Congressman Suggests People Will Don ‘White Hoods’ If Wilson Not Rebuked

Congressman Suggests People Will Don ‘White Hoods’ If Wilson Not Rebuked

More news stories on Bizarre Racism Charges

FOX News, September 15, 2009

Rep. Joe Wilson’s outburst last week is drawing new recriminations from his colleagues, with a member of the Congressional Black Caucus suggesting that a failure to rebuke the South Carolina Republican is tantamount to supporting the most blatant form of organized racism in American history.

In an obvious reference to the Ku Klux Klan, Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., said Tuesday that people will be putting on “white hoods and white uniforms again and riding through the countryside” if emerging racist attitudes, which he says were subtly supported by Wilson, are not rebuked. He said Wilson must be disciplined as an example.

The charged comments come as the House is preparing to take further action against Wilson. House Democratic leaders decided to formally discipline him Tuesday afternoon for jeering President Obama during last week’s joint session of Congress.

Wilson bellowed “You lie!” as Obama delivered his address.

{snip}

While he has been widely condemned by colleagues on both sides of the aisle for breaching protocol, some have gone a step further and accused Wilson of being racially motivated.

Johnson seemed to reference the protests held in Washington, D.C., on Saturday in making his claim. While many protesters were there to demonstrate against big government and federal over-spending, Johnson argued that a “fringe” element is motivated by race and that Wilson “winked” at that fringe with his behavior.

{snip}

The resolution is “privileged,” meaning whenever it is introduced the measure goes to the front of the legislative line. It is unclear who will call up the measure.

A “resolution of disapproval” is not one of the four forms of discipline typically meted out in the House. The most commonly used means of punishment are expulsion, censure, reprimand or fine.

For instance, in 1997, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was both reprimanded and fined for his book deal. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., was reprimanded in 1990 for ethical breaches tied to a male prostitute. Republicans tried to censure Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif., in 2007 for comments he made on the House floor about President Bush. But Democrats voted to set aside that effort.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on September 15, 2009)

Morality and Abstract Thinking- How Africans may differ from Westerners

Morality and Abstract Thinking

How Africans may differ from Westerners

by Gedaliah Braun

I am an American who taught philosophy in several African universities from 1976 to 1988, and have lived since that time in South Africa. When I first came to Africa, I knew virtually nothing about the continent or its people, but I began learning quickly. I noticed, for example, that Africans rarely kept promises and saw no need to apologize when they broke them. It was as if they were unaware they had done anything that called for an apology.

It took many years for me to understand why Africans behaved this way but I think I can now explain this and other behavior that characterizes Africa. I believe that morality requires abstract thinking—as does planning for the future—and that a relative deficiency in abstract thinking may explain many things that are typically African.

What follow are not scientific findings. There could be alternative explanations for what I have observed, but my conclusions are drawn from more than 30 years of living among Africans.

.
A public service billboard in South Africa. Note old tire and gas can.

My first inklings about what may be a deficiency in abstract thinking came from what I began to learn about African languages. In a conversation with students in Nigeria I asked how you would say that a coconut is about halfway up the tree in their local language. “You can’t say that,” they explained. “All you can say is that it is ‘up’.” “How about right at the top?” “Nope; just ‘up’.” In other words, there appeared to be no way to express gradations.

A few years later, in Nairobi, I learned something else about African languages when two women expressed surprise at my English dictionary. “Isn’t English your language?” they asked. “Yes,” I said. “It’s my only language.” “Then why do you need a dictionary?”

They were puzzled that I needed a dictionary, and I was puzzled by their puzzlement. I explained that there are times when you hear a word you’re not sure about and so you look it up. “But if English is your language,” they asked, “how can there be words you don’t know?” “What?” I said. “No one knows all the words of his language.”

I have concluded that a relative deficiency in abstract thinking may explain many things that are typically African.

“But we know all the words of Kikuyu; every Kikuyu does,” they replied. I was even more surprised, but gradually it dawned on me that since their language is entirely oral, it exists only in the minds of Kikuyu speakers. Since there is a limit to what the human brain can retain, the overall size of the language remains more or less constant. A written language, on the other hand, existing as it does partly in the millions of pages of the written word, grows far beyond the capacity of anyone to know it in its entirety. But if the size of a language is limited, it follows that the number of concepts it contains will also be limited and hence that both language and thinking will be impoverished.

African languages were, of necessity, sufficient in their pre-colonial context. They are impoverished only by contrast to Western languages and in an Africa trying to emulate the West. While numerous dictionaries have been compiled between Euro­pean and African languages, there are few dictionaries within a single African language, precisely because native speakers have no need for them. I did find a Zulu-Zulu dictionary, but it was a small-format paperback of 252 pages.

My queries into Zulu began when I rang the African Language Department at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg and spoke to a white guy. Did “precision” exist in the Zulu language prior to European contact? “Oh,” he said, “that’s a very Eurocentric question!” and simply wouldn’t answer. I rang again, spoke to another white guy, and got a virtually identical response.

.
Kikuyu women do not need dictionaries.

So I called the University of South Africa, a large correspondence university in Pretoria, and spoke to a young black guy. As has so often been my experience in Africa, we hit it off from the start. He understood my interest in Zulu and found my questions of great interest. He explained that the Zulu word for “precision” means “to make like a straight line.” Was this part of indigenous Zulu? No; this was added by the compilers of the dictionary.

But, he assured me, it was otherwise for “promise.” I was skeptical. How about “obligation?” We both had the same dictionary (English-Zulu, Zulu-English Dictionary, published by Witwatersrand University Press in 1958), and looked it up. The Zulu entry means “as if to bind one’s feet.” He said that was not indigenous but was added by the compilers. But if Zulu didn’t have the concept of obligation, how could it have the concept of a promise, since a promise is simply the oral undertaking of an obligation? I was interested in this, I said, because Africans often failed to keep promises and never apologized—as if this didn’t warrant an apology.

A light bulb seemed to go on in his mind. Yes, he said; in fact, the Zulu word for promise—isithembiso—is not the correct word. When a black person “promises” he means “maybe I will and maybe I won’t.” But, I said, this makes nonsense of promising, the very purpose of which is to bind one to a course of action. When one is not sure he can do something he may say, “I will try but I can’t promise.” He said he’d heard whites say that and had never understood it till now. As a young Romanian friend so aptly summed it up, when a black person “promises” he means “I’ll try.”

The failure to keep promises is therefore not a language problem. It is hard to believe that after living with whites for so long they would not learn the correct meaning, and it is too much of a coincidence that the same phenomenon is found in Nigeria, Kenya and Papua New Guinea, where I have also lived. It is much more likely that Africans generally lack the very concept and hence cannot give the word its correct meaning. This would seem to indicate some difference in intellectual capacity.

Note the Zulu entry for obligation: “as if to bind one’s feet.” An obligation binds you, but it does so morally, not physically. It is an abstract concept, which is why there is no word for it in Zulu. So what did the authors of the dictionary do? They took this abstract concept and made it concrete. Feet, rope, and tying are all tangible and observable, and therefore things all blacks will understand, whereas many will not understand what an obligation is. The fact that they had to define it in this way is, by itself, compelling evidence for my conclusion that Zulu thought has few abstract concepts and indirect evidence for the view that Africans may be deficient in abstract thinking.

Abstract thinking

Abstract entities do not exist in space or time; they are typically intangible and can’t be perceived by the senses. They are often things that do not exist. “What would happen if everyone threw rubbish everywhere?” refers to something we hope will not happen, but we can still think about it.

African wood carving.

Everything we observe with our senses occurs in time and everything we see exists in space; yet we can perceive neither time nor space with our senses, but only with the mind. Precision is also abstract; while we can see and touch things made with precision, precision itself can only be perceived by the mind.

How do we acquire abstract concepts? Is it enough to make things with precision in order to have the concept of precision? Africans make excellent carvings, made with precision, so why isn’t the concept in their language? To have this concept we must not only do things with precision but must be aware of this phenomenon and then give it a name.

How, for example, do we acquire such concepts as belief and doubt? We all have beliefs; even animals do. When a dog wags its tail on hearing his master’s footsteps, it believes he is coming. But it has no concept of belief because it has no awareness that it has this belief and so no awareness of belief per se. In short, it has no self-consciousness, and thus is not aware of its own mental states.

It has long seemed to me that blacks tend to lack self-awareness. If such awareness is necessary for developing abstract concepts it is not surprising that African languages have so few abstract terms. A lack of self-awareness—or introspection—has advantages. In my experience neurotic behavior, characterized by excessive and unhealthy self-consciousness, is uncommon among blacks. I am also confident that sexual dysfunction, which is characterized by excessive self-consciousness, is less common among blacks than whites.

Time is another abstract concept with which Africans seem to have difficulties. I began to wonder about this in 1998. Several Africans drove up in a car and parked right in front of mine, blocking it. “Hey,” I said, “you can’t park here.” “Oh, are you about to leave?” they asked in a perfectly polite and friendly way. “No,” I said, “but I might later. Park over there”—and they did.

While the possibility that I might want to leave later was obvious to me, their thinking seemed to encompass only the here and now: “If you’re leaving right now we understand, but otherwise, what’s the problem?” I had other such encounters and the key question always seemed to be, “Are you leaving now?” The future, after all, does not exist. It will exist, but doesn’t exist now. People who have difficulty thinking of things that do not exist will ipso facto have difficulty thinking about the future.

It appears that the Zulu word for “future”—isikhati—is the same as the word for time, as well as for space. Realistically, this means that these concepts probably do not exist in Zulu thought. It also appears that there is no word for the past—meaning, the time preceding the present. The past did exist, but no longer exists. Hence, people who may have problems thinking of things that do not exist will have trouble thinking of the past as well as the future.

This has an obvious bearing on such sentiments as gratitude and loyalty, which I have long noticed are uncommon among Africans. We feel gratitude for things that happened in the past, but for those with little sense of the past such feelings are less likely to arise.

Why did it take me more than 20 years to notice all of this? I think it is because our assumptions about time are so deeply rooted that we are not even aware of making them and hence the possibility that others may not share them simply does not occur to us. And so we don’t see it, even when the evidence is staring us in the face.

Mathematics and maintenance

I quote from an article in the South African press about the problems blacks have with mathematics:

“[Xhosa] is a language where polygon and plane have the same definition … where concepts like triangle, quadrilateral, pentagon, hexagon are defined by only one word.” (“Finding New Languages for Maths and Science,” Star [Johannesburg], July 24, 2002, p. 8.)

.
Apartheid-era sign post.

