russian Far East have not been forgotten in Beijing, and remain on Chinese maps.

How should America respond?

As none of these territorial disputes involves our vital interests, we should stay out and let free Asia get a good close look at the new China.

Then explore the depths of our own dependency on this bellicose Beijing and determine how to restore our economic independence.

Ending the trade deficit with China now becomes a matter of national security.

COPYRIGHT CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Patrick J. Buchanan needs no introduction to VDARE.COM readers; his book State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, can be ordered from Amazon.com. His latest book is Churchill, Hitler, and “The Unnecessary War”: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World, reviewed here by Paul Craig Roberts.

The Rise Of The Egalitarian Society Means The Death Of The Free Society

By Patrick J. Buchanan

If you would understand why America has lost the dynamism she had in the 1950s and 1960s, consider the new Paycheck Fairness Act passed by the House 256 to 162.

The need for such a law, writes Valerie Jarrett, the ranking woman in Barack Obama’s White House, is that “working women are still paid only 77 cents for every dollar earned by a man.”

But why is that a concern of the U.S. government, and where is the empirical evidence that an inequality of pay between the sexes is proof of sexist hostility to women?

On average, Asians earn more than Hispanics; blacks less than whites. Mormons earn more than Muslims; Jews more than Jehovah’s Witnesses. And Polish Americans earn more than Puerto Ricans.

Does that prove America is a racist and religiously bigoted country?

The assumption of the Jarrett-backed law is that the sexes are equal in capacity, aptitude, drive and interest, and if there is a disparity in pay, only bigotry can explain it.

But are there not other, simpler answers for why women earn less?

Perhaps half of American women leave the job market during their lives, sometimes for decades, to raise children, which puts them behind men who never leave the workforce. Women gravitate to teaching, nursing, secretarial and service work, which pay less than jobs where men predominate: mining, manufacturing, construction and the military.

Over 95 percent of our 40,000 dead and wounded from Afghanistan and Iraq were men. Men in prison outnumber women 10 to one. Is that the result of sex discrimination?

Sports have become a national obsession, and among the most rewarded professions in fame and fortune. And TV viewers prefer to watch male athletes compete in baseball, basketball, football, hockey, golf, tennis and boxing.

Is unequal pay for men and women professional athletes a matter for the government?

Larry Summers lost his job as president of Harvard for suggesting that women have less aptitude for higher math and that may explain why they are underrepresented on Ivy League faculties in the sciences, economics and math. Would not that male aptitude help explain why men are dominant in investment banking and corporate finance, where salaries are among the highest?

Jarrett wants to empower the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to more closely monitor all businesses until women reach pay parity.

But if inequality of pay is a result of human nature and a free society, a greater equality of rewards can only be achieved through coercion, a government declaring its value, economic parity, to be supreme, and imposing its value and its preferred pay structure upon employers.

If this is where America is headed, why not go all the way and dictate that Asians and Hispanics, Muslims and Jews, women and men, blacks and whites, gay and straight must all be paid the exact same for the same work—and let the EEOC hire 100,000 more bureaucrats to see that it happens?

Would that be a great country or a socialist hell?

And before we empower the EEOC to monitor every business for sexism and racism, perhaps the commissioners will explain why African-Americans are 40 percent of all EEOC employees, while only 10 percent of the civilian labor force. Not a single white male sits on the commission.

Whence comes this egalitarian fanaticism?

Not from our Declaration of Independence, which spoke of all men being equal in their Creator-endowed rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Nor from the America Revolution, which was about liberty not equality, not this alien ideology of egalitarianism.

Equality is not even mentioned in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, and the 14th Amendment’s “equal protection” clause did not even make an appearance until after the Civil War. And that was about equal justice under law, not the socioeconomic equality of all Americans.

No, this egalitarian ideology is traceable to the French Revolution, where the royalty and aristocracy went to the guillotine in the name of “egalite.”

Under the Paycheck Fairness Act, writes Jarrett, “employers will be required to prove in court that any wage differences were based on factors other than sex—such as education, training or experience—and were consistent with business necessity.”

In short, women alleging sexist practices by their bosses do not have to prove their guilt. The boss must prove his innocence. This is another way of saying businessman are to be presumed guilty when charged.

If that is not un-American, it surely once was.

Should this bill become law, the effects are predictable: more forms to be filled out by businesses, more bureaucrats for the EEOC, more charges of sex discrimination, more class-action suits, more fines, more lawyers getting rich via the litigious looting of the private sector.

America’s decline is directly related to the growth in government power and the concomitant loss of freedom.

Except in God-given and constitutional rights, we are not equal. We are all unequal. The utopian promise of equality is but the banner of every power-hungry politician in modern history. And the rise of the egalitarian society means the death of the free society.

COPYRIGHT CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Patrick J. Buchanan needs no introduction to VDARE.COM readers; his book State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, can be ordered from Amazon.com. His latest book is Churchill, Hitler, and “The Unnecessary War”: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World, reviewed here by Paul Craig Roberts.

Global Cooling

Global Cooling and the New World Order

Bilderberg. Whether you believe it’s part of a sinister conspiracy which will lead inexorably to one world government or whether you think it’s just an innocent high-level talking shop, there’s one thing that can’t be denied: it knows which way the wind is blowing. (Hat tips: Will/NoIdea/Ozboy)

At its June meeting in Sitges, Spain (unreported and held in camera, as is Bilderberg’s way), some of the world’s most powerful CEOs rubbed shoulders with notable academics and leading politicians. They included: the chairman of Fiat, the Irish Attorney General Paul Gallagher, the US special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke, Henry Kissinger, Bill Gates, Dick Perle, the Queen of the Netherlands, the editor of the Economist…. Definitely not Z-list, in other words.

Which is what makes one particular item on the group’s discussion agenda so tremendously significant. See if you can spot the one I mean:

The 58th Bilderberg Meeting will be held in Sitges, Spain 3 – 6 June 2010. The Conference will deal mainly with Financial Reform, Security, Cyber Technology, Energy, Pakistan, Afghanistan, World Food Problem, Global Cooling, Social Networking, Medical Science, EU-US relations.

Yep, that’s right. Global Cooling.

Which means one of two things.

Either it was a printing error.

Or the global elite is perfectly well aware that global cooling represents a far more serious and imminent threat to the world than global warming, but is so far unwilling to admit it except behind closed doors.

Let me explain briefly why this is a bombshell waiting to explode.

Almost every government in the Western world from the USA to Britain to all the other EU states to Australia and New Zealand is currently committed to a policy of “decarbonisation.” This in turn is justified to (increasingly sceptical) electorates on the grounds that man-made CO2 is a prime driver of dangerous global warming and must therefore be reduced drastically, at no matter what social, economic and environmental cost. In the Eighties and Nineties, the global elite had a nice run of hot weather to support their (scientifically dubious) claims. But now they don’t. Winters are getting colder. Fuel bills are rising (in the name of combating climate change, natch). The wheels are starting to come off the AGW bandwagon. Ordinary people, resisting two decades of concerted brainwashing, are starting to notice.

All this, of course, spells big trouble for the global power elite. As well as leading to  food shortages (as, for example, it becomes harder to grow wheat in northerly latitudes; adding, of course, to such already-present disasters as biofuels and the rejection of GM), global cooling is going to find electorates increasingly angry that they have been sold a pup.

Our fuel bills have risen inexorably; our countryside, our views and our property values have been ravaged by hideous wind farms; our holidays have been made more expensive; our cost of living has been driven up by green taxes; our freedoms have been curtailed in any number of pettily irritating ways from what kind of light bulbs we are permitted to use to how we dispose of our rubbish. And to what end? If man-made global warming was really happening and really a problem we might possibly have carried on putting up with all these constraints on our liberty and assaults on our  income. But if it turns out to have been a myth……

blofeld

Well then, all bets are off.

