Watching Racial Conflict Consume The Starbucks Left

There are certain mean, evil, and backwards White People. If woke is good, these guys are comatose. Anytime they are around people other than The Caucasian Persuasion, they react as if they are an infantry squad on patrol, out past the wire in Indian Country. And can you imagine how they would react to the knee-grows that get spawned in Filthadelphia.

So how does the White Man avoid this evil curse? It helps if you have a Dad who gets sick of seeing you lay around the house and makes you go do blue collar labor during the summer. Those guys you lay rip-rap, and build two or three miles of fence with, at least half of them will be All-Amerikan Knee-Grow. That level of familiarity and camaraderie will get you past giving all black people the funny-vibe. It teaches you the difference between a reasonably nice black man and the hard-ass, undomesticated, knee-grow you’d well better be afraid of.

So what do the spoiled, rich White People who haven’t been around enough black culture to properly develop knee-grow-dar react? A recent event at a Torrance, California Starbucks suggests that The White Left just hasn’t laced up the track shoes to Race Together. This was Southern California instead of Southern Mississippi. They therefore lacked the requisite separate but equal bathroom and wouldn’t even let a brother drain the main vein and make the bladder gladder.

In video of the local incident that has gone viral, a man who identifies himself as Brandon Ward questions another man as he exits a restroom inside a Starbucks in Torrance. The other man, who appears to be white, gives his name as Weston and says coffee shop employees gave him the code to get into the bathroom – before he made a purchase. Ward, a 26-year-old Carson resident, then indicates that he was denied the code because he had not made a purchase. “Is it because of my skin color?” he asks, confronting a woman who says she is the store manager.

Obviously, this a well-rehearsed political hit in the fine tradition of Homer Plessy in Plessy v. Ferguson. Brandon Ward had done his homework. He had observed this behavior* several times. He realized this particular manager made certain assumptions about black people based on either prior personal experience or stereotype; that she wouldn’t about others. He then arranged a time and date to set up a compare-and-contrast experiment and got this woman on film.

Starbucks will be in court soon and undoubtedly will be rendered “woke” with a heavy, blunt object. The next CEO better not have no cream in that coffee. They will give quite generously… to The Rev. Jackson, the Rev. Sharpton, The $PLC, The (((ACLJEW))), and if they still have a pot left to piss in, The United Negro College Fund as well.

So again, how do Red-Pilled Whites get along with blacks without either party being gratuitously and unfairly offended? They set up informal barriers. The mix sometimes, by mutual consent. They also have their spaces and traditions in which the other does not intrude. It’s nothing as crude as legally forced Jim Crow. It’s applied Freedom of Association. We separate on an amicable and mutually agreeable basis. Respect is repaid with respect. Distance is not perceived as resentment and good walls make good neighbors.

The White Left could never enter into or honor such a gentleman’s agreement. The managerial state doesn’t believe in any agreement that isn’t on paper and monitored by their legal team. There has to be something for The Central Scrutinizer to scrutinize. The White Left just can’t envision a world where the Brotherman isn’t just begging to be overcharged for sub-optimal coffee just so they can hang around deeply intellectual Leftist faggots with hideous neck beards. I mean who wouldn’t want the Good Life, Man.

* — So Cal restaurants and bars can be sticky about allowing you in the John. They do it because homeless people trash them by taking sink baths and leaving the filthy toilet paper and paper towels strewn all over the place. So I blame Gov. Jerry Brown instead of Gov. George Wallace.

Shock Pentagon report warns US would LOSE WW3 to Russia or China

THE US army is and would be annihilated if it went to war with Russia and China, a Pentagon report has shockingly revealed.

But worryingly for The Donald, a white paper produced by US defence officials states their ground combat forces would be defeated by well-equipped enemies – specifically naming China and Russia as potential enemies.

The US is “not ready” to take on “high capable” enemies, the report warns.

