California is a canary in the coal mine. As one of America’s “majority-minority” states with a mega-wealthy Jewish aristocracy (Silicon Valley and Hollywood), its cities have the living standards of Oaxaca at Geneva prices.
The average apartment in LA goes for $2,107. This is the new world order price for housing, a product of: real estate speculation, illegal immigrant fueled overpopulation and wage stagnation, and mass unemployment (was at 25% in 2010 and probably not much better now). Since local governments are run by corrupt Mexicans (on the city council level) and Jews (like Mayor ((((((Eric Garcetti))))))), they’re all taken care of or in on it.
You get a blanket under a bridge!
Add the low trust society multiculturalism creates, and the fact that some of these hobos are violent and filthy blacks or junkies, and public toilets are few and far between.
So the streets of Los Angeles are filled with human feces.
An outbreak of hepatitis A is spreading through Los Angeles County after leaping from a large homeless contingent in San Diego, threatening thousands of people and fueling criticism that local officials have not done enough to contain the deadly liver disease.
Hundreds of cases have turned up in southern California as well as Michigan — but conditions in Los Angeles, where roughly 50,000 people live on the streets, have prompted deeper concerns.
Reports compiled by volunteer organizations have faulted city officials for not providing enough accessible toilets as the homeless population sharply increased by 23 percent this year.
In a prescient warning, a June 2017 report by a collection of nonprofits called the LA Central Providers Collaborative sounded the alarm about crowding and living conditions on Skid Row, citing the city’s own predictions about the increased risk for hepatitis A and other diseases.
“One would think that Los Angeles, one of the greatest cities in the world, would exceed these minimal standards. However, this Audit finds that in Skid Row, Los Angeles fails to meet even the standards for a refugee camp,” the report said. “During overnight hours, there are only nine public toilets available for 1,777 unsheltered homeless people on Skid Row, and these toilets are largely inaccessible.”
The report noted that United Nations’ refugee camp standards are one toilet for every 20 people.
Even United Nations’ camps in Haiti have superior public sanitation than LA.
There’s no reason that one of the most resource rich states with such beautiful weather has to be such a horrible place to live. Until the 90s it was one of the most prosperous states in America.
When you replace your population with third world people, it’s a toilet that sinks all boats except the Jewish and billionaire ones. Everyone in California is doing badly, including the white minority, which is discriminated against by the state for jobs and educational opportunities. Basically if you can’t get a job with the municipality, you’re going to be struggling to subsist in a run down 65% Mexican gang run “middle class” neighborhood. Or knee deep in shit on Skid Row.
Want to see America’s near future? Visit sunny California!
Don’t you just love it when businesses that cater to well to do white folks make light of people of color being displaced from their neighborhoods? Shame on you @inkcoffee .
This Nation, called America belongs to the White man, not to the useless farm equipment, not the banksters, not the globalists, not the jews, its belongs to us, we built it, we maintain it, we pay the taxes, all the rest of you are just visiting, and the time is coming where you will all be going home.
A “non-white” student at Parkway Central High School in Chesterfield, Missouri reportedly confessed to writing “White Lives Matter Ni**ers!” on a mirror inside of a girls’ bathroom.
It’s past time for the Department of Justice to officially declare these hate hoaxes an epidemic.
This was found in a restroom at Parkway Central High School in Chesterfield, Missouri smh. I wish that y'all would control your tiny Hitlers, because we are getting sick of this bullshit. pic.twitter.com/NoLrnsrC7F
Parkway schools Superintendent Keith Marty said in a statement Tuesday that the revelation that a non-white student was involved was surprising, but it did not “diminish the hurt” caused by the incident at Parkway Central High School in Chesterfield.
“The behavior was wrong and the student will be held accountable for this serious act according to our student discipline policy,” said Marty, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. “It is important to understand why this happened and why we are often quick to assume who is responsible,” he added.