The next few years are going to be very interesting. Watch the global power elite squirming to reposition itself as it slowly distances itself from Anthropogenic Global Warming (”Who? Us? No. We never thought of it as more than a quaint theory…”), and tries to find new ways of justifying green taxation and control. (Ocean acidification; biodiversity; et al). You’ll notice sly shifts in policy spin. In Britain, for example, Chris “Chicken Little” Huhne’s suicidal “dash for wind” will be re-invented as a vital step towards “energy security.” There will be less talk of “combatting climate change” and more talk of “mitigation”. You’ll hear enviro-Nazis like Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren avoid reference to “global warming” like the plague, preferring the more reliably vague phrase “global climate disruption.”

And you know what the worst thing is? If we allow them to, they’re going to get away with it.

Our duty as free citizens over the next few years is to make sure that they don’t.

Al Gore, George Soros, Bill Gates, Carol Browner, John Holdren, Barack Obama, David Cameron, Ed Miliband, Tim Yeo, Michael Mann, Ted Turner, Robert Redford, Phil Jones, Chris Huhne, John Howard (yes really, he was supposed to be a conservative, but he was the man who kicked off Australia’s ETS), Julia Gillard, Kevin Rudd, Yvo de Boer, Rajendra Pachauri….The list of the guilty goes on and on. Each in his own way – and whether through ignorance, naivety idealism or cynicism, it really doesn’t matter for the result has been the same – has done his bit to push the greatest con-trick in the history of science, forcing on global consumers the biggest bill in the history taxation, using “global warming” as an excuse to extend the reach of government further than it has ever gone before.

It is time we put a stop to this. In the US, the Tea Party movement is showing us the way. We need to punish these dodgy politicians at the ballot box. We need to ensure that those scientists guilty of malfeasance are, at the very least thrown out of the jobs which we taxpayers have been funding these last decades. We need to ensure that corporatist profiteers are no longer able to benefit from the distortion and corruption of the markets which result from green regulation.

We need a “Global Warming” Nuremberg.

White American Identity Politics

White American Identity Politics

The American political arena and mainstream media is rigged against White American solidarity. Almost every single race or ethnicity has a political organization to serve its specific racial or ethnic interests. The glaring exception is a mainstream-credited or nationally-recognized political group dedicated to White American interests. There are groups dedicated to White advocacy, but they are invariably plagued by accusations of “extremism” or “hate” or “bigotry.”

The Preamble to the United States Constitution lists one of its purposes as to “secure the blessing of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.” Perhaps this explicit dedication to the interests of the White founding stock means that no White advocacy groups are needed. Maybe the explicit mandate of the Constitution demands the protection of liberty for the posterity of the White race, so White advocacy groups are superfluous. Until the middle of the twentieth century, this view might hold water. In light of the onslaught of anti-White propaganda, legislation, indoctrination, and social policy that has since followed, this explanation is a recipe for White political suicide.

Under oppressive legislation, a hostile media, and an anti-White educational system, the interests of White people have been subverted in favor of a cacophony of minority voices, all of which are alien to the original aims of the Founding Fathers. White Americans can no longer rest assured that the Constitution means what it says, or that the United States exists to preserve the interests of its White founding stock and their progeny. Instead, White Americans must organize specifically and purposefully on racial grounds, realizing that all other groups are slowly destroying each liberty and privilege that White Americans used to take for granted.

White Americans have no choice but to participate in racial identity politics. If White Americans remain unorganized and without a unified voice of advocacy, they will eventually succumb to being nothing more than demoralized tax-producers for the growing entitlement class. Even worse, White Americans will face a perfect storm of skyrocketing entitlements, smoldering racial grievances, and violent uprisings emanating from the non-White racial groups. This will not be a safe or secure future for White Americans. Look to the fates of Whites in the formerly productive countries of South Africa or Zimbabwe for examples of what happens when Whites are subject to a ruling majority of non-Whites. South Africa used to be the jewel of Africa. Rhodesia (the predecessor to the failed state of Zimbabwe) was the breadbasket of Africa, exporting food to its neighbors. Now, South Africa and Zimbabwe are the rape and murder capitols of the world, and Zimbabwe cannot even feed itself, let alone its neighbors. More than five thousand Whites have been murdered since the transition to a black government in South Africa, and the numbers of rapes and robberies are too many to accurately list. American Whites need to take decisive and organized political action before they become a hated minority in their own nation.

Latinos, Hispanics, and mestizos– whatever the gatekeepers of morality decide to call them– are free to organize, protest, and advance political goals strictly on the basis of race or ethnicity. Consider some of the mission statements of these advocacy groups: The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is busy “[a]dvancing the economic condition, educational attainment, political influence, health, and civil rights of the Hispanic population in the United States.” The National Council of La Raza “is the largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States” and “works to improve opportunities for Hispanic Americans.” Note that the translation of “la raza” into English is “the race.”

Jews are free to advocate specifically and exclusively for other Jewish people. Among other goals, the Anti-Defamation League “defends the security of Israel and Jews worldwide.” The American Jewish Congress is “organized to defend Jewish interests at home and abroad through public policy advocacy– using diplomacy, legislation and the courts.” Similarly, Asians are free to rally around race. The Asian American Justice Center exists “to advance civil and human rights for Asian Americans.” Blacks have a multitude of race-based advocacy groups. A special group for black practitioners exists for almost every professional occupation. Furthermore, the Congressional Black Caucus exists as an exclusively black organization and is comprised of exclusively black Congressmen advancing exclusively black interests.

In fact, all “people of color” (meaning all non-White people) have an implicit license to politically organize according to racial identity. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) states: “The NAACP’s principal objective is to ensure the political, educational, social and economic equality of minority group citizens of United States.” Blacks, Jews, Asians, Hispanics, “people of color”– all of these groups advocate and organize on the basis of race or ethnicity. Yet White Americans may do no such thing without an onslaught of defamatory remarks, negative press coverage, and accusations of “hate” or “extremism.”

The knee-jerk negative reaction to a White identity organization is not natural. Suspicion regarding an explicitly White political group is the product of intense conditioning from a very young age. The origin and methodology of this conditioning is too complicated to adequately explain herein, but much of it stems from public education, globalist elites, and the corporate media. In short, from a very young age, White Americans are taught that love and admiration for the race and ethnicity of non-Whites is a healthy and sociable trait, but love and admiration for Whites by Whites is strictly forbidden. White Americans are conditioned to scorn their own heritage and to fawn over all other races. According to the ruling orthodoxy, admiration of non-Whites is tolerance and love but admiration of Whites is hate and bigotry.

No other group in America is taught or conditioned to have the same amount of self-sacrificial aims or self-loathing emotions. In fact, most other ethnic groups are encouraged to have a deep and profound sense of heritage and ethnic identity. Perversely, Whites are expected to enthusiastically jump on the non-White bandwagon while abandoning their own families. Whites must celebrate the achievements of every other race and ethnicity. Only Whites are forbidden from celebrating their own extended family, heritage, and history. Any sense of pride or identity stemming from a genetic origin must only be experienced vicariously for White Americans. An entire month has been dedicated to a celebration of the contributions to high culture, technology, art, philosophy, and civilization produced by black Americans. If someone protests that an entire month seems like immense favoritism towards blacks, then calls of “racism” are certain. Any opposition to the politically correct viewpoint is met with swift “justice” and the punishment is summary social execution.

The mere accusation of “racism” is enough to ruin a career, sink a political campaign, cancel an entertainment show, or alienate an individual. Perhaps this is a better explanation for the dearth of White political groups. Most of the nonsensical “truths” that modern Americans are forced to swallow are nothing more than shibboleths. If the shibboleth is met with anything other than the proper response, the “outsider” has been successfully identified, and swift countermeasures will be undertaken.