US, China and Russia leaders GETTY

CRUSHED: Trump has been warned that he would lose a battle against China and Russia

Donald Trump at healthcare meeting GETTY

RETREAT: Trump has been advised to consider other methods of war

The document reads: “The US ground troops are currently not ready and unable to deter or defeat highly capable peer enemies.”

The paper adds that US soldiers are not “sufficiently trained, organised, equipped, nor postured” to win wars in the decades to come.

As a result, the US army has unveiled a new strategy for fighting multiple countries at the same time.

Political analyst Ilya Plekhanov said the US is preparing for a high-tech war without the use of ground troops.

He added: “This is why the US Army is currently leading the way in developing this doctrine.

“They understand the army will be nearly expendable in a high-tech war against potential adversaries, primarily China and Russia.

“The war of the future will be lethally chaotic for it.”

China and the US were reported to be on the brink of all-out war with China over disputed territory in the South China Sea.

And The Donald has repeatedly clashed with Putin’s Russia over North Korea and NATO.

This Is What World War III With China Might Look Like

Spoiler alert: We probably wouldn’t win.

France: No Go Zone Stops Selling Gas Because of Enriching Car Fires

Joe Jones

Daily Stormer
April 19, 2018

So apparently you can still buy gas at the pump, but in this part of occupied France you cannot fill a jerrycan with fuel to bring home for lawnmowers or whatever.

They decided to make this change because of the growing problem of Moslems setting cars on fire and rioting.

Well, you know what they say; you can’t cook an omelette without setting a car on fire and using the hood as a pan.

Another Day, Another Chimpout in South Africa Over Land Confiscation

Roy Batty

Daily Stormer
April 18, 2018

I’m not sure what to make of the South African situation. People are talking about how Whites are going to be genocided there in a land grab by the new black-run government that’s marginally more anti-White than the one before it.

I think there is a lot of truth in these reports. Something big is going to happen.

But at the same time, look at the police force being sent to contain this chimpout by mud hut dwelling urban Zulus.

It looks huwhite to me.

I think that there is an Anglo/Boer split that is happening in South Africa that isn’t being talked about. I know for a fact that a lot of Whites that still live in the cities and are still plugged into South African society are not supportive of the Boer and are actually quite liberal and believe in the whole “Rainbow Nation” despite having to live in fortified castles, not homes.

And the blacks that are chimping out are asking for land from Boer farmers.

They’re not asking for these suburban plots…yet.


Violence erupted at an informal settlement outside Cape Town, South Africa as authorities evicted locals illegally occupying land. Police opened fire as protesters looted stores and set nearby vegetation on fire.

Protesters, who say they are fed up with overcrowding and a lack of housing in Vrygrond, have earmarked a piece of land they want to move to and erected shacks in the area.

However, violence broke out as authorities destroyed these structures Monday night, with residents smashing a local liquor store and setting fire to tires and nearby vegetation. Footage from the scene shows gunfire ringing out as police confront protesters.

Here’s some more footage from the protest.

I don’t know what’s going on in South Africa in detail.

Lauren did a good job explaining what she saw when she visited South Africa. She redeemed herself in my eyes.

But again, I think she’s talking about the Boer, not about all White South Africans.

Hmm. Worth looking into some more, imho.

Prostitution – Heinous Crime or the Government in Your Bedroom?


Buying sexual favors – a heinous crime?

In Anglo-America, prostitution is treated as an unthinkable crime and the third rail of civilized political discussion. Johns and sellers alike are regularly rounded up as public enemy number one and whisked off to jail by servants of the almighty state.

Is prostitution the horrible crime it is made out to be? Or is it another example of the government micromanaging human conduct and legislating morality?

If you haven’t ventured outside the Anglo American cultural matrix, it may surprise you to learn that prostitution is legal in many parts of the world. It’s even legal in 11 counties in the state of Nevada.

Legacy media journalist ((((((((((((John Stossel)))))))))))) challenged conventional thinking on the issue when he went to the Moonlite Bunny Ranch just outside Las Vegas and talked to some of the girls who work as prostitutes there. The working girls unanimously agreed the state should not be enforcing morality or telling people what to do with their sex lives, and even went on to confront a prosecutor who regularly rounds up Johns and slaps them with criminal records. It is interesting to watch the verbal gymnastics the prosecutor performs when confronted by the girls who work at Bunny Ranch.