More accurately, these concepts simply do not exist in Xhosa, which, along with Zulu, is one of the two most widely spoken languages in South Africa. In America, blacks are said to have a “tendency to approximate space, numbers and time instead of aiming for complete accuracy.” (Star, June 8, 1988, p.10.) In other words, they are also poor at math. Notice the identical triumvirate—space, numbers, and time. Is it just a coincidence that these three highly abstract concepts are the ones with which blacks — everywhere — seem to have such difficulties?

The entry in the Zulu dictionary for “number,” by the way — ningi — means “numerous,” which is not at all the same as the concept of number. It is clear, therefore, that there is no concept of number in Zulu.

White rule in South Africa ended in 1994. It was about ten years later that power outages began, which eventually reached crisis proportions. The principle reason for this is simply lack of maintenance on the generating equipment. Maintenance is future-oriented, and the Zulu entry in the dictionary for it is ondla, which means: “1. Nourish, rear; bring up; 2. Keep an eye on; watch (your crop).” In short, there is no such thing as maintenance in Zulu thought, and it would be hard to argue that this is wholly unrelated to the fact that when people throughout Africa say “nothing works,” it is only an exaggeration.

The New York Times reports that New York City is considering a plan (since implemented) aimed at getting blacks to “do well on standardized tests and to show up for class,” by paying them to do these things and that could “earn [them] as much as $500 a year.” Students would get money for regular school attendance, every book they read, doing well on tests, and sometimes just for taking them. Parents would be paid for “keeping a full-time job … having health insurance … and attending parent-teacher conferences.” (Jennifer Medina, “Schools Plan to Pay Cash for Marks,” New York Times, June 19, 2007.)

The clear implication is that blacks are not very motivated. Motivation involves thinking about the future and hence about things that do not exist. Given black deficiencies in this regard, it is not surprising that they would be lacking in motivation, and having to prod them in this way is further evidence for such a deficiency.

The Zulu entry for “motivate” is banga, under which we find “1. Make, cause, produce something unpleasant; … to cause trouble . … 2. Contend over a claim; … fight over inheritance; … 3. Make for, aim at, journey towards … .” Yet when I ask Africans what banga means, they have no idea. In fact, no Zulu word could refer to motivation for the simple reason that there is no such concept in Zulu; and if there is no such concept there cannot be a word for it. This helps explain the need to pay blacks to behave as if they were motivated.

.
Zulus.

The same New York Times article quotes Darwin Davis of the Urban League as “caution[ing] that the … money being offered [for attending class] was relatively paltry … and wondering … how many tests students would need to pass to buy the latest video game.”

Instead of being shamed by the very need for such a plan, this black activist complains that the payments aren’t enough! If he really is unaware how his remarks will strike most readers, he is morally obtuse, but his views may reflect a common understanding among blacks of what morality is: not something internalized but something others enforce from the outside. Hence his complaint that paying children to do things they should be motivated to do on their own is that they are not being paid enough.

In this context, I recall some remarkable discoveries by the late American linguist, William Stewart, who spent many years in Senegal studying local languages. Whereas Western cultures internalize norms—“Don’t do that!” for a child, eventually becomes “I mustn’t do that” for an adult—African cultures do not. They rely entirely on external controls on behavior from tribal elders and other sources of authority. When Africans were detribalized, these external constraints disappeared, and since there never were internal constraints, the results were crime, drugs, promiscuity, etc. Where there have been other forms of control—as in white-ruled South Africa, colonial Africa, or the segregated American South—this behavior was kept within tolerable limits. But when even these controls disappear there is often unbridled violence.

Stewart apparently never asked why African cultures did not internalize norms, that is, why they never developed moral consciousness, but it is unlikely that this was just a historical accident. More likely, it was the result of deficiencies in abstract thinking ability.

.
Public service message, South Africa.

One explanation for this lack of abstract thinking, including the diminished understanding of time, is that Africans evolved in a climate where they could live day to day without having to think ahead. They never developed this ability because they had no need for it. Whites, on the other hand, evolved under circumstances in which they had to consider what would happen if they didn’t build stout houses and store enough fuel and food for the winter. For them it was sink or swim.

Surprising confirmation of Stewart’s ideas can be found in the May/June 2006 issue of the Boston Review, a typically liberal publication. In “Do the Right Thing: Cognitive Science’s Search for a Common Morality,” Rebecca Saxe distinguishes between “conventional” and “moral” rules. Conventional rules are supported by authorities but can be changed; moral rules, on the other hand, are not based on conventional authority and are not subject to change. “Even three-year-old children … distinguish between moral and conventional transgressions,” she writes. The only exception, according to James Blair of the National Institutes of Health, are psychopaths, who exhibit “persistent aggressive behavior.” For them, all rules are based only on external authority, in whose absence “anything is permissible.” The conclusion drawn from this is that “healthy individuals in all cultures respect the distinction between conventional … and moral [rules].”

However, in the same article, another anthropologist argues that “the special status of moral rules cannot be part of human nature, but is … just … an artifact of Western values.” Anita Jacobson-Widding, writing of her experiences among the Manyika of Zimbabwe, says:

“I tried to find a word that would correspond to the English concept of ‘morality.’ I explained what I meant by asking my informants to describe the norms for good behavior toward other people. The answer was unanimous. The word for this was tsika. But when I asked my bilingual informants to translate tsika into English, they said that it was ‘good manners’ …”

.
An all-too-common problem.

She concluded that because good manners are clearly conventional rather than moral rules, the Manyika simply did not have a concept of morality. But how would one explain this absence? Miss Jacobson-Widding’s explanation is the typical nonsense that could come only from a so-called intellectual: “the concept of morality does not exist.” The far more likely explanation is that the concept of morality, while otherwise universal, is enfeebled in cultures that have a deficiency in abstract thinking.

According to now-discredited folk wisdom, blacks are “children in adult bodies,” but there may be some foundation to this view. The average African adult has the raw IQ score of the average 11-year-old white child. This is about the age at which white children begin to internalize morality and no longer need such strong external enforcers.

Gruesome cruelty

Another aspect of African behavior that liberals do their best to ignore but that nevertheless requires an explanation is gratuitous cruelty. A reviewer of Driving South, a 1993 book by David Robbins, writes:

.
Victim of Rwandan violence.

“A Cape social worker sees elements that revel in violence … It’s like a cult which has embraced a lot of people who otherwise appear normal. … At the slightest provocation their blood-lust is aroused. And then they want to see death, and they jeer and mock at the suffering involved, especially the suffering of a slow and agonizing death.” (Citizen [Johannesburg], July 12, 1993, p.6.)

There is something so unspeakably vile about this, something so beyond depravity, that the human brain recoils. This is not merely the absence of human empathy, but the positive enjoyment of human suffering, all the more so when it is “slow and agonizing.” Can you imagine jeering at and mocking someone in such horrible agony?

During the apartheid era, black activists used to kill traitors and enemies by “necklacing” them. An old tire was put around the victim’s neck, filled with gasoline, and—but it is best to let an eye-witness describe what happened next:

“The petrol-filled tyre is jammed on your shoulders and a lighter is placed within reach . … Your fingers are broken, needles are pushed up your nose and you are tortured until you put the lighter to the petrol yourself.” (Citizen; “SA’s New Nazis,” August 10, 1993, p.18.)

The author of an article in the Chicago Tribune, describing the equally gruesome way the Hutu killed Tutsi in the Burundi massacres, marveled at “the ecstasy of killing, the lust for blood; this is the most horrible thought. It’s beyond my reach.” (“Hutu Killers Danced In Blood Of Victims, Videotapes Show,” Chicago Tribune, September 14, 1995, p.8.) The lack of any moral sense is further evidenced by their having videotaped their crimes, “apparently want[ing] to record … [them] for posterity.” Unlike Nazi war criminals, who hid their deeds, these people apparently took pride in their work.

Amy Biehl marker
Where Amy Biehl was killed.

In 1993, Amy Biehl, a 26-year-old American on a Fulbright scholarship, was living in South Africa, where she spent most of her time in black townships helping blacks. One day when she was driving three African friends home, young blacks stopped the car, dragged her out, and killed her because she was white. A retired senior South African judge, Rex van Schalkwyk, in his 1998 book One Miracle is Not Enough, quotes from a newspaper report on the trial of her killers: “Supporters of the three men accused of murdering [her] … burst out laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court today when a witness told how the battered woman groaned in pain.” This behavior, Van Schalkwyk wrote, “is impossible to explain in terms accessible to rational minds.” (pp. 188-89.)

These incidents and the responses they evoke—“the human brain recoils,” “beyond my reach,” “impossible to explain to rational minds” — represent a pattern of behavior and thinking that cannot be wished away, and offer additional support for my claim that Africans are deficient in moral consciousness.

I have long suspected that the idea of rape is not the same in Africa as elsewhere, and now I find confirmation of this in Newsweek:

“According to a three-year study [in Johannesburg] … more than half of the young people interviewed — both male and female — believe that forcing sex with someone you know does not constitute sexual violence … [T]he casual manner in which South African teens discuss coercive relationships and unprotected sex is staggering.” (Tom Masland, “Breaking The Silence,” Newsweek, July 9, 2000.)

Clearly, many blacks do not think rape is anything to be ashamed of.

The Newsweek author is puzzled by widespread behavior that is known to lead to AIDS, asking “Why has the safe-sex effort failed so abjectly?” Well, aside from their profoundly different attitudes towards sex and violence and their heightened libido, a major factor could be their diminished concept of time and reduced ability to think ahead.

Liberian billboard
Liberian billboard

Nevertheless, I was still surprised by what I found in the Zulu dictionary. The main entry for rape reads: “1. Act hurriedly; … 2. Be greedy. 3. Rob, plunder, … take [possessions] by force.” While these entries may be related to our concept of rape, there is one small problem: there is no reference to sexual intercourse! In a male-dominated culture, where saying “no” is often not an option (as confirmed by the study just mentioned), “taking sex by force” is not really part of the African mental calculus. Rape clearly has a moral dimension, but perhaps not to Africans. To the extent they do not consider coerced sex to be wrong, then, by our conception, they cannot consider it rape because rape is wrong. If such behavior isn’t wrong it isn’t rape.

An article about gang rape in the left-wing British paper, the Guardian, confirms this when it quotes a young black woman: “The thing is, they [black men] don’t see it as rape, as us being forced. They just see it as pleasure for them.” (Rose George, “They Don’t See it as Rape. They Just See it as Pleasure for Them,” June 5, 2004.) A similar attitude seems to be shared among some American blacks who casually refer to gang rape as “running a train.” (Nathan McCall, Makes Me Wanna Holler, Vintage Books, 1995.)