Instead of American spies inside Germany’s Third Reich being discovered by holding up the pointer, middle, and ring fingers to signify the number three, American citizens within the border are identified as racist outcasts by merely questioning the dubious notion that “diversity is our greatest strength.” Instead of asking a gringo to pronounce a Spanish word with a rolling ‘r’, ask the sociology professor who is up for tenure about her thoughts about the long-term viability of an increasingly diverse America. She had better work on her “accent” and toe the party line if she wants to have a successful academic career. Otherwise, she may infect future legions with the disease of critical thought, healthy dissent, or individuality. Heaven forbid, she may even fail in her greatest duty– to indoctrinate her pupils with the glorious fonts of wisdom which are Political Correctness and Tolerance for Diversity. Joseph Goebbels would be proud of this efficient method for political cleansing. A Soviet apparatchik would shriek with joy at the simplicity of this plan for purging the undesirables from the New Plan for Humanity.

As non-White Americans are free to create political organizations for the sole purpose of advancing the interests of a specific ethnicity, and White Americans are forbidden to do so, non-Whites enjoy fundamental rights and benefits which are denied to Whites. The logical implications of these thoughts and observations are non-controversial, but the act of drawing attention to it is definitely controversial. It might even be . . . “racist.”

As White Americans are prevented from organizing, thinking, or acting in a unified manner, and yet all other non-White groups are permitted and encouraged to do so, White Americans are at a distinct political disadvantage. Social pressure, media influence, legislation, and educational indoctrination combine to influence Whites against organizing or even thinking on the basis of race. This injustice must not stand. White Americans must organize to advance their own interests or they will fade into a dispossessed minority in the nation their forefathers carved from the unforgiving wilderness. White Americans must regain the political power they have implicitly relinquished. White Americans need not fear their own shadows any longer. Instead, White Americans must take back the reins and restore the conditions that made the United States of America into an exemplary society and a first-rate civilization.

Locust: If we fail to unite and stand against the darkness, this awaits our people.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_k07pirzBU34/TCXQbMo38TI/AAAAAAAAE-w/tmmiXFMnnvs/s1600/holocaust1.jpg

 

Restoring Honor: Glenn Beck and Implicit White Nationalism

Restoring Honor: Glenn Beck and Implicit White Nationalism

Glenn Beck at the Restoring Honor rally in DC.

On August 28, 1963, Martin Luther King, Jr. led a crowd of 250,000 to the Lincoln Memorial in the “March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.” It was there in the Summer of 1963 that King gave his iconic “I Have a Dream” speech.

In 1963, 75% to 80% of King’s audience was black. White liberals rounded out the other 20% who gathered on the National Mall. The March on Washington was the symbolic highwater mark of the Civil Rights Movement.

The television cameras were rolling that hot summer day. King’s sweet words about a utopian future of racial harmony plucked at the heartstrings of White America. The vision he articulated there changed the mindset of a generation.

It laid the foundation for half a century of drift toward the progressive ideal of race relations. In 2008, the cultural legacy of the Civil Rights Movement was powerful enough to send Barack Obama to the White House.

America’s first black president was widely touted in the mainstream media as the fulfillment of the civil rights dream articulated at the Lincoln Memorial in 1963. If Martin Luther King, Jr. were alive today, he would be the first to agree.

Restoring Honor

On August 28, 2010, Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin led a roaring crowd of 300,000 to 500,000 to the Lincoln Memorial at the “Restoring Honor” rally. The audience that gathered on the National Mall was told the America of the Founding Fathers had been “lost” and needed to be “restored.”

Now it is time to reverse course.

In 2010, 90% of Glenn Beck’s audience was White and conservative. The blacks, Jews, and White liberals who marched with Martin Luther King assembled in a smaller counter demonstration led by the Rev. Al Sharpton.

You could see the air deflating from their balloon.

As in 1963, the television cameras were rolling. This time around it was Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin pulling at the heartstrings of White America on that symbolic spot with soaring rhetoric about religion, patriotism, and military service.

Americans had lost their way. They needed to turn their eyes to God. It was all a highly choreographed display of White America’s emerging identity crisis.

A Movement Emerges

“Restoring Honor” eliminated any lingering doubt that may have existed that the Tea Party was an ephemeral phenomenon that was already in retreat. It turned out to be the largest such gathering to date.

The overt religiosity of the rally was also a departure from previous Tea Party events. It showed that the depth and breadth of the alienation felt in White America extends far beyond the fiscal issues that served as the earliest rallying cry against the Obama administration.

This can be seen in states like Tennessee where less than 25% of voters are affiliated with the Tea Party, but over 70% support Arizona-style immigration reform. The Tea Party is the spearhead of a far larger White backlash against the political class that controls the federal government.

Unfashionable Observations

Glenn Beck has done us a service here. Undoubtedly, “Restoring Honor” will be attacked in some circles for its kosher rhetorical concessions to political correctness. This is missing the forest for the trees.

The goal posts have been moved in several critical ways:

1.) White Americans are starting to think of themselves as “outsiders” ruled by “insiders” – the arrogant liberal elite that Barack Obama symbolizes. This is a major prerequisite of group identity, consciousness, and rebellion.

2.) Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin have succeeded in politicizing millions of White Americans who were formerly apolitical. Sheer apathy has always been one of the biggest obstacles to the formation of White racial consciousness.

Joe Six Pack has progressed from tuning out politics altogether to growing concerned about the direction of the country. Simply getting him to put down the beer and cheez-whiz, turn off the football game, and get off the La-Z-Boy for a moment to think about the future is in itself a huge accomplishment.

3.) White Americans are starting to believe that America has been hijacked and perverted by an alien elite. This isn’t the whole truth, but it is a tantalizing enough clue to point curious people in the right direction.

4.) White Americans have been told they are justified in “taking our country back.” This is a nationalist claim. If it is our country, we are entitled to it. The rightful heirs can take it back from the interlopers.

Glenn Beck’s Implicit White Nationalism

Fifty years of brainwashing isn’t going to be cast off in a day. If we have any hope of influencing our peers, we must have a realistic attitude and take as our starting point where ordinary White Americans find themselves on the political spectrum.

Judging by the “Restoring Honor” turnout, Glenn Beck seems to be striking the right chord in that respect. He can now speak with authority for the White majority. Unlike the rhetorical radicals, he has tailored his message to get their attention.

Beck is now in a position to lead the White majority from George W. Bush-style “compassionate conservatism” to Sarah Palin-style “implicit White Nationalism”; from apathy to engagement; from flag waving nationalist insider status to Don’t Tread on Me outsider status; from reform to revolution.

Should he choose to do so.

Whatever happens, the polarized political environment that Glenn Beck is contributing to works in our favor, intentionally or unintentionally. Such an enormous crowd of angry White people hardly bodes well for America’s ruling class.

It can be interpreted as a sign of things to come.

Nickelodeon producers admit to creating left-wing propaganda aimed at children.

Nickelodeon producers admit to creating left-wing propaganda aimed at children.

Nickelodeon is owned by Samuel “Redstone” Rothstein’s Viacom. Rothstein is an extreme leftist who is famous for promoting ganster rap music and black/white interracial couples on his main network MTV.

Nickelodeon producers admit that the tv show Dora the Explorer was created to propagandize to children. Essentially the show was created to make American children sympathetic to illegal aliens from South America.

Nickelodeon hired Carlos Cortes to help create the show. Cortes is the author of two books about using television to brainwash children with left-wing ideology.

From AP…

Don’t underestimate her just because she’s a little girl. “Dora The Explorer” is a multibillion-dollar franchise that may be creating a more enlightened generation, more open to different people and cultures not their own.

Ten years have passed since the Latina Dora became the first bilingual heroine of children’s TV and conquered the hearts of kids around the world. Nickelodeon has celebrated the anniversary with a one-hour special that features the voices of Rosie Perez, John Leguizamo and Hector Elizondo, and a documentary with comments from Dora herself, the series’ creators, experts from the industry, real-life kids and celebrities such as Salma Hayek and Shakira.