One girl even tells Stossel how she gave up a lucrative job because she enjoyed the sex work more.

Creating Problems to Create Profit

Inside the Matrix, such euphemisms as “human trafficking” are continuously invented by political puppet masters in order to repress sexuality for economic and political benefit. In modern times terms like “human trafficking” also serve to marginalize heterosexual behavior that has been taking place since time immemorial.

The human trafficking problem has largely been invented out of whole cloth by apparatchiks in the Anglo-American legacy media and the government. This truth of the matter was reported by none other than The Guardian in the UK:

The UK’s biggest ever investigation of sex trafficking failed to find a single person who had forced anybody into prostitution in spite of hundreds of raids on sex workers in a six-month campaign by government departments, specialist agencies and every police force in the country.

The failure has been disclosed by a Guardian investigation which also suggests that the scale of and nature of sex trafficking into the UK has been exaggerated by politicians and media.

Current and former ministers have claimed that thousands of women have been imported into the UK and forced to work as sex slaves, but most of these statements were either based on distortions of quoted sources or fabrications without any source at all.

As these facts show, the state often invents problems so it can give itself something to do. It also puts the government in the awkward position of being the judge of morality.


The Red Light District in Amsterdam is one of many places in Europe where prostitution is legal

Creating Problems the State Claims to Oppose

How can the government claim to want to enforce morality and when it is one of the most immoral institutions that has ever existed? In politics, one has to create problems to create profit and power. The prohibition on sexual behavior that’s as old as the human species itself causes the very problems that governments claim to want to eliminate. The irony is “human trafficking” would be reduced if the activity was legal. The secrecy and illegality is what causes problems.

We saw this with prohibition in the 1930s. As soon as alcohol was outlawed, buyers and sellers went underground and we saw the rise of bootleggers like Al Capone. Prohibition never works, it only creates criminals and crime.

All the while, the same puppet masters promote homosexuality by passing laws and giving the LGBT rights movement so much press it has arguably been elevated higher than heterosexuality in society. Homosexuality is widely regarded by the religions of the world to be an immoral behavior, but the U.S. now sanctions homosexual marriage and persecutes those who do not agree.

What about heterosexual rights? If the state cannot legislate morality for homosexuals, why is it legislating morality for heterosexuals? It is the ultimate in state hypocrisy.


Not worrying over people’s private sex lives frees up the state to focus on real crime

What Happens When It’s Legal

Prostitution is legal in many parts of the world. But in America, the “protect the puss and exploit the dick” Puritanical mentality still rules. Once a man begins traveling the world he notices that society does not fall apart if women can legally choose to sell sex to men.

Where I live prostitution is legal and I regularly see women who choose to perform this work, and they absolutely retain their biological advantage over men just as in countries where prostitution is illegal. The man must pay for play, and women often take full advantage of the sexual desperation of some Betas and Omegas who can’t get laid otherwise.

I regularly see women who leave Red Light zones with men twice their age. They all view sex as a normal part of life and not a sacred cow. In more libertine cultures both men and women benefit from legalized prostitution because it is easy money for the women and easy sex for the men. Most women later transition out of the profession as they age.

None of the women I have talked to who do this work view it as oppression, and none are coerced into doing it. Some women say just like to screw, and if they can screw for money all the better. This is hard to understand to a misandrist (man-hating) mentality like the one found in Anglo America. Cultural critic and scholar Rookh KShatriya points out the peculiar nature of sexual relations in Puritanical Anglo culture.

The Anglobitch Thesis broadly considers prostitution in the Anglosphere to be quite distinct from that which occurs in other cultures. This relates to the Disneyfied, Puritanical repression that undercuts sexual relations in the Anglosphere. Elsewhere, sex is viewed as a physical function, like eating, not some quasi-mystical sacrament bestowed by women on men. Hence, in the Anglosphere it is broadly in women’s interests to keep this high exchange value attached to sex, for any decline in its value means a loss of that princess status uniformly granted to women in the Anglosphere.

