The Monthly anti-white seminar about white privilege in Santa Monica CA

The anti-white seminar (which takes place monthly in Santa Monica CA… California which is ground zero for the race war) about white privilege took place yet again however we weren’t there this time. They are getting the jewish journal and ADL after us now. The Santa Monica mirror is reporting fake news about us and put out this video…

There is ONLY one way all this is going to end:

BLM leader gives Whites the 10 New Commandments

What we are about to read is really retarded beyond belief. It basically represents a demand of surrender to an enemy invading force – it cannot be interpreted as nothing else. What I shall point out immediately, as if the title of this article didn’t reveal it, is the “spiritual” connection these demands have with Christianity – which was, is, and always will be – yet another invading force into the European lands. It is remarkable how one can see the Jewish fingerprint in all of these movements; they haven’t really changed anything in the groundwork of their strategies – they merely change the mask of the movement, that is to say, the main theme of it. What yesterday was the Biblical Sin, is today the Sin of being born White. What the New Testament demanded by selling all your property and giving it to the poor – is today social justice towards non-White people. Only an outright imbecile, at this point in time, cannot see the same patterns unfold in front of our eyes.

I always return to this crucial paragraph within the New Testament, as this mind sickness was spreading into our homelands – 1 Corinthians 1 : Brothers, consider the time of your calling. Not many of you were wise by human standards; not many were powerful; not many were of noble birth. But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong. He chose the lowly and despised things of the world, and the things that are not, to nullify the things that are, so that no one may boast in His presence. It is because of Him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God: our righteousness, holiness, and redemption. Therefore, as it is written: “Let him who boasts boast in the Lord.”

If one were to link this statement to the universal idea of God having Chosen the Jews – then God chose the least wise, least powerful, non-noble, foolish, weak, lowly and despised people of the world, namely the Jews, in order to nullify everything that is wise, strong, healthy, noble and that makes sense. If this is the purpose of the Jewish God, of the Biblical God, then this God has no other mission but to destroy everything just, beautiful and natural. It tells you right here, right in these few sentences, what that motherfucking god is all about. And this has been the main characteristic of every Jewish “social movement“. They always pick up the most stupid people, round them up, heat them up, engage them against Aryans and destroy them through such a strategy. The idea of only “boasting in the Lord”, is equal to the current theme of the movement. In case of BLM, you are only allowed to boast in the name of Black, Brown and – in general – non-White people. Everything else is not permitted and is regarded as hateful, hate speech, and against the Will of the Jewish God. Imagine a Jew speaking to Black people, a Jew who is financing the BLM movement :


Brothers, consider the time of your calling. Not many of you were wealthy by the standards of those White supremacists; not many were given education; not many were of privileged birth. But the time has come for non-Whites to shame the Whites, for those among us to shame the weakened Whites. We, those whom they them third world, shall nullify everything they are, so that none of them may ever be proud of their existence.
It is because of equality and universal brotherhood, that we have grown wise in numbers: righteous, justified, truthful. Therefore, let us say it loudly: “White lives do not matter! Down with the Whites! Destroy White privilege! Every White is a Racist!”

And those who had nothing, never developed anything, never could or would be able to pose a threat against the Jews – would end up being used to destroy those who did have something, who did develop almost everything, who were a direct threat to the Jews. After all is said and done, all that would remain are lunatics with no organization, no skills, no mind, no reason – and the Jew ruling over them. The main mission would be accomplished : No one would remain who would be able to “boast against the Lord“, which is to say – against the Jews. The present “pleasures” which the Jews are giving to the non-Whites while exterminating us are exactly that – passing moments which mean nothing the grand scheme and design of the Jews. Give the non-Whites money, give them pleasure, abuse and use them by luring them in through various desires – it means absolutely nothing in the long run, in the Jewish timeline. What matters is that White people go extinct and that Jews can afterwards rule supreme.

And while the Jews control and manipulate the Black Africans, just like they do – mind you – many of the Whites among us, they have quite the different agenda with them in their own military base called Israel. Banning Africans is not just one measure the Jews have in mind. There were many such news articles about “immigrants” trying to enter Israel. Many Africans were simply shipped to Sweden and European Nations. Others, alongside many Muslims, were shipped to Australia. Other routes include Canada – and yet no one seems to notice, no one seems to care when one is capable of pointing out Jewish hypocrisy. The Jews have been slave-trading black Africans for the last thousands of years, yet managed someway, somehow, to make Whites look as the source of Slavery upon this planet. Having Slavery as a commandment from God written in the Jewish Bible is simply again not important, it is not something that we must discuss, it simply does not exist.

The natural European life style of “do it yourself“, “help yourself“, “be self-sustainable“, “be self-reliable” – simply does not include the idea of slavery. It came from the Middle East with the rise of the Jews and their Arab cousins. I have yet to see a “Black Lives Matter” movement attack Arabs for still, to this day, having tens of millions of Black Africans slaves. The Sun would sooner explode than for Africans to stop enslaving one another in Africa – or eating one another – for that matter. If the Jews could, they would have used Australian Aboriginals for their global agenda, they would have massively bred them into existence and would be sending them all over the planet instead of the Africans – but – the Australian Aboriginals are simply too different, too primitive, and impossible to even control on such a scale and level. It would take far too much controlled race-mixing with several specimen in order to create a breed of mixed Australian Aboriginals that could be easily controlled and still ruin everything around them. Thus, the Africans were used. Thus, the Africans were mixed with White slaves and the modern day “African-American” was created.


Let us now look into what the modern day Catholic Church of Black Lives Matter demands of White Europeans

Chanelle Helm, the co-founder of Black Lives Matter-Louisville, came up with a list of 10 commandments for White people. In general, Whites are to give up pretty much everything they have, their entire existence, because, as she claims, they are bound to find a way to earn money due to being “privileged”. I assume the White Europeans in South Africa are also finding ways of becoming healthy, wealthy and strong again after having given up all their rights, all their land, all the property their ancestors worked for hard. The Africans are killing them by the millions, looting, robbing, raping, every single day – how is it, one might wonder – that those White Europeans down there just haven’t found another “privileged” way to rebuild a Civilization despite of these African marauders? How is it that a small pack of lions is unable to defend their young against thousands of hyenas? Meanwhile, as many of you know, the Africans are unable to produce food on the farms they have stolen from the Whites. Who helps them survive? Jews primarily, but through the monetary help from Whites. White Europeans, primarily from Europe and America, are sending to Africa billions of dollars in cash, food and medicine in order to help the Africans who are killing their own European racial brethren.

What a circus of a planet we live on. How can the European race advance into Space, research the wonders of the Universe, of Life itself – how can we invest time into philosophy, into science, into spirituality – when we are surrounded by Jews who wish to conquer the planet, by Blacks who wish to rape our women, steal our possessions and then return it all back to the stone Age, by Muslim who wish to conquer the planet and leave it in a never-ending medieval state of existence? It is remarkable how at the same time we are talking about creating AI machines, while having Jews talk about being God’s Chosen idiots. It is remarkable how we have the Internet while Muslims are still going down on their head 5 times a day because a Jew wrote that in a book they deem holy. It is remarkable how we can identify races, how we are deeply invested into the research of genetics – and we still have Jews and various other Social Justice imbeciles talking about equality, one human race and that we all just simply bleed red.

It is remarkable what we have achieved despite of these lunatics surrounding us. The hard work it took from being random tribes to creating beautiful societies. Mobile phones must be growing on trees because everyone can get one for free nowadays. They drive cars, use electricity, use the internet, take the train, go on airplanes, use PC’s, receive high tech medical help – and all of it – must simply be taken for granted. In the Jewish worldview, everything is happening for them, everything we develop – was God’s Will so that Jews might have it as well. In the Jewish Worldview, Nikola Tesla came into existence only for the Jews. So, Chanelle Helm, a Jewish brainwashed puppet, has the following first demand :


White people, if you don’t have any descendants, will your property to a black or brown family. Preferably one that lives in generational poverty.
White people, if you’re inheriting property you intend to sell upon acceptance, give it to a black or brown family. You’re bound to make that money in some other white privileged way

For those of you who might now be familiar with the term, a generational poverty is defined as a family having lived in poverty for at least two generations. You might as well give your stuff to the poor South African Whites, or to Eastern Europeans who earn barely 500 dollars a month for working a minimum of 50 hours a week. Those god damn privileged Europeans. But hey, this statement rings a bell, doesn’t it? Jesus told him, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow Me”. You can only be “perfect” in the eyes of both the Jews and the BLM people – if you simply give your property to one of them. Nothing else will ensure your entry into the New World Order, into the Heaven on Earth system which the Jews and non-Whites will establish and run.