It happened because minority students know faking such hate crimes is a one way ticket to coveted victimhood status and social justice stardom.
The racial slur was found in a girls’ restroom on campus last week, prompting the local community to organize and stand against racism. “I was horrified,” West County anti-racism activist Joy Weese Moll told KTVI last week. “A lot of us in West County have a really hard time saying racism exists here. It makes me sad for the person who wrote it because they have not been taught and not learned how beautiful our society can be.”
Parents who have children going to the school also reacted. “This is very much a white person issue that we need to tackle as white people and speak up against,” parent Alexandria Lane-Detwiler said.
This was a “racist hate incident” — against white people.
White people as a group were framed for this hoax.
Duterte Admits ‘Fascism,’ Ends Peace Talks With Communists and Vows Crackdown on Left
We are glad to see one leader stand against the evils of communism and begin to exterminate that vile anti-life group from the face of the earth. Communist, whether violent or peaceful, must be destroyed, their believers exterminated, rounded up and put in mass graves, its belief system declared illegal, and punishable by death.
As the Philippines president cancels peace talks with NPA guerrillas and vows to crack down on legal activists, we speak to BAYAN Secretary-General Renato Reyes, Jr. in this teleSUR exclusive.
President Rodrigo Duterte has terminated peace talks with the New People’s Army (NPA), the armed wing of the underground Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), while vowing to treat combatants in East Asia’s longest-running communist insurgency as “terrorists.”
“I will follow America, since they say that I am an American boy,” Duterte said. “OK, granted, I will admit that I am a fascist. I will categorize you already as a terrorist.”
Both the CPP and the NPA have been included in the official U.S. government list of foreign terrorist organizations since 2002, shortly after then-President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo announced her own campaign to defeat them.
“We look at such threats as part of a greater plan to impose a fascist dictatorship.”
On Wednesday, the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process Secretary Jesus Dureza finally announced the formal cancellation of the peace talks.
“We are hereby announcing today the cancellation of all planned meetings with the CPP/NPA/NDF in line with President Duterte’s directive that there will be no more peace talks with them,” Dureza said.
“There will be no peace negotiations anymore with the CPP/NPA/NDF until such time as the desired enabling environment conducive to a change in the government’s position becomes evident … Never before have we all reached this far in our negotiations with them,” he added.
Since 1986, Manila has been engaged in on-again, off-again peace talks with the National Democratic Front, the united front representing the communist fighters and allied social movements.
While Duterte initially championed the peace process, which hinged on the implementation of an ambitious socio-economic reform agenda known as CASER, the negotiations were derailed in May after he declared martial law in Mindanao and launched a devastating five-month siege on alleged “Islamic State-aligned” rebels in Marawi City.
Duterte has lashed out at the reds for making “unreasonable demands” while failing to unilaterally “stand down” and halt their military operations.
The president has also threatened to crack down on legal social movements and mass organizations such as Bagong Alyansang Makabayan – the New Patriotic Alliance, or BAYAN – for allegedly “conspiring” with the guerrillas.
The threat is taken seriously by the labor unions, progressive student groups, human rights watchdogs, opposition politicians and other mass organizations united with BAYAN, the alliance’s Secretary-General Renato Reyes, Jr., told teleSUR.
“(We remain) prepared and vigilant and look at such threats as part of a greater plan to impose a fascist dictatorship,” Reyes explained.
Groups such as human rights monitor KARAPATAN, farmworkers’ and peasants’ unions, and housing rights group Kadamay have all reported the arbitrary detention of several of their members in the past week alone.
On Monday, the Communist Party issued an acerbic dismissal of Duterte’s latest threats.
“Duterte is nothing if not consistent in his fascist rants and acts, using even the tired excuse of the progressive left ‘conspiring’ with the NPA, to constantly kowtow to the wishes of the higher echelons of the U.S.-controlled armed forces,” the CPP Information Bureau said.