“I think that the fact that kids are identifying with a kid with darker color skin that speaks another language (shows they are more open),” said Chris Gifford, one of the show’s creators and executive producers. “Kids want their parents to read them the books and watch Dora with them. … That’s what it’s about.”

Yet, the original idea for the show had nothing to do with a bilingual girl.

“She didn’t start as a Latina or a heroine — she was a forest animal,” said co-creator and executive producer Valerie Walsh Valdes. “Nickelodeon actually asked us to consider making her a Latina because a recent study said that there were no positive bilingual characters on children’s television.”

So producers turned to such experts as historian Carlos E. Cortes, author of “The Children Are Watching” and “The Making — and Remaking — of a Multiculturalist.”

Samuel “Redstone,” creator and executive chairman of Viacom, is one of the biggest media moguls in the United States. His entire empire is aimed at promoting radical left-wing ideology, miscegenation, and multiculturalism towards children and teens through MTV, VH1, and Nickelodeon.

What Will Work

What Will Work

Farnham O’Reilly

August 10, 2010

The Problem

A short one hundred years ago, the sun never set on the empires of our people. At that time we had brought forth the finest music, explored to the uttermost ends of the earth, pioneered care of the environment and kindness to animals, made the most startling discoveries, created the greatest inventions, wrote the most profound literature, established colonies in foreign lands that — despite contemporary assertion — improved the lot of the indigenous peoples, and began unlocking the very secrets of Nature Herself.

Three generations later — ten decades — this race is now against the ropes, fighting for their very survival. Actually, it is worse than that — only a very few of us are fighting — the vast majority of us are actively or passively engaged in our own demise. Why in the world have we gotten into this situation?

The ‘what’ of it is no mystery — we can look around ourselves and at history over the past 100 years and see what happened. The ‘how’ is also no mystery. We have lost control to an intellectual, media and financial elite that reflects Jewish  concerns and interests. This new elite is intelligent, hyper-ethnocentric, and adept at ethnic networking. They have a malevolence born out of the twin delusions of grandeur and persecution. But, to understand the ‘why’ we must understand ourselves, i.e. — what makes us White on the inside, what makes us different from other peoples, what makes us behave the way we do. For, in the final analysis, the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ are simply byproducts of the ‘why’ — why we are well into our dispossession without firing a shot — literally. If we are to survive, we must come to grips with the ‘why’. Then the ‘what’ and ‘how’ will take care of themselves.

We have spent sixty unsuccessful years trying to reach the minds of our people, appealing to their sense of racial preservation. Our failure has not been through lack of effort, but rather because we have not taken the time to understand ourselves, that we are first and foremost not an intellectual people, rather we are a social people, and the way to reach our people is not through the mind, but through the social emotions. I repeat — the battle is to be won in our emotions, not our minds. The Enemy has not made the same mistake. He took the time to study us, to learn our on/off switches, and he has used that knowledge to his benefit. He knows we respond to emotion, altruism, guilt and social approval, rather than facts, data, proofs, reason, or even common sense, and he has used this knowledge as a weapon.

Yes, from us have come the most gifted intellects the world has ever seen: Caesar, Pythagoras, Dickens, Bach, Alexander, Da Vinci, Pasteur, Newton, Edison, Gutenberg, Mannerheim, Twain, Washington, Goethe, Lee, Ericsson, Ford, Beethoven, Nietzsche, Franklin, Von Braun, Socrates, London, Rembrandt, Kipling, Lindbergh, Dante, Shakespeare, Bell, Napoleon, Magellan, Amundsen, Mozart, Plato, Wagner, Copernicus and Galileo, (ahem) to name a few. But, we are not an intellectual people. Creative? Yes. Intelligent? Undoubtedly. But the key to our demise is to understand that at the core of our being are the social emotions.

I remember once a minister explaining how our emotions must be subject to our reason. He used a train as an analogy, describing how our mind and heart are like the train’s locomotive and caboose, respectively, and that the only way the train could reach its destination was for the caboose to follow the locomotive and not the other way around. This was good counsel, with only one flaw, but the flaw was fatal — we White folk just aren’t made that way.

In failing to understand ourselves we have wasted precious time in assuming our people would respond to appeals for racial preservation. The fact is that we are less ethnocentric than other peoples. Nor can we build in several decades what takes at least several thousand years to develop. Now, White ethnocentrism does exist, but it is deeply buried, and normally manifests itself only implicitly. In any event, it cannot be depended on as a catalyst for change.

What can be depended on for real change is what is already inside us, close to the surface, vibrant, strong, and responsive. Since the days of our Hyperborean home, this has been the spiritual mandate of our people — righteous moral virtue — that undeniable preference of our folk for good over evil. This inborn trait of ours manifests itself in many forms — a sense of fairness, a willingness to forgive and give people a second chance, love of truth and goodness, a desire to keep our good reputation, repulsion to lies and evil, and helping the less fortunate. This trait — an innate desire for Godliness defined as moral universalism, also has caused a weakness to evolve within us that has been exploited by our enemies. This is our predisposition towards guilt.

Our opponents are not dumb enough as to tell us to dismantle the family unit, cut our birth rate, and deprive children of the nurture and guidance only mothers can offer. Instead, we are told the White male hierarchy has suppressed women, shamelessly keeping them barefoot and pregnant in the home, condemned to a lifetime of domestic drudgery when they could be pursuing self-fulfilling careers and securing their own financial independence—an argument framed in terms of our proneness to self-gratifying individualism. Shame on us for denigrating our women!

Nor does anyone like a baby killer, and our enemies know full well that openly encouraging us to commit infanticide is tantamount to political suicide. Instead, this horrific proposition is couched in terms of freedom of choice—another appeal to our individualist proclivities. For is not denial of one’s freedom of choice the hallmark of the tyrant, the fascist, the Nazi? And who of us wishes to be labeled as such?

Speaking of babies, it is each child’s birthright that they be raised amongst their own people and in their own culture, thereby being allowed to fully experience the history, culture, and genetic experience of their folk. This is the way every morally and intellectually healthy person looks at it. The elites that dominate the media and intellectual discourse are loathe to challenge on those grounds. But they are smart enough to know that ethnic preservation — the key domino standing in their way of global conquest — begins in the family. So knowing the altruistic nature of our people and their relative lack of ethnocentrism, we are encouraged to adopt babies of color, knowing that those who do so will be regarded as making the ultimate personal sacrifice to the posterity of their family by allowing a little child that no one else wants to enjoy the tender care of a father and mother. No baby haters here. What sacrifice! What selflessness! What love! Indeed, such parents are not only venerated with the greatest of social approval, but they are held up as the very antitheses to that hallmark of the most despised of pariahs — the racist.

Ah, racism! By any other name, it is the flower of civilization. It is Mother Nature’s only line of defense for preservation of one’s own kind. It is the purest form of patriotism. It is the only guarantee for diversity, for without racism, diversity is doomed — something our elites are well aware of. Indeed, the blessing of knowing who and what you are is reserved exclusively for the racist. But, racism leads to ethnic preservation, and that is the one thing that can gore the ox of the global Power Elite. So, they must put a stop to it, and once again, seeing that racism is based on cosmic truth and therefore attractive to our folk, the task of our elites is to make good into evil, to make the racist the most pilloried of all people, an anathema beyond reproach. And, while much has been written on just how this is done (primarily via the media and the federal/public school system) the one really important feature of their strategy has been overlooked: the attack has not an intellectual foundation, but rather a spiritual one; i.e. the Enemy ignores the unassailable goodness of having a racial identity and pursuing racial interests, and instead simply does whatever he has to do to make us feel bad about it.