It should also remind you of the Church and the spreading of Christianity among us. Nuns were created, women who would have no children, who would have to take vows of poverty and celibacy in order to “enter the kingdom of God”. If a woman had any property – she would all give it to the Church, and on top of it – would never have any children of her own. Talk about an ideological genocide. Many priests were required to do the same as well. Many men cut of their penises and balls in order to follow yet another set of words of Jesus : For there are eunuchs who were born that way; others were made that way by men; and still others live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it. Yesterday it was nuns, priests and eunuchs, today the message is to either have no children to save the ozone layer, or to race-mix yourself in order to redeem yourself from the sin of being White.

Not only were those man unable to have children, not only would they have to leave everything they might have had to the Church, but they would also become faggots due to the drastic hormonal change they would experience. Forget not the psychological impact the idea of “hell and heaven” also had on people – what better victim than an old man or woman – to destroy his mind with some made up vision of guilt, while offering him the option of giving all he has as an inheritance to the Church in order to redeem himself? Is that not what this entire non-White movement, led by Jews, is demanding of White people as well? We continue :


If you are a developer or realty owner of multi-family housing, build a sustainable complex in a black or brown blighted neighborhood and let black and brown people live in it for free

One would even find it reasonable if they demanded to be educated on how to build their own house, but in their materialistically mad-driven mind, houses are not built, they are simply bought with money and a fairy drops them from heaven with a parachute. You are to invest your money into creating residential areas for non-Whites for free, who will then also demand free food, free education, free medicine, free cars, free welfare, more money and eventually, when their numbers grow, will demand the right to take over areas, have political and social power and make decisions about even the most important things – decision that will only benefit them. You are to simply continue to help them destroy you, you are to make them believe that living as a parasite is a natural state of being for humanoids – it is, after all – the Jewish way of life.

The cost of electricity, internet, water, heat – all of that is simply irrelevant. They want it and they want it for free. And once they have it, they don’t want you to have it. I have said it many times before : A mind that cannot grasp what it takes to get clean water, to get electricity, to develop a computer – is a mind that has no respect for any of those things, a mind that has no respect, no understanding for the civilization that Creators create. Such a mind has no reason and it is simply futile to try and have a discussion with it. It will never get it. For it doesn’t see the path, the road, it only sees the end result.


White people, if you can afford to downsize, give up the home you own to a black or brown family. Preferably a family from generational poverty.

There are no White families, you see – there are only a bunch of still-alive White people whose only last purpose in life is to uplift non-Whites. Do notice, all of these demands work wonderfully if there already exists a Christian foundation within the society. What can the Christian say in defense against these demands? He can only submit to them. His life is meaningless, his nation means nothing, he only has Jesus in his life and Jesus told him to sell everything anyways, to help and love even your enemy and those who wish to destroy and kill you – why should the Christian deny these demands? What does it mean to the Christian that White people will go extinct – all humanoids, after all – are simply One in Christ Jesus. The Christian feels pity for other humanoids for not having discovered Jesus, why he lurks around every corner, with open hands, waiting to accept the next idiot into his secret club.


White people, if any of the people you intend to leave your property to are racists assholes, change the will, and will your property to a black or brown family. Preferably a family from generational poverty.

For some of the Whites who still didn’t get it – you just have to leave everything you have to non-Whites. Any White person who wishes to preserve his people, his nation, his very existence – is simply a heretic in the eyes of the Black Lives Matter Church. When the Christian Church, led by Jews, grew enough in power to really persecute non-believers, they tortured them to death in the most gruesome and disgusting ways one can imagine. What do you think would the BLM Church do to your people, your wives and children, if they had an unstoppable power of such magnitude financed by Jews?

The Jews achieved one major thing : They really and truly are creating a Social Welfare Planet. These “children of the future”, these non-White race-mixed people, simply want free stuff. Free stuff which the Jews will gladly give to them – for the price of their soul. In our modern day times, such a future planet is called a “self-sustainable society”. How it will work without the people who created it, remains a mystery.


White people, re-budget your monthly so you can donate to black funds for land purchasing.

But, of course. One just couldn’t forget the monthly taxes one has to pay to the Church. In old times you were promised eternal life after death in the Jewish diverse and multi-cultural welfare system of Heaven; today you are promised a wonderful diverse, non-White, multi-nonEuropean-cultural, brown, race-mixed future. You might as well get a T-Shirt while you are at it for free : “I’m White and I committed Racial Suicide”. A trophy of the most delicate kind. Truly the Christian martyrdom spirit.


White people, especially white women (because this is yaw specialty — Nosey Jenny and Meddling Kathy), get a racist fired. Yaw know what the f*** they be saying. You are complicit when you ignore them. Get your boss fired cause they racist too

You have to motivate the followers of your faith to destroy the enemy. Destroy their buildings, monuments, heroes, idols, legends, stories, culture, race – everything. Get them fired from their job, kill them if you can, seize their property, give it to the Church and its leaders. You might believe in the faith, but if you are not really pro-actively living its spirit, then you are also basically a heretic. If there still existed a king in the past who resisted the Christian lunacy, you would have to kill him or remove him from power. For those of you in the knowledge, this should remind you of the last Pagan Roman Emperor who was back-stabbed and killed by a Christian soldier among his own ranks. In our modern day money-dependent Jewish societies, this is done by character assassination, which is  the equivalent of death today.

The same shit Jews did with the French revolution. The same shit they did with the Bolshevik revolution. The same shit they did and still do with Communism. The same shit the Jews do with their controlled AntiFa puppets. But, of course, it just could never ever be the Jews behind it all. And if you do notice it, it is a conspiracy and you are a conspiracy nut. You are probably imagining things, you might as well be delusional, you are simply anti-Semitic, Xenophobic and Racist. If you directly quote Jews and use their own words to explain their agenda – that is simply pure anti-Semitism.


Backing up No. 7, this should be easy but all those sheetless Klan, Nazi’s and Other lil’ d***-white men will all be returning to work. Get they ass fired. Call the police even: they look suspicious.

We might be laughing at this, but this is the reality we live in. These people are allowed to say these things because we live in Jewish operated nations, we live in Zionist Occupied Governments, we are not free, we do not have our own freedom within our own Nations. There is no way in hell a single white person may say stuff like that in  the public. This alone means that there is no such a thing as “White privilege” or “White supremacy” – because if there were such a thing – then there simply would be no non-Whites who would be able to speak such stuff. There would be no Jews running Hollywood, all of our media, newspapers, TV stations, Politicians, the Senate, the European Union, the UN, the FED, all of the Banks, etc. We are enslaved. And our only current purpose in life is to remain silent slaves who are not to ever wake up from their enslavement. The Blacks, even though they don’t get it either, are also slaves of the Jews – up to this very day.


OK, backing up No. 8, if any white person at your work, or as you enter in spaces and you overhear a white person praising the actions from yesterday, first, get a pic. Get their name and more info. Hell, find out where they work — Get Them Fired. But certainly address them, and, if you need to, you got hands: use them.

It wouldn’t be a Jewish run organization if there wasn’t violence involved in it. The point of course remains always the same : Make the gullible Goyim believe that the ideology or movement which the Jews have sold them is making them righteous, is somehow divine, is bringing about justice and truly makes them right about everything they do and say. The danger behind all of this is that there will always be a number of self-hating Whites who will join these Jewish ideologies. It happened with Christianity. It happened before. It will happen again, and it continues to happen. Let us give another simply analogy here : If the only Whites who care about preserving White people and their interests on this planet are labelled as “Racist”, then what are these non-Whites who are talking just and only about their own preservation and interests? But, White interests exist on their own, without the help of anyone else – whereas all these non-White interests entirely depend on the help and sacrifice of Whites, which this BLM leader further emphasizes in the last commandment :


Commit to two things: Fighting white supremacy where and how you can (this doesn’t mean taking up knitting, unless you’re making scarves for black and brown kids in need), and funding black and brown people and their work.

White supremacy defined as simply any and all White interests, White nations, White neighborhoods, White farms, etc. If there are White people in it – you have to destroy it. This is the obsession of the 21st century – destroy any and all White groups. If there is a group which consists of only White people – it must be “diversified“. One could read this commandment as follows : Commit to two things : Fighting Heretics and Pagans where and how you can, and fund Christian and Church interests and their work. You get the same when you apply Democracy, Communism, Bolshevism, Liberalism, Feminism, or any other Jewish -ism. You can’t miss this pattern. You can’t miss this simple Truth and Realization.