Interestingly, a man’s social status or financial power also considerably changes how people view prostitution.


Pretty Woman glorifies a high status male saving a damsel whore in distress, while if a low status male did the same thing he would be condemned

High Status Males Vs. Low Status Males

When a high status male buys sex it is portrayed a hero saving a damsel in distress as Richard Gere did in Pretty Woman, and it makes for a hit movie. When low status John Q. Citizen buys the same piece of ass he is reviled and punished to the full extent of the law.

Moral of the story: if you are going to buy sex in America it is okay if you are a billionaire. But if you are the average corporate cog in the wheel, it is verboten. High-status actors from Hugh Grant to Charlie Sheen have admitted to buying sex in the past. Hugh Grant got arrested for getting a blowjob from a whore and later went on the laugh about the incident on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. Sheen told a judge he didn’t pay his hooker for the sex as much as he was paying her to leave afterwards.


When sex is criminalized, people still find ways to do it

Prohibition Does Not Work

The War on Prostitution runs parallel to the disastrous but profitable trillion dollar Drug War the United States has been waging since the 1970s. This Drug War has not reduced drug use but has led to the formation of dangerous cartels, corrupt police officers who seize drugs and then resell them, prescription abuse, and provided yet another piñata for lying politicians to swing at with oppressive laws. The prohibition of prostitution only forces the activity into the darkness.

You may be surprised to learn many American legal scholars agree that the government should keep its nose out of a sexual transaction between two consenting adults. However, this would mean that men could not be as easily gulled into supporting a tax farm and family law system that exploits them. Translation: it would cost the state hardworking Beta male provider tax money.

((((((((((((Cathy Young)))))))))))), Contributing Editor as Reason magazine says:

Prostitution is perhaps the ultimate victimless crime: a consensual transaction in which both parties are supposedly committing a crime, and the person most likely to be charged—the one selling sex—is also the one most likely to be viewed as the victim.

Billy Long, Professor of Criminal Justice at Ferrum College says:

For too long, many in the United States have considered sex work to be demeaning toward women. Women sex workers are typically viewed as ‘billiard balls’ helplessly propelled into prostitution and being degraded by their male customers. These hapless victims are viewed with pity while the evil male oppressor is castigated for stooping to the depths of depravity by paying for sex with cash. This is a fallacious and wildly inaccurate allegation. Quite the contrary, after legalization and normalization of private prostitution, more women will feel empowered to perceive their activities not as degrading or demeaning but, rather, as uplifting and beneficial.

Sherry F. Colb, Professor of Law at Rutgers also agrees with legalizing normal human sexual behavior:

Prostitution should not be a crime. Prostitutes are not committing an inherently harmful act. While the spread of disease and other detriments are possible in the practice of prostitution, criminalization is a sure way of exacerbating rather than addressing such effects. We saw this quite clearly in the time of alcohol prohibition in this country.

Sue Bradford, member of New Zealand’s Parliament touched on why the state should not be involved in enforcing morality. (Especially, since politics is perhaps the most immoral institution ever conceived by man.)

We believed, and still do, that it was completely wrong to go on living with an archaic law which criminalized generations of sex workers, mainly women, for a victimless so called crime in the name of antique moralities shared by only some of the population.


Anglo America is not likely to get over its Puritanical views on sex anytime soon

Towards Legalization

It is very unlikely that this activity will be legalized in Anglo America anytime soon. (Australia and New Zealand are notable exceptions in the Anglosphere.) However, one need look no further than Backpage to see that it goes on each and every day.

The state acting as if it should be the moral judge over your life and taking control of what you do in your bedroom is symbolic of the biggest, and most intrusive government in the history of mankind.