Let’s not forget another old favorite, equality. Are we really paying attention to this word? Do we really want equality for ourselves or anyone else? Because of our altruistic, honest nature, we really believe other races want equality. Yet the truth is they don’t want equality. They want us dead. But we just don’t get it. Because of our unfortunately inborn racial characteristic to adhere to lofty principles, we seem to think the objective is equal opportunity, or equality under the law. But that’s not what our elites are after. They really want (except for themselves) equality, period. They want worker bees, the impossible dream of a people that are equal in ability, equal in general appearance, equal in genetic disposition, equal in sexual drive, equal in work ethic, equal in skin color, equal in desires, equal in intelligence, and equal in ambition. In other words, he wants his herd animal. The UN Brown Man, a reasonably intelligent and pleasantly obedient consumer who is completely housebroken and devoid of dangerously creative thought.

Then there is the great taboo, the epitome of social immorality — discrimination. In happier times, discrimination simply meant using good judgment. Discrimination is the prerequisite for freedom of choice. Free people use their God given brains to learn from experience and make decisions accordingly. It is a healthy, natural and Godly instinct that tells us to avoid certain types of people in the future if our experiences with those people have a negative impact — for whatever reason — on our lives or those of our children. This is the prerogative of all free people, and it is called discrimination. In Nature, it is crucial to survival. But our elites, desiring to enslave us, have portrayed this Godly attribute as an evil thing, so much so that the only thing weak sheep fear more than being labeled racist is being accused of discrimination. We are no longer even allowed to think about why discrimination may be wrong — discrimination is just wrong, period, end of discussion. This is no surprise, for in a free republic, children are taught how to think, but in a democracy (capitalistic or communistic), they are taught what to think.

Another way in which were are led to think that good is evil and evil is good is through word play. For example, the natural pairing of humans — male and female — is termed traditional with all the negative connotations that that word carries. The trick here is to make heterosexuality appear somehow old-fashioned and therefore subject to reassessment. Such thinking is tantamount to a declaration of war against Nature Herself, for the precious recipe for higher life that can only come from the intimate male/female union is no more ‘traditional’ than the law of gravity. On the other hand, it is well known that homosexuals are prone to a variety of self-destructive behaviors, including higher rates of alcoholism and drug abuse. Yet our enemies routinely teach that homosexuals are, by their very nature, sensitive, intelligent, and misunderstood variants of humanity. This is not to deny that there are strong biological influences on homosexuality. The point is that homosexuality should not have a privileged place at the center of our culture.

We are not a stupid people, yet we are bewilderingly vulnerable to the word play that emanates from our elite media and universities. Again this is because of our altruistic nature and predisposition to guilt. And so we come to the concept of ‘minorities’. Now, over 90% of the earth’s population is non-White (see the National Policy Institute’s “Global White Population to Plummet”), yet we are told they are a ‘minority’. Slightly over half of the world’s adult population is women, and again, we are told they are a ‘minority’. And the reason we accept this rubbish is because of our altruism or the ‘wounded dove syndrome’ as some call it. There is something in the soul of White people that makes them susceptible to appeals to moral virtue. It is a noble trait, but one that is leading us to our destruction.

Then there is the challenge for tolerance. Now, tolerance simply means enduring something unpleasant. In the long run, tolerance is unnatural. Many people have acquired a tolerance for alcohol — is that a good thing? Yet we are now taught that we should tolerate all sorts of evil people and repulsive lifestyles. Ignore what your grandparents taught you, ignore your little inner voice, ignore the warning bells going off in your soul, ignore Nature, indeed ignore God and replace the healthy freedom of how to think with its mandate of what to think.

White people do not like to think of themselves, or to be thought of, as advocates of what is unnatural, let alone what is wrong or even evil. One of the hallmarks of evil is that it is founded on lies — no truth can issue from it. And so we see that our elites have twisted the meanings of all words to their polar opposite: diversity, gay, tolerance, racism, discrimination, traditional, tolerance — had they attempted to twist these concepts through honest intellectual discourse, they would have encountered iron resistance. But, by making it a moral issue, we fall without firing a shot. We really have no choice, because that is how we are made.

We begin to see a pattern here. These examples may appear simplistic, even childish. But the chilling fact is that they work — quite successfully and consistently I might add — because they dovetail with the White man’s psyche that subconsciously responds to a sense of fairness, a willingness to give people a second chance, a desire to keep one’s good reputation, and helping the less fortunate. The White man, because of the way he is made, is helpless to resist. Our intellectual and media elites know that in order to succeed their attack on us must be a spiritual attack phrased in terms of high moral principle, rather than a purely intellectual attack — that we cannot be controlled through our minds until we are controlled through our hearts.

More than anything else, our future is determined by how we see ourselves. So, to control the future of us as a people, it is only necessary to control how we view ourselves. It follows then that to destroy a people one only needs to get them to feel bad about themselves. There are two weapons used to accomplish this, and they work flawlessly: shame and guilt.

Having studied us closely, the approach our enemies have taken with us is not surprising. For they know that if it’s wrong, we don’t want to do it, and if it is good, we want to do it. Thus it makes sense why they have twisted such noble virtues as discrimination to being a bad thing, and White self-hatred to being a good thing. He has made the things that ensure our destruction into moral issue, cleverly twisting all evil to appear good, and all good to appear evil, knowing that once this is done, we will embrace evil thinking it is good, for such is our inner nature and we are virtually incapable of responding any other way.

The Solution

There are, as of today, still a substantial amount of White people who are of pure blood; i.e. — White on the outside. But that is doing us no good, because very few of us are White on the inside. I am talking about moral purity. Our elites understand this very well, and that’s why they first concentrated on corrupting us with entertainment, pornography and sexual degeneracy (their favorites), destruction of the marriage as an institution, and radical feminism with the resultant destruction of the family unit. This all had to be done before they could proceed to making us lose our racial identity entirely.

The difference between the White people in depression-era America or National Socialist Germany and contemporary Whites is character. The difference between our great-grandfathers and contemporary Whites is character. And, the reason why the pro-White advocacy movement can’t get its act together and has been an abject failure can be summed up in one word: character. Character — moral purity and righteousness — is the White man’s antidote to the Enemy. It is our silver bullet, and it is the only one available. For us to survive we need only to be White on the inside — the outside cannot be deracinated if the inside remains White. Remember, England in particular and the White world in general became strongest during the time of Queen Victoria — at a time when those old fashioned, prudish, wonderful Victorian values dominated.

Unless the character issue is squarely faced, even if 40 million Whites were to pack their bags, move to the Pacific Northwest, and initiate a secessionist movement, it would do us no good. As proof of that assertion I will submit for consideration the fact that there was a time not too long ago when America was over 90% White, and much of Europe nearly 100% so, yet it did us absolutely no good because the character issue was ignored.

Some maintain the White advocacy movement needs to be formed from the bottom up — a grassroots movement if you will. Others hold that it must be from the top down. There are good arguments for both, and there is recognition, to varying degrees, that both are necessary, but this time it is different. The movement must be from the inside out. That is how we got in the mess we are in — not by being attacked from the top down or the bottom up, but from the outside in. Having been involved in advocating the interests of our folk for over 30 years, I can readily attest, as can other comrade kinsmen, that the most salient features of our abject failure have been a lack of money, a lack of women, and an abundance of single men with serious character defects, with the first two problems simply being a result of the last.

For us and us alone moral purity is what awakens wisdom, keen intellect and courage. Wisdom to know virtue must be in word, thought and deed, a keen intellect to figure out how to live virtuously with minimal and acceptable risk of losing one’s livelihood, and courage to take that risk, acknowledging there is no guarantee of success. For if we maintain the moral high ground (a delightfully easy proposition since we live in a society that, for starters, openly and proudly prefers the promotion of homosexuality over the lives of unborn babies — to the point that it vigorously gives legal protection to the former while legally permitting the savage murder of the latter) then racial preservation will take care of itself!

It must be remembered that even a certain unpopular German Chancellor of the 20th century won the hearts of the people not through an appeal for racial preservation, but rather through upholding righteousness — extolling the family unit, healthy living, sound financial practices, solid education, care for the environment and the sanctity of the family farm, and opposing pornography, homosexuality, animal cruelty, usurious business practices, and exploitation of the common laborer.