To sum up the demands of the BLM leader : Give up everything you own Whitey. Give up your existence. Give it all to us for free and while we live for free and get everything for free, you should find a non-Racist, non-Supremacist, non-Privileged way to keep the society you created upright and running so that we may benefit from it for the coming generations. All this of course has nothing to do with our direct hatred of everything European, all this is not of course financed and led by our Jewish masters, this all is simply an act of Equality, Diversity, Liberty,  Fraternity and Universal Brotherhood. It has nothing to do with White Genocide and the Extermination of your Race and People.

It is simply pay-back time for those 1% of White people who owned Black slaves during the Jewish slave trade era of America. The fact that 40% of Black slaves were owned by Jews and over 20+% of them by other Blacks, is irrelevant. Those 1% White people who had slaves are the representation of the rest of the 99% White people who had never any. It doesn’t matter that our own Black people sold us as Slaves to Jews, who then took them to the “New World” on Jewish ships and sold them at Jewish auction houses. It doesn’t matter that these same Jews were shipping White Europeans, especially the Irish, as Slaves into the New World as well – those are simply not important, these facts simply are not important, these facts simply do not exist.

We simply wish to take over your Nations, live for free, have a self-sustainable European futuristic society which will run without you. You should finance our cause which is cohen-cidently the death of everything you represent. You should not have children, sell everything you have, love your enemies, tolerate and not resist evil, you should look at your fellow Europeans as Heretics, just as in the old days you looked at those European Pagans as heretics who needed to be burned at the stake for refusing to submit to a Jewish invasive ideology. Your daughters and sons should race-mix, should avoid having White children – but, believe you me – all of this has nothing to do with White genocide. None of it. Nothing. It must be your imagination.

There is only one way this is going to end.

 

This is just the beginning of SHUT IT DOWN and Hurricane Harvey

I’ve seen a lot of bullshit about hurricane Harvey saving America from a race war, that’s utter nonsense, anyone who believes that a weather phenomenon can change peoples minds and what they think of each other in the days and weeks after, is fooling themselves. The crack down on the internet is still on going, white people are still waking up in numbers we didn’t even believe was possible, blacks are still doing what blacks do, so its not over. This is just beginning, and war is still coming, whether you want to admit it or not, NONE of the problems in the west have been solved, as a matter of fact the billions spent on the Hurricane clean up will further destabilize the system. Early estimates place the cost of clean up and damages, to be $200 Billion dollars, and the economic effects to Texas and the surrounding region will be felt for years to come.

Hurricane Harvey Will Render Some Parts Of Texas ‘Uninhabitable For An Extended Period Of Time’

Do you remember what Hurricane Katrina did to New Orleans?  Well, now we are watching the same thing happen to southeast Texas.  On Friday, Hurricane Harvey made landfall as a category 4 hurricane.  It is the first hurricane to make landfall in the United States in 12 years, and it is the most powerful storm to hit the state of Texas in at least 50 years.  One meteorologist is saying that what we are witnessing is “worse than the worst-case scenario for Houston”, and another stated that this storm “could easily be one of the worst flooding disasters in U.S. history”. (Read More…)

Hurricane Harvey Aftermath: 100,000 Homes Destroyed, A Million Vehicles Ruined And Bottled Water Being Sold For $99 A Case

It is now being estimated that the total amount of economic damage caused by Hurricane Harvey will be somewhere in the neighborhood of 190 billion dollars.  It is a disaster unlike anything that we have ever seen before in all of U.S. history, and federal officials are already admitting that they are literally going to be dealing with the aftermath of this storm for “years”.  At this point, more than 100,000 homes have been destroyed, “up to one million vehicles” have been ruined, and many retailers have already been caught engaging in extreme price gouging.  But this could be just the beginning, because this storm has already rendered many areas along the Gulf coast “uninhabitable” for an extended period of time, and as you will see at the end of this article another hurricane may be arriving early next month.

What we just witnessed in Houston is being called “a 1,000-year-flood”, and many basic necessities are now in extremely short supply.  So of course it was inevitable that this would lead to price gouging, and this is reportedly even happening at some of the largest retail chains.  For example, at one Best Buy store cases of bottled water were being sold for 42 dollars

On Friday, a Twitter user shared a picture of cases of bottled water being sold at a Best Buy in Houston. One of the cases was being sold for $42 when it normally retailed for about $15.

A Best Buy spokesman later apologized, saying it was a ‘big mistake’.

But that water was quite cheap compared to prices in other parts of the city.  According to CNN, one convenience store in Houston was actually charging 20 dollars for a single gallon of gasoline and 99 dollars for a case of bottled water…

Texas officials say they’ve gotten hundreds of complaints about price gouging and scams in the wake of Hurricane Harvey.

One convenience store in Houston reportedly charged $20 for a gallon of gas, $8.50 for a bottle of water and $99 for a case of water, according to the Texas Attorney General’s office.

The state has received 684 complaints in all, according to Kayleigh Lovvorn, a spokeswoman for the office.

It is inexcusable to take advantage of people during a crisis in this way.  So many are running low on food, water and other basic supplies, and to try to make a quick profit by engaging in price gouging just isn’t right.

In the end, many people are going to have to leave Houston and never look back.  To this day some parts of New Orleans still have not recovered from the devastation that Hurricane Katrina caused, and we are facing a similar scenario now with Houston.  According to AccuWeather president Joel Myers, it will be “weeks and possibly months” before people can even get back into certain parts of Houston…

Hurricane Harvey could be the costliest natural disaster in U.S. history with a potential price tag of $190 billion, according to a preliminary estimate from private weather firm AccuWeather.

This is equal to the combined cost of Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, and represents a 1% economic hit to the gross national product, AccuWeather said.

“Parts of Houston, the United States’ fourth largest city, will be uninhabitable for weeks and possibly months due to water damage, mold, disease-ridden water and all that will follow this 1,000-year flood,” said AccuWeather president Joel Myers.

I don’t think that the U.S. population as a whole really grasps what has just taken place.

Large stretches of the 4th-largest city in the United States have been destroyed.  Millions that were living comfortable middle class lives have now lost everything that they worked for.  Large numbers of people did not have flood insurance, and so they will be leaning on the federal government for assistance.  Many did have flood insurance, and a significant number of insurance companies may end up going bankrupt because of all the claims that will be suddenly pouring in.  Houston was one of the most important hubs for economic activity in our entire nation, and the economic damage from this crisis will literally stretch on for years.

But despite everything that has happened, many are being very bitter and very cruel on social media and on the comments sections of major news websites.  Apparently many on the left do not believe that compassion is appropriate because this storm hit a conservative state like Texas.  Not everything has to be politicized, and it has greatly disturbed me to see just how cold many hearts in this nation have become.

And what is truly frightening is that another hurricane is potentially heading toward the Gulf of Mexico.  It is still way too early to project exactly if it will make landfall or where, but it is being reported that Hurricane Irma has already become a category 3 storm

Hurricane Irma continued its rapid power grab Thursday, with wind speeds increasing by more than 55 mph since Wednesday to become a major Cat 3 storm.

In their 5 p.m. advisory, National Hurricane Center forecasters said sustained winds had climbed to 115 mph as the storm headed to the west, northwest at 12 mph. Irma remains in the far east Atlantic, just over 1,700 miles east of the Leeward Islands. Up and down changes in intensity are possible over the next few days, forecasters said, but the storm is expected to remain a major hurricane that could become a Cat 4 storm in four days.

I am proud of how the Trump administration is handling this crisis, and when I win my race for Congress I look forward to working with Trump to make sure that our nation is always prepared to handle this sort of event.

And please keep praying for Houston, because if another major hurricane were to hit that area it would be a nightmare beyond anything that any of us would ever want to imagine.

Michael Snyder is a Republican candidate for Congress in Idaho’s First Congressional District, and you can learn how you can get involved in the campaign on his official website. His new book entitled “Living A Life That Really Matters” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com.