“He has resorted to namecalling and threats so many times, in so many forms, that the people have grown weary of his constant harping. Emboldened by the recent Trump approval of his strongman rule, he is bent on eliminating all opposition, legal and otherwise.
“The people recognize these threats against the revolutionary and progressive movement for what they are: to eliminate the strongest and most consistent opposition to his fascist rule, silence dissent against his anti-people and pro-imperialist policies and further perpetuate himself in power through a one-man rule.”
Much of the Philippines left has made no secret of their sympathy toward the NPA, which they see as the armed branch of a genuine people’s government fighting for national independence and democracy, guided by a socialist perspective. In the eyes of organizers such as Reyes, the NPA can’t be defeated unless the social roots of the armed conflict are addressed.
“Duterte’s recent threats of designating the NPA as a terrorist organization, following the U.S. line, will not accomplish anything except the intensified attacks on the people. It certainly will not stop the NPA from waging revolutionary struggle.
“The threat of a terrorist listing may also be used by Duterte to force the revolutionary forces to surrender, but that won’t likely happen. In any case, if he does push through with it, it has the effect of terminating talks.”
As recently as Oct. 20, Duterte had hinted that he would resume the negotiations with the NDFP, telling reporters: “I have to talk to the NPA still.” Since the conclusion of the ASEAN leaders’ summit in Manila and the visit of U.S. President Donald Trump, however, Duterte assumed a far more bellicose tone that precipitated Wednesday’s cancellation of the peace process.
“The timing of the threat is not surprising since Duterte and Trump reaffirmed U.S.-Philippine relations,” Reyes said. “Trump has increased military aid to the Philippines – Duterte may be thinking that U.S. support for counter-insurgency, terror listing and Martial Law are enough to defeat the revolutionary forces.
“His imagined ‘conspiracy’ between the NPA and the legal organizations under Bayan is meant to justify increased political repression in order to eliminate the most effective resistance to fascist dictatorship, human rights abuses, anti-people economic impositions and increased U.S. intervention.”
Fuck off you communist scum, prepare to die.
On Tuesday, Duterte also threatened to shut down mines that pay “revolutionary taxes” to the Maoist combatants, accusing mine operators of depositing money in bank accounts maintained by the fighters in exchange for allowing their operations to continue.
“If I go against the communists, then everybody has to reconfigure their relationship with the New People’s Army,” he said. “If you support them financially, I will close you down.”
Foreign-owned mining operations have an extensive presence throughout rural regions of the Philippines, digging for gold, nickel, copper, chromite and coal. The Mines and Geosciences Bureau say the country had an estimated US$840 billion worth of untapped mineral wealth as of 2012, making the Philippines a “prime piece of real estate” from an extractivist standpoint (to paraphrase Trump).
The activities of foreign miners have resulted in militarization, land grabs and extensive environmental damage to the ancestral lands of national minorities such as the Lumad, Cordillera and Moro peoples. Indigenous peoples are among the most consistent supporters of the NPA, who are seen as defenders of their land and livelihood from the process of “imperialist plunder” facilitated by local comprador elites.
Predictably, the country’s mining bosses have eagerly welcomed the president’s promises to wipe out the NPA and are pledging to comply with Duterte’s new directive.
“We do not condone any member supporting the New People’s Army through the payment of revolutionary taxes,” said Ronald Recidoro, executive director at the Chamber of Mines of the Philippines.
“This is clearly against the law and they really should be prosecuted if they are found to be supporting these organizations. And if closure is warranted, that is within the prerogative of the president.”
Recidero also complained that some miners had experienced their equipment being burned by the NPA because of a refusal to pay the taxes.
During his speech, Duterte further promised to build the military’s domestic counter-insurgency capabilities. “I am fighting a rebellion… I have to build a strong army,” he said, noting that the military would acquire 23 attack helicopters in the near future.
Despite the threats from Malacañang, the communists continue to project confidence in their ability to withstand the announced all-out war.
