The British government has already “affirmed” at the UN and in the EU that there is no such thing as an indigenous Briton. These people really do mean to destroy us.

Wadham and the EHRC win.  The existential will go ballistic.

The BBC is reporting on its ticker service that Judge Paul Collins, sitting in the Central London County Court, has ruled that the BNP’s new membership rules are “likely to discriminate”.  The basis for this ruling appears to be that prospective members sign up to principles including a duty to oppose the promotion of any form of “integration or assimilation” that impacted on the “indigenous British”, and to support the “maintenance and existence of the unity and integrity of the indigenous British”.

If this is the case, we have indeed arrived at the existential moment I described in my last blog on the party‘s legal travails:

We have reached a defining moment in the long process of racial destruction which began with the Atlee government turning its back on the people’s rights and instincts in 1948. The BNP has stripped away everything but the one essential principle that it must fight, and fight, and fight. The Establishment has, in attempting to force the discourse of the BNP to match its own, stripped away everything but the one essential principle that the native British must die as native Britons. This is no longer about “fascism” or “the hard right” or even “hate”. It is existential …

We need more information to come out before a proper assessment of the scale of the damage can be made.  But it looks like the BNP will now have to lodge an appeal against the ruling in order to be able to contest the forthcoming General Election.

Downstream from this ruling is the prospect that anti-discrimination law will be clarified and, possible then, hate speech law will be extended to make the expression of nationalist sentiment illegal too.  This, in my view, is the logical end-game.  The British government has already “affirmed” at the UN and in the EU that there is no such thing as an indigenous Briton.  These people really do mean to destroy us.

The consequences of such a legal trajectory would be that thousands of good men and women will be imprisoned and have their lives destroyed because they love their people and they love justice and freedom too much to remain silent, and unknown numbers of others will quickly come to see violence as the only path to our survival still open.

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, March 12, 2010 at 02:47 PM in British Politics

The BNP, the EHRC, and revealing a historical moment

The judge also accepted ‘powerful submissions’ from the Commission that the BNP’s proposed new constitution is likely to remain unlawful. We will be back in court in March where we hope to conclude this matter by ensuring that whatever constitution the BNP adopts does not break discrimination laws.

John Wadham, EHRC, quoted in a Commission press release following the BNP’s return to the county court today.

The two parts of this statement contain the entire purpose of the EHRC in its action against the BNP.  The first part is to make the party non-racial in its politics.  The second is to render it financially incapable of campaigning in the (May 6th) General Election.

It is part one – the exclusion of all reference to the native British in the party constitution – that is of significance, and more for what it reveals about the historical moment than any political or legal aspects.  In fact, I would go further and say that unless the EHRC pushes its luck to the point of taking out a prosecution against one of the BNP’s leaders for publicly speaking of Britain’s native peoples, none of the legal or political consequences of today’s ruling will do any real, lasting damage.  Instead, the party will simply hold the two AGMs required of it and the voting membership will come to the view that, to quote Lee Barnes:

The sole aim of us participating in the political process is to take power.

Amen to that.  Everything is now clarified.  We have reached a defining moment in the long process of racial destruction which began with the Atlee government turning its back on the people’s rights and instincts in 1948.  The BNP has stripped away everything but the one essential principle that it must fight, and fight, and fight.  The Establishment has, in attempting to force the discourse of the BNP to match its own, stripped away everything but the one essential principle that the native British must die as native Britons.  This is no longer about “fascism” or “the hard right” or even “hate”.  It is existential, and well enough put by a commenter to the BNP’s website named Rijker:

This is no longer your country.
You cannot have a culture of your own.
You can not represent yourselves in Parliament.
You are to be persecuted until you no longer exist.

Out of this moment will quickly emerge a new clarity and urgency in racialist discourse, and not the death of racialist discourse the EHRC would wish.  What would have been seen by the public as the most extreme and contentious interpretation of “immigration” – that of a designed genocide by population transfer – will slowly but surely become the accepted version of events.  And when that happens, a general awakening is close.

Inevitablism has just been given a huge shot in the arm.

One thought on “The British government has already “affirmed” at the UN and in the EU that there is no such thing as an indigenous Briton. These people really do mean to destroy us.

  1. What a load of tosh!!! This is just another manifestation of how the British Ruling Class continue to exploit and now persecute their own people. I am a Briton, Born in New Zealand, living in Australia with an ancestry which is mainly Scottish with some English and one Irish born great-grandmother. Racially, I identify myself as British. Culturally, I am Australasian. Theologically, I am Calvinist/Presbyterian.
    Politically, I am Conservative/Nationalist/Ethnocentric.
    I am not racist in that I have friends who are of other races and religions but I am ethnocentric. I believe that blood is much thicker than water and I defend my ethnicity whenever I get the chance.
    Sadly, this ‘legislation’ which should rightly be called an act of treason does not surprise me. The inbred toffs that control the UK at the behest of the true rulers the financiers are only too keen to put the boot into the less well off and less powerful of their own race. They’ve been doing it for years and years and they continue to do it. They did it in Ireland, they did it in Scotland with the Highland Clearances and they did it in England with the enclosures act. They are still doing it today with deliberate culturecide which will end in genocide if not through killings and massacres it will happen through adulteration of the British DNA.
    This proclamation that their is no such entity as an indigenous Briton is nothing more than wishful thinking as there hundreds of millions living today as the result of the British diaspora which today is often termed the ‘Anglosphere’.
    I am in my eighth decade of life. I have read a lot and seen a lot and I have concluded that we are fast approaching the end game. I am not preaching sedition here but ordinary Britons wherever they live need to know who their worst enemy is. Having identified that enemy you need to call them out for what they really are. In other words the Britons first and most deadly enemy are the traitors of their own kind.
    Secondly you must study their motives and who they really work for. Do they do these things merely to serve their own best interests or are they working for a hidden (occult) power or government. Personally I find in studying history and historical events you will usually hit pay dirt if you follow the money trail. This leads you to your next most deadly enemy. Finally, you come to the people who are donating their DNA in order to adulterate yours. These people are not enemies in the sense that the previously abovementioned people are. No, they are more like opportunists who are taking advantage of conditions ordained by your real enemies and in a sense cannot be blamed for only doing what to them just comes naturally.
    Anglosphere rulers and politicians generally, have never truly served their subjects well. To whit; historical events alluded to above.
    They sign treaties which are hardly in the interests of their own people. e.g. The Lima Agreement. Free Trade Agreements. They are outraged when ordinary folk go against their nefarious plans: e.g. Brexit. It will be interesting to see how the PTB reacts if Donald Trump defies the establishment and Media expectations and polls and wins the U.S. Presidential Election.
    I have never visited the UK but I am racially a Briton. I do exist and I believe that race matters. Race is not merely a ‘social construct’ and if you don’t believe me then just ask some black people what they think.
    In Tudor times English sea captains started bringing black people into England to have them work in the mansions of the ruling class. This was seen as a bit of a novelty. Queen Elizabeth I eventually issued an edict saying in effect that
    “It has come to our attention that there are far too many Blackamoors within the realm and they are to depart forthwith.” … and so they had too leave. I wonder what Good Queen Bess would have to say about this proposition which in effect is now say that Black is now White and soon White will not exist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s