Hurricane Harvey Has Dumped 15 Trillion Gallons Of Water On Texas And May Be The Most Expensive Natural Disaster In U.S. History

Authorities are now telling us that Hurricane Harvey may end up causing more economic damage than even Hurricane Katrina did.  We already knew that some parts of southeast Texas are going to be “uninhabitable for an extended period of time”, but the latest forecasts are calling for about 10 more inches of total rain than had previously been projected.  At this moment 15 trillion gallons of water have already been dumped on Texas, and the rain continues to fall.  You can get some idea of the devastation that has taken place in Houston by watching this drone footage.  Essentially, some communities along the southeast Texas coastline have been totally destroyed.

It would be bad enough if 15 trillion gallons of water were dropped anywhere in the continental United States, but for it to happen in the Houston area makes it a disaster of unprecedented proportions.  Houston is our fourth largest city, and that means that millions upon millions of people are being deeply affected by this storm.  As I mentioned above, some experts now believe that this could end up being the most expensive natural disaster in our history

Tropical Storm Harvey has dropped more than 15 trillion gallons of water on Texas, triggering catastrophic, unprecedented flooding in the Houston area. The rains have broken all-time records, exceeding the rainfall totals seen during Tropical Storm Allison in 2001.

There may be no parallel available to any other rainstorm in U.S. history, based on the number of people affected, amount of water involved, and other factors, meteorologists have warned.

Due to its wide geographic scope across America’s 4th-largest city, the ensuing flood disaster may rank as one of the most, if not the most, expensive natural disaster in U.S. history.

And 15 trillion gallons is just the current number.  Meteorologists are forecasting that another 6 trillion gallons of water will fall on Texas before this storm is over.

Just yesterday, authorities were warning that some areas may see more than 40 inches of total rain, but now many forecasts are calling for “as much as 50 inches of rain” before Hurricane Harvey finally leaves Texas…

As the water rose, the National Weather Service issued another ominous forecast: Before the storm is gone, some parts of Houston and its suburbs could get as much as 50 inches of rain. That would be the highest amount ever recorded in Texas.

FEMA’s Long predicted that the aftermath of the storm would require FEMA’s involvement for years.

“This disaster’s going to be a landmark event,” Long said.

If these forecasts are accurate, the rainfall levels will exceed any previous record.

In fact, the amount of rain that has already fallen on southeast Texas would be enough to completely fill the Great Salt Lake in Utah, and then fill it all the way to the top again.

FEMA officials are already saying that they are going to be in the Houston area for “years”.  Tens of thousands are already using temporary shelters, and it is being projected that 450,000 people will ultimately file for disaster assistance…

U.S. emergency management officials said on Monday they were expediting federal resources to Texas to help with rescue efforts after Hurricane Harvey swamped coastal areas of the state and forced 30,000 people to seek refuge in temporary shelters.

Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator Brock Long said more than 450,000 people were expected to seek disaster assistance due to flooding after Harvey made landfall during the weekend before weakening to tropical storm status.

Of course whenever there is a disaster such as this, bad people are going to try to take advantage of the situation.

According to Houston police chief Art Acevedo, a number of looters have already been arrested

Acevedo also said officers are focused on protecting the city from looters as floodwater recede.

“We’ve already arrested a handful of looters. We’ve made it real clear to our community we’re going to do whatever it takes to protect their homes and their businesses,” Acevedo said. “And when people come from the outside to Houston, Texas, know we’re going to be out in the city, we’re not going to rest as a police department or law enforcement community until people restore their lives.”

I am proud of how the Trump administration and the authorities down in Texas are responding to this unprecedented crisis.  The loss of life appears to be minimal so far, and thousands of people have been rescued from their homes and vehicles.

We never give emergency responders the credit that they deserve.  Day after day they are saving lives in the most difficult of situations, and I am so thankful for all of the wonderful people that are working so hard to help Houston pull through this.

Please keep the people of Houston in your prayers, because this is truly the worst crisis that city has ever seen.

Chicano race organizations openly call for race war within five years

Pheonix based Chicano race hustlers openly call for race war within five years.

Chicano race organizations Calls for Race war?

Miguel Perez says he is the current president of Chicanos Unidos Arizona and an active member of La Raza. He says he also served as the vice president of MECHA in Fullerton California.

La Raza, or NCLA, is a militant Latino group that Obama is funding with American tax dollars. MECHA is a nationwide Latino student organization. MECHA explicitly calls for the creation of Atzlan, a new Chicano/Latino nation, in what is now the Southwest United States.

Perez is using Examiner.com to call for Latinos in the Southwest to arm themselves for race war. Perez tells his readers “Latino groups believe they have enough people in states such as California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas to successfully wage a war on the United States.  Who’s side will you be on?”

Perez is hyping a call to arms by a fellow Chicano militant…

Phoenix-based Nuestros Reconquistos claims that there will be a war very similar to the Civil War fought in the next five years. “La Raza and MEChA have already talked to Latinos and Phoenix and explained that Latinos need to arm themselves for war,” says Nuestros Reconquistos President Manuel Longoria.

Cecilia Maldonado of Chicanos Unidos Arizona isn’t hoping for any sort of war, but believes it may be unavoidable. “For generations, our people have prepared us to take back the lands of the Southwest that were stolen from our Mexican ancestors. Because of the bad economy and many racist laws, Latinos will be forced to fight sooner than later,” says Mrs. Maldonado.

Perez is listed as the “civil rights” writer for the Phoenix area on examiner.com. He recently praised Obama for issuing a unilateral amnesty for illegal aliens by ordering law enforcement to cease deportations.
Update: 9/1/11

The Race

Miguel Perez, current president of Chicanos Unidos Arizona and an active member of La Raza, also served as the vice president of the Latino civil rights organization MECHA in Fullerton California. He is the son of two Mexican immigrants. Perez plans to become a lawyer in order to protect the rights of Latinos. You can reach Perez at mperezlaraza1985@gmail.com.

Phoenix-based Nuestros Reconquistos claims that there will be a war very similar to the Civil War fought in the next five years. “La Raza and MEChA have already talked to Latinos and Phoenix and explained that Latinos need to arm themselves for war,” says Nuestros Reconquistos President Manuel Longoria.

Latino group claims Aztlán war in next five years

More from Miguel here.

Link courtesy Rebellion Blog

Locust: and the comments are even better!

6 comments:

Anonymous said…
Bring it you racist MFers! Your rhetoric is treasonous and all of you should be charged, tried, convicted and hung.

Pickdog
III

LFMayor said…
I find your terms acceptable, Perez. By all means, please let us know if you want to get started ahead of schedule. And be careful with those siestas… remember San Jacinto? We’ll bring tar again for all you great “leaders”.

xoxo
The Mayor

Anonymous said…
Ha Ha Ha! Seriously? To the halls of Montezuma again!
Mexico only exist because we allow it too.If we stopped buying their crap the entire Mexican economy would collapse.We just let you go so long out of kindness I suppose.
Really a latino insurgency? I’d give it a week.

Anonymous said…
Don’t kid yourselves, this guy and MANY MANY of his fellow travelers are quite serious…dead serious in fact. They already have the numbers in many communities and will be able to easily overrun most adjacent communities for the simple fact that most people think it can’t or won’t happen. Come on, think about it, the majority of Americans believe that they are just here to bus our tables and cut our grass…they’re just good hard working decent people who only want a better life for themselves and their families…and most importantly, they’re no threat. That is what ALL media outlets and political/community leaders have been telling the people for years now.

Maybe in some states something like this might only last a week, but in states such as CA, AZ, & N.M. it would be devastating and they could easily gain control of large portions of the state. Look at the devastation that a relatively small number of drug gang members have wrought on whole cities just south of the border…and they’re killing their own people there! These guys basically hate white people, do you think for even a moment that they would have a problem with killing entire neighborhoods just to get their point across?

Go ahead and laugh this guy off and treat what he is saying as a joke, but do so at your own peril. I live in AZ and seriously fear what I believe is coming.

The Quiet Man

Mike said…
If he could rectify the recto-cranial inversion he’s suffering from he’d realize what a f@#$%^& idiot he is. Come get some peckerhead.

Curtis said…
Well, I believe that he and his followers are serious. And I take it serious. But the numbers who think like him, while large enough to do some damage, especially in places like Los Angeles, their numbers are not large enough to take whole States or even half. I live in a predominately Hispanic neighborhood. Except for the house full of Hispanic Trannies (I shit you not) down the street, I don’t have a single problem with any of them. I don’t know if they are all legal, but they all do work except for my closet neighbor who got laid off his truck driving job. That’s not to say we don’t have a Hispanic gang problem and a few La Raza’s or a few pockets of Hispanic idiots, but for the most part, the Hispanic peoples up here where I live are quite folks.