If the African understanding of rape is far afield, so may be their idea of romance or love. I recently watched a South African television program about having sex for money. Of the several women in the audience who spoke up, not a single one questioned the morality of this behavior. Indeed, one plaintively asked, “Why else would I have sex with a man?”

From the casual way in which Africans throw around the word “love,” I suspect their understanding of it is, at best, childish. I suspect the notion is alien to Africans, and I would be surprised if things are very different among American blacks. Africans hear whites speak of “love” and try to give it a meaning from within their own conceptual repertoire. The result is a child’s conception of this deepest of human emotions, probably similar to their misunderstanding of the nature of a promise.

I recently located a document that was dictated to me by a young African woman in June 1993. She called it her “story,” and the final paragraph is a poignant illustration of what to Europeans would seem to be a limited understanding of love:

“On my way from school, I met a boy. And he proposed me. His name was Mokone. He tell me that he love me. And then I tell him I will give him his answer next week. At night I was crazy about him. I was always thinking about him.”

Moral blindness

Whenever I taught ethics I used the example of Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer in the French Army who was convicted of treason in 1894 even though the authorities knew he was innocent. Admitting their mistake, it was said, would have a disastrous effect on military morale and would cause great social unrest. I would in turn argue that certain things are intrinsically wrong and not just because of their consequences. Even if the results of freeing Dreyfus would be much worse than keeping him in prison, he must be freed, because it is unjust to keep an innocent man in prison.

To my amazement, an entire class in Kenya said without hesitation that he should not be freed. Call me dense if you want, but it was 20 years before the full significance of this began to dawn on me.

.
Death is certain but accidents are not.

Africans, I believe, may generally lack the concepts of subjunctivity and counterfactuality. Subjunctivity is conveyed in such statements as, “What would you have done if I hadn’t showed up?” This is contrary to fact because I did show up, and it is now impossible for me not to have shown up. We are asking someone to imagine what he would have done if something that didn’t happen (and now couldn’t happen) had happened. This requires self-consciousness, and I have already described blacks’ possible deficiency in this respect. It is obvious that animals, for example, cannot think counterfactually, because of their complete lack of self-awareness.

When someone I know tried to persuade his African workers to contribute to a health insurance policy, they asked “What’s it for?” “Well, if you have an accident, it would pay for the hospital.” Their response was immediate: “But boss, we didn’t have an accident!” “Yes, but what if you did?” Reply? “We didn’t have an accident!” End of story.

.
South African AIDS education poster.

Interestingly, blacks do plan for funerals, for although an accident is only a risk, death is a certainty. (The Zulu entries for “risk” are “danger” and “a slippery surface.”) Given the frequent all-or-nothing nature of black thinking, if it’s not certain you will have an accident, then you will not have an accident. Furthermore, death is concrete and observable: We see people grow old and die. Africans tend to be aware of time when it is manifested in the concrete and observable.

One of the pivotal ideas underpinning morality is the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. “How would you feel if someone stole everything you owned? Well, that’s how he would feel if you robbed him.” The subjunctivity here is obvious. But if Africans may generally lack this concept, they will have difficulty in understanding the Golden Rule and, to that extent, in understanding morality.

If this is true we might also expect their capacity for human empathy to be diminished, and this is suggested in the examples cited above. After all, how do we empathize? When we hear about things like “necklacing” we instinctively — and unconsciously — think: “How would I feel if I were that person?” Of course I am not and cannot be that person, but to imagine being that person gives us valuable moral “information:” that we wouldn’t want this to happen to us and so we shouldn’t want it to happen to others. To the extent people are deficient in such abstract thinking, they will be deficient in moral understanding and hence in human empathy—which is what we tend to find in Africans.

In his 1990 book Devil’s Night, Ze’ev Chafets quotes a black woman speaking about the problems of Detroit: “I know some people won’t like this, but whenever you get a whole lot of black people, you’re gonna have problems. Blacks are ignorant and rude.” (pp. 76-77.)

If some Africans cannot clearly imagine what their own rude behavior feels like to others—in other words, if they cannot put themselves in the other person’s shoes—they will be incapable of understanding what rudeness is. For them, what we call rude may be normal and therefore, from their perspective, not really rude. Africans may therefore not be offended by behavior we would consider rude — not keeping appointments, for example. One might even conjecture that African cruelty is not the same as white cruelty, since Africans may not be fully aware of the nature of their behavior, whereas such awareness is an essential part of “real” cruelty.

I am hardly the only one to notice this obliviousness to others that sometimes characterizes black behavior. Walt Harrington, a white liberal married to a light-skinned black, makes some surprising admissions in his 1994 book, Crossings: A White Man’s Journey Into Black America:

“I notice a small car … in the distance. Suddenly … a bag of garbage flies out its window . … I think, I’ll bet they’re blacks. Over the years I’ve noticed more blacks littering than whites. I hate to admit this because it is a prejudice. But as I pass the car, I see that my reflex was correct—[they are blacks].

“[As I pull] into a McDonald’s drive-through … [I see that] the car in front of me had four black[s] in it. Again … my mind made its unconscious calculation: We’ll be sitting here forever while these people decide what to order. I literally shook my head . … My God, my kids are half black! But then the kicker: we waited and waited and waited. Each of the four … leaned out the window and ordered individually. The order was changed several times. We sat and sat, and I again shook my head, this time at the conundrum that is race in America.

“I knew that the buried sentiment that had made me predict this disorganization … was … racist. … But my prediction was right.” (pp. 234-35.)

Africans also tend to litter. To understand this we must ask why whites don’t litter, at least not as much. We ask ourselves: “What would happen if everyone threw rubbish everywhere? It would be a mess. So you shouldn’t do it!” Blacks’ possible deficiency in abstract thinking makes such reasoning more difficult, so any behavior requiring such thinking is less likely to develop in their cultures. Even after living for generations in societies where such thinking is commonplace, many may still fail to absorb it.

.
A trash pile in Sudan.

It should go without saying that my observations about Africans are generalizations. I am not saying that none has the capacity for abstract thought or moral understanding. I am speaking of tendencies and averages, which leave room for many exceptions.

To what extent do my observations about Africans apply to American blacks? American blacks have an average IQ of 85, which is a full 15 points higher than the African average of 70. The capacity for abstract thought is unquestionably correlated with intelligence, and so we can expect American blacks generally to exceed Africans in these respects.

Still, American blacks show many of the traits so striking among Africans: low mathematical ability, diminished abstract reasoning, high crime rates, a short time-horizon, rudeness, littering, etc. If I had lived only among American blacks and not among Africans, I might never have reached the conclusions I have, but the more extreme behavior among Africans makes it easier to perceive the same tendencies among American blacks. AR

Gedhalia Braun holds a PhD in philosophy and is the author of Racism, Guilt, Self-Hatred and Self-Deceit. Anyone interested in reading his book can purchase it in PDF format at the AR website, AmRen.com.

The British State vs. The BNP—The Post-Modern Tyranny of “Human Rights” – “Nic Careem, [Email him]a former Labour activist from Camden in north London, who is now with the Conservatives, said he originally argued that black and Asian people should join the BNP en mass [sic] to cause chaos and expose the extent of racism inside the party of Nick Griffin.” In other words, the BNP is to be flooded with non-whites, who will then use further legal action—assuming the internal structures of the party are insufficient—to destroy it.

The British State vs. The BNP—The Post-Modern Tyranny of “Human Rights”

[Peter Brimelow writes: The U.S. may shortly have “Hate Crime” legislation, which will of course immediately metastasize into an attack on “hate speech”. Wanna bet that what is happening in the U.K., described below by a distinguished British libertarian, can’t happen here?)

By Sean Gabb

Also by Sean Gabb: England: The Peasants are Revolting

On Monday, August 24th 2009, the British Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) began legal proceedings against the British National Party (BNP). Its cause of action is that the BNP restricts membership to white people—"indigenous British ethnic groups deriving from the class of ‘Indigenous Caucasian’" plus "those we regard as closely related and ethnically assimilated or assimilable aboriginal members of the European race also resident in Britain.".[Constitution Of The British National Party Eighth Edition, published November 2004(PDF)] (Which is interpreted to include Jews—thus one BNP elected official, Pat Richardson, a local councilor, is Jewish).  

The BNP rule is said to be illegal under the Race Relations Act 1976 as amended in 2000. If successful, the court action will force the BNP to open its membership to all applicants regardless of their colour.

This is a politically-motivated prosecution. The BNP has long upset the people who now rule Britain. Its denunciations of mass-immigration and of multiculturalism disrupt what would otherwise be an almost smooth wall of praise—or at least of caution—by the other parties.

Despite universal condemnation in the media, the BNP has made considerable gains during the past few years in local elections, and managed to win two seats in June this year to the European Parliament. It may win a seat in the British Parliament at the next general election. Stopping the BNP is high on the agenda of the powers that be.

This being said, shutting down a political party simply because it dissents from the established multicultural faith is not something that is yet done in Britain. It is too openly an attack on freedom of speech. It may also be illegal under the Human Rights Act 1998, which enacts the European Convention on Human Rights into British law.

Nevertheless, the party stands to be ruined partly by the costs of legal action, and partly by the effects of losing the legal action.

These effects have been clearly spelled out by some of the BNP’s enemies. According to the Blog of Operation Black Vote,

“Nic Careem, [Email him]a former Labour activist from Camden in north London, who is now with the Conservatives, said he originally argued that black and Asian people should join the BNP en mass [sic] to cause chaos and expose the extent of racism inside the party of Nick Griffin.”

In other words, the BNP is to be flooded with non-whites, who will then use further legal action—assuming the internal structures of the party are insufficient—to destroy it.

This attack on the BNP is abhorrent for a number of reasons.

  • First, it is indirectly an attack on freedom of speech.

We in Britain are endlessly told nowadays that freedom of speech does not involve the right to preach hatred and “intolerance”. But it does. Freedom of speech means the right to say anything at all on any public issue, and to make any recommendation on what the law should be.

I was born into a Britain where this understanding was broadly accepted. I live now in a country where it is not. Thus Simon Woolley [Email him] of Operation Black Vote dismisses freedom of speech as an almost sacred cow. He even appeals for support to the majesty of the British Constitution:

“Over centuries our unwritten constitution has given us a framework for our democracy. From Magna Carta to the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000, our democracy has evolved to reflect our changing times. This framework gives us a democracy which, for all its limitations, seeks to balance individual freedoms with fairness and tolerance.”