It would have been far more productive to have spent the last sixty years exposing the role of our intellectual and media elites in creating our contemporary culture of critique — including the decisive role of Jews in shaping and promoting these transformations. This new elite has vigorously promoted the ‘feminist’ movement, the pornography industry, the abortion industry and the homosexual agenda. We would have had better results if we had exposed the contributions of this new elite in destroying the family unit, rather than investing in the ineffectual, spastic efforts that have ranged from ‘fighting communism’ to slapstick comedy ‘White power’ movements.

Again, the way to win our people is not winning their minds, but winning their hearts. Our people, that is. The eternal truth of race is that races are not equal, rather they are delightfully different. Now, if I were an Oriental, acting for the interests of my fellow racial kinsmen, I might well advocate an intellectual rather than spiritual strategy. Of late I have been reading Chairman Mao’s Little Red Book. Some of it is enlightening, and some of it is very dry, but the most obvious feature is that it is decidedly foreign. That is to say, it does not strike a chord in my soul as do the writings of my favorite European statesmen. The reason for this is that Mao’s writings proceed from an intellectual, rather than a spiritual premise. In other words, the Little Red Book is comprised of words written by an Oriental for Orientals, and the words serve very well indeed as revolutionary inspiration — for Orientals. As the aforementioned 20th-century German Chancellor said, “The inner nature of peoples always determines the way in which outward influences will have an effect. What leads one to starvation will train others for hard work.”

America — the Great Satan

Had the new elite made striving for high moral virtues a foundation stone of his assault on the White world, his victory would have been assured. But he hasn’t and he can’t — there is no good in him nor has goodness proceeded from him at any point in his history. Being what he is, he has chosen to call good evil and evil good. In the process — if we but have eyes to see and ears to hear — he has damned near given us the keys to the kingdom. He has given us the moral high ground.

Our folk are predisposed to guilt. More than anything else, we want to be on the side of moral righteousness. We just do not feel right inside unless we have full justification for our actions — that we bear the mark of God’s approval; indeed, that God is on our side. For non-religious Whites, there is a similar deep need to feel morally upright but without the spiritual overtones. This is the on/off switch of the Aryan soul. Nothing happens by accident, and there is a reason why our people, more than any other race, embraced Christianity as a set of moral imperatives. Yes, part of it is due to our predisposition to guilt. But there is a power in Christianity that causes good Christians to be deeply disturbed at the baleful events unfolding before their eyes, no less because being the self-proclaimed custodians of moral and spiritual values in the West, it is happening on their watch.

In my line of work I do a fair amount of public speaking to governing boards of various localities. These meetings are almost always opened with a salute to the federal flag (I stopped calling it the American flag some time ago) and occasionally even an invocation (you can still get away with that in some of the more rural parts of the Pacific Northwest). About two years ago I ceased ‘taking the pledge’ at these meetings. Wishing to be respectful, I do stand, but I do not put my hand over my heart. Nor do I tell lies about a republic that is really a democracy, about one nation that is really a conglomerate of nations, about being under God which simply won’t pass the smell test by any stretch of the imagination; nor is there liberty and justice for all.

Often I am confronted by board members or even general members of the audience after these meetings. They are angry, as should be expected. I give them a warm smile, and reply that I would be angry too if the country were still as the pledge described. But, both they and I know this is not so. I explain to them that while I do not mind lying to my enemies, I will not lie to my friends, and most certainly I will not lie to God.

At this point I have them, and I go on. I point out that in righteous societies of the past, sexual perverts were executed and unborn children were protected, but in this country federal law protects the former and gives its blessing to the savage murder of the latter. Why should any person of good moral character pledge his or her loyalty to a system that protects the wicked and slays the innocent? Why should God-fearing people pledge their loyalty to a government that allows a burgeoning pornography industry to go unchecked so it can destroy marriages, that encourages ‘feminism’ and the resultant destruction of the family unit, that funds and encourages sexual impropriety and perversion in the same public school system that vigorously excludes Christian influence, that derides its European heritage and turns its back on the very ethnic group that founded it, that encourages every form of materialism and crass consumerism even to the extent of shipping good jobs overseas and giving what jobs are left behind to alien invaders that cross a border it refuses to seal, that permits the sexual torture of its prisoners, that has a penchant for picking on little countries such as Iraq, Grenada, Serbia, or Afghanistan, that cradles a pop culture and entertainment industry that idolizes entertainers and sports figures with filthy morals, that encourages a better diet for pets than children, that abdicates its wealth to alien interests and subjugates its foreign policies to those same interests, that seeks to destroy the founding culture through multiculturalism, that seeks to genetically alter its founding ethnic group through the encouragement of miscegenation, whose leaders are all attorneys, and whose chief product is trash — trashing the environment, trashing healthy babies, trashing the family unit, trashing music, trashing culture, trashing education, trashing health, trashing morals, trashing marriage, trashing values, trashing its founding race, trashing love, and trashing God.

A society that makes Sodom and Gomorrah appear righteous by comparison, and that had better hope God is not a just God or else He owes those two cities of antiquity and iniquity one hell of an apology. Nay, it is not a nation but rather a beast, a fount of evil, an utterly corrupt and unspeakably malevolent abomination before the eyes of God and all right-thinking Whites.

Speaking these words to my people, people who otherwise are not racially conscious and are incensed at my unwillingness to say the pledge of allegiance, I have discovered an amazing thing: they are immediately disarmed and find themselves, perhaps for the first time, on the moral defensive. Many, indeed most, quickly grasp the new moral high ground, seeing the destruction created by our alien elite through new eyes for the first time. For our people are good people, and they will embrace goodness — including a love for their own ethnos — as quickly as they denied it in years prior, for such is our inner nature and we are virtually incapable of responding any other way.

There is a very big caveat here, which is that in revolutionary politics it is very bad business to go contrary to tradition. People cherish traditions, even dead ones. Just look at the birthdays of all the dead people we celebrate — Washington, Lincoln, etc… It is the same with America. The America we knew and loved is dead. But people still cherish it, which means you do not attack the Constitution, veteran’s organizations, past greatness, patriotic songs, national holidays, dead heroes, misguided wars, etc. What is fair game, and what we can attack, is the federal government — federally supported abortion, federally supported legal and illegal immigration, federally supported race-mixing, federally supported homosexuality, federal support for Israel, federal poisoning of our children through federal (public) schools, and if the circumstances are correct — even the federal flag. Again, if we attack the U.S. in its American context, we will alienate our kinsmen and be counterproductive. Always denounce the Great Satan as embodied in the federal government, and you will be amazed at the support and respect you will receive, including a generous portion from some of the most unlikely quarters.

Were such a revitalization of our folk simply to get us back on the straight and narrow path of knowing the difference between good and evil and choosing the former over the latter, we would have accomplished much in rebuilding the character of White people. But it will even take us one step further — it will serve to create the desire for a homeland and concomitantly sow the seeds for secession.

A White Homeland — Our Safe Haven from Evil

Moral purity and strength, without which our survival is doomed, is yet a prerequisite to our ultimate survival. In order to survive, all living organisms must secure the existence of their kind and a future for their offspring. In other words, they must have a safe and adequate habitat. This is an inviolable law of Nature. For us, this means a homeland. And the truth we must come to grips with here is that, seeing there are no lands left for colonization on this planet, our homeland can only come about through an act of secession from an existing power. We have no alternative. We are not exempt from Nature’s laws.

In Nature, all conflict is ultimately resolved through violence. One would not be too far off the mark to simply say that violence solves everything. Yet in speaking of secession, violence is a topic best left to private discussion for two reasons. First, certain ears may get the impression that violent overthrow of the government is being advocated, and as we all know, that’s against the law. Secondly, a lot of good people simply do not have it in their spiritual makeup to come to grips with the reality of violence. Personally, I have found the best way to address this aspect of secession when asked how we are to go about it is to simply reply that we should follow the example of the Founding Fathers. That says it all, says enough, and yet says nothing should one’s feet be held to the fire.