“Duterte is wrong in thinking that the revolutionary movement will just roll over and surrender in the face of his rants,” the CPP said.
“He is wrong in thinking that the progressive movement will be cowed with his threats of a crackdown and mass arrests. The democratic mass movement will continue to strengthen itself by organizing, propaganda and militant mobilizations, while the revolutionary forces will continue advancing the people’s war comprehensively to achieve genuine democracy and national sovereignty.”
Likewise, Reyes is sure that Duterte’s attacks on the Philippines left are doomed to backfire. “Duterte’s pronouncements will only fan the flames of struggle – he would be the best argument on why revolutionary struggle is needed.
“Marcos in 1972 attempted to do the same, but his dictatorship was eventually overthrown and the mass movement grew. Any attempt to impose a dictatorship now will be met with fierce resistance by the people.”
Sweden is slowly descending into a civil war and the police is helpless …or so it seems. A recent flash mob in Gothenburg by the Nordic Resistance Movement shows a very different police force than the one that claim its unable to keep crime at bay in the 60 no-go zones in Sweden.
Help keep us ad free, sign up for a membership at http://www.redicemembers.com. You’ll receive full access to our extensive archives. Stream or download over 1400 programs, including radio, video, TV segments & Weekend Warrior.
Civilization has made most western people soft, now it’s time to get uncivilized again. If we don’t go back to survival mode, we will no longer have a future. Democracy will never fix this problem, because democracy created the problem. There is only one solution, and we all know it by instinct. Our Time is coming that is a Fact.
Most stories about civilization decline begin with the phrase, “We were told,” as in, “We were told that the famine was the fault of the kings, and that the new regime would ensure that there was always plenty,” and then launch into a description of how human wishful thinking did not match reality much at all, leading to horrors. This is why all revolutions fail.
Revolutions, after all, are based on human conjecture about what might be true, and since we like the thought of that, what should be true, but they rely on the “excluded middles” — the points between extremes — filled out by all the other details that are not part of the explanation. Secondary effects, implications and unintended consequences spring up like demons.
As with all ideas, we ask ourselves whether the argument is for an actual purpose, or simply a pretext or rationalization designed to explain how people want to feel about life, instead of what they see as its actual parameters. Since most people seem discontented, and can reliably be counted on to blame others for their own failings, it looks more like justification than purposeful action.
The sexual revolution fits this pattern as well despite being a cultural change brought about by a loose coalition of Leftist believers instead of purely a State action. We were told that we could keep living as we had, but that this way, people would not face the consequences for relatively “innocent” behavior. Instead we got the utter destruction of the family.
While many blame the Pill, the broader move toward the sexual revolution was present even a century before when women’s rights advocates demanded the ability to have sex outside of marriage, and Bohemians back into the 1600s endorsed polyamory and extra-marital sex. With the 1940s, it became a possibility since women had jobs and were living alone in big anonymous cities.
As with all things Leftist, the goal of sexual liberation was to avoid having the individual lose rank for bad behavior, or otherwise be less included because of the consequences of her or his actions. But fifty plus years later, we can see that whatever intentions, desires, or fantasies were behind the sexual revolution, it ended in horrors.
Since 1970, out-of-wedlock birth rates have soared. In 1965, 24 percent of black infants and 3.1 percent of white infants were born to single mothers. By 1990 the rates had risen to 64 percent for black infants, 18 percent for whites. Every year about one million more children are born into fatherless families.
Over the same period the white out-of-wedlock birth ratio experienced yet faster growth- albeit from a lower-level-more then quintupling, from 3.1 percent to 18 percent.
Not surprising, many of these babies are unwanted, which led to a massive surge in abortions until checked by Republican laws making access more difficult:
In 2011, the U.S. abortion rate was 16.9 abortions per every 1,000 women aged 15 to 44, the lowest it’s been since abortion was legalized in 1973.