In the technical sense, Woolley may be right. Being unwritten, the British Constitution is whatever the authorities decide it to be.

But his claim is irrelevant. A constitution does not legitimise oppression. Rather, it is legitimate so far as it protects rights. If the British Constitution no longer guarantees freedom of speech, so much the worse for the Constitution.

  • Second, as said, the authorities are frightened to make a direct attack on freedom of speech. Instead, they are relying on laws that abolish freedom of association.

But this is barely less important within the liberal tradition than freedom of speech. The two rights complement each other. Freedom of speech is the right to say anything. Freedom of association involves the right to propagate what is said. It means the right of people to come together for any purpose that does not involve aggression against others.

Obviously, it also means the right not to associate. Laws imposing equal access to employment, or paid services, or membership of private associations, are not an extension of rights, but a denial of rights. By forcing people to associate with persons whom they would otherwise reject, anti-discrimination laws are a form of coerced association. They also allow dissident organisations to be taken over and destroyed.

  • Third, if the form of the attack is hypocritical, so is the substance. The BNP is not the only organisation that seeks to confine its membership to members of a particular race. But it is the only organisation the EHRC is taking to court.

The Lincolnshire Black Police Association, for example, declares on its website —rather, it declares on its section of the official web site of the  Lincolnshire Police Force—that

“Membership applications for the LBPA are invited from everybody. Full Membership is available to all Black Minority Ethnic staff of the Lincolnshire Police. Associate Membership is open to ALL members of the Lincolnshire Police and outside agencies who wish to support the work of the LBPA.”

I am told that these confessions of racial discrimination are being hurriedly taken down from the Internet. However, the BNP has published a selection of screen shots from the Lincolnshire and other branches of the Black Police Association. The EHRC has so far refused even to acknowledge complaints of this racial discrimination.

And even if the Black Police Association should take down the offending words and open its full membership to all, there is no chance of its being flooded by hostile whites. There are no white equivalents of Operation Black Vote or other ethnic advocacy groups.

Any whites groups that did form would soon be prosecuted or harassed out of existence. Any individual whites who joined would themselves be evangelists of the multicultural faith. If not, they would be chased out with violence or threats of violence that the modern Politically Correct British police—memorably described by  purged National Review editor John O’Sullivan as “the paramilitary wing of the Guardian, the leading left-wing newspaper—would now do nothing to investigate.

  • Fourth, it is at least interesting to see how the language of rights has been perverted into a cover for oppression. The Equality and Human Rights Commission promotes equality by discriminating against whites, and protects human rights by attacking freedom of association as a means of neutering freedom of speech.

It is also interesting that the EHRC Commissioner overseeing the BNP prosecution is John Wadham. He was once Director of Liberty, which is supposed to be the main independent guardian in this country of civil and political rights.

At a public meeting in 2001, I accused Mr Wadham of not caring about the liberties of anyone perceived to be on the political “right”. This sent him into a rhetorical frenzy. A few weeks later, I felt almost guilty at how roughly I had treated him when I read this in a letter of his to The Daily Telegraph:

[H]uman rights are primarily about limiting the power of the central state in its dealing with the individual citizen.”

According to the accounts of the body that the EHRC replaced, Mr Wadham’s salary in the year to the 31st March 2008 was £78,548. [VDARE.COM: roughly $127,735 US] I will limit my comments on this fact to observing that his salary—and it has probably risen by a third in the past 18 months—is at least three times his probable worth in any market-based employment.

By way of a conclusion, I feel I ought to give my opinion on the BNP. This is that I fear its success.

The next Conservative Government will fail to reverse the disasters that Labour has brought on the country. This is because the Conservatives do not even intend to try for a counter-revolution. When the failure has become manifest, people will turn to the only alternative party that has forthrightly denounced the Labour revolution and has an existing electoral base. This will be the BNP.

I fear that the BNP will, by default, become the only viable champion of counter-revolution.

Now, I am not frightened that the BNP is a party of national socialists, and that its leaders are counting the days till they can rip off their business suits, to show the black and red uniforms beneath. Under its present leader, Nick Griffin, the BNP has become a white nationalist party. The party believes in the expulsion of illegal immigrants, an in some voluntary repatriation of non-whites who are legally here, and in dismantling the Equal Opportunities police state from which people like Mr Wadham benefit. Other than this, a BNP Government might easily show more respect for the forms of a liberal constitution than have the Labour governments of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown—after all, this would not be difficult.

The problem is that the BNP and much of its leading personnel used to be national socialists. There are too many published statements in praise of Hitler or denouncing the Jews.

Of course, people change their opinions over time. Middle-aged men are not necessarily to be judged on what they said or wrote in their late teens.

That excuse has been made and accepted for the Ministers in the Labour Government. Many of these in their younger days were Trotskyite street bullies. Peter Mandelson, who is effectively deputy Prime Minister, joined the Young Communist League three years after the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia, and used to sell the Communist Morning Star. John Reid, who was a Home Secretary in the Blair Government, was a member of the Communist Party in his late twenties, and was noted for his admiration of Josef Stalin. It would be easy to fill an article with the disreputable pasts of those who have ruled this country since 1997.

If there were any fairness in politics, they would be regarded as no less disreputable than the leaders of the BNP.

But there is no fairness in politics. A man can deny the Soviet holocaust—or even admit that it happened but try to justify it—and remain in good standing with the media and educational Establishments. The slightest whisper of approval for the lesser horrors of National Socialism, and a man is tainted for life.

This is unfair, but it is a fact that must be accepted. I can easily imagine how the BNP might replace the useless Conservatives as main opponents to what has been done to this country. I can also imagine how the movement then led by the BNP might be smeared and discredited out of existence.

Even so, if I can have no longing for a BNP breakthrough at the next but one general election, neither can I regard the legal proceedings against it as other than a classic illustration of how to run a post-modern tyranny.

The British State has no Gestapo, no KGB. But why would it need one when it has the Equality and Human Rights Commission?

Dr. Sean Gabb [Email him] is a writer, academic, broadcaster and Director of the Libertarian Alliance in England. His monograph Cultural Revolution, Culture War: How Conservatives Lost England, and How to Get It Back is downloadable here. For his account of the Property and Freedom Society’s 2008 conference in Bodrum, Turkey, click here. For his address to the 2009 PFS conference, “What is the Ruling Class?”, click here; for videos of the other presentations, click here.

A Day In Mudland, very very funny!!!!!!

Wednesday, July 08, 2009

A Day In Mudland

I was driving down the freeway this afternoon during heavy traffic, as thousands of wetbacks and niggers and chinks crammed the highway, heading out for the holidays. To my right was a huge semi with a long box on it. The monster was blocking traffic and weaving all over the road, scaring the crap out of everyone around him. It was obvious this clown had started partying a day early.

Suddenly the driver decided he wanted in my spot…with me still in it! His rig slid across the white line and came within one inch of taking me out, before I was able to get out of his way. I leaned on my horn, but the asshole just ignored me. I backed way off to give the nut room, because there were too many bozos on the freeway to maneuver.

After tailing him for three miles, I decided to pass him and leave the prick behind me. I’ll be dipped in shit, if this idiot didn’t choose this exact time to slide into my lane again! Once again I leaned on my horn and barely escaped a major accident. Madder than hell, I pulled up next to the prick, only to discover a black-assed coon with a bottle of Thunderbird in his hand.

This old wino nigger had no business behind the wheel of an 18-wheeler, or even a 1963 Studebaker. From the looks of him, he’d had about fifty-thousand or so of those bottles before that one over the course of his useless life. I had no doubt at this point that he stole the truck. No crew boss in his right mind is going to hand the keys to a wino Rastus! I pointed at him and yelled for him to get that rig off the freeway. And in true nigger form he flipped me off and yelled, “FUGG YOUZ, MUUFUUGGGAH!!”

It was at this point that I stuck my lips waaay out and started scratching under my arm like a chimp and going, “Oook!! Oook!” Ole’ Buckwheat really chimped out when he saw this, and damn near rolled the rig! He was so pissed that he couldn’t keep it straight on the highway! I was laughing so hard I almost pissed myself. I had really struck a nerve.

But he was only one of many encounters I had in the past 24 hours, and though perhaps unusual for many of you, what I went through is anything but rare. It’s a normal, daily thing for the few remaining whites that live in this third world pest hole called California. People worry about the muds taking it over. They have nothing to sweat. They already did, about five years ago. I can sit at a stop sign on any given day, and any given time, and 19 out of 20 cars that pass will have a mud at the wheel. Driving in this state is a real risk. That’s because this state is stuffed with immigrants from all over the world, and most of them never drove a car in their lives until they got here.

And the old saying about Asian drivers being the worst is no legend. They’re a menace. You can always spot one. He’s the guy doing 40 in a 75 zone. He’s leaning waaay forward and squinting so hard at the road you could blindfold him with dental floss. His hands are gripping the wheel so tightly his knuckles are white. Cars honk and whiz past, but he stubbornly refuses to get in the slow lane or speed up.

Thousands of deadly accidents are caused here every year by these accursed chinks. In fact I, and a dozen other people had to slam on the brakes and come skidding to a stop from 70 miles per hour today because of one such chink, who got on the freeway and promptly settled down to a break-neck 35 mph in a 70 zone. If I could have stopped him somehow, I’d have squeezed his ignorant head off like a chicken.

But as far as attitude goes, the worst are the nigger hos. Nobody has these arrogant bitches beat when it comes to thinking the world owes them a living. Talk about hateful, spiteful, vicious, violent, loud, mouthy, profane, and classless! When one of these mean bitches gets behind the wheel of a car, the whole planet had better watch out.

In fact, nigger bitches in cars is a cottage industry out here for ambulance chasers. There is an entire class of nigger out here that lives and lives good off of trumped-up lawsuits these sluts file against poor, unsuspecting white families. They do this by deliberately causing a fender bender with some poor white, then screaming that they hurt their back or sprained their lips, etc. The Jewish shyster, whom they have on a perpetual retainer, takes a 40% cut of the take, and between them the white doesn’t stand a chance. After all, this is California; home of the liberal judge and the all-nigger jury. And if you’re black, you’re a slam-dunk.

Twice now, I’ve come very close to getting nailed myself by these hos. They sit in their car with the engine idling, watching and waiting for some white to start backing out of the parking lot they’re in. As soon as they see the backup lights come on, they slam their car in gear and hit the gas, timing it so that the two cars collide. Then comes the screaming and chimping out. And brother, you aint’ seen nothin’ until you’ve seen a loud mouthed nigger ho’ get down and dirty. Talk about loud!