Regardless, I am for the record not speaking of revolution, but rather secession. There is an immeasurable benefit accruing to secession that is not offered through revolution. Simply put, secession can be prosecuted as a colonial dispute whereby the enemy views the conclusion of conflict not as defeat and resultant loss of power, but rather as a matter of concession to economic expediency. Furthermore, the enemy can afford the rationalization that such a concession is only temporary in nature, thereby saving considerable face and placating its more aggressive elements.

Our homeland will need to be located where we have a generous coastline that will allow for shipment of vital raw materials from sympathetic nations (Russia comes to mind), land and climate that allows for generous agricultural pursuits yet is natural to our genetic makeup (i.e. — the semi-tropics aren’t for us), large enough to obviate saturation attacks yet small enough so that by bordering at least two nations nuclear attack is discouraged by one or the other, and far enough from the seats of enemy power so as not to represent a direct threat. A homeland where little boys can ride their bikes down to the creek to hunt for frogs and catch fish without fear of savage pedophiles, and where girls can grow into womanhood without ever hearing the word lesbian. Where will this homeland be? Your first guess is probably the right one.

We will have our homeland. We won’t force anyone to join us. Those of our kin who wish to stay behind are free to joyously wallow in their multicultural, interracial, and bisexual American cesspool. We will have our nation based on God’s laws, and those who wish to remain behind will have their consumer trading bloc based on man’s laws, free to engage to their evil heart’s delight in killing their unborn, perverting their children, gorging on junk food, lusting in pornography, buying their endless plastic trinkets, and of course supporting Israel regardless of other affected nations in the Middle East — nations that in happier times offered the hand of friendship to America. In short, exercising their hedonistic guarantee to a life of entertainment, liberty to go to hell any way they choose, and the pursuit of degenerate happiness.

We need to start pulling together — physically as well as spiritually. Much of the physical work will involve helping many of our folk, especially young families, physically relocate to the Homeland. Not all of us should relocate, nor is it possible or even desirable that all of us do. For many of us it is simply not a viable option, and there are many of us who can serve our folk better where they are now.

A timely article by Alex Kurtagic appeared recently in TOO: “Learning from the Right.” In it he points out that in learning from our mistakes we need to avoid a single monolithic organization dedicated to serving our needs. Rather, we need many, many small groups covering all facets of life — homeschooling, personal finances, cultural events and organizations, reenactment societies, scholarship foundations, political organizations, benevolent societies, and so on.

We need to gear much of our energies to young families. Many benefits accrue from this. Two come readily to mind: All else being held equal, we get a lot more years out of young people than old ones. Secondly, guess where babies come from?

Two things some of our folk are currently working on are geared towards bringing young families into the Homeland. First, a website is being constructed that will be focused on assisting young people in the relocation process, including guidance on how to become successfully self-employed.

Secondly, a mortgage company is being developed that will be of symbiotic benefit to all involved. Young people moving into the Homeland who do demonstrate successful self-employment skills will be eligible for a favorably structured financing package to allow them a home of their own, in the country, on a minimum of five acres where children can be raised in a safe and wholesome environment. Investors, on the other hand, will be holders of fully secured first trust deeds with a decent rate of return, along with income structured favorably for tax purposes (primarily interest and long-term capital gains). In short, investors will be permitted a secure and profitable investment while knowing they are serving the interests of their folk in the process — something that traditional Wall Street cannot compete with. For years one of the hallmarks of our movement has been financial ineptitude. That’s going to change.

Conclusion

Again, our opponents have damned near given us the keys to the kingdom. This is not unexpected; time and again down through history they have exhibited a reoccurring weakness — not knowing when to stop. The brass ring of power is not enough — they must seek for even greater dominion over their subjects, and this has always been their undoing. The time is ripe for action.

To my Christian kinsmen, I beseech you to rise up. Shall this be your finest hour, or shall it be said you turned your back on duty when God called? Regain the Godly courage of your Christian forefathers and throw down the deceptive, cowardly doctrine to love the sinner and not the sin. Shall you be destined to wear your crown, or shall you go where all dead things go, where the blood of the fifty million aborted children will remain on your heads forever?

We got where we are by way of the path of misplaced altruism, thinking our goodness superior to God’s goodness. This was the path of civil rights (integration and resultant miscegenation), freedom of dress (immodesty), liberation from traditional music (degenerative alien rhythms), freedom of speech (pornography), women’s liberation (destruction of the family unit and infanticide), and sexual liberation (shameless adultery, then homosexuality, and finally — with NAMBLA’s efforts and assistance from our new elite I’d give it a dozen years or so — pedophilia). This was the path to freedom? It is the path of destruction and death for our White race.

The only way back is back the way we came, embracing sexual purity, reestablishing the sanctity of the traditional family unit, intolerance for filth in print or picture, exaltation of the music of our forebears, modesty in dress, and establishing, by whatever means God makes available a homeland of our own. This is the path to Nature. It is the path of upward struggle, and in the end, a wonderful existence for our people and a wholesome, safe future for our children.

Farnham O’Reilly (email him)  is the pen name of a businessman, farmer and investor. A family man, his home is in the Pacific Northwest.

Private property rights are racist and Background checks: the next frontier in civil rights

http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/

Background checks: the next frontier in civil rights

Every day seems to bring a new use for “civil rights” laws. One day homosexuality is a crime; a few years later and homo marriage is legal. Now the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is cracking down on another bastion of racism and hate – employers who refuse to hire people with criminal backgrounds. Because blacks and Hispanics have crime rates far higher than whites, this policy has a “disparate impact” on them, and is therefore “racist.” And so it has to go.

You don’t want to hire a guy who served only six months in prison after he killed a woman for knocking on his door? Then you might as well be in the KKK. That man paid his “debt to society”, so the fact that he’s a cold blooded killer is none of your business.

The hate has got to stop.

Well, anyway, it probably won’t be long before employers aren’t allowed to make their own hiring and firing decisions. The government’s “equal opportunity” experts will probably have to start doing that in order to root out the last vestiges of racism and hate in America. Oh, don’t worry, employers will probably still be allowed to voice their opinion, and the EEOC will take that into consideration. After all, this is the land of the free and the home of the brave!

Dan Calabrese explains that it may soon be illegal to refuse to hire someone with a criminal background:

ry to follow the logic here: If you’d rather not hire people who have criminal records or bad credit histories, you might be a racist. So says the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The EEOC, which apparently exists for the purpose of reaching such bizarre conclusions, makes this claim because a disproportionate number of those with bad credit and rap sheets are minorities. Thus, employment practices that take a dim view of such things are, by definition, discriminatory.

And you want to be my latex salesman.
Now you, the prospective employer protest: You don’t care if the would-be employee is black, white, yellow, red or Alabama crimson. Hiring criminals with credit problems is foolishness up with which you will not put. It has nothing whatsoever to do with race. It is simply smart business.

The EEOC doesn’t even dispute you on your motivation. It may very well have nothing to do with race. The EEOC doesn’t care. It’s still discrimination because the average minority is more likely to be negatively impacted by your policy, even if that’s not what you intend.

Read the whole thing. The EEOC is also going after credit checks by employers. One of these days it will be illegal to check a non-white mortgage applicant’s credit, for the same reason. Blacks and Hispanics aren’t as good about paying their bills as white people are, so credit checks for mortgages have a disparate impact on them.

Flint “white” racist serial killer suspected arrested: He’s an Israeli

They caught him at the Atlanta airport, trying to flee to Israel.

But never mind. This will still be brought up continuously for the next 10 years as proof of how white Americans hate black people.

Israeli citizen suspected of racially motivated stabbings of black men apprehended

A possible suspect in a string of 20 stabbings that terrorized people across three states and left five dead was arrested at an airport as he tried to board a plane for Israel, officials said Thursday.