Global black on white mob attacks

Low Level Race War going global as blacks attack and kill whites globally.

 

FOX News finally mentions black on white mob attacks.

For the past two years, CofCC.org has been exposing the bloody rise of black on white mob attacks. We have also been exposing the open media censorship.

Finally a few “mainstream” media outlets have begun to whisper “questions” about what CofCC.org has been telling you for the past two years.

From FOX News…

Questions Arise Over Whether ‘Flash Mob’ Attacks in U.S. Cities Motivated by Race

Police departments in several cities around the country are investigating what appear to be incidents of “flash mob”-generated violence, in which packs of dozens or even hundreds of youths appear seemingly out of nowhere to commit assaults, robberies and other crimes against innocent bystanders.

The motive and circumstances surrounding the attacks that have resulted in numerous arrests around the country are being investigated — and law enforcement officials in at least one city are looking into a possible racial component to the crimes.

 

Media lying. Working class fighting back against rioters.

The radical left-wing taxpayer supported NPR recently released a fictional report falsely claiming that “young working class white” people are strongly represented among the rioters. Other media outlets around the world are working overtime to falsify information about the riots. Even Rush Limbaugh was duped into saying that the rioters were working class people protesting economic conditions.

The actual rioters are largely professional thugs and gangbangers. They started as an all black race riot, and Afro-Caribbean and African immigrants continue to make up the bulk of the rioters. About 10%-12% of London is black. Half from the Caribbean and half from sub-Saharan Africa.

Working class whites in Enfield drive black rioters out of the area. Enfield is about 15% black.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=h6p4itkdLi8

Meanwhile the politically correct London police leadership, issued a warning to “vigilantes.” These same authorities ordered London police to stand down the first day of the riots! They were so afraid of political taboos that they allowed a black mob to set fires and loot stores at will.

From BBC…

The Metropolitan Police has warned Londoners against forming “vigilante patrol groups”.

The caution comes after hundreds of residents in Southall, Enfield, Hackney and Eltham patrolled their areas.

On Tuesday night Sikh men in Southall, many with hockey sticks, stood guard outside a Sikh and a Hindu temple and a mosque following Monday’s disorder.

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Stephen Kavanagh said “vigilantism” could lead to violence and drain Met’s resources.

The Met described Monday’s disorder as “the worst” in its recent history as violence began in Hackney and spread to Croydon, Clapham, Camden, Lewisham, Peckham, Newham, East Ham, Enfield, Woolwich, Ealing and Colliers Wood.

About 16,000 officers were on duty on Tuesday night – up from 6,000 – and the increased police presence will remain, the government said.

About 300 Sikh men gathered in Southall to protect religious buildings and businesses while about 100 men stood in Church Street, Enfield, vowing to “defend the streets”.

 

British MP courageously denounces politically correct coverage of London riots.

British MP Gerard Batten denounced BBC pandering and coddling of the rioters. Batten correctly describes them as thugs who do not have jobs, because they do not want to work. Batten is from London and a member of the UK Independence party. He is an outspoken critic of immigration.

Mass hate crime mob attacks in London.

Photo from UK Daily Mail.

Give me your clothes white boy! Thugs want to humiliate white pedestrians. Numerous reports of black thugs forcing white pedestrians to strip.

London riots continue for fourth day.

London based race hustler tells BBC that blacks are justified in rioting.

 

 

 

 

 

Congressman Suggests People Will Don ‘White Hoods’ If Wilson Not Rebuked

Congressman Suggests People Will Don ‘White Hoods’ If Wilson Not Rebuked

More news stories on Bizarre Racism Charges

FOX News, September 15, 2009

Rep. Joe Wilson’s outburst last week is drawing new recriminations from his colleagues, with a member of the Congressional Black Caucus suggesting that a failure to rebuke the South Carolina Republican is tantamount to supporting the most blatant form of organized racism in American history.

In an obvious reference to the Ku Klux Klan, Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., said Tuesday that people will be putting on “white hoods and white uniforms again and riding through the countryside” if emerging racist attitudes, which he says were subtly supported by Wilson, are not rebuked. He said Wilson must be disciplined as an example.

The charged comments come as the House is preparing to take further action against Wilson. House Democratic leaders decided to formally discipline him Tuesday afternoon for jeering President Obama during last week’s joint session of Congress.

Wilson bellowed “You lie!” as Obama delivered his address.

{snip}

While he has been widely condemned by colleagues on both sides of the aisle for breaching protocol, some have gone a step further and accused Wilson of being racially motivated.

Johnson seemed to reference the protests held in Washington, D.C., on Saturday in making his claim. While many protesters were there to demonstrate against big government and federal over-spending, Johnson argued that a “fringe” element is motivated by race and that Wilson “winked” at that fringe with his behavior.

{snip}

The resolution is “privileged,” meaning whenever it is introduced the measure goes to the front of the legislative line. It is unclear who will call up the measure.

A “resolution of disapproval” is not one of the four forms of discipline typically meted out in the House. The most commonly used means of punishment are expulsion, censure, reprimand or fine.

For instance, in 1997, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was both reprimanded and fined for his book deal. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., was reprimanded in 1990 for ethical breaches tied to a male prostitute. Republicans tried to censure Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif., in 2007 for comments he made on the House floor about President Bush. But Democrats voted to set aside that effort.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on September 15, 2009)

Newsweek’s War On White People

Newsweek’s War On White People

Newsweek just launched an all out war on the mental well-being of white children in their September issue.

The article is titled “See Baby Discriminate. “The article demands, with religious fanaticism, that white children be made to shun all knowledge of racial differences and taught to feel guilty. Newsweek actually printed “It’s horrifying to imagine kids being proud to be white.”

The Newsweek article actually states that white children should be made to feel guilty to “knock down their glorified view of white people,” while black children should be built up with “ethnic pride.” White parents, and only white parents, are called on to go to great lengths to brainwash their own children starting at age 3.

However, amidst the extremist statements by Newsweek, some real bombshells about racial realities are admitted. Here are some highlights:

1. “Kids as young as 6 months judge based on skin color.” – Newsweek

2. White parents who welcome multiculturalism and embrace diversity, are terrified to talk to their own children about race for fear of what their own children might say.

3. 75% of non-white parents talk to their children about race, compared to only 25% of white parents.

4. White children 5 to 7 attending racially diverse schools universally had a better opinion of their own race than other races.

5. Whites are called on to begin intense multi-cultural indoctrination using videos and parental discussions at age 3, so as not to miss the right “developmental window.”

6. White children should be made to feel guilty for alleged wrongdoings by their race, to increase positive attitudes towards blacks.

7. Black children need to be coached on “ethnic pride” to pump them up and make them more likely to succeed in life.

8. 553 scientists signed a 2007 Supreme Court school amicus brief supporting school desegregation. However, the brief used many qualifiers and only said that desegregation “may” improve black performance. There was no real confidence in desegregation on the part of the scientists.

9. Diverse schools do not lead to more cross-race relationships. In fact the opposite is true. The more diverse a school, the more students self-segregate by race.

10. White children prefer a white Santa Claus and black children prefer a black Santa Claus.

What you will see strikingly absent in Newsweek’s whitey hating diatribe of making white children feel guilty and making black children feel proud, is the fact that black children actually have higher self-esteem already than white children. In fact the people with the lowest self-esteem tend to be Orientals.

American Sociological Association (Source)Past research indicates that black adolescents consistently have higher self-esteem than white students. Other research demonstrates that self-esteem has positive effects on academic achievement. However, black students have lower academic achievement than white students while concurrently exhibiting higher self-esteem.


http://www.northwestfront.org

Morality and Abstract Thinking- How Africans may differ from Westerners

Morality and Abstract Thinking

How Africans may differ from Westerners

by Gedaliah Braun

I am an American who taught philosophy in several African universities from 1976 to 1988, and have lived since that time in South Africa. When I first came to Africa, I knew virtually nothing about the continent or its people, but I began learning quickly. I noticed, for example, that Africans rarely kept promises and saw no need to apologize when they broke them. It was as if they were unaware they had done anything that called for an apology.

It took many years for me to understand why Africans behaved this way but I think I can now explain this and other behavior that characterizes Africa. I believe that morality requires abstract thinking—as does planning for the future—and that a relative deficiency in abstract thinking may explain many things that are typically African.

What follow are not scientific findings. There could be alternative explanations for what I have observed, but my conclusions are drawn from more than 30 years of living among Africans.