And the really disgusting part of all of this is the way other niggers automatically rally around their fellow coon. Oh, they all know the score. It’s a well known scam among niggers. And as we all know, they’re a clannish people, and they help each other to rob whitey every chance they get. So any bystanders that happen to be black are all running over and pointing to the white and yelling, “I sawz it all! Yazzuuhh! De crackah done it!” And of course these “good citizens” will get a small kickback from her lawyer after they win. That’s how the game is played down here. Now you know why our insurance is so damned high.

Between the thieving niggers and the thieving wetbacks stealing cars faster than they can build them, the insurance companies in this state would pull out altogether if they could, but the government won’t let them. They tried to, about ten years ago…lol…

I went to the bank this morning to cash a couple of checks, but when I got there, the place looked like a Martin Luther King convention. It was wall-to-wall coons. I couldn’t figure out what the hell had attracted so many niggers to one bank. Finally I couldn’t take it any longer, and I asked the nearest white. She said that it was their welfare checks, that the state had sent them out late(the state’s in a budget crisis..no duuh! Too many muds on the dole), and the banks would also be closed for the next three days.

It was a nasty, stinking, reeking, noisy-assed ordeal to wait in line with that many porch monkeys, let me tell you. By the time I got out of there, my eyes were bloodshot and glazed over, and I was grimacing like I had hemorrhoids and was trying to pass an armadillo. No sane person should have to go through that. The smell alone was enough to give a person brain damage. And on the ugly scale from one to ten, some of those coons rated a fifteen. One extremely fat ho had an ass that started at the back of her neck and went to her feet. I think if she’d been able to turn that big fat mouth of hers sideways, she’d have split in two. We’ve all seen them; the ones that are so fat that when they walk it looks like two rabid pit bulls fighting in a gunny sack. Every time she took a step, her ass threatened to slap the back of her head.

And what the hell is it with their predilection for purple tights? The fatter they are, the more they love really loud colored tights and leotards. This bitch had on a pair that had seen better days (and soap)a couple of years back. The thread that held the ass together was stretched to the breaking point, and I could see ass through the gap where the threads had stretched so far, that they were leaving a space large enough to toss a cat through. I was terrified that those inhumanly overworked threads would give up the ghost while I was still near her, and bury me under a mountain of reeking black ass. The thought almost sent me running out the door, gibbering, screaming and pulling out tufts of hair as I went. The “joys of diversity” my cracker ass…

But even after all that, I still didn’t escape unscathed, for no sooner had I stepped outside into breathable air, when a greasy looking wetback that had a face not even his mother could love, walked up to me and tried to sell me a pineapple. His partner was hawking them and some other sundry fruits out of the back of an old Chevy pickup with no plates(what else?). I hadn’t eaten all day and was starved, so I decided I’d grab a cantaloupe and wolf it in the parking lot, then hit the road again.

I never got the chance. No sooner had I taken three steps toward the truck when three more wetbacks came out of the woodwork and tried to mooch money off of me. They wait to see who might buy fruit. And if they walk toward the truck, that means they have money. That’s how they know who to hit. And they’ll work as a team to try to distract the gringo.And while two are in his face yelling for money, the third is behind him stealing his wallet with very expert fingers.

But as most of my readers already know by now, I’m pretty streetwise and didn’t fall for their scam. I knew immediately what they were up to and pulled my knife and popped it open. I always carry it, and it has a wickedly long and sharp blade. I showed it to them and said, “Back off or get cut, you thieving wetbacks. Your choice.” One of them looked like he might have been game anyway, but not alone, and his brothers didn’t want anything to do with me. I think it was probably the insane way I was grinning at them..lol.

I left the bastards standing there in the parking lot as I drove off. I called the local PD for all the good it would do, because half the force is now wetback, and the other half is rabid liberal. I might as well have called the local girl scout troop. Just another day in mudland…

Whites are literally stampeding out of the state as I write this, and the wetbacks are pouring in. Vacant houses are everywhere, and greedy landlords would rather let their places set empty making nothing, than drop the rent to something reasonable. They had a taste of gouge money during the real estate boom, and being mostly stupid, greedy ragheads and chinks (the government financed the property for all of them when they arrived here), they think they can still reap that kind of extortion money. They refuse to get the point that people are broke and won’t…can’t pay their insane rates any longer.

Whites are sick of the constantly increasing taxes, fees, tickets, cop harassment, muds, crime, and all the good jobs going overseas or to muds. They’re especially sick of a government that refuses to run these invaders out. California has become just an extension of northern Mexico, trash, ghettos and all.

Last week the city hired a road contractor, and naturally hired the lowest bidder, who works only fresh, unskilled wetbacks for minimum wage. They dug up a mile of street on Baseline Blvd to install some new pipe, then they filled and paved it. Yeah right. They took a formerly white-built, glass smooth road and turned it into a devil’s golf course. I kid you not. You have never driven on anything so bad in your life. A drunken blind man could have done a better job. That section of road is now tearing the hell out of the suspensions of a lot of cars, and city hall is being flooded with angry callers, demanding the city pay for all the damage.

So the mayor’s office tried to get the contractor to come out and fix the mess, but “Pedro’s Contracting” no longer exists. It’s now “Pedro’s Lawn Care”. Think I’m kidding? You reap what you sow Mr. Liberal…

I got home and turned on the TV to some fiction show straight out of Hollyweird, where the ace code breaker; the genius of the entire country mind you, was a fat, rap spouting, plate-lipped nigger punk. And his sidekick? Any guesses? You win! Yep! It was a beautiful blonde! The standard liberal formula for shows now. Just one more reason to despise this state..and Washington DC…

I could go on with this, and list quite a few more misadventures I had just trying to get through the day, but to be honest, it’s just too depressing and makes me dream visions of war, blood, and red mayhem.I think I’ll go down to the junk shop and buy a couple of their worst old TVs and put them in my bedroom. That way, when I see the inevitable program ala mud, that I know is going to send me over the edge, I’ll have some old TVs to abuse and be able to leave my good one alone. Boots through the screen are starting to get expensive.

-The Lone Haranguer

Locust: You must live in San Diego Californication. I have seen the same damn shit for some time now, I try to not go to the bank for the same exact reason, where I live, we have diversity up the ass, diversity centers, diversity training, diversity police, diversity here, there and everywhere, no mention of America’s people, you know what I mean, “white” people, yeah I said it, we are the only Americans everyone else is something else entirely. As for what you said in your post, I agree with every single aspect, I have friends who are Asian, and its all true, but you forgot to mention the “Massage” Parlors, and nail salons full of “legal” workers, who didn’t marry a cousin so they could come on over and bleed our population dry through the pedicure.  I have seen the future of America and its California, broke, tired, and hungry.  But before we go down that path, I bought a 12 ga. Tactical Shotgun, an AR-15 with 6.8 spec upper for windshields penetration, and various other tools that I will need for what’s coming to America, like a machete.  I can say without a shadow of a doubt that the white devil is about to be released, the only thing holding us back is the economy, and as we have seen over the last few months under the current illegal administration, the economy is going down hard.  But like true Americans we won’t do anything until the mud people begin to riot, and when they do it will spread like wild fire in the hills of Malibu, we will either rise up and slaughter these animals or they will eat us alive.  I know for a fact that hundreds of thousands of us are preparing for what is to come, we are buying guns and ammo, building safe rooms, buying and storing food for the long haul.  We all work with the mud’s, I work in healthcare, I know without a doubt that they sense what’s happening, they know that we know what they think about us, they know that we are buying up all the bullets and guns the factory can make, and they know we are mad as hell and are not going to take it any more.   Its time we begin to organize on the ground level, we cannot retake our homeland through the ballot box, only a revolution can save this nation, and hell fucking NO, are we going to allow the mud’s to split Our Nation up into separate smaller nations, fuck that! There are enough of us in small surrounding communities around the major cities to retake this nation, we control the police, army, navy, air fore, and the navy, we own 90% of the firearms, all we need is the will and a leader to take us there.  But I don’t think killing every mud will solve the problem, we must eliminate every liberal yes that’s true, we must give the mud’s a choice to leave with nothing but the cloths on their backs, nothing more. Primarily the male mud’s must go, every one of them, NO exceptions, All blacks MUST GO back to Africa NO exceptions, but Asian Females and Latina Females should be allowed to stay, so long as only white males remain in the nation.  Our constitution must remain the same but also include protections for our people, and additional clauses on who is allowed to run for and hold public office, only white males.  The last point Canada, must be annexed, and cleansed, and the many Mexicans south of us must be relocated on the other side of the panama canal.  Lastly, we must retake Europe, and wipe Islam off the face of the Earth.  This is just a small list, we could add some other things to it, but I think this is a good start, now all we need it a massive poverty riot, and the game will be on.

Black Caucus Rejects Membership of White

Black Caucus Rejects Membership of White

More news stories on Anti-White Discrimination

Seth Blomeley, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Fayetteville), February 10, 2009

Rep. Richard Carroll of North Little Rock, Arkansas’ only Green Party legislator, asked to be a member of the Arkansas Black Legislative Caucus but was rejected because he’s white.

{snip}

Caucus Chairman Rep. Nancy Duffy Blount, D-Marianna, likened the situation to a man wanting to be part of the Legislative Women’s Caucus.

“With men, there are some things that men can understand and share and there are some things they can’t because they’re not women,” Blount said. “Same thing here.”

Carroll represents District 39 in southern and eastern North Little Rock. The historically Democratic district has a black population of 65 percent, according to 2000 census data used to draw the districts in 2001.

{snip}

Carroll, 52, said he wanted to be a caucus member to better represent and understand the views of his constituents. He said he could ask his wife, who is black, for her thoughts, but that she would only be one person.

{snip}

“You have to be an elected legislator and you have to be black,” Blount said.

{snip}

The latest bylaws for the caucus on file at the Bureau of Legislative Research give no race requirement for membership.

It says that the membership “shall consist of any current member of the Arkansas General Assembly who pays an annual membership.” But the bureau staff didn’t know whether those bylaws were current.

{snip}

She said she doesn’t have a copy of the bylaws but based her understanding of the membership requirements on “common sense” and from what caucus vice chairman, Sen. Tracy Steele, D-North Little Rock, told her the bylaws said. Steele later said he had “no idea” what the bylaws said about membership.

{snip}

Another caucus member, Sen. Joyce Elliott, D-Little Rock, said Carroll’s interest in the caucus is “commendable” but “since it’s called the ‘black caucus’ he can’t be a member. It is a caucus defined as being black. All discrimination is not bad. You can discriminate about whether you are going to drink four beers or 10 beers. I would say that’s good discrimination.”