The man was arrested late Wednesday and was being held on unrelated charges, police in Leesburg, Va., said.

He was arrested at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport where he was trying to board a Delta Air Lines flight to Tel Aviv, Israel, said Rafael Lemaitre, a spokesman at U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

The man has ties to Flint, Mich., where the attacks began May 24, and to Leesburg, the site of three similar attacks last week, Leesburg Police Officer Chris Jones said.
e condition of anonymity due to the ongoing investigation.

“While this is a key step in the investigation there are still many issues that need to be addressed before we identify this individual as the person responsible for this horrific crime spree,” Jones said.

Police had been focusing their hunt on Flint — where 16 of the stabbings took place — until Leesburg police reported three attacks. Authorities in Toledo, Ohio, say a stabbing in that city Saturday appears to be linked to the violent spree.

As of Wednesday afternoon, a task force led by the Michigan State Police and including the FBI had received 469 tips. Those tips have been passed out to the various law enforcement teams involved in the case.

The attacks began surfacing in late spring, and picked up the pace as the stabber traversed the country.

Police have said the man’s attacks usually follow a pattern: He approaches black men late at night on lonely urban roads, and asks for directions or help with a broken-down car. Then, without warning, he pulls out a knife and strikes. Then, he speeds away in his vehicle, leaving them for dead.

The brazen nature and the frequency of the attacks — the assailant has struck an average of about once every four days since the first stabbing in May — has terrified some of those in cities he’s already targeted.

The victims have been mostly black, and police have suspected the attacks may have been racially motivated. The youngest victim was 17; the oldest was 60. They ranged in size from 5-foot-4 inches and 120 pounds to 6-foot-1 and 190 pounds.

Private property rights are racist

Up in Canada, blacks went on the warpath because a private property owner thought they had the right to use their property as they see fit. Local blacks, along with the local white quisling leaders, quickly disabused them of that notion, making clear that black people have the last word on how people are allowed to use their property. If blacks don’t approve of a certain use, then it’s racist, and can’t be allowed.

What happened is that the government is replacing a bridge in Halifax. The bridge is on a road that runs to North Preston, a town of about 2,000 which is mostly black. A private golf course allowed 10 local families to use a private access road which is locked; they gave the 10 local families keys. When the blacks of North Preston heard this, they went ballistic. Why? Because the 10 homeowners who got keys are white. So it had to be “racism.”

Never mind that the private road is is terrible shape and wasn’t meant to stand up to much traffic.

Never mind that the 10 families given keys were saving nearly 10 kilometers on the detour by using the private road, due to the geography, while North Preston residents would only have saved about 2 kilometers.

Never mind that it’s private property.

None of that matters.

All that matters is what blacks want. And because they’re willing to riot on the slightest pretext, and are always eager to use the implied threat of a riot to get what they want, naturally, they got what they wanted. After two days of protests and blockades, city officials prevailed on the golf club to revoke the access for the 10 local families.

If blacks can’t use private property, then nobody should be allowed to use it.

Stuff Black People Don’t like #10. The Founding Documents

#10. The Founding Documents

http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/


In history classes across this land, one text is exploited for maximum indoctrination affects and utilized to harness the unrelenting animosity of Black people and Disingenuous White Liberal toward Pre-Obama America: The People’s History of the United States of America.

Penned by Howard Zinn, this one book fuels the awesome rage and desire to reconstitute the United States as a nation antithetical to its original intent, and these two groups have succeeded in an ongoing peaceful revolution that has reinvented the nation entirely.

With the perpetual victim – hood status of Black people firmly legalized with the creation and institution of Black Run America (BRA) and DWL’s in complete control of the Judicial Branch (basically the entire Federal Government), the United States has ceased to be a nation, governed as a Republic.

All nations need a founding myth to sustain them and the nation that arose on the backs of the sacrifices made by The Greatest Generation looks to the Civil Rights era with fondness, reverence and continued reliance to maintain its hegemony.

How can anyone dare question the regal authority of BRA and the white liberals who support these long-discriminated against souls? Do you wish to turn the dogs loose and unleash water hoses upon Black people again? Haven’t you read the founding document as espoused by Martin Luther King, Jr., that ordains the judging of person “not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character?”

The Civil Rights Era heralded the unraveling of that nation conceived two centuries ago and brought about its complete dismantling. In her place grew a leviathan that Tea Party members protest with no clear-cut or definitive endgame in place.

Is it the United States Constitution they yearn to return to prominence? The Declaration of Independence they pray is restored to importance?

Written long ago by slave holding, dead white males, the founding documents encompass long dead and disassembled ideals, replaced by the now universally-mandated desire to uplift every Black person to positions of prominence, admiration and veneration.

The US Constitution is an antiquated document, a reminder of all that the Civil Rights movement invalidated, displaced and triumphed over. How dare dead, white males label Black people three-fifths of a person in the hateful document they devised for their own pernicious gain!

Any mention of resurrecting this menacing document must be met with dread, apprehension and derisive remarks by those in power, hence the across-the-board attacks and condemnation of Rand Paul.

The victory by those who ascribe to Zinn’s book – and its brutal accounts of racial despotism all in the name of the Constitution – an overzealous amount of worship find the labeling of that despised and largely discredited document with a warning label a perfect reminder of the total victory they have won over any last vestige of Pre-Obama America:

A small publishing company is under fire after putting warning labels on copies of the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence and other historical documents.

Wilder Publications warns readers of its reprints of the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, Common Sense, the Articles of Confederation, and the Federalist Papers, among others, that “This book is a product of its time and does not reflect the same values as it would if it were written today.”

The disclaimer goes on to tell parents that they “might wish to discuss with their childrenhow views on race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, and interpersonal relations have changed since this book was written before allowing them to read this classic work.”

Walter Olson, senior fellow at the Cato Institute, says the company may be trying to ensure that oversensitive people don’t pull its works
off bookstore or library shelves.

“Any idea that’s 100 years old will probably offend someone or other,” Olson told FoxNews.com. “…But if there’s anything that you ought to be able to take at a first gulp for yourself and then ask your parents if you’re wondering about this or that strange thing, it should be the founding documents of American history.”

Black people have no use for this document and the only reason to study this draconian record is to further engorge Black children with hatred and animosity toward the descendants of those dead, white males who wrote the document.

Tom Toles of The Washington Post drew a cartoon that perfectly encapsulated the idea of Tea Party acolytes and those conservatives and evil Republicans who yearn for a restoration of the past, when the Constitution ruled the land.

One can only laugh at those people who cling to foolish notions of strict adherence to the US Constitution and yearn for a return to a past that ultimately gave birth to the present order.

The United States Constitution and Declaration of Independence are founding documents that are included in Stuff Black People Don’t Like, as thankfully these sheets of paper were superseded and usurped thanks to the Civil Rights era (now, if only the monuments in DC could come down!).

Though, useful phrases have been kept alive, maintained from both documents to ensure that some attachment to the true founding date of the United States can remain, such as the important sentence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

It is one sentence from that same document though, that forever troubles those who work to keep BRA forever the law of the land. Strangely, it was prominently quoted in the film National Treasure:

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

At few times in America’s history has it seemed a government is so intent on subverting the will of the people. California and Arizona live under the rule of DWL’s, while other states labor in crushing debt thanks to the continued existence of BRA.

Divisions in racial attitudes have never been greater in America, where white people secretly hold one view on race in private, but publicly lip the prescribed platitudes toward state-enforced political correctness.

Though Black people do not like the founding documents, they do not like the idea that one day white people will lose complete attachments to these long dead documents either.

SBDPL is reminded of the most poignant scene from the 2004 Troy, the one where Paris hands the sword safeguarding Trojans continued existence to Aeneas. This, this is the thought that Black people truly don’t like: when white people give up on the United States and decide to safeguard their lives, liberty and sacred honor (for their progeny) elsewhere.