.
A public service billboard in South Africa. Note old tire and gas can.

My first inklings about what may be a deficiency in abstract thinking came from what I began to learn about African languages. In a conversation with students in Nigeria I asked how you would say that a coconut is about halfway up the tree in their local language. “You can’t say that,” they explained. “All you can say is that it is ‘up’.” “How about right at the top?” “Nope; just ‘up’.” In other words, there appeared to be no way to express gradations.

A few years later, in Nairobi, I learned something else about African languages when two women expressed surprise at my English dictionary. “Isn’t English your language?” they asked. “Yes,” I said. “It’s my only language.” “Then why do you need a dictionary?”

They were puzzled that I needed a dictionary, and I was puzzled by their puzzlement. I explained that there are times when you hear a word you’re not sure about and so you look it up. “But if English is your language,” they asked, “how can there be words you don’t know?” “What?” I said. “No one knows all the words of his language.”

I have concluded that a relative deficiency in abstract thinking may explain many things that are typically African.

“But we know all the words of Kikuyu; every Kikuyu does,” they replied. I was even more surprised, but gradually it dawned on me that since their language is entirely oral, it exists only in the minds of Kikuyu speakers. Since there is a limit to what the human brain can retain, the overall size of the language remains more or less constant. A written language, on the other hand, existing as it does partly in the millions of pages of the written word, grows far beyond the capacity of anyone to know it in its entirety. But if the size of a language is limited, it follows that the number of concepts it contains will also be limited and hence that both language and thinking will be impoverished.

African languages were, of necessity, sufficient in their pre-colonial context. They are impoverished only by contrast to Western languages and in an Africa trying to emulate the West. While numerous dictionaries have been compiled between Euro­pean and African languages, there are few dictionaries within a single African language, precisely because native speakers have no need for them. I did find a Zulu-Zulu dictionary, but it was a small-format paperback of 252 pages.

My queries into Zulu began when I rang the African Language Department at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg and spoke to a white guy. Did “precision” exist in the Zulu language prior to European contact? “Oh,” he said, “that’s a very Eurocentric question!” and simply wouldn’t answer. I rang again, spoke to another white guy, and got a virtually identical response.

.
Kikuyu women do not need dictionaries.

So I called the University of South Africa, a large correspondence university in Pretoria, and spoke to a young black guy. As has so often been my experience in Africa, we hit it off from the start. He understood my interest in Zulu and found my questions of great interest. He explained that the Zulu word for “precision” means “to make like a straight line.” Was this part of indigenous Zulu? No; this was added by the compilers of the dictionary.

But, he assured me, it was otherwise for “promise.” I was skeptical. How about “obligation?” We both had the same dictionary (English-Zulu, Zulu-English Dictionary, published by Witwatersrand University Press in 1958), and looked it up. The Zulu entry means “as if to bind one’s feet.” He said that was not indigenous but was added by the compilers. But if Zulu didn’t have the concept of obligation, how could it have the concept of a promise, since a promise is simply the oral undertaking of an obligation? I was interested in this, I said, because Africans often failed to keep promises and never apologized—as if this didn’t warrant an apology.

A light bulb seemed to go on in his mind. Yes, he said; in fact, the Zulu word for promise—isithembiso—is not the correct word. When a black person “promises” he means “maybe I will and maybe I won’t.” But, I said, this makes nonsense of promising, the very purpose of which is to bind one to a course of action. When one is not sure he can do something he may say, “I will try but I can’t promise.” He said he’d heard whites say that and had never understood it till now. As a young Romanian friend so aptly summed it up, when a black person “promises” he means “I’ll try.”

The failure to keep promises is therefore not a language problem. It is hard to believe that after living with whites for so long they would not learn the correct meaning, and it is too much of a coincidence that the same phenomenon is found in Nigeria, Kenya and Papua New Guinea, where I have also lived. It is much more likely that Africans generally lack the very concept and hence cannot give the word its correct meaning. This would seem to indicate some difference in intellectual capacity.

Note the Zulu entry for obligation: “as if to bind one’s feet.” An obligation binds you, but it does so morally, not physically. It is an abstract concept, which is why there is no word for it in Zulu. So what did the authors of the dictionary do? They took this abstract concept and made it concrete. Feet, rope, and tying are all tangible and observable, and therefore things all blacks will understand, whereas many will not understand what an obligation is. The fact that they had to define it in this way is, by itself, compelling evidence for my conclusion that Zulu thought has few abstract concepts and indirect evidence for the view that Africans may be deficient in abstract thinking.

Abstract thinking

Abstract entities do not exist in space or time; they are typically intangible and can’t be perceived by the senses. They are often things that do not exist. “What would happen if everyone threw rubbish everywhere?” refers to something we hope will not happen, but we can still think about it.

African wood carving.

Everything we observe with our senses occurs in time and everything we see exists in space; yet we can perceive neither time nor space with our senses, but only with the mind. Precision is also abstract; while we can see and touch things made with precision, precision itself can only be perceived by the mind.

How do we acquire abstract concepts? Is it enough to make things with precision in order to have the concept of precision? Africans make excellent carvings, made with precision, so why isn’t the concept in their language? To have this concept we must not only do things with precision but must be aware of this phenomenon and then give it a name.

How, for example, do we acquire such concepts as belief and doubt? We all have beliefs; even animals do. When a dog wags its tail on hearing his master’s footsteps, it believes he is coming. But it has no concept of belief because it has no awareness that it has this belief and so no awareness of belief per se. In short, it has no self-consciousness, and thus is not aware of its own mental states.

It has long seemed to me that blacks tend to lack self-awareness. If such awareness is necessary for developing abstract concepts it is not surprising that African languages have so few abstract terms. A lack of self-awareness—or introspection—has advantages. In my experience neurotic behavior, characterized by excessive and unhealthy self-consciousness, is uncommon among blacks. I am also confident that sexual dysfunction, which is characterized by excessive self-consciousness, is less common among blacks than whites.

Time is another abstract concept with which Africans seem to have difficulties. I began to wonder about this in 1998. Several Africans drove up in a car and parked right in front of mine, blocking it. “Hey,” I said, “you can’t park here.” “Oh, are you about to leave?” they asked in a perfectly polite and friendly way. “No,” I said, “but I might later. Park over there”—and they did.

While the possibility that I might want to leave later was obvious to me, their thinking seemed to encompass only the here and now: “If you’re leaving right now we understand, but otherwise, what’s the problem?” I had other such encounters and the key question always seemed to be, “Are you leaving now?” The future, after all, does not exist. It will exist, but doesn’t exist now. People who have difficulty thinking of things that do not exist will ipso facto have difficulty thinking about the future.

It appears that the Zulu word for “future”—isikhati—is the same as the word for time, as well as for space. Realistically, this means that these concepts probably do not exist in Zulu thought. It also appears that there is no word for the past—meaning, the time preceding the present. The past did exist, but no longer exists. Hence, people who may have problems thinking of things that do not exist will have trouble thinking of the past as well as the future.

This has an obvious bearing on such sentiments as gratitude and loyalty, which I have long noticed are uncommon among Africans. We feel gratitude for things that happened in the past, but for those with little sense of the past such feelings are less likely to arise.

Why did it take me more than 20 years to notice all of this? I think it is because our assumptions about time are so deeply rooted that we are not even aware of making them and hence the possibility that others may not share them simply does not occur to us. And so we don’t see it, even when the evidence is staring us in the face.

Mathematics and maintenance

I quote from an article in the South African press about the problems blacks have with mathematics:

“[Xhosa] is a language where polygon and plane have the same definition … where concepts like triangle, quadrilateral, pentagon, hexagon are defined by only one word.” (“Finding New Languages for Maths and Science,” Star [Johannesburg], July 24, 2002, p. 8.)

.
Apartheid-era sign post.

More accurately, these concepts simply do not exist in Xhosa, which, along with Zulu, is one of the two most widely spoken languages in South Africa. In America, blacks are said to have a “tendency to approximate space, numbers and time instead of aiming for complete accuracy.” (Star, June 8, 1988, p.10.) In other words, they are also poor at math. Notice the identical triumvirate—space, numbers, and time. Is it just a coincidence that these three highly abstract concepts are the ones with which blacks — everywhere — seem to have such difficulties?

The entry in the Zulu dictionary for “number,” by the way — ningi — means “numerous,” which is not at all the same as the concept of number. It is clear, therefore, that there is no concept of number in Zulu.