Elliott said excluding whites is a legitimate form of discrimination because black legislators need to join with others of “common cause.”

{snip}

Rep. Darrin Williams, D-Little Rock, said, “Anyone who has the concerns of the caucus ought to be a member of the caucus.”

But he said he didn’t know whether Carroll should be a full member or have some sort of auxiliary membership instead.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on February 11, 2009)


Comments

Yeah, not all discrimination is bad…unless you’re black and trying to get away with something. Isn’t that about how it goes?

Posted by Alexandra at 6:01 PM on February 11


Does that also include Mulllatos who pass for white. How about Dravidians from south india who have really black skin. Does that mean I no longer need to be ashamed of myself for no voting for Barack Obama because he is black. Should I also quit the republican party because the new chairman is Black. FYI a few years ago a white congressman by the name of Cohen was also rejected by the united states congressional black caucus because he was white.

Posted by Tony Soprano at 7:01 PM on February 11


“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” George Orwell in Animal Farm.

A few years ago at the University of Florida, some students tried to start a White Student Union. They copied the charter of the Black Student Union, just changing black to white. You would have thought they advocated homicide. Blacks and the liberals went ballistic, and it was not allowed.

Orwell had it right.

Posted by Cogitator at 7:15 PM on February 11


By way of extension, one could surmise that the black caucus members would approve of a white caucus that excludes blacks.

I wonder, just what do the black caucus members talk about that a white member wouldn’t understand? Or offended at?

Posted by Anonymous at 8:45 PM on February 11


In Jared Taylor’s book Paved With Good Intentions there was an entire chapter about double standards. On issues of race in America you could easily fill an entire book, or for that matter fill an entire library with books about double standards concerning race relations.

Can you just imagine a White Legislative Caucus rejecting a black from membership? The Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, the NAACP, Southern Poverty Law Center, ADL, ACLU, et al., would all be lining up to sue the White Caucus into non-existence. Don’t hold your breath expecting any of said organizations to battle discrimination against whites. We all know they won’t lift a finger or spend a dime on this one. All we can expect is silence. How typical. Such sickening hypocrisy.

Posted by liberal on most issues but race at 8:54 PM on February 11


this man carroll should sue and make a case of it. use the same methods they did. but this man carrol is just another sorry white, i am glad he got what he deserved for pandering to blacks all the time. maybe he has learned something here and will come out of his state of denial.

Posted by danjack at 10:37 PM on February 11


When you are dealing with low IQ’s, what do you expect?

Posted by Trisket at 10:40 PM on February 11


“In Jared Taylor’s book Paved With Good Intentions there was an entire chapter about double standards. On issues of race in America you could easily fill an entire book, or for that matter fill an entire library with books about double standards concerning race relations.

Can you just imagine a White Legislative Caucus rejecting a black from membership? The Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, the NAACP, Southern Poverty Law Center, ADL, ACLU, et al., would all be lining up to sue the White Caucus into non-existence. Don’t hold your breath expecting any of said organizations to battle discrimination against whites. We all know they won’t lift a finger or spend a dime on this one. All we can expect is silence. How typical. Such sickening hypocrisy.”

Posted by liberal on most issues but race

- And you know what? You think it’s bad now. It’s gonna get worse. A whole lot worse. White’s are like the person getting backed into the corner by an attacker. It’s going to come to a point – whenever it comes – that we’re either going to have to fight or relinquish our existence.

Posted by Awakened at 10:50 PM on February 11


” Racism ” at its hypocritical worse or is it best ? May the ” black caucus ” members eat copious amounts of George Wahington Carver’s peanut butter from the ” in the news ” Georgia plant.

Posted by Michigan Patriot at 12:28 AM on February 12


We need to learn something from blacks.

Let’s not vote, under any circumstances, on any black candidate just because he is black and likely to join a group of other blacks in their anti-white “unity”.

Posted by A Reader at 1:08 AM on February 12


The black caucus is totally unnecassary and does very little benfit the black community let alone America as a whole. They complain and whine which will ultimately make blacks look bad infront of America. I wouldnt sweat it they are unimportant to their cause all they care about is make themselves look good while getting payed. Some members are good and dont hold prejuides but they still need to shut down that organization because it serves no purpose in the progress of our country.

I support blacks when their right but on this one they wrong.

Posted by rational thinker at 1:40 AM on February 12


A better example cannot be had.

Clear evidence of the corruption and dishonesty of the judiciary.

Posted by Anonymous at 2:47 AM on February 12


A crowning acheivement in the career of a liberal politican, becoming a member of the Black Caucus, its a bizarro world.

Posted by abc at 5:44 AM on February 12


“…excluding whites is a legitimate form of discrimination because black legislators need to join with others of “common cause.””

Hmmm… Then I guess excluding blacks is a legitimate form of discrimination because White legislators need to join with others of “common cause.”

Oops! That’s Racist Hate Speech, isn’t it?

Posted by Anonymous at 7:02 AM on February 12


Those atonishingly candid quotes regarding discrimination by Sen. Elliot should be etched into the memory of every racially aware White person, and perhaps placed right on the AR home page for perpetual future reference! Hypocrisy just doesn’t get any more blatant and shameless than that!!

Posted by HH at 7:20 AM on February 12


“You can discriminate about whether you are going to drink four beers or 10 beers.”
- Sen. Joyce Elliott, D-Little Rock

Really? Wow. I’d love to hear her try to explain this. This one is as dumb as a brick.

(To discriminate is to make a distinction in favor of or against a person or thing on the basis of the group, class, or category to which the person or thing belongs rather than according to actual merit.)

- Realist in Atlanta

Posted by Anonymous at 7:39 AM on February 12


Here is the problem (blacks) have not TAKEN anything from us, WE have served it up to them on a silver platter, WHY I am not sure but they do NOT have the power on their own to do this. So in my opinion we are getting exactly what we deserve with all these Invaders, Intruders and Free Loaders? Will we change? I really don’t know anymore? Is is too late for us to reclaim what is ours?

Posted by T Rexx at 8:16 AM on February 12


“need to join with others of common cause”

Therein lies the great truth. What “common cause” do whites have left?

Posted by Anonymous at 10:11 AM on February 12


THIS GOES ON WITH THE CBC as well , remember Pete Stark or Steve Cohen

Posted by Anonymous at 11:32 AM on February 12


Blacks and the liberals went ballistic, and it was not allowed.

But whites need to fight it in court. By now whites should know the routine of blacks and liberals going balistic, shouting, rantiing. And whites should also be well acquainted with school officials immediately kowtowing to black anger.

My response would be so what if they go balistic. Let them engage in their balistic posturing, the real fight begins in court. You sue the university for violating your civil rights, for causing you emotional distress, for creating an environment of harrassment and intimidation, etc. You find a way to sue for $50 million. That will sober them up and make them rethink their position. And when you sue for $50 million that will get the attention of skilled lawyers who are looking for a case.

Posted by Anonymous at 2:04 PM on February 12


Neat, if this form is discrimination is alright once again, I take it we can have white only clubs, bars and schools again? After all, the Black Caucus just banned whitey from joining their club.

Posted by Anonymous at 3:53 PM on February 12


What I find most astonishing is that little passage about caucus chairwoman, one Nancy ‘Duffy’ Blount, being unable to find a copy of the bylaws regarding membership. Furthermore, the vice chairman Steele admitted “he had no idea” what the bylaws said about who is allowed to join and who is not. I am bewildered: Aren’t those two supposed to be the brains of the whole caucus operation?

What’s next? The caucus being able to find somebody who’s able to read its own bylaws?

Posted by John at 5:28 PM on February 12


But he said he didn’t know whether Carroll should be a full member or have some sort of auxiliary membership instead.

Make him a second class member. Use him as a gopher when you need ice, beer, chips, etc. He wants to be a lapdog; i say let him be a lapdog. It would do whites good to know who he is serving.

Posted by Anonymous at 5:30 PM on February 12


Does anyone know the location of that definition of racism that basically states that whites, because they are in power, cannot be not racist, and that blacks, because they are not in power, can never be racist? I can’t remember where it is, and it would be good to have it posted here, because it is exactly the justification used for the many instances of this or that being allowed to be all black but forbidden to be all white.

Posted by Sunder at 6:34 PM on February 12


There was a time when politicians, ministers, police, teachers, the military command and others were on the same page as far as preserving our way of life. For the last 50 or so years each of those groups have been picked off one by one and re-educated as to their role. We are told that this country no longer belongs to those of European heritage or Christian beliefs. What is the end game? We see it now. White people full of loathing for their own race and religious beliefs, horrible crimes committed against white people, their property, and heritage. So naturally, the use of phony quotas to push whites out of places of education, business, and politics is our just punishment. One only needs to look to Zimbabwe for our future where whites are deprived of their lives as if they are mere animals. To turn this around in the USA is almost impossible. At least one third to one half of our own race are our own worse enemies. Then there is the increasingly larger, non-white and ever hostile population that is coaxing us down the road to extinction. I see no way out. We have committed ourselves to the ash heap of history.

Posted by Too Late at 4:34 PM on February 13

Race realism, Ethnic Nationalism, are still alive and growing.

Race realism, Ethnic Nationalism, are still alive and growing.  Moronic liberal self destructive communist like yourself are what will be doing the dieing when the time comes.  The world you created with the 1960′s revolution overthrowing the government of the United States of America is coming to an end.  Your racist politics of anti-white egalitarianism are falling apart, your attempt at creating a world devoid of individual thought out side of the politically correct doctrine has failed, you can only go so long against what is the natural tendencies of human kind before you pay the price.  The west is now dieing because of people like you, culturally, linguistically, socially, politically, militarily (except America) and in nearly every other facet, the western world is in decline.  We only have to look to what Latinos, Asians, and Africans as a whole hold dear, and that’s blood, their people, and they will choose their own people every time over one of yours you fool.  As they gain power in western nations, your power declines, as they have more children and you have none, your power declines, as their culture and language take priority, your power declines.  Your cities have become a bastardized mishmash of crumbling infrastructure and 3 world ghettos, like so many before you, you have failed.  From the ashes of the west, we will rise, you will die in the chaos and anarchy of the transition, you will be put down like the old dieing dogs that you are.  Riots and conflict now reign in many places of Europe and soon will reign in America, and when America falls your ideology will die with it.  Try as you may no economic bail out can bail out the morally corrupt and inept you represent, the corruption of the soul cannot be bailed out, no amount of money can fix what cannot be fixed.  We will mark our future history book with your failures so that future generation will come to know the name of what had caused the collapse of Western civilization, and that name is egalitarianism, socialism, communism, and liberalism, all brothers and sisters of death.  We will not roll over and die, that’s your job.  And if you think creating a fascist socialist police state will shut us down, you are wrong, we will only get stronger, our voice louder amongst our people and we will prepare for what is to come, we will find those like yourself, and when the killing begins, you cannot hide among us, we will seek you out and you will pay for what you have done.