For now, men who choose to stay in Anglo America will have no other choice than to learn Game. The law says one night stands are okay as long as you don’t leave a $100 bill on the nightstand. Learning Game isn’t a bad solution. However, if a guy gets into a dry spell or really needs some female attention it’s would be nice to have an alternative available that wouldn’t lead to public shaming, and the destruction of one’s life and reputation for wanting to screw around for a few minutes.


Follow his blog for more great thought provoking posts.

America is in the midst of a Socialist Revolution, and a purge of dissident voices has begun.

Sweden Is Forcing Its Young Boys Into Homosexuality

By Howard Roark

Remember hearing your local preacher or priest talking about how the city of Sodom and its wicked people digged their own graves at Sunday School? Sweden in a not so far future might end up like Sodom 2.0. Its educators are currently digging their own graves by forcing gender experiments on children, with no right of choice and ability to differentiate from right and wrong yet.

Sweden’s Gender Neutral Schools

Judes 1,7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Sweden’s educators claim their aim is to promote “gender equality” in order to create a society in which its citizens wont discern between male or female when choosing friendships or relationships. Educators say their efforts will be worth it, since they claim it will create more “successful” citizens that treat each other as “human beings” rather than “men/women.”

Some of their attempts to social engineer children include forbidding kids from using pronouns, such as “he” or “she.” If a boy tries to call a female colleague by she/her/girl or the contrary, the teacher advertises them to stop doing it. The same rule applies for girls, since it can deconstruct their idea of a “gender neutral society”. They promote everyone to call each other with the substantive friend or “hen”, a genderless pronoun originally from Nordic Finnish.

Other strategies of theirs include making boys more submissive by making them play with dolls, pretend to be cooking in a kitchen, and dress like girls. At the same time, they try to make girls more rebellious and defiant by teaching them to yell , run, dress on their own, and play outside.

During drawing classes, one of the teachers, Ms.Esteka, states that they try to enforce boys into drawing boys with long eyelashes just like they would do if they were drawing girls even if her male students complain “We know its not like that in real life.”

Sweden’s toy makers taking advantage of the gender-neutral trend in schools and society


The state curriculum in Sweden urges teachers to “counteract traditional gender roles and gender patterns.” – Andrea Bruce for The New York Times

Sweden’s toy industry is also taking advantage of this “progressive” trend by creating gender-neutral toys and children’s books. Sweden Educators completely forbid children, especially boys into reading children’s books that would teach them traditional gender roles like Sleeping Beauty and Cinderella.

What kind of men and women Sweden will raise with all those experiments that sound batshit insane? Are they trying to turn Sweden into Sodom/Gomorrah 2.0?

Maybe North American and South American Educators aren’t so bad after all…

Brazil is my homeland. It might be a third world country and not as developed as Sweden, but at least we don’t force naive young boys and girls, who have no way of fighting back and are easily influenced, to switch roles like crazy nazi Swedish educators are doing. The repercussions of the social engineering they are doing to those poor children will be terrible and will definitely only bring Sweden one step closer to total collapse.

America’s K12 schools might not be perfect as well, but at least they don’t try to social engineer in a forceful way America’s youth into changing their traditional roles. For now.

I wonder why parents haven’t done anything yet and are allowing such behaviour from people (educators), who were supposed to be teaching their youth about freedom of will and speech instead of forcing children into their creepy social experiments and ideologies.

I’m proud of the strong latin machismo culture in my country of birth and the rest of Latin America. It will sure help South America from becoming so degenerate and gaily as Sweden has. This is just as sad and as disturbing as the atrocities Nazi scientists commited in WW2.

Swedes can laugh all they want about the educational disadvantage American and Brazilian public high schools are when compared to theirs, but at least we are manly and don’t force no one into becoming a tomboy nor a tomgirl. They are basically trying to condition males and females from a young age to switch their roles, behaviour and sexual preferences derived from their gender.

Isaiah 3, 9 The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.

In short, Swedish culture is reaching a point of no return in which in a few years from now the Cultural Marxists will have successfully annihilated all national identity in that country. I’m no xenophobic but I don’t think it’s morally or ethically right to force anyone into switching their normal biological roles and sexual preferences.