White rule in South Africa ended in 1994. It was about ten years later that power outages began, which eventually reached crisis proportions. The principle reason for this is simply lack of maintenance on the generating equipment. Maintenance is future-oriented, and the Zulu entry in the dictionary for it is ondla, which means: “1. Nourish, rear; bring up; 2. Keep an eye on; watch (your crop).” In short, there is no such thing as maintenance in Zulu thought, and it would be hard to argue that this is wholly unrelated to the fact that when people throughout Africa say “nothing works,” it is only an exaggeration.

The New York Times reports that New York City is considering a plan (since implemented) aimed at getting blacks to “do well on standardized tests and to show up for class,” by paying them to do these things and that could “earn [them] as much as $500 a year.” Students would get money for regular school attendance, every book they read, doing well on tests, and sometimes just for taking them. Parents would be paid for “keeping a full-time job … having health insurance … and attending parent-teacher conferences.” (Jennifer Medina, “Schools Plan to Pay Cash for Marks,” New York Times, June 19, 2007.)

The clear implication is that blacks are not very motivated. Motivation involves thinking about the future and hence about things that do not exist. Given black deficiencies in this regard, it is not surprising that they would be lacking in motivation, and having to prod them in this way is further evidence for such a deficiency.

The Zulu entry for “motivate” is banga, under which we find “1. Make, cause, produce something unpleasant; … to cause trouble . … 2. Contend over a claim; … fight over inheritance; … 3. Make for, aim at, journey towards … .” Yet when I ask Africans what banga means, they have no idea. In fact, no Zulu word could refer to motivation for the simple reason that there is no such concept in Zulu; and if there is no such concept there cannot be a word for it. This helps explain the need to pay blacks to behave as if they were motivated.

.
Zulus.

The same New York Times article quotes Darwin Davis of the Urban League as “caution[ing] that the … money being offered [for attending class] was relatively paltry … and wondering … how many tests students would need to pass to buy the latest video game.”

Instead of being shamed by the very need for such a plan, this black activist complains that the payments aren’t enough! If he really is unaware how his remarks will strike most readers, he is morally obtuse, but his views may reflect a common understanding among blacks of what morality is: not something internalized but something others enforce from the outside. Hence his complaint that paying children to do things they should be motivated to do on their own is that they are not being paid enough.

In this context, I recall some remarkable discoveries by the late American linguist, William Stewart, who spent many years in Senegal studying local languages. Whereas Western cultures internalize norms—“Don’t do that!” for a child, eventually becomes “I mustn’t do that” for an adult—African cultures do not. They rely entirely on external controls on behavior from tribal elders and other sources of authority. When Africans were detribalized, these external constraints disappeared, and since there never were internal constraints, the results were crime, drugs, promiscuity, etc. Where there have been other forms of control—as in white-ruled South Africa, colonial Africa, or the segregated American South—this behavior was kept within tolerable limits. But when even these controls disappear there is often unbridled violence.

Stewart apparently never asked why African cultures did not internalize norms, that is, why they never developed moral consciousness, but it is unlikely that this was just a historical accident. More likely, it was the result of deficiencies in abstract thinking ability.

.
Public service message, South Africa.

One explanation for this lack of abstract thinking, including the diminished understanding of time, is that Africans evolved in a climate where they could live day to day without having to think ahead. They never developed this ability because they had no need for it. Whites, on the other hand, evolved under circumstances in which they had to consider what would happen if they didn’t build stout houses and store enough fuel and food for the winter. For them it was sink or swim.

Surprising confirmation of Stewart’s ideas can be found in the May/June 2006 issue of the Boston Review, a typically liberal publication. In “Do the Right Thing: Cognitive Science’s Search for a Common Morality,” Rebecca Saxe distinguishes between “conventional” and “moral” rules. Conventional rules are supported by authorities but can be changed; moral rules, on the other hand, are not based on conventional authority and are not subject to change. “Even three-year-old children … distinguish between moral and conventional transgressions,” she writes. The only exception, according to James Blair of the National Institutes of Health, are psychopaths, who exhibit “persistent aggressive behavior.” For them, all rules are based only on external authority, in whose absence “anything is permissible.” The conclusion drawn from this is that “healthy individuals in all cultures respect the distinction between conventional … and moral [rules].”

However, in the same article, another anthropologist argues that “the special status of moral rules cannot be part of human nature, but is … just … an artifact of Western values.” Anita Jacobson-Widding, writing of her experiences among the Manyika of Zimbabwe, says:

“I tried to find a word that would correspond to the English concept of ‘morality.’ I explained what I meant by asking my informants to describe the norms for good behavior toward other people. The answer was unanimous. The word for this was tsika. But when I asked my bilingual informants to translate tsika into English, they said that it was ‘good manners’ …”

.
An all-too-common problem.

She concluded that because good manners are clearly conventional rather than moral rules, the Manyika simply did not have a concept of morality. But how would one explain this absence? Miss Jacobson-Widding’s explanation is the typical nonsense that could come only from a so-called intellectual: “the concept of morality does not exist.” The far more likely explanation is that the concept of morality, while otherwise universal, is enfeebled in cultures that have a deficiency in abstract thinking.

According to now-discredited folk wisdom, blacks are “children in adult bodies,” but there may be some foundation to this view. The average African adult has the raw IQ score of the average 11-year-old white child. This is about the age at which white children begin to internalize morality and no longer need such strong external enforcers.

Gruesome cruelty

Another aspect of African behavior that liberals do their best to ignore but that nevertheless requires an explanation is gratuitous cruelty. A reviewer of Driving South, a 1993 book by David Robbins, writes:

.
Victim of Rwandan violence.

“A Cape social worker sees elements that revel in violence … It’s like a cult which has embraced a lot of people who otherwise appear normal. … At the slightest provocation their blood-lust is aroused. And then they want to see death, and they jeer and mock at the suffering involved, especially the suffering of a slow and agonizing death.” (Citizen [Johannesburg], July 12, 1993, p.6.)

There is something so unspeakably vile about this, something so beyond depravity, that the human brain recoils. This is not merely the absence of human empathy, but the positive enjoyment of human suffering, all the more so when it is “slow and agonizing.” Can you imagine jeering at and mocking someone in such horrible agony?

During the apartheid era, black activists used to kill traitors and enemies by “necklacing” them. An old tire was put around the victim’s neck, filled with gasoline, and—but it is best to let an eye-witness describe what happened next:

“The petrol-filled tyre is jammed on your shoulders and a lighter is placed within reach . … Your fingers are broken, needles are pushed up your nose and you are tortured until you put the lighter to the petrol yourself.” (Citizen; “SA’s New Nazis,” August 10, 1993, p.18.)

The author of an article in the Chicago Tribune, describing the equally gruesome way the Hutu killed Tutsi in the Burundi massacres, marveled at “the ecstasy of killing, the lust for blood; this is the most horrible thought. It’s beyond my reach.” (“Hutu Killers Danced In Blood Of Victims, Videotapes Show,” Chicago Tribune, September 14, 1995, p.8.) The lack of any moral sense is further evidenced by their having videotaped their crimes, “apparently want[ing] to record … [them] for posterity.” Unlike Nazi war criminals, who hid their deeds, these people apparently took pride in their work.

Amy Biehl marker
Where Amy Biehl was killed.

In 1993, Amy Biehl, a 26-year-old American on a Fulbright scholarship, was living in South Africa, where she spent most of her time in black townships helping blacks. One day when she was driving three African friends home, young blacks stopped the car, dragged her out, and killed her because she was white. A retired senior South African judge, Rex van Schalkwyk, in his 1998 book One Miracle is Not Enough, quotes from a newspaper report on the trial of her killers: “Supporters of the three men accused of murdering [her] … burst out laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court today when a witness told how the battered woman groaned in pain.” This behavior, Van Schalkwyk wrote, “is impossible to explain in terms accessible to rational minds.” (pp. 188-89.)

These incidents and the responses they evoke—“the human brain recoils,” “beyond my reach,” “impossible to explain to rational minds” — represent a pattern of behavior and thinking that cannot be wished away, and offer additional support for my claim that Africans are deficient in moral consciousness.

I have long suspected that the idea of rape is not the same in Africa as elsewhere, and now I find confirmation of this in Newsweek:

“According to a three-year study [in Johannesburg] … more than half of the young people interviewed — both male and female — believe that forcing sex with someone you know does not constitute sexual violence … [T]he casual manner in which South African teens discuss coercive relationships and unprotected sex is staggering.” (Tom Masland, “Breaking The Silence,” Newsweek, July 9, 2000.)