Table A-2. Employment status of the civilian population by race, sex, and age

  HOUSEHOLD DATA                                                                                                           HOUSEHOLD DATA

  Table A-2.  Employment status of the civilian population by race, sex, and age

  (Numbers in thousands)

                                                   Not seasonally adjusted                      Seasonally adjusted (1)                  

      Employment status, race, sex, and age
                                                   Dec.      Nov.      Dec.      Dec.      Aug.     Sept.      Oct.      Nov.      Dec.
                                                   2007      2008      2008      2007      2008     2008       2008      2008      2008  

                     WHITE                                                                                                               

  Civilian noninstitutional population.........  189,093   190,221   190,351   189,093   189,747   189,916   190,085   190,221   190,351
    Civilian labor force.......................  125,334   126,057   125,588   125,403   125,987   125,844   126,298   126,029   125,634
        Participation rate.....................     66.3      66.3      66.0      66.3      66.4      66.3      66.4      66.3      66.0
      Employed.................................  120,004   118,721   117,409   119,947   119,082   118,964   118,722   118,226   117,357
        Employment-population ratio............     63.5      62.4      61.7      63.4      62.8      62.6      62.5      62.2      61.7
      Unemployed...............................    5,331     7,336     8,179     5,456     6,904     6,880     7,577     7,803     8,277
        Unemployment rate......................      4.3       5.8       6.5       4.4       5.5       5.5       6.0       6.2       6.6
    Not in labor force.........................   63,759    64,165    64,763    63,690    63,761    64,072    63,787    64,193    64,718 

             Men, 20 years and over
    Civilian labor force.......................   65,462    65,681    65,424    65,471    65,680    65,718    65,792    65,762    65,331
        Participation rate.....................     76.2      76.0      75.6      76.3      76.2      76.2      76.2      76.1      75.5
      Employed.................................   62,789    61,995    60,965    62,929    62,336    62,125    61,972    61,761    61,101
        Employment-population ratio............     73.1      71.7      70.5      73.3      72.3      72.0      71.8      71.5      70.7
      Unemployed...............................    2,674     3,686     4,459     2,542     3,344     3,593     3,821     4,001     4,230
        Unemployment rate......................      4.1       5.6       6.8       3.9       5.1       5.5       5.8       6.1       6.5 

            Women, 20 years and over
    Civilian labor force.......................   54,465    55,131    55,033    54,249    54,703    54,543    54,891    54,810    54,878
        Participation rate.....................     60.4      60.8      60.6      60.2      60.5      60.2      60.6      60.4      60.5
      Employed.................................   52,517    52,454    52,199    52,148    52,113    52,233    52,178    52,014    51,846
        Employment-population ratio............     58.3      57.8      57.5      57.8      57.6      57.7      57.6      57.3      57.1
      Unemployed...............................    1,948     2,677     2,833     2,101     2,590     2,310     2,714     2,796     3,031
        Unemployment rate......................      3.6       4.9       5.1       3.9       4.7       4.2       4.9       5.1       5.5 

           Both sexes, 16 to 19 years
    Civilian labor force.......................    5,406     5,245     5,131     5,683     5,604     5,583     5,615     5,457     5,425
        Participation rate.....................     41.3      40.0      39.1      43.4      42.8      42.6      42.9      41.6      41.4
      Employed.................................    4,698     4,272     4,245     4,870     4,634     4,605     4,572     4,451     4,409
        Employment-population ratio............     35.9      32.6      32.4      37.2      35.4      35.2      34.9      34.0      33.6
      Unemployed...............................      709       973       886       813       970       978     1,043     1,006     1,016
        Unemployment rate......................     13.1      18.6      17.3      14.3      17.3      17.5      18.6      18.4      18.7 

           BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN                                                                                                     

  Civilian noninstitutional population.........   27,704    28,021    28,059    27,704    27,896    27,939    27,982    28,021    28,059
    Civilian labor force.......................   17,498    17,683    17,720    17,574    17,949    17,733    17,768    17,708    17,796
        Participation rate.....................     63.2      63.1      63.2      63.4      64.3      63.5      63.5      63.2      63.4
      Employed.................................   15,999    15,705    15,649    16,013    16,026    15,709    15,762    15,703    15,674
        Employment-population ratio............     57.7      56.0      55.8      57.8      57.4      56.2      56.3      56.0      55.9
      Unemployed...............................    1,499     1,979     2,071     1,561     1,923     2,024     2,006     2,005     2,122
        Unemployment rate......................      8.6      11.2      11.7       8.9      10.7      11.4      11.3      11.3      11.9
    Not in labor force.........................   10,206    10,338    10,339    10,129     9,947    10,206    10,214    10,313    10,263 

             Men, 20 years and over
    Civilian labor force.......................    7,858     7,957     7,981     7,888     8,072     8,000     7,961     7,954     7,999
        Participation rate.....................     70.4      70.6      70.7      70.7      72.0      71.2      70.7      70.5      70.8
      Employed.................................    7,196     7,013     6,879     7,244     7,213     7,049     7,019     6,989     6,930
        Employment-population ratio............     64.5      62.2      60.9      64.9      64.3      62.7      62.3      62.0      61.4
      Unemployed...............................      662       944     1,102       644       859       952       942       965     1,069
        Unemployment rate......................      8.4      11.9      13.8       8.2      10.6      11.9      11.8      12.1      13.4 

            Women, 20 years and over
    Civilian labor force.......................    8,814     9,069     9,031     8,830     9,036     8,931     9,016     9,069     9,060
        Participation rate.....................     63.5      64.5      64.2      63.6      64.6      63.7      64.2      64.5      64.4
      Employed.................................    8,212     8,234     8,264     8,203     8,218     8,097     8,213     8,249     8,256
        Employment-population ratio............     59.1      58.6      58.7      59.1      58.7      57.8      58.5      58.7      58.7
      Unemployed...............................      602       836       767       627       818       834       804       820       804
        Unemployment rate......................      6.8       9.2       8.5       7.1       9.1       9.3       8.9       9.0       8.9 

           Both sexes, 16 to 19 years
    Civilian labor force.......................      826       657       708       856       842       802       790       685       736
        Participation rate.....................     31.0      24.4      26.3      32.2      31.4      29.9      29.4      25.5      27.4
      Employed.................................      590       457       506       567       595       563       531       464       488
        Employment-population ratio............     22.2      17.0      18.8      21.3      22.2      21.0      19.8      17.3      18.1
      Unemployed...............................      235       199       202       289       247       239       260       221       248
        Unemployment rate......................     28.5      30.4      28.5      33.8      29.3      29.8      32.9      32.2      33.7 

                     ASIAN                                                                                                               

  Civilian noninstitutional population.........   10,801    10,811    10,873     (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)
    Civilian labor force.......................    7,225     7,134     7,223     (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)
        Participation rate.....................     66.9      66.0      66.4     (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)
      Employed.................................    6,958     6,791     6,857     (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)
        Employment-population ratio............     64.4      62.8      63.1     (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)
      Unemployed...............................      267       343       365     (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)
        Unemployment rate......................      3.7       4.8       5.1     (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)
    Not in labor force.........................    3,577     3,677     3,651     (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)       (2)   

    1 The population figures are not adjusted for seasonal variation; therefore, identical numbers appear in the unadjusted and
  seasonally adjusted columns.
    2 Data not available.
    NOTE:  Estimates for the above race groups will not sum to totals shown in table A-1 because data are not presented for all races.
  Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.  Seasonally adjusted household data have been
  revised to reflect updated seasonal adjustment factors.

 Unemployment rates
                         |_____________________________________________________
                         |        |        |        |        |        |
All workers .............|     6.0|     6.9|     6.6|     6.8|     7.2|     0.4
  Adult men .............|     5.8|     6.8|     6.4|     6.7|     7.2|      .5
  Adult women ...........|     5.0|     5.6|     5.4|     5.6|     5.9|      .3
  Teenagers .............|    19.7|    20.7|    20.7|    20.4|    20.8|      .4
  White .................|     5.4|     6.3|     6.0|     6.2|     6.6|      .4
  Black or African       |        |        |        |        |        |
    American ............|    10.7|    11.5|    11.3|    11.3|    11.9|      .6
  Hispanic or Latino     |        |        |        |        |        |
    ethnicity ...........|     7.8|     8.9|     8.8|     8.6|     9.2|      .6

Table of Contents

Last Modified Date: January 09, 2009

http://www.bls.gov/web/mmartcr1.gif

http://media.mcclatchydc.com/smedia/2008/10/03/20/168-20081003-States-JOBLESS.large.prod_affiliate.91.jpg

http://www.bls.gov/web/mstrtcr1.gif

I want Obama to win. We must allow everything to occur as it is intended.

I want Obama to win.  I may die during the conflict, but we will fight when the time comes, and we will win.

Here is how we win this new conflict with an old history.  We must allow everything to occur as it is intended.

I want Obama to do everything he and his anti-white communist elites have planned, I want them to break the economic back of this nation with massive spending, I want him to fire all white heterosexual males currently working within the government and only hire minorities, I want Obama to push every liberal agenda to mainstream and break the moral and linguistic heritage of this nation.  I want this nation to die, a slow and painful death.  I want Obama to weaken our nation militarily, I want Obama to break down our central intelligence agency, making it easier for terrorists to infiltrate this nation.  I want communist and islamists to run freely over the landscape, I want the islamists terrorists to detonate a nuclear bomb in ten major metropolitan cities.  I want Obama to declare our constitution illegal, and no longer needed in the brave new world order.  The left in the west are moving towards the creation of a communist block federation of nations once called the western world.  I want them to open the borders and allow every illegal alien to enter this nation from all over the world, and bankrupt and destroy the local and state economies.

Why do I want these things?  Because these events will destroy this nation, economically first, riots and crime will skyrocket. Second they will destroy this nation socially, education will collapse, madness and insanity will reign supreme. The left will destroy this nation there is nothing we can do about, only when whites realize that non-white males must go, will we even begin to wake the hell up, and I have one thing to fall back on, my 12 gauge shot gun, my 6.8 spc AR-15 assault rifle, other planned weapons, and my various home made weapon systems.  Not to mention multiply levels of body armor, and other homemade defensive systems.