Between 2008 and 2010, 44 laws related to abortion were implemented in 18 states, according to the report. Most did not likely have an effect on the abortion rate, the study authors say, but a few may have. For example, a new law in Missouri that requires a woman to attend an in-person counseling session 24 hours before an abortion may have attributed to the state’s 17% decline.
Until the 1960s, abortion — the disposal of unwanted children who were mostly produced by casual sex — was relatively unknown in America, where now it is a commonplace event.
Fewer babies were born to teenagers in 2010 than in any year since 1946.
How does this shatter the family? In addition to the replacement of the family with the single-parent home, those who have more sex are the least likely to form lifelong bonds, meaning that they may reproduce, but will then end up alone and possibly with their children in one-parent homes or the dreaded parent plus significant other unstable relationship which seems to often end in molestation or violence:
‘The highest five-year divorce rates of all are associated with marrying in the 2000s and having 10 or more premarital sex partners: 33 percent,’ he wrote in the report.
And women who were virgins on their wedding night were the least likely to get divorced, according to the study.
According to census data cited in the report, barely half of adults ages 18 and older are married — 51% in 2010, compared with 72% in 1960. This decline is especially notable for young adults: 20% of 18- to 29-year-olds were married in 2010, compared with 59% in 1960.
…In 2011, the median age at first marriage is an estimated 28.7 for men and 26.5 for women. That means half of men don’t marry until at least about age 29, and half of women don’t marry until at least about age 27. In 1960, the median age at first marriage for both men and women was in the early 20s.
…Although 39% of Americans say they agree that marriage is becoming obsolete, most people who have never married say they would like to marry someday (including many who agree that marriage is becoming obsolete).
The divorce surge is over. (Or most people believe it is: this paper offers an alternate take.) In truth, the rise in divorce has been over for 20 years. Divorce rates peaked in the early 1980s when Ronald Reagan was president and the Internet was only a mite in the eye of wierdos hanging out in California garages.
…The younger generation, whether they know divorce is declining or not, believes that marriage is on the rocks. From their vantage point, they’re right. While fewer American adults have been divorcing over the past decades, a growing number of people in their own cohort have grown up apart from one parent, almost always their fathers.
…How can divorce be declining but at the same time more children growing up with single parents? Because—and this is the story that Miller underplays—so many parents never marry in the first place. A little history is in order here: When divorce rates skyrocketed in the 1970s, American were not simply suddenly looking at their spouses and deciding en masse that they couldn’t take it anymore. They were reacting to a changing understanding about what marriage meant. Instead of an arrangement largely centered around providing for and rearing the next generation, it was becoming an adult-centric union based on love and shared happiness, which as an upper middle class grew in size, became closely linked to granite countered kitchens, European and spa vacations, and weddings with 200 guests.
…If marriage and childbearing were no longer tightly linked but rather discreet—even unrelated—life events, and if they were not earning enough to enjoy the middle class status objects enjoyed by their more educated peers, then why marry at all? Why not just have kids without getting married?
This fits with the data about children being born out of wedlock. The Left replaced the family with the individual, part of a process called “atomization” which separates society into individual and State, and so now people simply reproduce, then abandon those children to day care, public schools, and jobs, and only wonder about whether this was a good idea when they get dropped off at nursing homes and abandoned.
The carnage of the sexual revolution is just beginning to reveal itself. The “Greatest Generation” experienced the first of it, the Baby Boomers lived it, and Generation X reacted to it, with the lockstep ideologues indoctrinated at public schools from the millennials embracing it as long as it was “safe sex,” but Generation Z finds itself looking back over the carnage and wanting away. It will take another few generations for us to see secondary effects such as lower transfer of social capital, greater neurosis, inability to attach, alienation, and other effects on kids who lack the benefits of a stable, family-oriented home situation.
Perhaps the sexual revolution will then be known as just another revolution: a fantasy, applied with violence, that destroyed its host and left behind a wandering, cultureless, and isolated herd of individuals who could not recall a life before everything became grey and meaningless.