Clearly, many blacks do not think rape is anything to be ashamed of.

The Newsweek author is puzzled by widespread behavior that is known to lead to AIDS, asking “Why has the safe-sex effort failed so abjectly?” Well, aside from their profoundly different attitudes towards sex and violence and their heightened libido, a major factor could be their diminished concept of time and reduced ability to think ahead.

Liberian billboard
Liberian billboard

Nevertheless, I was still surprised by what I found in the Zulu dictionary. The main entry for rape reads: “1. Act hurriedly; … 2. Be greedy. 3. Rob, plunder, … take [possessions] by force.” While these entries may be related to our concept of rape, there is one small problem: there is no reference to sexual intercourse! In a male-dominated culture, where saying “no” is often not an option (as confirmed by the study just mentioned), “taking sex by force” is not really part of the African mental calculus. Rape clearly has a moral dimension, but perhaps not to Africans. To the extent they do not consider coerced sex to be wrong, then, by our conception, they cannot consider it rape because rape is wrong. If such behavior isn’t wrong it isn’t rape.

An article about gang rape in the left-wing British paper, the Guardian, confirms this when it quotes a young black woman: “The thing is, they [black men] don’t see it as rape, as us being forced. They just see it as pleasure for them.” (Rose George, “They Don’t See it as Rape. They Just See it as Pleasure for Them,” June 5, 2004.) A similar attitude seems to be shared among some American blacks who casually refer to gang rape as “running a train.” (Nathan McCall, Makes Me Wanna Holler, Vintage Books, 1995.)

If the African understanding of rape is far afield, so may be their idea of romance or love. I recently watched a South African television program about having sex for money. Of the several women in the audience who spoke up, not a single one questioned the morality of this behavior. Indeed, one plaintively asked, “Why else would I have sex with a man?”

From the casual way in which Africans throw around the word “love,” I suspect their understanding of it is, at best, childish. I suspect the notion is alien to Africans, and I would be surprised if things are very different among American blacks. Africans hear whites speak of “love” and try to give it a meaning from within their own conceptual repertoire. The result is a child’s conception of this deepest of human emotions, probably similar to their misunderstanding of the nature of a promise.

I recently located a document that was dictated to me by a young African woman in June 1993. She called it her “story,” and the final paragraph is a poignant illustration of what to Europeans would seem to be a limited understanding of love:

“On my way from school, I met a boy. And he proposed me. His name was Mokone. He tell me that he love me. And then I tell him I will give him his answer next week. At night I was crazy about him. I was always thinking about him.”

Moral blindness

Whenever I taught ethics I used the example of Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer in the French Army who was convicted of treason in 1894 even though the authorities knew he was innocent. Admitting their mistake, it was said, would have a disastrous effect on military morale and would cause great social unrest. I would in turn argue that certain things are intrinsically wrong and not just because of their consequences. Even if the results of freeing Dreyfus would be much worse than keeping him in prison, he must be freed, because it is unjust to keep an innocent man in prison.

To my amazement, an entire class in Kenya said without hesitation that he should not be freed. Call me dense if you want, but it was 20 years before the full significance of this began to dawn on me.

.
Death is certain but accidents are not.

Africans, I believe, may generally lack the concepts of subjunctivity and counterfactuality. Subjunctivity is conveyed in such statements as, “What would you have done if I hadn’t showed up?” This is contrary to fact because I did show up, and it is now impossible for me not to have shown up. We are asking someone to imagine what he would have done if something that didn’t happen (and now couldn’t happen) had happened. This requires self-consciousness, and I have already described blacks’ possible deficiency in this respect. It is obvious that animals, for example, cannot think counterfactually, because of their complete lack of self-awareness.

When someone I know tried to persuade his African workers to contribute to a health insurance policy, they asked “What’s it for?” “Well, if you have an accident, it would pay for the hospital.” Their response was immediate: “But boss, we didn’t have an accident!” “Yes, but what if you did?” Reply? “We didn’t have an accident!” End of story.

.
South African AIDS education poster.

Interestingly, blacks do plan for funerals, for although an accident is only a risk, death is a certainty. (The Zulu entries for “risk” are “danger” and “a slippery surface.”) Given the frequent all-or-nothing nature of black thinking, if it’s not certain you will have an accident, then you will not have an accident. Furthermore, death is concrete and observable: We see people grow old and die. Africans tend to be aware of time when it is manifested in the concrete and observable.

One of the pivotal ideas underpinning morality is the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. “How would you feel if someone stole everything you owned? Well, that’s how he would feel if you robbed him.” The subjunctivity here is obvious. But if Africans may generally lack this concept, they will have difficulty in understanding the Golden Rule and, to that extent, in understanding morality.

If this is true we might also expect their capacity for human empathy to be diminished, and this is suggested in the examples cited above. After all, how do we empathize? When we hear about things like “necklacing” we instinctively — and unconsciously — think: “How would I feel if I were that person?” Of course I am not and cannot be that person, but to imagine being that person gives us valuable moral “information:” that we wouldn’t want this to happen to us and so we shouldn’t want it to happen to others. To the extent people are deficient in such abstract thinking, they will be deficient in moral understanding and hence in human empathy—which is what we tend to find in Africans.

In his 1990 book Devil’s Night, Ze’ev Chafets quotes a black woman speaking about the problems of Detroit: “I know some people won’t like this, but whenever you get a whole lot of black people, you’re gonna have problems. Blacks are ignorant and rude.” (pp. 76-77.)

If some Africans cannot clearly imagine what their own rude behavior feels like to others—in other words, if they cannot put themselves in the other person’s shoes—they will be incapable of understanding what rudeness is. For them, what we call rude may be normal and therefore, from their perspective, not really rude. Africans may therefore not be offended by behavior we would consider rude — not keeping appointments, for example. One might even conjecture that African cruelty is not the same as white cruelty, since Africans may not be fully aware of the nature of their behavior, whereas such awareness is an essential part of “real” cruelty.

I am hardly the only one to notice this obliviousness to others that sometimes characterizes black behavior. Walt Harrington, a white liberal married to a light-skinned black, makes some surprising admissions in his 1994 book, Crossings: A White Man’s Journey Into Black America:

“I notice a small car … in the distance. Suddenly … a bag of garbage flies out its window . … I think, I’ll bet they’re blacks. Over the years I’ve noticed more blacks littering than whites. I hate to admit this because it is a prejudice. But as I pass the car, I see that my reflex was correct—[they are blacks].

“[As I pull] into a McDonald’s drive-through … [I see that] the car in front of me had four black[s] in it. Again … my mind made its unconscious calculation: We’ll be sitting here forever while these people decide what to order. I literally shook my head . … My God, my kids are half black! But then the kicker: we waited and waited and waited. Each of the four … leaned out the window and ordered individually. The order was changed several times. We sat and sat, and I again shook my head, this time at the conundrum that is race in America.

“I knew that the buried sentiment that had made me predict this disorganization … was … racist. … But my prediction was right.” (pp. 234-35.)

Africans also tend to litter. To understand this we must ask why whites don’t litter, at least not as much. We ask ourselves: “What would happen if everyone threw rubbish everywhere? It would be a mess. So you shouldn’t do it!” Blacks’ possible deficiency in abstract thinking makes such reasoning more difficult, so any behavior requiring such thinking is less likely to develop in their cultures. Even after living for generations in societies where such thinking is commonplace, many may still fail to absorb it.

.
A trash pile in Sudan.

It should go without saying that my observations about Africans are generalizations. I am not saying that none has the capacity for abstract thought or moral understanding. I am speaking of tendencies and averages, which leave room for many exceptions.

To what extent do my observations about Africans apply to American blacks? American blacks have an average IQ of 85, which is a full 15 points higher than the African average of 70. The capacity for abstract thought is unquestionably correlated with intelligence, and so we can expect American blacks generally to exceed Africans in these respects.

Still, American blacks show many of the traits so striking among Africans: low mathematical ability, diminished abstract reasoning, high crime rates, a short time-horizon, rudeness, littering, etc. If I had lived only among American blacks and not among Africans, I might never have reached the conclusions I have, but the more extreme behavior among Africans makes it easier to perceive the same tendencies among American blacks. AR

Gedhalia Braun holds a PhD in philosophy and is the author of Racism, Guilt, Self-Hatred and Self-Deceit. Anyone interested in reading his book can purchase it in PDF format at the AR website, AmRen.com.