This nation must die politically, socially and economically, so that the white males who own 95% of the fire arms in this nation can do something about it.  The nation must die so when can rebuild, 1 in 3 of us must sacrifice our lives, we must embrace the destruction of the west, only then will the white males rise up and destroy our enemies, take back what’s rightfully ours, and kill everyone who moved against us.  A world wide race war is what’s needed, and America is the lynch pin of the liberal democracies within the west, when America goes, the west will follow, and then the rise of white Nationalist is all but assured.

White Nationalist government will come to power after the collapse of the west!!!  Think about it, don’t fight it, buy guns and ammo, buy food and water, buy body armor and NBC gear for you and your family, get ready and be prepared, and when the time comes my brothers, I will see you on the battlefield from the streets of L.A. to New York’s Central park, it will not occur in the next 4-5 years, but soon afterwards, we will retake what is ours, allow the world to see the first African Dictator of America, allow this nation to die, be joyful when terrorist attack us, allow this nation to die, and then and only then will we rise to power.  Many of us will die, but the West will be reborn, and our constitution will be reborn in our image, it will protect the ethnic nature of our nation and that of the west, and we must make ready for time is coming when you will no longer be able to purchase what you need to survive.  Be ready, buy plenty of guns and ammo, our organization will come when it is intended to occur, when we need it to save our people, and not a moment sooner.  Obama will fail, liberalism will fail, you cannot defy human nature for very long, until you face the consequences of your defiance.

Black Locust

Dear Black America…

Dear Black America…

our-wedding

A draft for a letter I’m thinking of sending….

Dear Black America,

In the midst of what is for you the joyous occasion of the inauguration of the first black president of the United States, I’m really sorry to have to write something that I know is going to hurt you. It’s the last thing I would ever want to do. But I’ve been thinking about it for a long time now, and there’s no getting around the truth.

You know it and I know it. Our marriage is not working out.

I want a divorce.

I have not come to this decision lightly. When we married, we promised to stay together for the rest of our lives, “till death do us part.” And I’ve taken that vow seriously through all these years, and tried ceaselessly to fix what was wrong with me to try to make you happy. And then, there are the children, who didn’t get to choose their parents and now will have to suffer from our failed marriage. But you know, sometimes, a marriage is just so impossible and so hurtful to everyone that there’s nothing left to do but cut your losses. I’ve decided that’s what I need to do.

I’m not playing the saint here. I wasn’t a saint at all. It was I who started things to begin with. I seduced you and took advantage of you, and I forced you to do things against your will. It was terribly wrong and there’s nothing I can do to fix the way I hurt you. True, that’s the way everyone did things in those days. I did try, in my own way, to treat you well…. Well, I don’t need to remind you what happened after that. We got into a situation where the only honorable thing to do was to offer to marry you. I gave you the option to get out quietly, but you said no, we were together and you meant for us to stay together, and so we were married.

We never got along completely peacefully, but I think that, at least at first, we both tried to make it work out. You asked me to teach you about what was in all those books of mine, so you could improve yourself and so we’d have more in common to talk about. And I think we were both pretty excited about the progress you made, at first. I tried to get to know your interests, too, and really came to appreciate your charms and your talents and your own special kind of wisdom. We went places together, and we helped each other out in all sorts of ways. I thought things were going pretty well there for awhile. Even you have to admit we had some good times.

I always tried to be good to you, and I think I did many things to help you. But I admit, despite my best intentions, I could sometimes be abusive and violent and cruel to you. I didn’t mean to be, but I was. I was used to being in control and I felt threatened when you challenged me on it. Oh, you provoked me often enough, and nobody can be meaner than you when you want to be, but I’m not going to use that as an excuse. I take responsibility for my own actions. I eventually managed to get myself under control, and I thought you’d forgiven me for the past and that we had an understanding now of how to settle disputes between us. And we had a period where I thought we got along pretty well. Don’t you think so?

Well, it came as a shock when you came out and said you were miserable and that I was still mistreating you just as badly as before. You wanted us to be equal. You wanted an equal say in how our household was run, you wanted an equal share of our possessions and prestige. Well, I was completely shocked because I’d always figured the arrangement we had was what was best for both of us. We weren’t completely equal, but each of us had his own sphere of activity and it seemed to work smoothly most of the time. But what could I say if that’s what you wanted? I believe in marriage as an equal partnership; I don’t want to keep my spouse under my thumb. So I promised to devote myself to making our partnership into an equal partnership.

Well, I believe I have done the best any person could do to meet your request. I’ve had myself analyzed and re-educated; I’ve apologized and renounced my acts;  I’ve been punished and rebuked. I cut off ties with those relatives of mine who didn’t accept you; I sent money and gave my help to your relatives across town and invited some of them to join our family. And I never lost faith. Every time I tried something new, I believed that this time, you would be happy.

Instead, I’ve ended up the victim in an abusive relationship. First there is the physical abuse. I just never know when you’re going to lash out and hit me or worse. There’s been some sexual abuse too, I’m sorry to say. Then there is the psychological abuse. You are constantly talking about our past and how I’ve mistreated you, and I’m starting to realize that you’re exaggerating and making up things that aren’t even true. And you’ve made me a stranger in my own home, talking about me with your friends and telling the children lies about me to get them to side against me. Then, when I draw back from you, you get teary-eyed and sentimental and tell me I need to understand you, that if we both just try a little harder we can get along. Something about you is so sweet when you cry to me like that that I begin to believe what you say. But now I realize it’s part of the way you manipulate me.

And I don’t know why it’s only recently that I’ve noticed you never say you love me?

I have to be honest with myself. Living with you makes me miserable. I’ve given up my friends, my hobbies, even my values and beliefs, to try to make you happy. But it’s just not working out. And I’ve realized that it never can. You know why? We are just naturally different. We don’t fit together, spiritually, intellectually, or physically. And we really have known it all along. I’m not saying this to put you down. You are a wonderful person. But you need to be with someone else, not me. And the same is true for me. If I stay with you, I seriously feel it is going to destroy me.

What I’ve said may be very hurtful to you. So though it may not help any, I want to say that I care about you very much. We have been together for a long, long time and our lives have been changed forever by the experience. In some ways, we know each other better than anyone. I value the good times we had together and all the things you have taught me. It is a cliché, but I sincerely hope that we’ll be able to be friends, once the pain of separation has subsided. We like and care about many of the same things, and sometimes we really enjoy each other’s company. And I assure you that if you ever need help in the future, I’ll do anything in my power to assist you.

I want to be friends. But I don’t want to be married to you anymore. I want a divorce.

Please try to understand.

Sincerely,

White America

Obamas new Deal – reveal the new anti-white, anti-middle-class agenda

Reich and Rangel reveal the new anti-white, anti-middle-class agenda

Thanks to Bo for this video of Robert Reich and Charles Rangel at an Economic Recovery Plan meeting on 7th January.

Today the $825 billion economic stimulus package was marked up by the House Ways & Means Committee.  It includes money for infrastructure, health care and education projects.  But little to none of it will be coming your way if you are white or middle-class.

Norwegian girls ask for it. increase in Somali rapists, generally on account of gang rapes.

Norwegian girls ask for it.

Esther of Islam in Europe translated the following interview.

Oslo police recently released its 2007 Rape Report. The report shows a marked increase in Somali rapists, generally on account of gang rapes.

The transcript below is not complete (in the original)

At least ten women were attacked and molested by a gang of Somali men at Sofienberg park in Oslo on Saturday evening.

Last year a record-high 161 rapes and 35 rape attempts were reported in Oslo. Over 70% of the rapists were non-Norwegian [ed. ethnically, a majority had Norwegian citizenship].

Lawyer Abid Raja visited a cafe in Grønland in Oslo for Norwegian broadcaster P4. There he met three young men (ages 26, 30 and 35), from Somalia and Senegal.

The men, who refused to have their names published, spoke with P4 about the rape and robbery wave hitting the city.

A: Honestly? Norwegians are horrible!

Q: What are you thinking about?

A: I’m thinking of everything. Not least the food is bad. (He then speaks of the fact that Muslims don’t eat pork).

Q: What do you think of Norwegian women then?

A: They’re something completely different, he says as his friends laugh.

A: But listen now, Norwegian girls complain that foreign boys do this and that, but the reason there are so many rapes is that Norwegian girls go around almost completely naked! That’s like saying “come here and fuck me”, you understand?

Q: You’re saying that Norwegian girls are asking to be raped?

A: Not exactly asking, but when then go out almost completely naked and get completelydrunk in Frogner park or go to a party together with some friend, and then they complain about being raped? It’s their fault, says the 26 year old from Somalia.

Q: But even if they go around lightly dressed and get drunk then they’re certainly not asking to be raped?

A: No, but many of the foreigners aren’t used to this where they come from. They’re not accustomed that girls go dressed as they want, then maybe they interpret this a bit wrong, you understand?

Regarding the gang who attacked several girls, threw them down and tore off their clothes in Sofienberg park in Grünerløkka, the men explain this saying that the boys were very young.

A: Weren’t these boys young? Such as 13-14 years old? I think this was curiosity as to how girls look. They were so young that they didn’t know what they were doing, says the 35 year old Somali.

The 30 year old comes from Senegal and thinks African men respect women, but that attack rapes happen when the men drink.

A: We who come from Senegal don’t like to speak with Norwegian men, but we like Norwegian women. That’s because in African culture they respect women, but not men.

Q: But why do young African men attack Norwegian women?

A: Such things happen now and then. When we drink too much and get drunk it happens that we attack them, but if we don’t drink, we don’t attack Norwegian women – but respect them, says the Senegalese, who speaks in bad English.

The 26 year old Somali speaks the most. He thinks his and his friends’ points of view represent the attitudes of many in the Somali community.

Q: You don’t think many will be scared that you have such attitudes if P4 broadcasts this interview on the radio?

A: Just broadcast it, because this is true. That’s the way things are – it’s the facts. I’m not lying. I’ve never been with a Norwegian lady, but I’ve been with many Norwegian girls – they are fairly nice and very skilled in bed.

Source: P4 (Norwegian), h/t Snaphanen (Danish)

____________________________________________________________

You’ll find this is the prevailing attitude of Muslims in any Islamic country. Consider that these Muslims will be instilling this same attitude into the children they raise in European countries. Won’t be long before Europe descends into a violent, dangerous third world pit, just like most of the Islamic countries they escaped from.